The fragile process of Homecoming – Young women in recovery from severe ME/CFS

Abstract:

Purpose: To explore the recovery narratives of 13 young women who had fallen ill with severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME), also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), during childhood and adolescence, with the focus on what they had to say about their past experiences from the perspective of the present.

Method: A qualitative narrative approach, informed by a phenomenological theoretical perspective, was adopted to explore what the women found significant and meaningful in their recovery process. Data analysis of in-depth narrative interviews was performed which are presented to readers through the stories of two particular participants.

Results: The first story describes how one participant made a recovery by testing her body’s tolerance and working to create a more confident self. The second story describes a complex exploration of possibilities for action in recovery, along with a struggle to make sense of setbacks and hold on to what has been gained.

Conclusion: Recovering from ME/CFS emerges as an inter-personal, contextual, fragile and nonlinear process of homecoming, based on gradually rising bodily based self-knowledge. Illness slowly fades away into the background, and there is the prospect of a healthier tomorrow.

Source: Krabbe SH, Groven KS, Schrøder Bjorbækmo W, Sveen U, Mengshoel AM. The fragile process of Homecoming – Young women in recovery from severe ME/CFS. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2146244. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2146244. PMID: 36367977. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482631.2022.2146244 (Full text)

Cross-sectional analysis of clinical aspects in patients with long-COVID and post-COVID syndrome

Abstract:

Objective: Regarding pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, at-risk individuals, and diagnostic methods for stratifying patients for therapeutic approaches, our understanding of post-COVID syndrome is limited. Here, we set out to assess sociodemographic and clinical aspects in patients with the long-COVID and post-COVID syndrome.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of patients presenting at our specialized university hospital outpatient clinic. We assessed patients’ clinical presentation, fatigue, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and impairment of smell.

Results: A total of 101 patients were included (73.3% female), of whom 78.2% had a mild course of COVID-19. At presentation, 93.1% suffered from fatigue, 82.2% from impaired concentration, and 79.2% from impaired memory, 53.5% had impaired sleep. The most common secondary diagnosis found in our cohort was thyroid disease. Fatigue analysis showed that 81.3% of female and 58.8% of male patients had severe combined fatigue. Female gender was an independent risk factor for severe fatigue (severe cognitive fatigue OR = 8.045, p = 0.010; severe motor fatigue OR = 7.698, p = 0.013). Males suffered from more depressive symptoms, which correlated positively with the duration of symptom onset. 70.3% of patients with anamnestic smell impairment had hyposmia, and 18.9% were anosmic.

Interpretation: Most long-COVID patients suffered from severe fatigue, with the female sex as an independent risk factor. Fatigue was not associated with symptoms of depression or anxiety. Patients with long-COVID symptoms should receive an interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach depending on the clinical presentation.

Source: Schulze H, Charles James J, Trampe N, Richter D, Pakeerathan T, Siems N, Ayzenberg I, Gold R, Faissner S. Cross-sectional analysis of clinical aspects in patients with long-COVID and post-COVID syndrome. Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 14;13:979152. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.979152. PMID: 36313487; PMCID: PMC9614029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614029/ (Full text)

Post-COVID-19 syndrome symptoms after mild and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract:

Background: Post-COVID-19 Syndrome (PCS) is characterized by residual symptoms following the initial recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The prevalence of PCS is known to be the highest among severe and critical forms of the disease. However, the occurrence and risk factors for PCS after mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been extensively investigated.

Methods: Online and offline via both paper or mailed questionnaires distributed among Jordan collected between 1st and 21st August 2021, including a total number of 800 respondents, of whom 495 had previous mild to moderate COVID-19 infection. The Newcastle post-COVID syndrome Follow-up Screening Questionnaire was modified, translated, and used as a standard instrument for data collection regarding psychological, medical, and socio-economic symptoms post-infection. The primary outcome was the prevalence of PCS after mild to moderate COVID-19 in Jordan. Secondary outcome was the identification of PCS risk factors.

Results: The most common PCS symptom was mood disturbance followed by fatigue, anxiety, and myalgia. Female gender significantly increased the risk for multiple PCS symptoms. Age < 30 years was found to be an independent risk factor for myalgia (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: PCS is highly prevalent among COVID-19 survivors in Jordan, especially in females and patients with comorbidities. Planning physical and mental rehabilitation services is recommended for those patients with PCS symptoms after mild to moderate COVID-19 infection.

Source: Al-Husinat L, Nusir M, Al-Gharaibeh H, Alomari AA, Smadi MM, Battaglini D, Pelosi P. Post-COVID-19 syndrome symptoms after mild and moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 3;9:1017257. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1017257. PMID: 36262270; PMCID: PMC9573938.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573938/ (Full text)

Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults

Abstract:

Importance: Persistence of COVID-19 symptoms beyond 2 months, or long COVID, is increasingly recognized as a common sequela of acute infection.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of and sociodemographic factors associated with long COVID and to identify whether the predominant variant at the time of infection and prior vaccination status are associated with differential risk.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study comprised 8 waves of a nonprobability internet survey conducted between February 5, 2021, and July 6, 2022, among individuals aged 18 years or older, inclusive of all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Main outcomes and measures: Long COVID, defined as reporting continued COVID-19 symptoms beyond 2 months after the initial month of symptoms, among individuals with self-reported positive results of a polymerase chain reaction test or antigen test.

Results: The 16 091 survey respondents reporting test-confirmed COVID-19 illness at least 2 months prior had a mean age of 40.5 (15.2) years; 10 075 (62.6%) were women, and 6016 (37.4%) were men; 817 (5.1%) were Asian, 1826 (11.3%) were Black, 1546 (9.6%) were Hispanic, and 11 425 (71.0%) were White. From this cohort, 2359 individuals (14.7%) reported continued COVID-19 symptoms more than 2 months after acute illness. Reweighted to reflect national sociodemographic distributions, these individuals represented 13.9% of those who had tested positive for COVID-19, or 1.7% of US adults. In logistic regression models, older age per decade above 40 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.12-1.19) and female gender (adjusted OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.73-2.13) were associated with greater risk of persistence of long COVID; individuals with a graduate education vs high school or less (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79) and urban vs rural residence (adjusted OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86) were less likely to report persistence of long COVID. Compared with ancestral COVID-19, infection during periods when the Epsilon variant (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) or the Omicron variant (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92) predominated in the US was associated with diminished likelihood of long COVID. Completion of the primary vaccine series prior to acute illness was associated with diminished risk for long COVID (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86).

Conclusions and relevance: This study suggests that long COVID is prevalent and associated with female gender and older age, while risk may be diminished by completion of primary vaccination series prior to infection.

Source: Perlis RH, Santillana M, Ognyanova K, Safarpour A, Lunz Trujillo K, Simonson MD, Green J, Quintana A, Druckman J, Baum MA, Lazer D. Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38804. PMID: 36301542.  https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2797782 (Full text)

Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study

Abstract:

With increasing numbers infected by SARS-CoV-2, understanding long-COVID is essential to inform health and social care support. A Scottish population cohort of 33,281 laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 62,957 never-infected individuals were followed-up via 6, 12 and 18-month questionnaires and linkage to hospitalization and death records. Of the 31,486 symptomatic infections,1,856 (6%) had not recovered and 13,350 (42%) only partially. No recovery was associated with hospitalized infection, age, female sex, deprivation, respiratory disease, depression and multimorbidity.

Previous symptomatic infection was associated with poorer quality of life, impairment across all daily activities and 24 persistent symptoms including breathlessness (OR 3.43, 95% CI 3.29-3.58), palpitations (OR 2.51, OR 2.36-2.66), chest pain (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.96-2.23), and confusion (OR 2.92, 95% CI 2.78-3.07). Asymptomatic infection was not associated with adverse outcomes. Vaccination was associated with reduced risk of seven symptoms. Here we describe the nature of long-COVID and the factors associated with it.

Source: Hastie CE, Lowe DJ, McAuley A, Winter AJ, Mills NL, Black C, Scott JT, O’Donnell CA, Blane DN, Browne S, Ibbotson TR, Pell JP. Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study. Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 12;13(1):5663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33415-5. PMID: 36224173; PMCID: PMC9556711. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-33415-5 (Full text)

Elevated vascular transformation blood biomarkers in Long-COVID indicate angiogenesis as a key pathophysiological mechanism

Abstract:

Background: Long-COVID is characterized by prolonged, diffuse symptoms months after acute COVID-19. Accurate diagnosis and targeted therapies for Long-COVID are lacking. We investigated vascular transformation biomarkers in Long-COVID patients.

Methods: A case–control study utilizing Long-COVID patients, one to six months (median 98.5 days) post-infection, with multiplex immunoassay measurement of sixteen blood biomarkers of vascular transformation, including ANG-1, P-SEL, MMP-1, VE-Cad, Syn-1, Endoglin, PECAM-1, VEGF-A, ICAM-1, VLA-4, E-SEL, thrombomodulin, VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, VCAM-1 and VEGF-D.

Results: Fourteen vasculature transformation blood biomarkers were significantly elevated in Long-COVID outpatients, versus acutely ill COVID-19 inpatients and healthy controls subjects (P < 0.05). A unique two biomarker profile consisting of ANG-1/P-SEL was developed with machine learning, providing a classification accuracy for Long-COVID status of 96%. Individually, ANG-1 and P-SEL had excellent sensitivity and specificity for Long-COVID status (AUC = 1.00, P < 0.0001; validated in a secondary cohort). Specific to Long-COVID, ANG-1 levels were associated with female sex and a lack of disease interventions at follow-up (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Long-COVID patients suffer prolonged, diffuse symptoms and poorer health. Vascular transformation blood biomarkers were significantly elevated in Long-COVID, with angiogenesis markers (ANG-1/P-SEL) providing classification accuracy of 96%. Vascular transformation blood biomarkers hold potential for diagnostics, and modulators of angiogenesis may have therapeutic efficacy.

Source: Patel, M.A., Knauer, M.J., Nicholson, M. et al. Elevated vascular transformation blood biomarkers in Long-COVID indicate angiogenesis as a key pathophysiological mechanism. Mol Med 28, 122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-022-00548-8 https://molmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s10020-022-00548-8 (Full text)

Research priorities for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): the results of a James Lind alliance priority setting exercise

Objective: To identify research priorities of people with myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and those who support and care for them.

Method: Using the James Lind Alliance’s protocols, online surveys and workshops were held. The first survey asked participants from the U.K. to submit research questions about ME/CFS which were important to them. In the second, participants prioritised frequently submitted questions from the 1st survey. These were short listed and then workshop discussions were held to reach consensus on the top ten research priorities.

Results: 1565 participated in the 1st survey and 5300 research priorities were submitted. 1752 participated in the 2nd. In both surveys, the predominant demographic was white, middle-aged women with ME/CFS. 15–17% were family/carers of people with ME/CFS and 4–6% were health and social care workers. From the 1st survey, 59 summary questions were identified. These were prioritised and short listed to 18 questions. Of these, the top 10 covered 1. Post-exertional malaise, 2. Use of existing drugs for other conditions, 3. Diagnosis, 4. Autoimmunity, 5. Sub-types, 6. Post-infective cause, 7. Neurological symptomology, 8. Genetics, 9. Severe ME/CFS, 10. Mitochronical dysfunction and 10 (equal) Oxygenation dysfunction.

Conclusion: People with ME/CFS, their families and carers, and health care professionals worked together to identify, for the first time, the research priorities for ME/CFS. These focus on the biomedical causes of ME/CFS and how to diagnose, treat and manage it. Researchers and funding bodies should consider these in their plans for future research.

SourceSarah Tyson, Kristina Stanley, Toto Anne Gronlund, Sian Leary, Mike Emmans Dean, Claire Dransfield, Helen Baxter, Rachel Elliot, Rachel Ephgrave, Monica Bolton, Annette Barclay, Gemma Hoyes, Ben Marsh, Russell Fleming, Joan Crawford, Ann West, Opal Webster-Phillips, Cristina Betts, Susan O’Shea, Vinod Patel & Sonya Chowdhury (2022) Research priorities for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): the results of a James Lind alliance priority setting exercise, Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2022.2124775 (Full text)

Post-COVID myalgic encephalomyelitis in chronic heart disease patient: A case series

Abstract

Purpose of Study: Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), also called chronic fatigue syndrome, is a condition characterized by severe fatigue that impairs a patient’s ability to perform common daily activities.

Criteria for ME include 6 months of fatigue-limited daily activities, unrefreshing sleep, and symptom exacerbation following physical or mental strain, and orthostatic intolerance.

New reports indicate that ME incidence may be higher in specific patient populations. This study was designed to investigate the association between ME and Cardiovascular disease in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Methods: Used The patient population used for this study includes 19 patients that were referred to the Amarillo Heart Group in Amarillo, TX who also tested positive for Covid-19 at least 6 months prior to September 1, 2021.

The patients that fit this timeline were asked a series of standardized questions and rate the severity of their symptoms on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the absence of symptoms and 5 being the most severe. Two sets of questions were created and named Life Spheres Criteria (4 questions) and Symptoms Criteria (3 questions) based on the 2015 IOM Diagnostic Criteria for CFS. Rating more than 1 Life Spheres question as a 3 or higher or rating all 3 Symptoms Criteria questions as a 3 or higher indicated Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Information from the survey, including time since infection, demographics, and question scores, were analyzed.

Summary of Results: Our study included 10 women and 10 men, with the average amount of time since Covid-19 infection being 328.17 ± 41.36 days. Worsening of symptoms with mild exertion was the most commonly endorsed criteria (3.58 ± 1.64) and the least common criterion was fatigue reducing activity in school (2.00 ± 1.94).

Women scored higher in every category except reduced activity in school when compared to men. However, there was no significant difference in symptom scores between the two groups with the Combined Fatigue Score being 2.89 ± 1.47 for women and 2.67 ± 1.59 for men.

Nearly all symptom scores significantly positively correlated with one another, meaning if one category was high it was likely for other categories to be high as well.

Ultimately, when looking at the Cumulative Pearson Correlation Scores, reduced social life, difficulty concentrating, and symptoms worsening with mild exertion were found to be most predictive of a high Combined Fatigue Score.

Conclusions: In this case series, over 80% of patients met the criteria for Post-COVID Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. While the link between ME and both COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease has been established, little is known about the severity of ME in patients who have a history of both cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 infection.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine ME in patients with both of these predisposing conditions. A high degree of clinical suspicion for ME should be used when screening and treating cardiac patients who have been infected with COVID-19.

Source: Holder, K. G.; Vemulapalli, V.; Daines, B.; Kankam, A.; Galvan, B.; Nambiar, R. Post-COVID myalgic encephalomyelitis in chronic heart disease patient: A case series. Journal of Investigative Medicine ; 70(2):475, 2022. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-1705710

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: A mixed-methods systematic review

Abstract:

Background Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a fluctuating complex condition. More common in women than men, it tends to develop between mid-20s and mid-40s, including the main childbearing age (15–45 years). There are currently no systematic reviews summarising evidence relating to ME/CFS and pregnancy. The lack of quality assessed, and systematic summary evidence makes it harder for people with ME/CFS to make informed decisions about pregnancy, and harder for health care professionals to offer evidence-based care. This mixed methods systematic review aims to examine and summarise existing evidence relating to ME/CFS and pregnancy, both in relation to pregnancy outcomes and experiences of pregnancy but also the effect of pregnancy on ME/CFS severity and symptoms.

Methods This review followed a convergent segregated design. Seven electronic databases, relevant grey literature, reference lists of relevant reviews, and reference lists and citations of all included studies, were searched. Where necessary, authors were contacted for additional information. Studies of any design published in English, reporting on ME/CFS and pregnancy/postpartum (up to two years), risk of pregnancy outcomes with ME/CFS, or experiences during pregnancy for mother, partner or health and social care professionals following pregnancy with ME/CFS were included. Three researchers performed screening, data extraction and quality assessments independently. Qualitative and quantitative literature was analysed separately using thematic and descriptive syntheses, respectively (meta-analysis was not appropriate). Findings were integrated through configuration.

Results Searches identified n=2,789 studies, n=10 met our inclusion criteria. There were five quantitative studies, two qualitative studies and three pieces of grey literature. Preliminary results suggest that evidence is conflicting. In the qualitative literature, one study suggested one participant thought pregnancy improved ME/CFS symptoms while the other noted a participant commented that ME/CFS may have adversely affected her pregnancy. Of the four quantitative studies that reported on ME severity during pregnancy, two suggested pregnancy negatively impacted on ME/CFS, one study found most women had no change in ME/CFS symptoms during pregnancy, and one found ME/CFS improved during pregnancy. Only one study reported on pregnancy outcomes, finding a higher rate of spontaneous abortions, and increased developmental and learning delays in infants born to mothers with ME/CFS.

Conclusion Current evidence on ME/CFS in pregnancy is limited, and findings are inconsistent. Studies are limited by small sample size and currently, there is no UK evidence. More high-quality research into ME/CFS and pregnancy is urgently needed to support the development of evidence-based guidelines on ME/CFS and pregnancy.

Source: Pearce M, Slack E, Pears K, et alOP72 Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and pregnancy: a mixed-methods systematic reviewJ Epidemiol Community Health 2022;76:A35. https://jech.bmj.com/content/76/Suppl_1/A35.1

Long-COVID Clinical Features and Risk Factors: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients from the STOP-COVID Registry of the PoLoCOV Study

Abstract:

Despite recovering from the acute phase of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), many patients report continuing symptoms that most commonly include fatigue, cough, neurologic problems, hair loss, headache, and musculoskeletal pain, a condition termed long-COVID syndrome. Neither its etiopathogenesis, nor its clinical presentation or risk factors are fully understood. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the most common symptoms of long-COVID among patients from the STOP COVID registry of the PoLoCOV study, and to search for risk factors for development of the syndrome.

The registry includes patients who presented to the medical center for persistent clinical symptoms following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The analysis included data from initial presentation and at three-month follow-up. Of the 2218 patients, 1569 (70.7%) reported having at least one symptom classified as long-COVID syndrome three months after recovery from the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most common symptoms included chronic fatigue (35.6%\), cough (23.0%), and a set of neurological symptoms referred to as brain fog (12.1%).

Risk factors for developing long-COVID syndrome included female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 1.48, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.19-1.84]), severe COVID-19 (OR: 1.56, CI: 1.00-2.42), dyspnea (OR: 1.31, CI: 1.02-1.69), and chest pain (OR: 1.48, CI: 1.14-1.92). Long-COVID syndrome represents a significant clinical and social problem. The most common clinical manifestations are chronic fatigue, cough, and brain fog. Given the still-limited knowledge of long-COVID syndrome, further research and observation are needed to better understand the mechanisms and risk factors of the disease.

Source: Chudzik M, Babicki M, Kapusta J, Kałuzińska-Kołat Ż, Kołat D, Jankowski P, Mastalerz-Migas A. Long-COVID Clinical Features and Risk Factors: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients from the STOP-COVID Registry of the PoLoCOV Study. Viruses. 2022 Aug 11;14(8):1755. doi: 10.3390/v14081755. PMID: 36016376; PMCID: PMC9415629. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/8/1755/htm (Full text)