Tag: biopsychosocial approach

Contesting oppressive regimes of truth: A critical feminist re-examination of (bio)psychosocial hegemony in the field of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome, a disabling condition disproportionately affecting women, is predominantly clinically managed through a (bio)psychosocial lens with psychosocial-inspired therapies, criticised for facilitating social and epistemic injustice, psychological and physical harms. Whilst most literature contesting (bio)psychosocial practices espouses a mainstream scientific perspective, politics and power relations undergirding psychosocial hegemony are better explicated through a critical lens. This article re-examines the ascendancy of psychosocial therapies and related practices through a critical feminist psychology and Foucauldian lens, with a view to locating oppressive practices in their socio-political and cultural context and promoting dialogue on possibilities for positive social change.

Source: Hunt, J. E. (2023, August 10). Contesting oppressive regimes of truth: A critical feminist re-examination of (bio)psychosocial hegemony in the field of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3g7kp https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/3g7kp/ (Full text)

The Rise and Fall of the Psychosomatic Approach to Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

The psychosomatic approach to medically unexplained symptoms, myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome (MUS/ME/CFS) is critically reviewed using scientific criteria. Based on the ‘Biopsychosocial Model’, the psychosomatic theory proposes that patients’ dysfunctional beliefs, deconditioning and attentional biases cause or make illness worse, disrupt therapies, and lead to preventable deaths. The evidence reviewed suggests that none of these psychosomatic hypotheses is empirically supported.

The lack of robust supportive evidence together with the use of fallacious causal assumptions, inappropriate and harmful therapies, broken scientific principles, repeated methodological flaws and an unwillingness to share data all give the appearance of cargo cult science. The psychosomatic approach needs to be replaced by a scientific, biologically grounded approach to MUS/ME/CFS that can be expected to provide patients with appropriate care and treatments. Patients with MUS/ME/CFS and their families have not been treated with the dignity, respect and care that is their human right. Patients with MUS/ME/CFS and their families could consider a class action legal case against the injuring parties.

Source: David F Marks. (2022). The Rise and Fall of the Psychosomatic Approach to Medically Unexplained Symptoms,
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Arch Epidemiol Pub Health Res, 1(2), 97-143. https://www.opastpublishers.com/peer-review/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-psychosomatic-approach-to-medically-unexplained-symptoms-myalgic-encephalomyelitis-and-chronic–4899.html (Full text available as PDF file)

Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome, understood as per (bio) psychosocial discourse, is a political construction, serving actors and structures associated with welfare reform, to the detriment of patients.

The condition typically known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling condition characterised by post-exertional malaise, often accompanied by cognitive impairment, pain, sleep disturbance, gastro-intestinal and autonomic dysfunction (Goudsmit et al., 2009). ME/CFS is positioned as having multifactorial aetiology, including a genetic predisposition, precipitated by viral, bacterial and parasitic infection, toxins and stress, perpetuated through neuro-immune and metabolic dysfunction (Cortes Rivera et al., 2019). The dominant conceptualisation of ME/CFS in UK healthcare, generated through a biopsychosocial model with a cognitivebehavioural focus, is that of a psychosocial entity which, whilst possibly precipitated by a virus or other stressor, is perpetuated by ‘maladaptive’ illness beliefs, fear-avoidance behaviours, and social reinforcement (Sharpe et al., 1997; Deary et al., 2007; Harvey & Wessely, 2009). This conceptualisation has been critiqued for lacking empirical support.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Hunt, Joanne. Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18-28  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361017759_Towards_a_critical_psychology_of_chronic_fatigue_syndrome_Biopsychosocial_narratives_and_UK_welfare_reform (Full text)

Identifying disrupted biological factors and patient-tailored interventions for chronic fatigue in adolescents and young adults with Q-Fever Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (QFS-study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with single-subject experimental case series design

Abstract:

Background: Chronic fatigue with a debilitating effect on daily life is a frequently reported symptom among adolescents and young adults with a history of Q-fever infection (QFS). Persisting fatigue after infection may have a biological origin with psychological and social factors contributing to the disease phenotype. This is consistent with the biopsychosocial framework, which considers fatigue to be the result of a complex interaction between biological, psychological, and social factors. In line, similar manifestations of chronic fatigue are observed in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Cognitive behavioral therapy is often recommended as treatment for chronic fatigue, considering its effectiveness on the group level. However, not everybody benefits on the individual level. More treatment success at the individual level might be achieved with patient-tailored treatments that incorporate the biopsychosocial framework.

Methods: In addition to biological assessments of blood, stool, saliva, and hair, the QFS-study consists of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which a single-subject experimental case series (N=1) design will be implemented using Experience Sampling Methodology in fatigued adolescents and young adults with QFS, CFS/ME, and JIA (aged 12-29). With the RCT design, the effectiveness of patient-tailored PROfeel lifestyle advices will be compared against generic dietary advices in reducing fatigue severity at the group level. Pre-post analyses will be conducted to determine relevance of intervention order. By means of the N=1 design, effectiveness of both advices will be measured at the individual level.

Discussion: The QFS-study is a comprehensive study exploring disrupted biological factors and patient-tailored lifestyle advices as intervention in adolescent and young adults with QFS and similar manifestations of chronic fatigue. Practical or operational issues are expected during the study, but can be overcome through innovative study design, statistical approaches, and recruitment strategies. Ultimately, the study aims to contribute to biological research and (personalized) treatment in QFS and similar manifestations of chronic fatigue.

Trial registration: Trial NL8789 . Registered July 21, 2020.

Source: Vroegindeweij A, Swart JF, Houtveen J, Eijkelkamp N, van de Putte EM, Wulffraat NM, Nijhof SL. Identifying disrupted biological factors and patient-tailored interventions for chronic fatigue in adolescents and young adults with Q-Fever Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (QFS-study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with single-subject experimental case series design. Trials. 2022 Aug 19;23(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06620-2. PMID: 35986408.  https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06620-2 (Full text)

 

Holistic or harmful? Examining socio-structural factors in the biopsychosocial model of chronic illness, ‘medically unexplained symptoms’ and disability

Abstract:

A particular application of the biopsychosocial model is associated in peer-reviewed literature and patient testimony with harms done to chronically ill and disabled people. These harms derive from an empirically unsubstantiated, neoliberal narrative emphasising the role of personal responsibility and effort in ‘recovery’ from ill-health, ignoring socio-structural contributors to chronic illness and disability. Notably, this biopsychosocial model ignores the health-related impact of welfare and disability insurance reforms which the model has been employed to justify. The model and associated interests can thus be recognised as socio-structural phenomena that should be acknowledged in any truly holistic biopsychosocial approach to chronic illness and disability. A critically informed and reflexive approach to biopsychosocial theorising would allow a more holistic and nuanced understanding of chronic illness and disability, with implications for health and social policy that underline and address what ails society as opposed to what is ‘wrong’ with the individual.

  • Points of interest

  • The biopsychosocial approach suggests that health and illness should be understood ‘holistically’. This means considering not only a person’s biology, but also their psychology (thoughts and behaviour) and social context (for example, social support levels).

  • A particular variant of biopsychosocial model, dominant in UK health and social policy, has been associated with political agendas, predominantly: welfare reform, healthcare spending cuts, and creation of profits for the disability insurance industry.

  • This variant of the model has also been associated with harms experienced by chronically ill and disabled people.

  • Any truly holistic biopsychosocial framework should acknowledge the broader social (here, political) context that has shaped this model and recognise how the model, and associated practices, may contribute to chronic illness and disability.

  • Such a framework gives rise to recommendations for health and social policy and practice that address what is wrong with society as opposed to what is ‘wrong’ with the person.

Source: Joanne Hunt (2022) Holistic or harmful? Examining socio-structural factors in the biopsychosocial model of chronic illness, ‘medically unexplained symptoms’ and disability, Disability & Society, DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2022.2099250 (Full text)

ME/CFS and the biopsychosocial model: a review of patient harm and distress in the medical encounter

Abstract:

Objective: Despite the growing evidence of physiological and cellular abnormalities in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), there has been a strong impetus to tackle the illness utilizing a biopsychosocial model. However, many sufferers of this disabling condition report distress and dissatisfaction following medical encounters. This review seeks to account for this discord.

Methods: A narrative review methodology is employed to synthesize the evidence for potential iatrogenesis.

Results: We identify seven potential modalities of iatrogenesis or harm reported by patients: difficulties in reaching an acceptable diagnosis; misdiagnosis, including of other medical and psychological conditions; difficulties in accessing the sick role, medical care and social support; high levels of patient dissatisfaction with the quality of medical care; negative responses to controversial therapies (cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy); challenges to the patient narrative and experience; psychological harm (individual and collective distress).

Conclusion: The biopsychosocial framework currently applied to ME/CFS is too narrow in focus and fails to adequately incorporate the patient narrative. Misdiagnosis, conflict, and harm are observable outcomes where doctors’ and patients’ perspectives remain incongruent. Biopsychosocial practices should be scrutinized for potential harms. Clinicians should consider adopting alternative patient-centred approaches.

Implications for rehabilitation: Patients with ME/CFS may report or experience one or more of the modalities of harms and distress identified in this review. It is important health and rehabilitation professionals seek to avoid and minimize harms when treating or assisting ME/CFS patients. There are conflicting models of ME/CFS; we highlight two divergent models, a biopsychosocial model and a biomedical model that is preferred by patients. The ‘biopsychosocial framework’ applied in clinical practice promotes treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise therapy, however, the evidence for their success is contested and many patients reject the notion their illness is perpetuated by dysfunctional beliefs, personality traits, or behaviors. Health professionals may avoid conflict and harm causation in ME/CFS by adopting more concordant ‘patient-centred’ approaches that give greater prominence to the patient narrative and experience of illness.

Source: Geraghty KJ, Blease C. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and the biopsychosocial model: a review of patient harm and distress in the medical encounter. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec;41(25):3092-3102. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1481149. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PMID: 29929450. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29929450/

The negative impact of the psychiatric model of chronic fatigue syndrome on doctors’ understanding and management of the illness

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a disabling condition that greatly impacts the lives of sufferers. Many sufferers report problems getting a confirmatory diagnosis and difficulties getting doctors to believe them and offer support. Objective: This paper explores this issue by examining a biopsychosocial (BPS) model of ME/CFS promoted within psychiatry and its potential influence on how doctors might view and manage the illness.

Method: A narrative literature review is undertaken to identify salient theory and discourse for consideration.

Findings: Psychiatrists proffer a hypothetical model of ME/CFS aetiology and continuance, that instructs doctors to view the illness as a syndrome perpetuated by psycho-social factors that sustain unexplained symptoms such as fatigue, pain and post-exertional malaise, rather than symptoms being related to biological disease processes. The psychiatric model theorises that patients’ symptoms are maintained by their maladaptive beliefs and behaviours, requiring psychotherapy.

Conclusion: The psychiatric BPS model of ME/CFS may negatively bias how physicians approach the illness, with doctors directed to view patients’ complaints as manifestations of psychological distress, rather than physical symptoms that require medical investigation or intervention. This finding may help explain why many ME/CFS patients feel disbelieved and unsupported after seeking medical care. Psychiatric theory fails to acknowledge or incorporate a substantial body of evidence showing biological deficits associated with ME/CFS. Medical trainees and physicians need more training and clinical exposure to ME/CFS patients, armed with better awareness of misleading and unproven claims associated with the BPS model.

Source: Keith Geraghty (2020) The negative impact of the psychiatric model of chronic fatigue syndrome on doctors’ understanding and management of the illness, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2020.1834295 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21641846.2020.1834295?journalCode=rftg20

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and chronic pain conditions – vitally protective systems gone wrong

Abstract:

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and chronic pain syndromes represent major health problems in society. These conditions are disabling and strongly associated with low quality of life. Even though CFS and chronic pain are separate conditions, they have strikingly much in common. Both pain and fatigue are important sensations with protective value in an acute situation. It can be life-threatening not to be aware of them.

However, as these symptoms become chronic, their protective roles decrease and instead they become health problems. Our understanding of the perception of pain and fatigue has shifted through the years, from a dualistic biomedical point of view to a holistic biopsychosocial understanding. This combined with the increasing evidence of how our brain works in a predictive/anticipatory manner, gives a deeper understanding of why treatments like cognitive behavior therapies and stress relief therapies can help these patients recover to better health.

Source: Pedersen M. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and chronic pain conditions – vitally protective systems gone wrong. Scand J Pain. 2019 Jun 29. pii: /j/sjpain.ahead-of-print/sjpain-2019-0072/sjpain-2019-0072.xml. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0072. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31256069

The Invisible Burden of Chronic Fatigue in the Community: a Narrative Review

Abstract:

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Unexplained fatigue is commonly reported in the general population, with varying severity. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) sits at the extreme of the fatigue continuum, yet more individuals experience unexplained prolonged fatigue (1-6-month duration) or chronic fatigue (> 6 months) that, although debilitating, does not fulfil ME/CFS criteria. This review examines the empirical literature comparing symptoms for those with prolonged fatigue, chronic fatigue and ME/CFS.

RECENT FINDINGS: Substantial overlap of self-reported psychological, physical and functional impairments exists between chronic fatigue and ME/CFS. The conversion rate from prolonged or chronic fatigue to ME/CFS is not understood. Current research has failed to uncover factors accounting for differences in fatigue trajectories, nor incorporate comprehensive, longitudinal assessments extending beyond self-reported symptoms. Distinguishing factors between prolonged fatigue, chronic fatigue and ME/CFS remain poorly understood, highlighting a need for longitudinal studies integrating biopsychosocial approaches to inform early management and targeted rehabilitation strategies.

Source: Fatt SJ, Cvejic E2,, Lloyd AR, Vollmer-Conna U, Beilharz JE. The Invisible Burden of Chronic Fatigue in the Community: a Narrative Review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019 Feb 11;21(2):5. doi: 10.1007/s11926-019-0804-2.

The “Biology-First” Hypothesis: Functional disorders may begin and end with biology-A scoping review

Abstract:

While it is generally accepted that gastrointestinal infections can cause functional disturbances in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract-known as postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) and functional dyspepsia (PI-FD)-it has still not been widely recognized that such an infection can also initiate functional non-intestinal diseases, and that non-intestinal infections can provoke both intestinal and non-intestinal functional disturbances. We conducted a scoping review of the respective literature and-on the basis of these data-hypothesize that medically unexplained functional symptoms and syndromes following an infection may have a biological (genetic, endocrine, microbiological) origin, and that psychological and social factors, which may contribute to the disease “phenotype,” are secondary to this biological cause. If this holds true, then the search for psychological and social theories and factors to explain why one patient develops a chronic functional disorder while another does not is-at least for postinfectious states-misleading and detracts from exploring and identifying the true origins of these essentially biological disorders. The biopsychosocial model may, as the term implies, always begin with biology, also for functional (somatoform) disorders.

Source: Enck P, Mazurak N. The “Biology-First” Hypothesis: Functional disorders may begin and end with biology-A scoping review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun 28:e13394. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13394. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29956418