Tag: covid-19

Missteps in Creating a Long Haul COVID Case Definition

Excerpt:

Millions of individuals who have not recovered from the COVID virus are now dealing with a host of symptoms that are challenging our health care system. Many are experiencing significant problems in being recognized by health care workers as a real disorder, as for many of them, there are no biological markers of persistent illness. Just as with ME/CFS, we need to be sure that long haul COVID patients are not victimized first by the pandemic and then by the health care skepticism of their significant symptoms. We have the conceptual and theoretical grounding to develop clinical and research case definitions for those with persisting COVID symptoms. Patients must be instrumentally involved in all such efforts as failure to do so will only further delegitimize their condition.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Leonard Jason, Ph.D. and Vernita Perkins, PhD. Missteps in Creating a Long Haul COVID Case Definition. Psychology Today. Posted November 22, 2021

Post-COVID syndrome: the aftershock of SARS-CoV-2

Introduction:

Significant time has passed since the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak, which led to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection in hundreds of millions of individuals all around the globe. Accumulation evidence along the pandemic raised an association between the SARS-CoV-2 and autoimmunity (1). SARS-CoV-2 infected patients have a high presence of various autoantibodies (1). Moreover, numerous cases of new-onset of autoimmune-related disorders had been documented following the infection, including both organ-specific and systemic autoimmune diseases (1).

Recent studies focused on analyzing recovered COVID-19 patients demonstrate a broad spectrum of persistent and systemic symptoms, which had got the novel terms of “post-COVID syndrome”, “long COVID” and “chronic COVID-19” (2). This new disorder had led to the understanding that the absence of SARS-CoV-2 following COVID-19 does not necessarily mean full recovery (2).

Studies conducted follow-ups on COVID-19 patients indicate that 50-80% of symptomatic COVID-19 patients who recovered report non-specific symptoms, most commonly fatigue, headache, dyspnea, anosmia, and memory complaint (3–5). An Italian study that examined patients after a mean of 60 days from the first COVID-19 symptom on-set had found only 12.6% of the patients completely recovered; 55% had three or more symptoms, and worsened quality of life was observed among 44% of patients (3). Intriguingly, a systematic review and meta-analysis reported more than 50 possible long-term effects of the SAR-CoV-2 infection (6). The chronic phase of COVID-19 is also presented in objective findings; for example, a study conducted in Germany had found that 78% of recently recovered symptomatic COVID-19 patients had at least one chronic symptom; the most common abnormality was myocardial inflammation (60%) (4).

In this issue of the journal, Bertin D et al. documented a case of post-COVID syndrome with a one-year follow-up. This case describes persistent anti-cardiolipin IgG autoantibodies and eosinopenia with ongoing neurologic symptoms, demonstrating the long-term disease course of COVID-19 in many patients. Anti-cardiolipin autoantibodies and eosinopenia were defined as independent factors associated with COVID-19 severity, indicating their active involvement in the progression of the disease (7,8). Additional studies that included follow-up on recovered COVID-19 patients describe similar findings: patients report respiratory, neurologic, and non-specific symptoms, accompanied by the presents of autoantibodies (6). Interestingly, in a one-year prospective cohort study, neurocognitive symptoms frequency were found significantly higher in patients with ANA titer of ≥1:160 in comparison to <1:160 at 12 months post–COVID-19 symptom onset (9). It should be emphasized that the development of autoantibodies, which appears to be common following symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, could act as the preclinical stage of many autoimmune diseases. Thus, the long-term autoimmune implications of SARS-CoV-2 could be severe.

Involvement of the autonomic nervous system dysfunction in post-COVID syndrome

Many viruses are well known to contribute to autoimmunity in genetically pre dispositioned individuals, such as those with human leukocyte antigen B27 (10). SARS-CoV-2 had been associated with numerous autoantibodies (1); some are believed to be the basis of the severe forms of COVID-19 (11). Furthermore, these autoantibodies, along with others, could lead to the multi-organ involvement of post-COVID syndrome, which manifests as broad and unspecific symptoms (6). Autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system compounds are believed to be an incremental part of the post-COVID syndrome etiology. A study that included post-COVID syndrome patients had unidentified in all the subjects between 2 and 7 different functionally active autoantibodies that acted as receptor agonists, such as β2-adrenoceptor, α1-adrenoceptor, and angiotensin II receptor type 1 receptor (12). Functionally active autoantibodies such as those were present in several neurological and cardiac disorders, which might clarify the onset of neurological and cardiovascular symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome (12).

Post-COVID patients commonly have a clinical presentation similar to the encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): severe fatigue, sleep disorders, cognition impairments, and different manifestations of autonomic dysfunction exacerbated in physical exercise (6,13–15). ME/CFS has an autoimmune etiology, which can be demonstrated by high titers of autoantibodies against autonomic receptors, such as beta-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors (16,17). These autoantibodies, similar to those found in patients with post-COVID symptoms, lead to unspecific symptoms due to autonomic nervous system dysregulation. In addition to ME/CFS, many features of the post-COVID syndrome are shared with fibromyalgia patients. It had been shown that 189/616 (30.7%) of COVID-19 recovered patients satisfied the American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia, 43.4% of which were men (18).

Therapeutic options and vaccination

ME/CFS and fibromyalgia have solid evidence of dysregulated immune involvement (16,17,19). Moreover, current studies suggest that immunosuppression, such as monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody and cyclophosphamide, may benefit patients suffering from ME/CFS (20,21). Such immunosuppressive therapeutic options can assist in the depletion of B cells, thus reducing the functionally active autoantibodies linked to autonomic dysfunction. Beneficial effects had also been demonstrated by the use of anti-ß2 adrenergic receptor-binding immunoadsorption (22). It should be emphasized that such treatment can diminish other pathogenic antibodies that the medical community had not yet recognized. Due to the possible involvement of autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system in the post-COVID syndrome, similar immunosuppressive options in these patients may be effective, thereby should be investigated.

Most individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or experience mild symptoms (23,24). While the frequency of post-COVID syndrome in such individuals is still uncertain, it seems to be much lower than in symptomatic patients (9). Thus, avoiding COVID-19 with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could prominently assist in preventing long-term symptoms of COVID-19, lower the prevalence of post-COVID syndrome and help overcome the pandemic. Nonetheless, even with the ongoing heist mass vaccination programs, the COVID-19 pandemic will leave its mark.

Conclusion

Due to the accumulating evidence of persistent post-infectious symptoms reported by numerous recovered patients, the focus of the medical and research communities might need to start shifting focus from the acute phase of COVID-19 to the chronic manifestations of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, referred to as by “post-COVID syndrome”. Post-COVID syndrome presents as non-specific symptoms, most commonly fatigue, headache, dyspnea, anosmia, and memory complaint, which is suspiciously similar to the infection-induced myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia (15,18). As current studies suggest an involvement of immune-related dysfunction in the development of post-COVID syndrome, immunosuppressive therapeutic options could be beneficial in parallel to heist SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of the population (15,20,21).

References

  • 1
    Dotan A, Muller S, Kanduc D, David P, Halpert G, Shoenfeld Y. The SARS-CoV-2 as an instrumental trigger of autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2021 Apr;20(4):102792.
  • 2
    Alwan NA. A negative COVID-19 test does not mean recovery. Nature. 2020 Aug 11;584(7820):170–170.
  • 3
    Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, for the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):603–5.
  • 4
    Puntmann VO, Carerj ML, Wieters I, Fahim M, Arendt C, Hoffmann J, et al. Outcomes of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Recently Recovered From Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Nov 1;5(11):1265–73.
  • 5
    Mahmud R, Rahman MM, Rassel MA, Monayem FB, Sayeed SKJB, Islam MS, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome among symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study in a tertiary care center of Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249644.
  • 6
    Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo PA, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144.
  • 7
    Lindsley AW, Schwartz JT, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophil responses during COVID-19 infections and coronavirus vaccination. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020 Jul 1;146(1):1-7.
  • 8
    Jizzini M, Shah M, Zhou K. SARS-CoV-2 and Anti-Cardiolipin Antibodies. Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports. 2020 Dec;13:1179547620980381.
  • 9
    Seeßle J, Waterboer T, Hippchen T, Simon J, Kirchner M, Lim A, Müller B, Merle U. Persistent Symptoms in Adult Patients 1 Year After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Prospective Cohort Study. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021.
  • 10
    Shoenfeld Y, Gilburd B, Abu-Shakra M, Amital H, Barzilai O, Berkun Y, et al. The mosaic of autoimmunity: genetic factors involved in autoimmune diseases–2008. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2008 Jan;10(1):3–7.
  • 11
    Khamsi R. Rogue antibodies could be driving severe COVID-19. Nature. 2021 Jan 19;590(7844):29–31.
  • 12
    Wallukat G, Hohberger B, Wenzel K, Fürst J, Schulze-Rothe S, Wallukat A, et al. Functional autoantibodies against G-protein coupled receptors in patients with persistent Long-COVID-19 symptoms. J Transl Autoimmun. 2021 Jan 1;4:100100.
  • 13
    Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):220–32.
  • 14
    Wostyn P. COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come? Med Hypotheses. 2021 Jan;146:110469.
  • 15
    Bornstein SR, Voit-Bak K, Donate T, Rodionov RN, Gainetdinov RR, Tselmin S, Kanczkowski W, Müller GM, Achleitner M, Wang J, Licinio J. Chronic post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is there a role for extracorporeal apheresis?. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 17:1-4.
  • 16
    Rasa S, Nora-Krukle Z, Henning N, Eliassen E, Shikova E, Harrer T, et al. Chronic viral infections in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Transl Med. 2018 Oct 1;16(1):268.
  • 17
    Loebel M, Grabowski P, Heidecke H, Bauer S, Hanitsch LG, Wittke K, Meisel C, Reinke P, Volk HD, Fluge Ø, Mella O. Antibodies to β adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2016 Feb 1;52:32-9.
  • 18
    Ursini F, Ciaffi J, Mancarella L, Lisi L, Brusi V, Cavallari C, et al. Fibromyalgia: a new facet of the post-COVID-19 syndrome spectrum? Results from a web-based survey. RMD Open. 2021 Aug 1;7(3):e001735.
  • 19
    Rodriguez-Pintó I, Agmon-Levin N, Howard A, Shoenfeld Y. Fibromyalgia and cytokines. Immunol Lett. 2014 Oct;161(2):200–3.
  • 20
    Tölle M, Freitag H, Antelmann M, Hartwig J, Schuchardt M, van der Giet M, et al. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Efficacy of Repeat Immunoadsorption. J Clin Med. 2020 Aug;9(8):2443.
  • 21
    Rekeland IG, Fosså A, Lande A, Ktoridou-Valen I, Sørland K, Holsen M, et al. Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. An Open-Label Phase II Study. Front Med. 2020;7:162.
  • 22
    Scheibenbogen C, Loebel M, Freitag H, Krueger A, Bauer S, Antelmann M, et al. Immunoadsorption to remove ß2 adrenergic receptor antibodies in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome CFS/ME. PloS One. 2018;13(3):e0193672.
  • 23
    Salzberger B, Buder F, Lampl B, Ehrenstein B, Hitzenbichler F, Holzmann T, et al. Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2. Infection. 2021 Apr;49(2):233–9.
  • 24
    Gao Z, Xu Y, Sun C, Wang X, Guo Y, Qiu S, et al. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J Microbiol Immunol Infect Wei Mian Yu Gan Ran Za Zhi. 2021 Feb;54(1):12–6.

Article Info

Publication History

Accepted: November 9, 2021
Received: November 9, 2021

Publication stage

In Press Journal Pre-Proof

Identification

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.020

Copyright

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

The impact of COVID-19 stress on pain and fatigue in people with and without a central sensitivity syndrome

Abstract:

Objectives: Stress may augment somatic symptoms in central sensitivity syndromes (CSS) such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and irritable bowel syndrome. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether the association between COVID-19 stress and somatic symptom severity would be stronger in people with than without CSS and whether psychological flexibility would buffer the impact of this stress on symptom severity.

Methods: In a 2-sample, repeated cross-sectional design, we analysed questionnaire data from Dutch people with and without CSS, collected in two independent surveys: before the COVID-19 pandemic (2018; CSS: n = 194, non-CSS: n = 337) and at the peak of the pandemic (2020; CSS: n = 428, non-CSS: n = 1101). Somatic symptom severity, worry and stress due to the pandemic, and psychological flexibility were examined in regression analyses. Two stress operationalisations were analysed: stress levels during the peak of the pandemic, and a comparison of measurements in 2020 and 2018 (assuming higher stress levels in 2020).

Results: Higher worry and stress during the pandemic (standardized β = 0.14), the presence of a CSS (β = 0.40), and lower psychological flexibility (β = -0.33) were all (p < .0001) associated with more severe somatic symptoms, but the associations of each stress operationalisation with somatic symptoms was not particularly strong in people with CSS (β = -0.026, p = .27; β = -0.037, p = .22), and psychological flexibility (β = -0.025, p = .18; β = 0.076, p = .35) did not buffer this association.

Conclusions: Findings do not support the hypotheses that COVID-19 stress augments somatic symptoms, particularly in CSS, or that psychological flexibility buffers this impact. Rather, COVID-19-related stress appears to have an uncertain impact on somatic symptoms.

Source: Koppert TY, Jacobs JWG, Lumley MA, Geenen R. The impact of COVID-19 stress on pain and fatigue in people with and without a central sensitivity syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Oct 29;151:110655. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110655. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34739944. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34739944/

Estimating total morbidity burden of COVID-19: relative importance of death and disability

Abstract:

Objective: Calculations of disease burden of COVID-19, used to allocate scarce resources, have historically considered only mortality. However, survivors often develop postinfectious ‘long-COVID’ similar to chronic fatigue syndrome; physical sequelae such as heart damage, or both. This paper quantifies relative contributions of acute case fatality, delayed case fatality, and disability to total morbidity per COVID-19 case.

Study design and setting: Healthy life years lost per COVID-19 case were computed as the sum of (incidence*disability weight*duration) for death and long-COVID by sex and 10-year age category in three plausible scenarios.

Results: In all models, acute mortality was only a small share of total morbidity. For lifelong moderate symptoms, healthy years lost per COVID-19 case ranged from 0.92 (male in his 30s) to 5.71 (girl under 10) and were 3.5 and 3.6 for the oldest females and males. At higher symptom severities, young people and females bore larger shares of morbidity; if survivors’ later mortality increased, morbidity increased most in young people of both sexes.

Conclusions: Under most conditions most COVID-19 morbidity was in survivors. Future research should investigate incidence, risk factors, and clinical course of long-COVID to elucidate total disease burden, and decisionmakers should allocate scarce resources to minimize total morbidity. WHAT IS NEW; KEY FINDINGS: : Under most plausible model scenarios, most COVID-19 morbidity (death + disability) is likely to be due to disability (‘long-COVID’) or delayed death due to organ damage, rather than immediate death. Only if long-COVID resolves (atypical of postinfectious syndromes) is morbidity higher in old than young WHAT THIS ADDS TO WHAT IS KNOWN: : While COVID-19 deaths are numerous, they likely cause less morbidity overall than does disability or organ damage in survivors. Morbidity is highest in females, especially those infected young.

What should change now: Scarce resources such as vaccines should be allocated to minimize morbidity rather than focusing solely on mortality. Data on long-COVID, especially its sex bias, should be collected and publicized.

Source: Smith MP. Estimating total morbidity burden of COVID-19: relative importance of death and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct 26:S0895-4356(21)00339-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.018. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34715312. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34715312/

Intersections between pneumonia, lowered oxygen saturation percentage and immune activation mediate depression, anxiety, and chronic fatigue syndrome-like symptoms due to COVID-19: a nomothetic network approach

Abstract:

Background: COVID-19 is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms including increased depressive, anxiety and chronic fatigue-syndrome (CFS)-like and physiosomatic symptoms.

Aims: To delineate the associations between affective and CFS-like symptoms in COVID-19 and chest computed tomography scan anomalies (CCTAs), oxygen saturation (SpO2), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), albumin, calcium, magnesium, soluble angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE2) and soluble advanced glycation products (sRAGEs).

Method: The above biomarkers were assessed in 60 COVID-19 patients and 30 heathy controls who had measurements of the Hamilton Depression (HDRS) and Anxiety (HAM-A) and the Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue (FF) Rating Scales.

Results: Partial Least Squares-SEM analysis showed that reliable latent vectors could be extracted from a) key depressive and anxiety and physiosomatic symptoms (the physio-affective or PA-core), b) IL-6, IL-10, CRP, albumin, calcium, and sRAGEs (the immune response core); and c) different CCTAs (including ground glass opacities, consolidation, and crazy paving) and lowered SpO2% (lung lesions). PLS showed that 70.0% of the variance in the PA-core was explained by the regression on the immune response and lung lesions latent vectors. One common “infection-immune-inflammatory (III) core” underpins pneumonia-associated CCTAs, lowered SpO2 and immune activation, and this III core explains 70% of the variance in the PA core, and a relevant part of the variance in melancholia, insomnia, and neurocognitive symptoms.

Discussion: Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is accompanied by lung lesions and lowered SpO2 which may cause activated immune-inflammatory pathways, which mediate the effects of the former on the PA-core and other neuropsychiatric symptoms due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Al-Jassas HK, Al-Hakeim HK, Maes M. Intersections between pneumonia, lowered oxygen saturation percentage and immune activation mediate depression, anxiety, and chronic fatigue syndrome-like symptoms due to COVID-19: a nomothetic network approach. J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 23:S0165-0327(21)01123-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.039. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34699853.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34699853/

Source:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): An Overview

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic systemic disease that manifests via various symptoms such as chronic fatigue, post-exertional malaise, and cognitive impairment described as “brain fog”. These symptoms often prevent patients from keeping up their pre-disease onset lifestyle, as extended periods of physical or mental activity become almost impossible. However, the disease presents heterogeneously with varying severity across patients. Therefore, consensus criteria have been designed to provide a diagnosis based on symptoms. To date, no biomarker-based tests or diagnoses are available, since the molecular changes observed also largely differ from patient to patient.

In this review, we discuss the infectious, genetic, and hormonal components that may be involved in CFS pathogenesis, we scrutinize the role of gut microbiota in disease progression, we highlight the potential of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) for the development of diagnostic tools and briefly mention the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection causing CFS.

Source: Deumer US, Varesi A, Floris V, Savioli G, Mantovani E, López-Carrasco P, Rosati GM, Prasad S, Ricevuti G. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): An Overview. J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 19;10(20):4786. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204786. PMID: 34682909; PMCID: PMC8538807. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8538807/ (Full text)

The 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Back to the Future?

Abstract:

Background: It is just over a century since the 1918 flu pandemic, sometimes referred to as the “mother” of pandemics. This brief retrospective of the 1918 pandemic is taken from the viewpoint of the current SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic and is based on a short lecture given during the 2021 Virtual Congress of the ERA-EDTA.

Summary: This review summarizes and highlights some of the earlier pandemic’s salient features, some parallels with today, and some potential learnings, bearing in mind that the flu pandemic occurred over 100 years ago at a time of major turmoil during the climax to WWl, and with limited medical expertise and knowledge, research facilities, or well-structured and resourced healthcare services. While there is little or no information on renal complications at the time, or an effective treatment, some observations in relation to COVID-19 and vaccination are included.

Key Messages: Lessons are difficult to draw from 1918 other than the importance and value of non-pharmaceutical measures to limit viral transmission. While the economic impact of the 1918 pandemic was significant, as it is now with COVID-19, subsequent economic analysis has shown that protecting public health and preserving economic activity are not mutually exclusive. Both H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 viruses are neurotropic and may cause chronically debilitating neurological diseases, including conditions such as encephalitis lethargica (still debated) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (chronic fatigue syndrome), respectively. Although coronavirus and influenza viral infections have some similarities, they are certainly not the same, as we are realising, and future infectious pandemics may still surprise us, but being “forewarned is forearmed.”

Source: Unwin RJ. The 1918 Influenza Pandemic: Back to the Future? Kidney Blood Press Res. 2021 Oct 18:1-8. doi: 10.1159/000519288. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34662882. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34662882/ 

Fatigue in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 (PASC) treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy – preliminary results on 100 patients

Abstract:

Objective: Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 infection (PASC) are a novel terminology used to describe post-COVID persistent symptoms, mimicking somehow the previously described chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). In this manuscript, we evaluated a therapeutical approach to address PASC-derived fatigue in a cohort of past-COVID-19 positive patients.

Patients and methods: A number of 100 patients, previously diagnosed as COVID-19 positive subjects and meeting our eligibility criteria, was diagnosed having PASC-related fatigue. They were recruited in the study and treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy (O2-O3-AHT), according to the SIOOT protocol. Patients’ response to O2-O3-AHT and changes in fatigue were measured with the 7-scoring Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), according to previously published protocols.

Results: Statistics assessed that the effects of O2-O3-AHT on fatigue reduced PASC symptoms by 67%, as a mean, in all the investigated cohort of patients (H = 148.4786 p < 0.0001) (Figure 1). Patients following O2-O3-AHT therapy, quite completely recovered for PASC-associated fatigue, a quote amounting to about two fifths (around 40%) of the whole cohort undergoing ozone treatment and despite most of patients were female subjects, the effect was not influenced by sex distribution (H = 0.7353, p = 0.39117).

Conclusions: Ozone therapy is able to recover normal functionality and to relief pain and discomfort in the form of PASC-associated fatigue in at least 67% of patients suffering from post-COVID sequelae, aside from sex and age distribution.

Source: Tirelli U, Franzini M, Valdenassi L, Pisconti S, Taibi R, Torrisi C, Pandolfi S, Chirumbolo S. Fatigue in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 (PASC) treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy – preliminary results on 100 patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Sep;25(18):5871-5875. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202109_26809. PMID: 34604980. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34604980/

Evolving phenotypes of non-hospitalized patients that indicate long COVID

Abstract:

Background: For some SARS-CoV-2 survivors, recovery from the acute phase of the infection has been grueling with lingering effects. Many of the symptoms characterized as the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) could have multiple causes or are similarly seen in non-COVID patients. Accurate identification of PASC phenotypes will be important to guide future research and help the healthcare system focus its efforts and resources on adequately controlled age- and gender-specific sequelae of a COVID-19 infection.

Methods: In this retrospective electronic health record (EHR) cohort study, we applied a computational framework for knowledge discovery from clinical data, MLHO, to identify phenotypes that positively associate with a past positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for COVID-19. We evaluated the post-test phenotypes in two temporal windows at 3-6 and 6-9 months after the test and by age and gender. Data from longitudinal diagnosis records stored in EHRs from Mass General Brigham in the Boston Metropolitan Area was used for the analyses. Statistical analyses were performed on data from March 2020 to June 2021. Study participants included over 96 thousand patients who had tested positive or negative for COVID-19 and were not hospitalized.

Results: We identified 33 phenotypes among different age/gender cohorts or time windows that were positively associated with past SARS-CoV-2 infection. All identified phenotypes were newly recorded in patients’ medical records 2 months or longer after a COVID-19 RT-PCR test in non-hospitalized patients regardless of the test result. Among these phenotypes, a new diagnosis record for anosmia and dysgeusia (OR 2.60, 95% CI [1.94-3.46]), alopecia (OR 3.09, 95% CI [2.53-3.76]), chest pain (OR 1.27, 95% CI [1.09-1.48]), chronic fatigue syndrome (OR 2.60, 95% CI [1.22-2.10]), shortness of breath (OR 1.41, 95% CI [1.22-1.64]), pneumonia (OR 1.66, 95% CI [1.28-2.16]), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR 1.41, 95% CI [1.22-1.64]) is one of the most significant indicators of a past COVID-19 infection. Additionally, more new phenotypes were found with increased confidence among the cohorts who were younger than 65.

Conclusions: The findings of this study confirm many of the post-COVID-19 symptoms and suggest that a variety of new diagnoses, including new diabetes mellitus and neurological disorder diagnoses, are more common among those with a history of COVID-19 than those without the infection. Additionally, more than 63% of PASC phenotypes were observed in patients under 65 years of age, pointing out the importance of vaccination to minimize the risk of debilitating post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 among younger adults.

Source: Estiri H, Strasser ZH, Brat GA, Semenov YR; Consortium for Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE), Patel CJ, Murphy SN. Evolving phenotypes of non-hospitalized patients that indicate long COVID. BMC Med. 2021 Sep 27;19(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02115-0. PMID: 34565368. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34565368/

Long COVID and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A survey of elderly female survivors in Egypt

Abstract:

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate post COVID 19 symptoms amongst elderly females and whether they could be a risk factor for developing Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) later on.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, in the form of an online survey. A total of 115 responses were finally included.

Results: The mean age was 73.18±6.42. Eighty-nine reported symptoms in the post recovery period; of these 54 had no symptoms of CFS, 60 were possible, and only 1 was probable. Fatigue was reported by 66, musculoskeletal symptoms by 56, and sleep problems by 73. Twenty-nine patients visited a doctor’s office as a result. Post recovery symptoms were significantly related to stress, sadness and sleep disturbances. Also, stress, sadness, sleep disturbances, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and recurrent falls were all significantly associated with CFS like symptoms.

Conclusions: From our findings the presence of fatigue, cognitive impairment, stress, sadness, sleep disturbances, and recurrent falls in the post-recovery period were all significantly associated with CFS like symptoms. To conclude it would be reasonable to screen for Long COVID and consider the potential for developing CFS later on. Whether it can be a risk factor for developing CFS like other viral infections will need more larger scale studies to confirm this.

Source: Aly MA, Saber HG. Long COVID and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A survey of elderly female survivors in Egypt. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 19:e14886. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14886. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34537995. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34537995/