Tag: covid-19

Lessons from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for Long COVID Part 3: “Energy System First Aid” for People With Postexertional Symptom Exacerbation

In a previous post, we demonstrated that the symptoms and physiology of postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE) are inconsistent with deconditioning. PESE worsens in response to exercise and demonstrates a variable clinical presentation. We will build a clinical rationale for energy system first aid as a place to start helping people with PESE.

Graded Exercise May Be Harmful to People With PESE

It is not surprising that patients with PESE frequently report worsening symptoms and function with exercise prescribed based on time and activity quotas,1 based on the physiological evidence. The United Kingdom’s Pacing, graded Activity, and Cognitive behaviour therapy, a randomized Evaluation (UK PACE) compared the clinical outcomes of specialist medical care, adaptive pacing, and graded exercise therapy (GET) in 641 people with idiopathic, disabling fatigue.9 In this study, GET was a quota-based progressive exercise program, where subjects incrementally increased exercise regardless of symptoms. PESE was not a specific recruitment criterion for this trial.8,9 The trial did not adhere to the published protocol, without appropriate justification. The raw data was independently reanalyzed according to the original protocol,10 Upon reanalysis, most symptomatic and functional outcome findings from the UK PACE trial did not reach thresholds for clinical relevance. Many ME/CFS experts contend the results of GET are marginal, probably not clinically relevant or beneficial.10

Despite the important concerns of the UK PACE trial, the trial continues to exert outsized influence on clinical guidelines.3 Some countries’ systems developed formal treatment pathways based on flawed results. Treatment pathways involving GET may have exposed an untold number of patients with ME/CFS worldwide to a GET program that, at best, is marginally effective, and at worst, may be harmful. Recent clinical guidelines for people with PESE, such as long COVID, no longer involve GET.6,7 These omissions reflect the ongoing re-evaluation of how clinical care should proceed for people with PESE, including people with long COVID. Implicit to this re-evaluation is a further reflection on the generally accepted idea that “movement is medicine” in a way that universally benefits clinical populations.

Read the full article HERE.

Source: Todd E. Davenport, Staci R. Stevens, Jared Stevens, Christopher R. Snell, J. Mark Van Ness. Lessons from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for Long COVID Part 3: “Energy System First Aid” for People With Postexertional Symptom Exacerbation. JOSPT blog, Published online on February 16, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.blog.20220216 (Full text)

Lessons from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for Long COVID Part 2: Physiological Characteristics During Acute Exercise Are Abnormal in People With Postexertional Symptom Exacerbation

In a previous post on the JOSPT Blog, we outlined the connection between postacute sequalae to novel coronavirus (long COVID) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) through their common clinical presentation: postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE). PESE suggests the presence of abnormal physiological responses to exercise/activity. These physiological responses may be measured using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), which allows for careful characterization of cardiac, pulmonary, and metabolic functioning during exercise. We will review the characteristic findings on CPET in people with PESE.

The Physiology of PESE

One well-established protocol involves consecutive-day CPETs.8 In deconditioned people and people with a whole host of health conditions, CPET measurements demonstrate low error variance. Yet, CPET measurements are known to vary between tests in people with PESE.2 The observed variation in people with PESE reflects the biological variance associated with PESE.2 Clues about biological variance can provide important information about the underlying pathoetiology, severity, and functional limitations present.2,8 CPET data from peak exertion and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (VAT) provide important snapshots of physiological functioning. Data from peak exertion tells us about the physiology of a person’s “top-end” performance, and data from VAT elucidates the physiology of more “everyday” levels of exertion.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Todd E. Davenport, Staci R. Stevens, Jared Stevens, Christopher R. Snell, J. Mark Van Ness. Lessons from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome for Long COVID Part 2: Physiological Characteristics During Acute Exercise Are Abnormal in People With Postexertional Symptom Exacerbation. JOSPT blog, Published online on February 9, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.blog.20220209 (Full text)

Is It Useful to Question the Recovery Behaviour of Patients with ME/CFS or Long COVID?

Abstract:

For the last few decades, medical guidelines have recommended treating patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) with graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Moreover, doctors have questioned the recovery behaviour of these patients and stimulated them to follow these treatments so that they would be able to go back to work. In this article, we reviewed trials of GET and CBT for ME/CFS that reported on work status before and after treatment to answer the question of whether doctors should continue to question the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS.

Our review shows that more patients are unable to work after treatment than before treatment with CBT and GET. It also highlights the fact that both treatments are unsafe for patients with ME/CFS. Therefore, questioning the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS is pointless. This confirms the conclusion from the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which has recently published its updated ME/CFS guideline and concluded that CBT and GET are not effective and do not lead to recovery.

Studies on CBT and GET for long COVID have not yet been published. However, this review offers no support for their use in improving the recovery of patients with an ME/CFS-like illness after infection with COVID-19, nor does it lend any support to the practice of questioning the recovery behaviour of these patients.

Source: Vink M, Vink-Niese F. Is It Useful to Question the Recovery Behaviour of Patients with ME/CFS or Long COVID? Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;10(2):392. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020392. PMID: 35207003. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/2/392 (Full text)

A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications

Abstract:

Post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC), usually referred to as ‘Long COVID’ (a phenotype of COVID-19), is a relatively frequent consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, in which symptoms such as breathlessness, fatigue, ‘brain fog’, tissue damage, inflammation, and coagulopathies (dysfunctions of the blood coagulation system) persist long after the initial infection. It bears similarities to other post-viral syndromes, and to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Many regulatory health bodies still do not recognize this syndrome as a separate disease entity, and refer to it under the broad terminology of ‘COVID’, although its demographics are quite different from those of acute COVID-19. A few years ago, we discovered that fibrinogen in blood can clot into an anomalous ‘amyloid’ form of fibrin that (like other β-rich amyloids and prions) is relatively resistant to proteolysis (fibrinolysis). The result, as is strongly manifested in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) of individuals with Long COVID, is extensive fibrin amyloid microclots that can persist, can entrap other proteins, and that may lead to the production of various autoantibodies. These microclots are more-or-less easily measured in PPP with the stain thioflavin T and a simple fluorescence microscope.

Although the symptoms of Long COVID are multifarious, we here argue that the ability of these fibrin amyloid microclots (fibrinaloids) to block up capillaries, and thus to limit the passage of red blood cells and hence O2 exchange, can actually underpin the majority of these symptoms. Consistent with this, in a preliminary report, it has been shown that suitable and closely monitored ‘triple’ anticoagulant therapy that leads to the removal of the microclots also removes the other symptoms. Fibrin amyloid microclots represent a novel and potentially important target for both the understanding and treatment of Long COVID and related disorders.

Source: Kell DB, Laubscher GJ, Pretorius E. A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. 2022 Feb 17;479(4):537-559. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220016. PMID: 35195253. https://portlandpress.com/biochemj/article/479/4/537/230829/A-central-role-for-amyloid-fibrin-microclots-in (Full text)

Post-corona fatigue-a familiar picture in a new guise?

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) has again come into focus as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Fundamentally problematic is the fact that ME/CFS is considered a separate entity; however, extreme fatigue is also a common symptom of an underlying disease. Our article aims to increase the acceptance of ME/CFS and extreme fatigue facing a symptomatology that is not fully understood, and to highlight the need for research, orientation for physicians, and counselling services for patients.

Materials and methods: Orientative research by focused information gathering.

Results: In various research projects, the hypothesis of post-infectious ME/CFS as an autoimmune disease could be confirmed. In general, the heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria as well as the variety of formulations to describe the symptomatology and different coding options make it difficult to clearly assign symptoms to a clinical picture. Exertion intolerance has been identified as a severe symptom of post-COVID-19 disorder. For this reason, recommendations in international guidelines are currently being revised, especially with regard to pacing. The implications for recommendations in tumor-related fatigue or due to multiple sclerosis are unclear.

Conclusion: Against the background of a decreasing burden of disease due to increasing vaccination rates, research on fatigue should not only include viral diseases.

Source: Buchberger B, Zwierlein R, Rohde V. Post-Corona-Fatigue – das bekannte Bild in neuem Gewand? [Post-corona fatigue-a familiar picture in a new guise?]. Onkologe (Berl). 2022 Feb 17:1-6. German. doi: 10.1007/s00761-022-01102-1. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35194336; PMCID: PMC8853121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853121/ (Article in German) (Full text)

Long COVID-19 symptoms: clinical characteristics

Abstract:

Background: To describe persistent symptoms in long COVID-19 non-severe outpatients and report the 6-month clinical recovery (CR) rate.

Methods: Observational study enrolling outpatients (≥18 years) with confirmed non-severe COVID-19 (positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR or presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies) who consulted for persistent symptoms after the first pandemic wave (March-May 2020). CR was assessed at the 6-month visit and defined as complete (no symptom), partial (persistent symptoms of lower intensity) or lack of recovery (no improvement).

Results: Sixty-three patients (79% women, mean age: 48 years) enrolled; main symptoms (mean 81 days after acute infection): asthenia/myalgia (77%), dyspnea (51%), headaches (35%), cough (33%). At 6 months (n=56), 30% had complete, 57% partial, and 13% lack of recovery. The proportion of patients with >2 persistent symptoms was 27% at 6 months (main symptoms: dyspnea [54%] and asthenia/myalgia [46%]).

Conclusion: We observed a slow but high recovery rate at 6 months among these outpatients.

Source: Seang S, Itani O, Monsel G, Abdi B, Marcelin AG, Valantin MA, Palich R, Fayçal A, Pourcher V, Katlama C, Tubiana R. Long COVID-19 symptoms: clinical characteristics and recovery rate among non-severe outpatients over a six-month follow-up. Infect Dis Now. 2022 Feb 11:S2666-9919(22)00038-0. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2022.02.005. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35158095; PMCID: PMC8832844. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832844/ (Full text)

Assessment and Management of Long COVID

Abstract:

Almost two years into the pandemic, the scientific and healthcare communities continue to learn a great deal regarding COVID-19, the disease produced by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Broad variability during acute COVID-19 infection is seen, ranging from asymptomatic presentation to death. The vast majority of individuals who develop COVID-19 return to their pre-COVID-19 baseline within several weeks.

However, a portion of patients will develop a post-COVID-19 syndrome of persistent cognitive, somatic, and behavioral symptoms. This syndrome, designated as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, is more commonly known as long COVID. The objectives of this paper are to inform psychologists regarding our current understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of COVID-19, review criteria for range of severity during acute illness, present clinical manifestations of long haul phenomena, and discuss the emerging literature base of evidence-based treatment and management approaches.

Source: Rivas-Vazquez, R.A., Rey, G., Quintana, A. et al. Assessment and Management of Long COVID. J Health Serv Psychol 48, 21–30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-022-00055-8  (Full study)

Determinants of Persistence of Symptoms and Impact on Physical and Mental Wellbeing in Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract:

Background: Residual symptoms can be detected for several months after COVID-19. To better understand the predictors and impact of symptom persistence we analysed a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients.

Methods: Patients were followed for 9 months after COVID-19 onset. Duration and predictors of persistence of symptoms, physical health and psychological distress were assessed.

Results: 465 patients (54% males, 51% hospitalised) were included; 37% presented with at least 4 symptoms and 42% complained of symptom lasting more than 28 days. At month 9, 20% of patients were still symptomatic, showing mainly fatigue (11%) and breathlessness (8%). Hospitalisation and ICU stay vs. non-hospitalised status increased the median duration of fatigue of 8 weeks. Age > 50 years (OR 2.50), ICU stay (OR 2.35), and presentation with 4 or more symptoms (OR 2.04) were independent predictors of persistence of symptoms at month 9. A total of 18% of patients did not return to optimal pre-COVID physical health, while 19% showed psychological distress at month 9. Hospital admission (OR 2.28) and persistence of symptoms at day 28 (OR 2.21) and month 9 (OR 5.16) were independent predictors of suboptimal physical health, while female gender (OR 5.27) and persistence of symptoms at day 28 (OR 2.42) and month 9 (OR 2.48) were risk factors for psychological distress.

Conclusions: Patients with advanced age, ICU stay and multiple symptoms at onset were more likely to suffer from long-term symptoms, which had a negative impact on both physical and mental wellbeing. This study contributes to identify the target populations and Long COVID consequences for planning long-term recovery interventions.

Source: Righi E, Mirandola M, Mazzaferri F, Dossi G, Razzaboni E, Zaffagnini A, Ivaldi F, Visentin A, Lambertenghi L, Arena C, Micheletto C, Gibellini D, Tacconelli E. Determinants of Persistence of Symptoms and Impact on Physical and Mental Wellbeing in Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Infect. 2022 Feb 9:S0163-4453(22)00065-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.02.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35150765; PMCID: PMC8828388. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828388/ (Full text)

Exploring the Trajectory Recovery Curve of the number of Post-COVID Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study

Abstract:

Objective: This multicenter study investigated the recovery curve of the number of post-COVID symptoms in previously hospitalized survivors by using an exponential decay model and mosaic plots.

Methods: Patients hospitalized during the first wave of the pandemic (from March 10 to May 31, 2020) due to COVID-19 from five hospitals in Madrid (Spain) were scheduled for two telephone interviews at two follow-ups with a five-month period in between and were asked about the presence of post-COVID symptoms. The total number of post-COVID symptoms was monitored. Clinical features, symptoms at hospital admission, and hospitalization data were collected from medical records.

Results: A total of 1,593 COVID-19 survivors were assessed 8.4 (T1) and 13.2 (T2) months after hospitalization. The mean number of post-COVID symptoms was 2.6 (SD 2.0) at T1 and 1.5 (SD 1.4) at T2. The trajectory curve showed a decrease prevalence trend. The analysis also revealed that 985 (61.8%) subjects reported a greater number (T1>T2), 549 (34.5%) equal number (T1 =T2) and 59 (3.7%) lower number (T1<T2) of post-COVID symptoms in the first (T1: 8.4 months) in comparison with the second (T2: 13.2 months) assessment.

Conclusion: Current trajectory analysis revealed an overall decrease in the tendency in the number of post-COVID symptoms throughout the two years after the infection.

Source: Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Martín-Guerrero JD, Cancela-Cilleruelo I, Moro-López-Menchero P, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Pellicer-Valero OJ. Exploring the Trajectory Recovery Curve of the number of Post-COVID Symptoms: The LONG-COVID-EXP-CM Multicenter Study. Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 9:S1201-9712(22)00083-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.010. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35150911; PMCID: PMC8826603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826603/ (Full text)

Long COVID from rheumatology perspective: a simple mimicker or promoter of autoimmunity?

Dear editor,

We have read with great interest the review article by Sapkota et al. which has been recently published in the Clinical Rheumatology journal dealing with long COVID []. In this paper, the authors reported the symptoms and immunological findings of patients who were infected from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronovirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). These symptoms and laboratory features share similarities with those of patients suffering from autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). They concluded that long COVID is a mimicker of ARDs and needs to be excluded to ensure a correct diagnosis [].

Recently, we reported a patient who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and developed an erosive seronegative arthritis six months after infection []. Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and other systemic manifestations, along with the presence of autoantibodies, are frequently observed in these patients. On the other hand, SARS-CoV-2 may trigger autoimmune responses and the development of de-novo manifestations of ARDs, as in our patient []. The pathogenesis of these phenomena is not well defined. One hypothesis implies the presence of autoantibodies against interferon (IFN) type-I, or inborn errors in the type-I IFN immunity [, ]. Another hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2 might trigger autoimmune responses through molecular mimicry []. Several viruses have been implicated as possible etiological factors for the development of ARDs, mostly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and others. Between viruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is implicated in the pathogenesis of the above disorders [, ]. Indeed, EBV can trigger immune responses through molecular mimicry and is a polyclonal activator of B-cells and increases the production of rheumatoid factor (RF). Several studies suggested that molecular mimicry is a possible mechanism responsible for the development of ARDs in SARS-CoV-2 infection [, ]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 may trigger autoimmunity and the possible development of the de novo manifestations of ARDs.

Read the full article HERE.

Source: Drosos AA, Pelechas E, Voulgari PV. Long COVID from rheumatology perspective: a simple mimicker or promoter of autoimmunity? Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Feb 11:1–2. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06092-4. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35147823; PMCID: PMC8831874. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831874/ (Full text)