Abstract:
Category: Overlapping Illnesses
Long COVID: Plasma levels of neurofilament light chain in mild COVID-19 patients with neurocognitive symptoms
Abstract:
It is well known the potential of severe acute respiratory coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection to induce post-acute sequelae, a condition called Long COVID. This syndrome includes several symptoms, but the central nervous system (CNS) main one is neurocognitive dysfunction. Recently it has been demonstrated the relevance of plasma levels of neurofilament light chain (pNfL), as a biomarker of early involvement of the CNS in COVID-19.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pNfL in patients with post-acute neurocognitive symptoms and the potential of NfL as a prognostic biomarker in these cases. A group of 63 long COVID patients ranging from 18 to 59 years-old were evaluated, submitted to a neurocognitive battery assessment, and subdivided in different groups, according to results. Plasma samples were collected during the long COVID assessment and used for measurement of pNfL with the Single molecule array (SIMOA) assays. Levels of pNfL were significantly higher in long COVID patients with neurocognitive symptoms when compared to HC (p = 0.0031).
Long COVID patients with cognitive impairment and fatigue symptoms presented higher pNfL levels when compared to long COVID patients without these symptoms, individually and combined (p = 0.0263, p = 0.0480, and 0.0142, respectively). Correlation analysis showed that levels of cognitive lost and exacerbation of fatigue in the neurocognitive evaluation had a significative correlation with higher pNfL levels (p = 0.0219 and 0.0255, respectively). Previous reports suggested that pNfL levels are related with higher risk of severity and predict lethality of COVID-19.
Our findings demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to have a long-term impact on the brain, even in patients who presented mild acute disease. NfL measurements might be useful to identify CNS involvement in long COVID associated with neurocognitive symptoms and to identify who will need continuous monitoring and treatment support.
Source: Gutman E, Salvio A, Fernandes R, et al. Long COVID: Plasma levels of neurofilament light chain in mild COVID-19 patients with neurocognitive symptoms. Research Square; 2023. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2921879/v1. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2921879/v1 (Full text)
COVID-19 and Cognitive Function: Evidence for Increased Processing Speed Variability in COVID-19 Survivors and Multifaceted Impairment with LongCOVID Symptoms
Abstract:
Background: There is increasing evidence for cognitive function to be negatively impacted by COVID-19. There is, however, limited research evaluating cognitive function pre- and postCOVID-19 using objective measures.
Methods: We examined processing speed, attention, working memory, executive function and memory in adults (≤69 years) with a history of COVID-19 (n=129; assessed ≥20 days after diagnosis, none acutely unwell), compared to those with no known history of COVID-19 (n=93). We also examined cognitive changes in a sub-group of COVID (n=30) and non-COVID (n=33) participants, compared to their pre-COVID-19 pandemic level (data available through the MyCognition database).
Results: Cross-sectionally, the COVID group showed significantly larger intra-individual variability in processing speed, compared to the non-COVID group. The COVID sub-group also showed significantly larger intra-individual variability in processing speed, compared to their
pre-COVID level; no significant change occurred in non-COVID participants over the same time scale. Other cognitive indices were not significantly impacted in the cross-sectional or withinsubjects investigations, but participants (n=20) who had needed hospitalisation due to COVID19 showed poor attention and executive function relative to those who had not required hospitalisation (n=109). Poor health and long-COVID symptoms correlated with poor cognitive function across domains in the COVID group.
Conclusions: The findings indicate a limited cognitive impact of COVID-19 with only intraindividual variability in processing speed being significantly impacted in an adult UK sample. However, those who required hospitalisation due to COVID-19 severity and/or experience long-COVID symptoms display multifaceted cognitive impairment and may benefit from repeated cognitive assessments and remediation efforts.
Source: Vakani K, Ratto M, Sandford-James A, Antonova E, Kumari V. COVID-19 and Cognitive Function: Evidence for Increased Processing Speed Variability in COVID-19 Survivors and Multifaceted Impairment with Long-COVID Symptoms. Eur Psychiatry. 2023 May 12:1-34. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.25. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37170616. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/AE8EFA3BF7DC84334EEBC3039427801C/S0924933823000251a.pdf/covid-19-and-cognitive-function-evidence-for-increased-processing-speed-variability-in-covid-19-survivors-and-multifaceted-impairment-with-long-covid-symptoms.pdf (Full text available as PDF file)
Integrated Care Models for Long Coronavirus Disease
Key points:
- The wide range of persistent symptoms in long COVID requires a coordinated response from multiple medical specialties.
- Formalized models of care systems and multidisciplinary collaborations began in early 2021 as health care providers recognized the needs of the affected population.
- Multidisciplinary models largely exist in academic centers and larger cities; however, most care for PASC patients is provided by the primary care providers.
Introduction:
Deficient GABABergic and glutamatergic excitability in the motor cortex of patients with long-COVID and cognitive impairment
Abstract:
Objective: Attention, working memory and executive processing have been reported to be consistently impaired in Neuro-Long coronavirus disease (COVID). On the hypothesis of abnormal cortical excitability, we investigated the functional state of inhibitory and excitatory cortical regulatory circuits by single “paired-pulse” transcranial magnetic stimulation (ppTMS) and Short-latency Afferent Inhibition (SAI).
Methods: We compared clinical and neurophysiological data of 18 Long COVID patients complaining of persistent cognitive impairment with 16 Healthy control (HC) subjects. Cognitive status was evaluated by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a neuropsychological evaluation of the executive function domain; fatigue was scored by the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Resting motor threshold (RMT), the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP), Short Intra-cortical Inhibition (SICI), Intra-cortical Facilitation (ICF), Long-interval Intracortical Inhibition (LICI) and Short-afferent inhibition (SAI) were investigated over the motor (M1) cortex.
Results: MoCA corrected scores were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.023). The majority of the patients’ performed sub-optimally in the neuropsychological assessment of the executive functions. The majority (77.80%) of the patients reported high levels of perceived fatigue in the FSS. RMT, MEPs, SICI and SAI were not significantly different between the two groups. On the other hand, Long COVID patients showed a reduced amount of inhibition in LICI (p = 0.003) and a significant reduction in ICF (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Neuro-Long COVID patients performing sub-optimally in the executive functions showed a reduction of LICI related to GABAb inhibition and a reduction of ICF related to glutamatergic regulation. No alteration in cholinergic circuits was found.
Significance: These findings can help to better understand the neurophysiological characteristics of Neuro-Long COVID, and in particular, motor cortex regulation in people with “brain fog”.
Source: Manganotti P, Michelutti M, Furlanis G, Deodato M, Buoite Stella A. Deficient GABABergic and glutamatergic excitability in the motor cortex of patients with long-COVID and cognitive impairment. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 May 10;151:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.04.010. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37210757; PMCID: PMC10170904. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170904/ (Full text)
Thromboembolism in the Complications of Long COVID-19
Abstract:
SARS-CoV-2 is a +ssRNA helical coronavirus responsible for the global pandemic caused by coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). Classical clinical symptoms from primary COVID-19 when symptomatic include cough, fever, pneumonia or even ARDS; however, they are limited primarily to the respiratory system. Long-COVID-19 sequalae is responsible for many pathologies in almost every organ system and may be present in up to 30% of patients who have developed COVID-19.
Our review focuses on how long-COVID-19 (3 -24 weeks after primary symptoms) may lead to an increased risk for stroke and thromboembolism. Patients who were found to be primarily at risk for thrombotic events included critically ill and immunocompromised patients. Additional risk factors for thromboembolism and stroke included diabetes, hypertension, respiratory and cardiovascular disease, and obesity.
The etiology of how long-COVID-19 leads to a hypercoagulable state are yet to be definitively elucidated. However, anti-phospholipid antibodies and elevated D-dimer are present in many patients who develop thromboembolism. In addition, chronic upregulation and exhaustion of the immune system may lead to a pro-inflammatory and hypercoagulable state, increasing the likelihood for induction of thromboembolism or stroke. ‘
This article provides an up-to-date review on the proposed etiologies for thromboembolism and stroke in patients with long-COVID-19 and to assist health care providers in examining patients who may be at a higher risk for developing these pathologies.
Source: Leilani A Lopes, Devendra K Agrawal. Thromboembolism in the Complications of Long COVID-19. Cardiology and Cardiovascular
Medicine. 7 (2023): 123-128. https://fortunepublish.com/articles/10.26502.fccm.92920317.pdf (Full text)
Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom
Abstract:
Objectives: To estimate the risk of Long COVID by socioeconomic deprivation and to further examine the inequality by sex and occupation.
Design: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey between 26 April 2020 and 31 January 2022. This is the largest nationally representative survey of COVID-19 in the UK with longitudinal data on occupation, COVID-19 exposure and Long COVID.
Setting: Community-based survey in the UK.
Participants: A total of 201,799 participants aged 16 to 64 years and with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
Main outcome measures: The risk of Long COVID at least 4 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection by index of multiple deprivation (IMD) and the modifying effects of socioeconomic deprivation by sex and occupation.
Results: Nearly 10% (n = 19,315) of participants reported having Long COVID. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for a range of variables (demographic, co-morbidity and time), showed that participants in the most deprived decile had a higher risk of Long COVID (11.4% vs. 8.2%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34, 1.59) compared to the least deprived decile. Significantly higher inequalities (most vs. least deprived decile) in Long COVID existed in healthcare and patient-facing roles (aOR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.27, 2.44), in the education sector (aOR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.31, 2.16) and in women (aOR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.40, 1.73) than men (aOR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.51).
Conclusions: This study provides insights into the heterogeneous degree of inequality in Long COVID by deprivation, sex and occupation. These findings will help inform public health policies and interventions in incorporating a social justice and health inequality lens.
Source: Shabnam S, Razieh C, Dambha-Miller H, Yates T, Gillies C, Chudasama YV, Pareek M, Banerjee A, Kawachi I, Lacey B, Morris EJ, White M, Zaccardi F, Khunti K, Islam N. Socioeconomic inequalities of Long COVID: a retrospective population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. J R Soc Med. 2023 May 10:1410768231168377. doi: 10.1177/01410768231168377. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37164035. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01410768231168377 (Full text)
Factors associated with psychiatric outcomes and coping in Long COVID
Abstract:
The relationship between Long COVID (LC) and psychiatric outcomes, as well as factors associated with presence and absence of these, has so far been insufficiently studied. Here we evaluated psychiatric symptoms and coping among patients with LC and patients recovered from COVID-19 who participated in a large international survey. Given increased rates of psychiatric illness with chronic medical conditions and known immune-inflammatory contributors to psychiatric disease, we hypothesized that a subset, but not the entirety, of LC respondents may have comorbid psychopathology.
A substantial minority of both groups experienced suicidality, depression and anxiety symptoms, with these symptoms being more common in the LC group. LC respondents used more adaptive coping styles. Psychiatric outcomes in LC were associated with younger age, greater reductions in overall health, higher symptom severity, limitations to physical capability, lower income, financial hardship, psychiatric history, employment impact, male sex, men and non-binary gender, and negative experiences with medical professionals, family, friends, partners and employers.
Source: Re’em, Y., Stelson, E.A., Davis, H.E. et al. Factors associated with psychiatric outcomes and coping in Long COVID. Nat. Mental Health 1, 361–372 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00064-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-023-00064-6 (Full text)
Long-Term Effects of SARS-CoV-2 in the Brain: Clinical Consequences and Molecular Mechanisms
Abstract:
From Cell to Symptoms: The Role of SARS-CoV-2 Cytopathic Effects in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19 and Long COVID
Abstract: