Is It Useful to Question the Recovery Behaviour of Patients with ME/CFS or Long COVID?

Abstract:

For the last few decades, medical guidelines have recommended treating patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) with graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Moreover, doctors have questioned the recovery behaviour of these patients and stimulated them to follow these treatments so that they would be able to go back to work. In this article, we reviewed trials of GET and CBT for ME/CFS that reported on work status before and after treatment to answer the question of whether doctors should continue to question the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS.

Our review shows that more patients are unable to work after treatment than before treatment with CBT and GET. It also highlights the fact that both treatments are unsafe for patients with ME/CFS. Therefore, questioning the recovery behaviour of patients with ME/CFS is pointless. This confirms the conclusion from the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), which has recently published its updated ME/CFS guideline and concluded that CBT and GET are not effective and do not lead to recovery.

Studies on CBT and GET for long COVID have not yet been published. However, this review offers no support for their use in improving the recovery of patients with an ME/CFS-like illness after infection with COVID-19, nor does it lend any support to the practice of questioning the recovery behaviour of these patients.

Source: Vink M, Vink-Niese F. Is It Useful to Question the Recovery Behaviour of Patients with ME/CFS or Long COVID? Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;10(2):392. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020392. PMID: 35207003. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/2/392 (Full text)

Prevalence of Aspergillus-Derived Mycotoxins (Ochratoxin, Aflatoxin, and Gliotoxin) and Their Distribution in the Urinalysis of ME/CFS Patients

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a known complex, multi-organ system disorder with a sudden or subacute onset. ME/CFS occurs most commonly among women between 30 and 50 years of age. The current diagnostic criteria of ME/CFS, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, includes: profound fatigue and post-exertional malaise (>6 mo) unrelieved by rest, persistent cognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance, and chronic unrefreshing sleep.

Despite reported associations between ME/CFS onset and exposure to infectious agents (viral, bacterial, or fungal), the pathophysiology of ME/CFS remains unknown. In this prevalence study, we investigated the rates of Aspergillus-derived toxin levels, Aflatoxin (AF), Ochratoxin A (OTA), and Gliotoxin (GT), in the urinalysis of 236 ME/CFS patients with a history of chronic exposure to mold (i.e., from water-damaged buildings).

Among ME/CFS patients reporting chronic exposure to mold, we found evidence of exposure in 92.4 percent of patients, with OTA being the most prevalent mycotoxin. Mold distributions (OTA, AF, and GT) in the urinalysis all demonstrated right skewness, while the distribution of age of ME/CFS patients diagnosed showed no deviation from normality.

This study aims to provide preliminary, epidemiological evidence among ME/CFS patients who were diagnosed in South Florida with a history of exposure to mycotoxins. Based on these findings, we proposed how future control studies should approach investigating the association between chronic mold exposure and the diagnosis of ME/CFS.

Source: Wu TY, Khorramshahi T, Taylor LA, Bansal NS, Rodriguez B, Rey IR. Prevalence of Aspergillus-Derived Mycotoxins (Ochratoxin, Aflatoxin, and Gliotoxin) and Their Distribution in the Urinalysis of ME/CFS Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 12;19(4):2052. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042052. PMID: 35206241. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2052 (Full text)

A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications

Abstract:

Post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC), usually referred to as ‘Long COVID’ (a phenotype of COVID-19), is a relatively frequent consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, in which symptoms such as breathlessness, fatigue, ‘brain fog’, tissue damage, inflammation, and coagulopathies (dysfunctions of the blood coagulation system) persist long after the initial infection. It bears similarities to other post-viral syndromes, and to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

Many regulatory health bodies still do not recognize this syndrome as a separate disease entity, and refer to it under the broad terminology of ‘COVID’, although its demographics are quite different from those of acute COVID-19. A few years ago, we discovered that fibrinogen in blood can clot into an anomalous ‘amyloid’ form of fibrin that (like other β-rich amyloids and prions) is relatively resistant to proteolysis (fibrinolysis). The result, as is strongly manifested in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) of individuals with Long COVID, is extensive fibrin amyloid microclots that can persist, can entrap other proteins, and that may lead to the production of various autoantibodies. These microclots are more-or-less easily measured in PPP with the stain thioflavin T and a simple fluorescence microscope.

Although the symptoms of Long COVID are multifarious, we here argue that the ability of these fibrin amyloid microclots (fibrinaloids) to block up capillaries, and thus to limit the passage of red blood cells and hence O2 exchange, can actually underpin the majority of these symptoms. Consistent with this, in a preliminary report, it has been shown that suitable and closely monitored ‘triple’ anticoagulant therapy that leads to the removal of the microclots also removes the other symptoms. Fibrin amyloid microclots represent a novel and potentially important target for both the understanding and treatment of Long COVID and related disorders.

Source: Kell DB, Laubscher GJ, Pretorius E. A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. 2022 Feb 17;479(4):537-559. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220016. PMID: 35195253. https://portlandpress.com/biochemj/article/479/4/537/230829/A-central-role-for-amyloid-fibrin-microclots-in (Full text)

Post-corona fatigue-a familiar picture in a new guise?

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) has again come into focus as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Fundamentally problematic is the fact that ME/CFS is considered a separate entity; however, extreme fatigue is also a common symptom of an underlying disease. Our article aims to increase the acceptance of ME/CFS and extreme fatigue facing a symptomatology that is not fully understood, and to highlight the need for research, orientation for physicians, and counselling services for patients.

Materials and methods: Orientative research by focused information gathering.

Results: In various research projects, the hypothesis of post-infectious ME/CFS as an autoimmune disease could be confirmed. In general, the heterogeneity of diagnostic criteria as well as the variety of formulations to describe the symptomatology and different coding options make it difficult to clearly assign symptoms to a clinical picture. Exertion intolerance has been identified as a severe symptom of post-COVID-19 disorder. For this reason, recommendations in international guidelines are currently being revised, especially with regard to pacing. The implications for recommendations in tumor-related fatigue or due to multiple sclerosis are unclear.

Conclusion: Against the background of a decreasing burden of disease due to increasing vaccination rates, research on fatigue should not only include viral diseases.

Source: Buchberger B, Zwierlein R, Rohde V. Post-Corona-Fatigue – das bekannte Bild in neuem Gewand? [Post-corona fatigue-a familiar picture in a new guise?]. Onkologe (Berl). 2022 Feb 17:1-6. German. doi: 10.1007/s00761-022-01102-1. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35194336; PMCID: PMC8853121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8853121/ (Article in German) (Full text)

How mycobacterium tuberculosis infection could lead to the increasing risks of chronic fatigue syndrome and the potential immunological effects: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Abstract:

Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been shown to be associated with infections. Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly prevalent infectious disease. Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and post-tuberculosis experience similar symptoms. Furthermore, chronic fatigue syndrome and tuberculosis share similar plasma immunosignatures. This study aimed to clarify the risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (MTI), by analyzing the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan.

Methods: 7666 patients aged 20 years or older with newly diagnosed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection during 2000-2011 and 30,663 participants without Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection were identified. Both groups were followed up until the diagnoses of chronic fatigue syndrome were made at the end of 2011.

Results: The relationship between Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and the subsequent risk of chronic fatigue syndrome was estimated through Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, with the incidence density rates being 3.04 and 3.69 per 1000 person-years among the non-Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection populations, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, with 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.47). In the stratified analysis, the Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection group were consistently associated with a higher risk of chronic fatigue syndrome in the male sex (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.58) and age group of ≥ 65 years old (HR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.86-3.38).

Conclusions: The data from this population-based retrospective cohort study revealed that Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is associated with an elevated risk of subsequent chronic fatigue syndrome.

Source: Yang TY, Lin CL, Yao WC, Lio CF, Chiang WP, Lin K, Kuo CF, Tsai SY. How mycobacterium tuberculosis infection could lead to the increasing risks of chronic fatigue syndrome and the potential immunological effects: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Transl Med. 2022 Feb 21;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03301-1. PMID: 35189895. https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-022-03301-1 (Full text)

Ginseng for the Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies

Abstract:

Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a complex and often disabling chronic condition emerging worldwide, with no curative or definitive therapy yet identified. Ginseng has been widely used to treat fatigue in other patient groups and conditions; however, a systematic review focusing solely on the impact of ginseng on fatigue in patients with CFS has not been performed.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the current state of evidence regarding ginseng for CFS.

Methods: Multiple databases were searched from inception to October 2020. All data was extracted independently and in duplicates. Outcomes of interest included the effectiveness and safety of ginseng in patients with CFS.

Results: 2 studies enrolling 68 patients were deemed eligible, including one randomized clinical trial and one prospective observational study. The certainty of evidence in the effectiveness outcome was low and moderate from both studies, while the safety evidence was very low as reported from one study.

Conclusion: Study findings highlight a potential benefit of ginseng therapy in the treatment of CFS. However, we are not able to draw firm conclusions due to limited clinical studies. The paucity of data warrants limited confidence. There is a need for future rigorous studies to provide further evidence.

Source: Yang J, Shin KM, Abu Dabrh AM, Bierle DM, Zhou X, Bauer BA, Mohabbat AB. Ginseng for the Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Glob Adv Health Med. 2022 Feb 14;11:2164957X221079790. doi: 10.1177/2164957X221079790. PMID: 35186446; PMCID: PMC8848096. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848096/ (Full text)

Saliva Fatigue Biomarker Index As a Marker for Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in a Community Based Sample

Abstract:

Objective: The prevalence of pediatric Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) has been estimated from an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse community-based random sample of 10,119 youth aged 5-17. A team of physicians made a final diagnosis of ME/CFS if the participants met criteria for up to three selected case definitions following medical and psychiatric evaluations. We assessed whether a salivary biomarker of fatigue could identify youth with ME/CFS.

Study design: We examined the ratio of the concentrations of 2 peptide fragments in saliva, referred to as the Fatigue Biomarker Index (FBI), in participants from our study diagnosed with ME/CFS (n=59) and matched controls (n=39).

Results: Significant overall differences were found in the FBI between those participants with severe ME/CFS and those with ME/CFS and the controls.

Conclusions: If confirmed in other populations, the FBI could serve as an objective test to aid in the diagnosis of severe ME/CFS.

Source: Jason LA, Kalns J, Richarte A, Katz BZ, Torres C. Saliva Fatigue Biomarker Index As a Marker for Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in a Community Based Sample. Fatigue. 2021;9(4):189-195. doi: 10.1080/21641846.2021.1994222. Epub 2021 Oct 27. PMID: 35186443; PMCID: PMC8855987.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8855987/ (Full text)

Long COVID-19 symptoms: clinical characteristics

Abstract:

Background: To describe persistent symptoms in long COVID-19 non-severe outpatients and report the 6-month clinical recovery (CR) rate.

Methods: Observational study enrolling outpatients (≥18 years) with confirmed non-severe COVID-19 (positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR or presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies) who consulted for persistent symptoms after the first pandemic wave (March-May 2020). CR was assessed at the 6-month visit and defined as complete (no symptom), partial (persistent symptoms of lower intensity) or lack of recovery (no improvement).

Results: Sixty-three patients (79% women, mean age: 48 years) enrolled; main symptoms (mean 81 days after acute infection): asthenia/myalgia (77%), dyspnea (51%), headaches (35%), cough (33%). At 6 months (n=56), 30% had complete, 57% partial, and 13% lack of recovery. The proportion of patients with >2 persistent symptoms was 27% at 6 months (main symptoms: dyspnea [54%] and asthenia/myalgia [46%]).

Conclusion: We observed a slow but high recovery rate at 6 months among these outpatients.

Source: Seang S, Itani O, Monsel G, Abdi B, Marcelin AG, Valantin MA, Palich R, Fayçal A, Pourcher V, Katlama C, Tubiana R. Long COVID-19 symptoms: clinical characteristics and recovery rate among non-severe outpatients over a six-month follow-up. Infect Dis Now. 2022 Feb 11:S2666-9919(22)00038-0. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2022.02.005. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35158095; PMCID: PMC8832844. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832844/ (Full text)

Assessment and Management of Long COVID

Abstract:

Almost two years into the pandemic, the scientific and healthcare communities continue to learn a great deal regarding COVID-19, the disease produced by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Broad variability during acute COVID-19 infection is seen, ranging from asymptomatic presentation to death. The vast majority of individuals who develop COVID-19 return to their pre-COVID-19 baseline within several weeks.

However, a portion of patients will develop a post-COVID-19 syndrome of persistent cognitive, somatic, and behavioral symptoms. This syndrome, designated as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, is more commonly known as long COVID. The objectives of this paper are to inform psychologists regarding our current understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of COVID-19, review criteria for range of severity during acute illness, present clinical manifestations of long haul phenomena, and discuss the emerging literature base of evidence-based treatment and management approaches.

Source: Rivas-Vazquez, R.A., Rey, G., Quintana, A. et al. Assessment and Management of Long COVID. J Health Serv Psychol 4821–30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-022-00055-8  (Full study)

Determinants of Persistence of Symptoms and Impact on Physical and Mental Wellbeing in Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract:

Background: Residual symptoms can be detected for several months after COVID-19. To better understand the predictors and impact of symptom persistence we analysed a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients.

Methods: Patients were followed for 9 months after COVID-19 onset. Duration and predictors of persistence of symptoms, physical health and psychological distress were assessed.

Results: 465 patients (54% males, 51% hospitalised) were included; 37% presented with at least 4 symptoms and 42% complained of symptom lasting more than 28 days. At month 9, 20% of patients were still symptomatic, showing mainly fatigue (11%) and breathlessness (8%). Hospitalisation and ICU stay vs. non-hospitalised status increased the median duration of fatigue of 8 weeks. Age > 50 years (OR 2.50), ICU stay (OR 2.35), and presentation with 4 or more symptoms (OR 2.04) were independent predictors of persistence of symptoms at month 9. A total of 18% of patients did not return to optimal pre-COVID physical health, while 19% showed psychological distress at month 9. Hospital admission (OR 2.28) and persistence of symptoms at day 28 (OR 2.21) and month 9 (OR 5.16) were independent predictors of suboptimal physical health, while female gender (OR 5.27) and persistence of symptoms at day 28 (OR 2.42) and month 9 (OR 2.48) were risk factors for psychological distress.

Conclusions: Patients with advanced age, ICU stay and multiple symptoms at onset were more likely to suffer from long-term symptoms, which had a negative impact on both physical and mental wellbeing. This study contributes to identify the target populations and Long COVID consequences for planning long-term recovery interventions.

Source: Righi E, Mirandola M, Mazzaferri F, Dossi G, Razzaboni E, Zaffagnini A, Ivaldi F, Visentin A, Lambertenghi L, Arena C, Micheletto C, Gibellini D, Tacconelli E. Determinants of Persistence of Symptoms and Impact on Physical and Mental Wellbeing in Long COVID: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Infect. 2022 Feb 9:S0163-4453(22)00065-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.02.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35150765; PMCID: PMC8828388. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828388/ (Full text)