Vascular inflammation in neuropsychiatric long COVID

Highlights:

  • Long COVID is characterized by endothelial dysfunction with dysregulated inflammatory and coagulation pathways.
  • Endothelial biomarkers are elevated in Long COVID vs acute COVID-19, supporting a distinct vascular process.
  • Vascular biomarkers correlate with key cognitive and neuropsychiatric measures (fluency, memory, depression, and anxiety).
  • Vascular inflammation is a targetable mechanism in Long COVID, informing patient stratification and therapeutic trials.
  • Results highlight need to define the short- and long-term impact of vascular inflammation on brain health after COVID-19.

Abstract

The role of vascular inflammation in neuropsychiatric Long COVID (LC) is suspected but not well understood. This study evaluated whether vascular inflammation is present in individuals with neuropsychiatric LC and how it relates to cognitive and mental health symptoms.

This cross-sectional, case-control study included individuals with acute COVID-19 (AC), neuropsychiatric LC, and recovered controls. Participants were enrolled from the COVID Mind Study and the Yale IMPACT Study (hospitalized), and an independent cohort from the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Long COVID Study. Fifty individuals with neuropsychiatric LC (new symptoms a median of 368 days post-COVID), 28 with AC, and 29 recovered controls (>3 months post-COVID) were evaluated. All underwent blood sampling and neuropsychiatric testing. The JHU cohort included 114 individuals with late LC (median 1065 days post-COVID illness associated with LC onset) and 31 recovered controls (median 852 days).

Fourteen plasma biomarkers of vascular inflammation were measured. ANCOVA was used to compare groups, adjusting for comorbidities. Non-hospitalized participants completed the Global Neuropsychological Assessment, GAD-7, and PHQ-9. LC and recovered groups were demographically similar, while AC participants had higher obesity and hypertension rates. LC participants had elevated circulating biomarkers of endothelial, leukocyte, and platelet adhesion (sL-selectin, ADAMTS13, sP-selectin, sICAM-1) compared to recovered controls.

Coagulation markers (D-dimer, fibrinogen) did not differ. Most biomarkers were highest in AC and lower in LC; however, fetuin, sL-selectin, and α-2 macroglobulin were higher in LC than AC. In LC, higher sP-selectin correlated with lower fluency and verbal learning. Lower α1-acid glycoprotein levels were strongly associated with poorer verbal memory, verbal learning, fluency, depression, and anxiety. In the JHU cohort, late LC and recovered controls showed no differences in biomarkers or demographics, suggesting normalization over time. Persistent dysregulation at the intersection of inflammation, platelet adhesion, and endothelial dysfunction is strongly linked to neuropsychiatric Long COVID.

Elevated markers of endothelial adhesion in LC suggest distinct pathophysiology from AC. These biomarkers correlate with lower fluency and verbal learning, linking vascular dysfunction to brain function. This study underscores the critical need for longitudinal, within-person investigations to elucidate how vascular inflammation evolves over time.

Source: McAlpine LS, Shorer EF, Chiarella J, Nelson A, Veenhuis R, Azola A, Lee A, Pierce R, Farhadian S, Rubin LH, Spudich SS; Yale COVID Mind; IMPACT Study Groups. Vascular inflammation in neuropsychiatric long COVID. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2026 Apr 28;54:101247. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2026.101247. PMID: 42099668; PMCID: PMC13147379. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13147379/ (Full text)

Attention and verbal learning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Former neuropsychological studies with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) patients evaluated a broad range of cognitive functions. Several, but not all, reported subtle attentional and memory impairments suggesting possible mild cerebral involvement.

In this study, a battery of attentional tests and a verbal memory task were administered to 20 CFS patients and 22 healthy controls (HC) in order to clarify the specific nature of attention and memory impairment in these patients. The results provide evidence for attentional dysfunction in patients with CFS as compared to HC.

CFS patients performed more poorly on a span test measuring attentional capacity and working memory. Speeded attentional tasks with a more complex element of memory scanning and divided attention seem to be a sensitive measure of reduced attentional capacity in these patients.

Focused attention, defined as the ability to attend to a single stimulus while ignoring irrelevant stimuli, appears not to be impaired. CFS patients were poorer on recall of verbal information across learning trials, and poor performance on delayed recall may be due to poor initial learning and not only to a retrieval failure.

 

Source: Michiels V, Cluydts R, Fischler B. Attention and verbal learning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998 Sep;4(5):456-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9745235