Comment on: Markers of viral infection in monozygotic twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Clin Infect Dis. 2002]
SIR—Koelle et al. recently studied 22 pairs of identical twins discordant for chronic fatigue syndrome and concluded that there was no major contribution for viral infections in the perpetuation of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The authors should be commended for their methodology and the use of well-matched control subjects. However, the study raised several issues.
First, similar to previous studies, the approach of Koelle et al. was to look for statistical differences among the well-matched pairs with respect to the presence of viral antibodies and, more specifically, the presence of DNA of the viruses studied. Although these viruses were no more prevalent among the patients with CFS than among their healthy twins, one cannot conclude that these viruses are not the cause of CFS in a small subset of patients. CFS has been described in a small number of patients who had had well-documented acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and parvovirus B19 infections, and many of the patients responded to specific antiviral therapy. Of the first 200 patients with CFS who we evaluated for viral etiologies , only ∼10% had etiologies that were attributed to the viruses studied by Koelle et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection, an uncommon, although treatable, cause of CFS, was also dismissed in a previous, smaller study .
You can read the rest of this comment here: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/5/671.long
Source: Chia JK, Chia A. Diverse etiologies for chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):671-2; author reply 672-3. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/5/671.long (Full article)