Tag: comment

Phantom lymphadenopathy. An association with chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Phantom lymphadenopathy. An association with chronic fatigue syndrome. [Postgrad Med J. 2003]

 

Shee reports an association between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and what he regards as a “phantom lymphadenopathy”.1 However, his failure to observe “true lymphadenopathy” in patients with CFS complaining of swollen lymph glands does not exclude a real, albeit subclinical enlargement of those glands, because he did not compare their dimensions with the ones that were measurable before the appearance of patients’ complaints.

As someone who suffered from CFS and reported on its dramatic resolution thanks to old and new drugs for Addison’s disease,2 I clearly remember that my lymph nodes, just a few days after the abrupt onset of CFS, became mildly painful and began to swell gradually. This slow process of enlargement lasted approximately one month. However, even when my lymph glands stopped swelling further (but continued to be mildly painful), their dimensions were still clinically within normal limits. This may indirectly explain why Shee found that “careful examination did not confirm lymphadenopathy” in CFS patients with “self diagnosed enlarged lymph glands”.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1742656/pdf/v079p00185a.pdf

 

Source: Baschetti R. Phantom lymphadenopathy. An association with chronic fatigue syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2003 Mar;79(929):185. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1742656/ (Full article)

 

Diverse etiologies for chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Markers of viral infection in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Clin Infect Dis. 2002]

 

SIR—Koelle et al.  recently studied 22 pairs of identical twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome and concluded that there was no major contribution for viral infections in the perpetuation of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The authors should be commended for their methodology and the use of well-matched control subjects. However, the study raised several issues.

First, similar to previous studies, the approach of Koelle et al.  was to look for statistical differences among the well-matched pairs with respect to the presence of viral antibodies and, more specifically, the presence of DNA of the viruses studied. Although these viruses were no more prevalent among the patients with CFS than among their healthy twins, one cannot conclude that these viruses are not the cause of CFS in a small subset of patients. CFS has been described in a small number of patients who had had well-documented acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and parvovirus B19 infections, and many of the patients responded to specific antiviral therapy. Of the first 200 patients with CFS who we evaluated for viral etiologies , only ∼10% had etiologies that were attributed to the viruses studied by Koelle et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection, an uncommon, although treatable, cause of CFS, was also dismissed in a previous, smaller study .

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/5/671.long

 

Source: Chia JK, Chia A. Diverse etiologies for chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):671-2; author reply 672-3. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/5/671.long (Full article)

 

Differential diagnosis for chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Chronic fatigue syndrome: evaluation and treatment. [Am Fam Physician. 2002]

 

To the Editor: I have just read the recent article on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). While the authors present an excellent framework for the evaluation and management of patients with chronic fatigue, they have overlooked a differential diagnosis. Celiac disease, also known as gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE), may present as CFS and is highly treatable.

You can read the rest of this comment here:  http://www.aafp.org/afp/2003/0115/p252.html

 

Source: Nelsen DA Jr. Differential diagnosis for chronic fatigue syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jan 15;67(2):252; author reply 252 http://www.aafp.org/afp/2003/0115/p252.html (Full article)

 

Chronic unexplained fatigue

Comment on: Chronic unexplained fatigue. [Postgrad Med J. 2002]

 

I found the editorial on chronic fatigue syndrome by White both surprising and disappointing, because he used the title “Chronic unexplained fatigue” and the subtitle “A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”, but his editorial, by ignoring very important facts about chronic fatigue syndrome, actually perpetuates that riddle, rather than helping to solve it.

If a puzzling and poorly manageable condition shares more than 40 features, including all of its diagnostic criteria, with a well known and easily treatable disease, this astounding clinical overlap should not be ignored, because reason not only suggests that the mysterious illness may simply be a form of the well known disease, but also hints that it is worthwhile assessing whether the classic therapy for that treatable disease could be effective for the enigmatic condition as well.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1757928/pdf/v078p00763a.pdf

 

Source: Baschetti R. Chronic unexplained fatigue. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Dec;78(926):763; author reply 763. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1757928/pdf/v078p00763a.pdf

 

Women experienced chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia as stigmatising

Comment on: Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. [Qual Health Res. 2002]

 

Any clinician who has taken the trouble to get to know a patient with fibromyalgia or CFS will recognise the basic finding of the study by Åsbring and Närvänen — patients attending specialist clinics with either condition (the similarities between the 2 outweigh the differences) feel acutely a sense of discrimination and stigmatisation. Many describe negative interactions with the medical profession.1 This is most acute when doctors are perceived to be “psychologising” the condition. Indeed, patients in this study found the act of prescribing antidepressants to be “violating”. This is regrettable because evidence exists that antidepressants can reduce pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in patients with fibromyalgia,2 although similar evidence does not exist for patients with CFS.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://ebmh.bmj.com/content/5/4/127.long

 

Source: Wessely S. Women experienced chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia as stigmatising. Evid Based Ment Health. 2002 Nov;5(4):127. http://ebmh.bmj.com/content/5/4/127.long (Full comment)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome/ME. [Br J Gen Pract. 2002]

Comment on: Doctors and social epidemics: the problem of persistent unexplained physical symptoms, including chronic fatigue. [Br J Gen Pract. 2002]

 

In their editorial (Journal, May 2002), Stanley et al argued that chronic fatigue should be categorised under ‘persistent unexplained physical symptoms’, and that these are often the result of the somatisation of ‘unhappiness’ and the misinterpretation of ‘normal functioning’. However, their analysis contained some notable flaws.

Firstly, there is more to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) than ‘tiredness and its synonyms’ and to ignore symptoms, such as vertigo, nausea, and photophobia, both misrepresents and trivialises this illness.

Secondly, the authors alluded to widespread somatisation, despite the lack of evidence that this is a major problem in relation to CFS. The suggestion that this is a homogeneous population of unhappy, prejudiced, attention-seekers is difficult to reconcile with evidence-based medicine, and the subtle accusations of mass exaggeration are stigmatising and unhelpful.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf

 

Source: Goudsmit E. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):763; author reply 763-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis

Comment on: Doctors and social epidemics: the problem of persistent unexplained physical symptoms, including chronic fatigue. [Br J Gen Pract. 2002]

 

The editorial in the May 2002 issue by Drs Stanley, Peters and Salmon1 questions the validity of the report to the Chief Medical Officer stating that chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy (CFS/ME) ‘is indeed a chronic illness meriting significant NHS resources, including the unreserved attention of the medical profession.’ They suggest that CFS/ME may be a ‘social epidemic’ where symptoms are generated by psychogenic mechanisms. They set high standards for discussions of these issues, advocating that information ‘must be interpreted within a rigorous scientific framework such as that afforded by the methods of qualitative research.’ Let us do just that. There have been repeated reports of objectively measurable physiological changes in CFS/ME.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf

 

Source: Pall ML. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):762; author reply 763-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis

Comment on: Doctors and social epidemics: the problem of persistent unexplained physical symptoms, including chronic fatigue. [Br J Gen Pract. 2002]

 

Readers of your editorial of May 2002 may easily gain the impression that the medical profession’s ‘established scientific methods’ have shown that CFS/ME is not a real illness and that people with CFS/ME are not really ill but are simply unhappy.

Such a perception of CFS/ME runs strongly counter to our experience at the registered charity, Westcare UK. Over the past 13 years we have been offering, with beneficial results, professional help to well over 700 patients with CFS/ME.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf

 

Source: Sykes R. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):762-3; author reply 763-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314419/pdf/12236282.pdf (Full article)

 

Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence

Comment on: Recognising chronic fatigue is key to improving outcomes. [BMJ. 2002]

 

In 1998, the chief medical officer of England and Wales commissioned a working group to advise on best practice guidelines to improve the quality of care and treatment for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Now issued, the group’s report reflects the good efforts of the scholars, practitioners, patients, and advocates who joined to address this complex matter.1

Given the controversies surrounding chronic fatigue syndrome, it is not surprising that the report admits to broad domains of disagreement among its members. If anything, it is remarkable that most of the original group weathered the undertaking, as there were resignations both among patients who deemed the evolving product insufficiently sympathetic and among academic practitioners who chafed at recommendations untempered by data.

The report identifies the sentinel issues that concern patients and practitioners alike: how one makes the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome; the treatments to consider; and research that remains to be done. Unfortunately, despite more than 2000 relevant papers indexed on PubMed since chronic fatigue syndrome was first named in 1987, the group’s conclusions appear more shaped by anecdote than by evidence. In particular, major systematic reviews, including the recent one by Whiting et al, are not cited and do not seem to have significantly informed the guidelines.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/

 

Source: Straus SE. Caring for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Conclusions in CMO’s report are shaped by anecdote not evidence. BMJ. 2002 Jan 19;324(7330):124-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122056/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

Frequency of attendance in general practice and symptoms before development of chronic fatigue syndrome: a case-control study. [Br J Gen Pract. 2001]

 

Professor Murdoch in the September BJGP 1 uses his study of Down’s syndrome,2 which demonstrated that mothers had an increased number of reported illnesses in the year before the birth, to undermine our interpretation of the findings in our chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) study in the July BJGP. 3 He asks why anyone should believe CFS is caused by behavioural factors.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314178/pdf/11766858.pdf

 

Source: Hamilton W. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Dec;51(473):1015. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314178/pdf/11766858.pdf (Full comment)