Category: Psychiatry/Psychology

Cortisol output in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: pilot study on the comparison with healthy adolescents and change after cognitive behavioural guided self-help treatment

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: This study examined cortisol in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) compared to healthy adolescents and changes in cortisol after cognitive behavioural guided self-help treatment. Exploratory analyses investigated the association between cortisol output and psychological variables.

METHODS: Salivary cortisol was measured upon awakening, at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min afterwards and at 12 noon, 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m., in adolescents with CFS and healthy controls (HC). Groups were matched for age, gender, menarche status, menstrual cycle and awakening time. Twenty-four adolescents with CFS provided saliva samples six months after treatment. The main outcome measure was total salivary output over the day, calculated by area under the curve (AUC). The salivary awakening response was also assessed.

RESULTS: Cortisol output over the day was significantly lower in the CFS group (n=46) than in healthy controls (n=33). Within the CFS group, lower daily cortisol output was associated with higher self-reported perfectionist striving and prosocial behaviour. There were no significant group differences in the awakening response (n=47 CFS versus n=34 HC). After treatment, adolescents with CFS (n=21) showed a significant increase in daily cortisol output, up to normal levels.

CONCLUSION: The reduced daily cortisol output in adolescents with CFS is in line with adult findings. Associations between reduced cortisol output and two psychological variables-perfectionism and prosocial behaviour-are consistent with cognitive behavioural models of chronic fatigue syndrome. The mild hypocortisolism is reversible; cortisol output had returned to healthy adolescent levels by six months after cognitive behavioural guided self-help treatment.

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Rimes KA, Papadopoulos AS, Cleare AJ, Chalder T. Cortisol output in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: pilot study on the comparison with healthy adolescents and change after cognitive behavioural guided self-help treatment. J Psychosom Res. 2014 Nov;77(5):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Sep 8.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260861

 

Prevalence and predictors of recovery from chronic fatigue syndrome in a routine clinical practice

Abstract:

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is one of the treatments of choice for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). However, the factors that predict recovery are unknown. The objective of this study was to ascertain the recovery rate among CFS patients receiving CBT in routine practice and to explore possible predictors of recovery.

Recovery was defined as no longer meeting Oxford or CDC criteria for CFS measured at 6 months follow-up. A composite score representing full recovery additionally included the perception of improvement, and normal population levels of fatigue and of physical functioning. Logistic regression was used to examine predictors of recovery.

Predictors included age, gender, cognitive and behavioural responses to symptoms, work and social adjustment, beliefs about emotions, perfectionism, anxiety and depression at baseline. At 6 months follow-up 37.5% of the patients no longer met either the Oxford or the CDC criteria for CFS while 18.3% were fully recovered.

Multivariate analyses showed that worse scores on the work and social adjustment scale, unhelpful beliefs about emotions, high levels of depression and older age were associated with reduced odds for recovery. Recovery rates in this routine practice were comparable to previous RCTs. There was a wide spectrum of significant predictors for recovery.

Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Flo E, Chalder T. Prevalence and predictors of recovery from chronic fatigue syndrome in a routine clinical practice. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Aug 26. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796714001429 (Full article)

 

Pilot study investigating the utility of a specialized online symptom management program for individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome as compared to an online meditation program

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a long-term, debilitating condition that impacts numerous areas of individuals’ lives. The two predominant treatment options for ME/CFS are cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy; however, many people have found these techniques unacceptable or even damaging. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the utility of a specialized online symptom management program for ME/CFS in comparison to an online meditation program in an effort to ascertain whether this tool could be a further option for those with ME/CFS.

METHODS: THIS EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN CONSISTED OF TWO INTERVENTIONS: a specialized online symptoms management program (N=19) and a control intervention based on an online meditation website (N=9). A battery of questionnaires, including measures of multidimensional fatigue, illness-specific symptoms, perceived control, and mindful awareness, were completed before the participants commenced use of the programs and following 8 weeks’ use.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the areas of chance and powerful others’ locus of control, and sleeping difficulties, but not in ME/CFS symptomatology overall.

CONCLUSION: The specialized online program described in this study warrants further investigation, as it appears to influence perceived control and key ME/CFS symptoms over time.

 

Source: Arroll MA, Attree EA, Marshall CL, Dancey CP. Pilot study investigating the utility of a specialized online symptom management program for individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome as compared to an online meditation program. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Sep 2;7:213-21. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S63193. ECollection 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4159366/ (Full article)

 

Living with the unexplained: coping, distress, and depression among women with chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia compared to an autoimmune disorder

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia are disabling conditions without objective diagnostic tests, clear-cut treatments, or established etiologies. Those with the disorders are viewed suspiciously, and claims of malingering are common, thus promoting further distress. It was hypothesized in the current study that levels of unsupportive social interactions and the coping styles used among those with CFS/fibromyalgia would be associated with perceived distress and depressive symptoms.

Women with CFS/fibromyalgia (n=39), in fact, reported higher depression scores, greater perceived distress and more frequent unsupportive relationships than healthy women (n=55), whereas those with a chronic, but medically accepted illness comprising an autoimmune disorder (lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis; n=28), displayed intermediate scores. High problem-focused coping was associated with low levels of depression and perceived distress in those with an autoimmune condition.

In contrast, although CFS/fibromyalgia was also accompanied by higher depression scores and higher perceived distress, this occurred irrespective of problem-focused coping. It is suggested that because the veracity of ambiguous illnesses is often questioned, this might represent a potent stressor in women with such illnesses, and even coping methods typically thought to be useful in other conditions, are not associated with diminished distress among those with CFS/fibromyalgia.

 

Source: McInnis OA, Matheson K, Anisman H. Living with the unexplained: coping, distress, and depression among women with chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia compared to an autoimmune disorder. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014;27(6):601-18. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.888060. Epub 2014 Mar 3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24479644

 

Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Symptom Severity: Stress Management Skills are Related to Lower Illness Burden

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The onset of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) typically involves reductions in activities of daily living and social interactions (jointly referred to as “illness burden”). Emotional distress has been linked to increased reported symptoms, and stress management skills have been related to lower fatigue severity in CFS patients. Symptom severity and illness burden are highly correlated. The ability to manage stress may attenuate this relationship, allowing individuals to feel less burdened by the illness independent of the severity of their symptoms.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate if perceived stress management skills affect illness burden via emotional distress, independent of ME/CFS symptom severity.

METHODS: A total of 117 adults with ME/CFS completed measures of perceived stress management skills, emotional distress, ME/CFS symptom severity and illness burden.

RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed that greater perceived stress management skills related to less social and fatigue-related illness burden, via lower emotional distress. This relationship existed independent of the association of symptom severity on illness burden, and was stronger among those not currently employed.

CONCLUSIONS: Ability to manage stress is associated with a lower illness burden for individuals with ME/CFS. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in lowering illness burden by targeting stress management skills.

 

Source: Lattie EG, Antoni MH, Fletcher MA, Czaja S, Perdomo D, Sala A, Nair S, Fu SH, Penedo FJ, Klimas N. Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) Symptom Severity: Stress Management Skills are Related to Lower Illness Burden. Fatigue. 2013;1(4). doi: 10.1080/21641846.2013.843255. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3837381/ (Full article)

 

Differences in physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: According to the Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) protocol for patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), therapists are advised to categorize patients in relatively active and passive patients. However, evidence to support the differences in physical functioning between these subgroups is limited. Using the baseline data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial (FatiGo), the differences in actual and perceived physical functioning between active and passive patients with CFS were evaluated.

METHODS: Sixty patients, who received CBT during the FatiGo trial were included. Based on the expert opinion and using the definitions of subgroups defined in the CBT protocols, the therapist categorized the patient. Data from an activity monitor was used to calculate actual physical functioning, physical activity, daily uptime, activity fluctuations and duration of rest during daily life. Perceived physical functioning was assessed by measuring physical activity, physical functioning and functional impairment with the Checklist Individual Strength, Short Form-36 and Sickness-Impact Profile 8.

RESULTS: Relatively active patients have a significantly higher daily uptime and show significantly less fluctuations in activities between days. Passive patients experience a significantly lower level of physical functioning and feel more functionally impaired in their mobility. However, no significant differences were found in the other actual or perceived physical functioning indices.

CONCLUSIONS: A clear difference in actual and perceived physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with CFS as judged by their therapists could not be found. Future research is needed to form a consensus on how to categorize subgroups of patients with CFS.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Vos-Vromans DC, Huijnen IP, Köke AJ, Seelen HA, Knottnerus JA, Smeets RJ. Differences in physical functioning between relatively active and passive patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2013 Sep;75(3):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23972414

 

Does neuropsychological test performance predict outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and what is the role of underperformance?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: A subgroup of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) has cognitive impairments, reflected by deviant neuropsychological test performance. However, abnormal test scores can also be caused by suboptimal effort. We hypothesized that worse neuropsychological test performance and underperformance were related to each other and to a smaller reduction in fatigue, functional impairments, physical limitations and higher dropout rates following cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for CFS.

METHODS: Data were drawn from a previous trial, in which CFS patients were randomized to two conditions; 1) guided self-instruction and additional CBT (n=84) or 2) waiting period followed by regular CBT for CFS (n=85). Underperformance was assessed using the Amsterdam Short Term Memory Test (<84). To test neuropsychological test performance, the Symbol Digit Modalities Task, a simple reaction time task and a choice reaction time task were used. Interaction effects were determined between underperformance and neuropsychological test performance on therapy outcomes.

RESULTS: Underperformance was associated to worse neuropsychological test performance, but there were no significant interaction effects of these two factors by therapy on fatigue severity, functional impairments and physical limitations, but there was a significant main effect of underperformance on functional impairments, physical limitations and dropout rates.

CONCLUSION: Underperformance or neuropsychological test performance was not related to the change in fatigue, functional impairments, and physical limitations following CBT for CFS. However, underperforming patients did drop out more often. Therapists should pay attention to beliefs and behavioral or environmental factors that might maintain underperformance and increase the risk of dropout.

© 2013

Comment in

Source: Goedendorp MM, van der Werf SP, Bleijenberg G, Tummers M, Knoop H. Does neuropsychological test performance predict outcome of cognitive behavior therapy for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and what is the role of underperformance? J Psychosom Res. 2013 Sep;75(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Jul 26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23972413

 

The process of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: which changes in perpetuating cognitions and behaviour are related to a reduction in fatigue?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) can significantly reduce fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), but little is known about the process of change taking place during CBT. Based on a recent treatment model (Wiborg et al. J Psych Res 2012), we examined how (changes in) cognitions and behaviour are related to the decrease in fatigue.

METHODS: We included 183 patients meeting the US Centers for Disease Control criteria for CFS, aged 18 to 65 years, starting CBT. We measured fatigue and possible process variables before treatment; after 6, 12 and 18 weeks; and after treatment. Possible process variables were sense of control over fatigue, focusing on symptoms, self-reported physical functioning, perceived physical activity and objective (actigraphic) physical activity. We built multiple regression models, explaining levels of fatigue during therapy by (changes in) proposed process variables.

RESULTS: We observed large individual variation in the patterns of change in fatigue and process variables during CBT for CFS. Increases in the sense of control over fatigue, perceived activity and self-reported physical functioning, and decreases in focusing on symptoms explained 20 to 46% of the variance in fatigue. An increase in objective activity was not a process variable.

CONCLUSION: A change in cognitive factors seems to be related to the decrease in fatigue during CBT for CFS. The pattern of change varies considerably between patients, but changes in process variables and fatigue occur mostly in the same period.

© 2013

 

Source: Heins MJ, Knoop H, Burk WJ, Bleijenberg G. The process of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: which changes in perpetuating cognitions and behaviour are related to a reduction in fatigue? J Psychosom Res. 2013 Sep;75(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.06.034. Epub 2013 Jul 19. http://www.jpsychores.com/article/S0022-3999(13)00266-3/fulltext (Full article)

 

Response to Derek Enlander

Sir,

Derek Enlander’s comments refer to Table 4 in our paper1 which describes the association of baseline characteristics with change in physical function at follow-up. It does not describe the outcome which can be found in Table 2. This shows an improvement in fatigue (−6.8; 95% CI −7.4 to −6.2; P < 0.001), physical function (4.4, 95% CI 3.0 to 5.8; P < 0.001), anxiety, depression and pain at follow-up.

In addition, as we state in the methods, the scores from the different inventories were re-scaled, so that a regression coefficient of 1 represents a 10% change in the score. Hence, the coefficient of −0.47 (95% CI −0.58 to −0.36) for the mean change in (re-scaled) SF-36 physical function per unit (re-scaled) Chalder Fatigue score at baseline, indicates that each 10% increment in baseline Chalder Fatigue (i.e. 3.3 points on the original 0 to 33 scale) is associated with a mean change of −4.7 points (95% CI −5.8 to −3.6 points) on the original 0 to 100 SF-36 scale at follow-up. Similarly, the coefficient of 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.87) for the mean change in (re-scaled) SF-36 physical function per unit (re-scaled) SF-36 score at baseline, indicates that each 10% increment in baseline physical function (i.e. 10 points on the original 0 to 100 SF-36 scale) is associated with a mean change of 8.1 points (95% CI 7.5 to 8.7 points) on the original 0 to 100 SF-36 scale at follow-up.

In summary, our paper shows that patients showed improvements in fatigue, physical disability, anxiety, depression and pain. Table 4 referred to by Derek Enlander show that worse fatigue and disability at assessment predict a worse outcome for disability at follow-up.

You can read the rest of this comment here: https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/107/3/247/1569245/Response-to-Derek-Enlander

Comment on

 

Source: Crawley E. Response to Derek Enlander. QJM. 2014 Mar;107(3):247. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hct171. Epub 2013 Aug 22. https://academic.oup.com/qjmed/article/107/3/247/1569245/Response-to-Derek-Enlander (Full article)

 

 

Pain in chronic fatigue syndrome: response to rehabilitative treatments in the PACE trial

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common symptom of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We investigated the effects of the treatments used in the PACE trial [cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), adaptive pacing therapy (APT) and specialist medical care (SMC)] on pain in CFS.

METHOD: We compared pain outcomes including individual painful symptoms, taken from the CDC criteria for CFS and co-morbid fibromyalgia. We modelled outcomes adjusting for baseline variables with multiple linear regression.

RESULTS: Significantly less frequent muscle pain was reported by patients following treatment with CBT compared to SMC (mean difference = 0.38 unit change in frequency, p = 0.02), GET versus SMC (0.42, p = 0.01) and GET versus APT (0.37, p = 0.01). Significantly less joint pain was reported following CBT versus APT (0.35, p = 0.02) and GET versus APT (0.36, p = 0.02). Co-morbid fibromyalgia was less frequent following GET versus SMC (0.03, p = 0.03). The effect sizes of these differences varied between 0.25 and 0.31 for muscle pain and 0.24 and 0.26 for joint pain. Treatment effects on pain were independent of ‘change in fatigue’.

CONCLUSIONS: CBT and GET were more effective in reducing the frequency of both muscle and joint pain than APT and SMC. When compared to SMC, GET also reduced the frequency of co-morbid fibromyalgia; the size of this effect on pain was small.

 

Source: Bourke JH, Johnson AL, Sharpe M, Chalder T, White PD. Pain in chronic fatigue syndrome: response to rehabilitative treatments in the PACE trial. Psychol Med. 2014 May;44(7):1545-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002201. Epub 2013 Aug 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967878