Feasibility, Adherence, Acceptance and Usability of a Multimodal Telemonitoring for Pediatric Post-COVID Syndrome: A Bicentric Pilot Study

Abstract:

Existing healthcare infrastructure struggles to meet the complex care required for pediatric Post-COVID Syndrome (pPCS). Telemonitoring offers potential to enhance care access, reduce patient burden, and ensure continuity. This study introduces and evaluates a novel, multimodal telemonitoring concept for pPCS with high translational potential for broader pediatric chronic and post-infectious conditions. Telemonitoring included a patient app, digital sensors (spirometer, smartwatch), Patient Reported Outcome Measures, chat/video consultations (VC), and a medical telemonitoring platform.

Patients aged 12-17 years with diagnosed PCS were recruited from two pPCS outpatient university clinics in Bielefeld and Munich, Germany. Monitoring lasted three months. Evaluation focused on feasibility, adherence, acceptance, and usability, using monitoring data, the System Usability Scale (SUS), Technology Usage Inventory (TUI), and a custom survey completed by patients and parents. 30 patients (mean age: 15y ± 1.9; 57% female (17/30); mean Baseline Bell-Score: 36.4) and 30 parents participated.

Adherence was high, with an average of 3.4 (smartwatch) to 4.6 (spirometry) measurements/week. Questionnaire response rate was 86% (411/480) and 97% (58/60) of VCs were conducted. SUS scores indicated very high usability (patients: 81.25/100; parents: 75.42/100). TUI results showed low skepticism, and high interest. Telemonitoring supported symptom management independent of in-person visits, despite sensor connectivity issues.

This is the first study to demonstrate successful integration of telemonitoring in pPCS, with high adherence and positive feedback from all stakeholders supporting its potential. Despite occasional technical challenges and resource needs, this concept shows promise for broader hybrid telemonitoring care implementation in PCS and other post-infectious syndromes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), trial registration number: DRKS00029354. Registered 07 February 2023 – Retrospectively registered https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00029354/entails.

Source: Oftring ZS, Schmidt J, Greenfield J, Hägele M, Farzaneh A, Hamelmann E, Behrends U, Kuhn S. Feasibility, Adherence, Acceptance and Usability of a Multimodal Telemonitoring for Pediatric Post-COVID Syndrome: A Bicentric Pilot Study. J Med Syst. 2026 May 9;50(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s10916-026-02409-x. PMID: 42105038. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10916-026-02409-x (Full text)

Telehealth as a care solution for homebound people: systematic review and meta-analysis of healthcare utilization, quality of life, and well-being outcomes

Abstract:

Homebound individuals residing in community settings with severe health conditions and disabilities could arguably benefit from telehealth interventions. However, the effectiveness of telehealth compared to in-person care remains underexplored, considering the diversity of these groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth in reducing healthcare utilization and improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and well-being in homebound populations.

Adhering and expanding on a published protocol, we conducted comprehensive search across multiple databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, LILACS, and the Web of Science, with no restrictions on language or publication date, and experimental and quasiexperimental studies considered. Eleven independent reviewers were responsible for study selection, and three for data extraction. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using JBI checklists. A meta-analysis was then performed using Stata software, which reported standardized mean differences (SMDs) as the effect measure, with the quality of evidence evaluated using the GRADE approach. From an initial screening of 3289 articles, ten studies met our inclusion criteria, with eight suitable for meta-analysis. These studies encompassed data from 2245 participants.

Our findings revealed that telehealth interventions significantly reduced healthcare utilization (SMD: −0.49; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.22; p < 0.01, GRADE: low certainty), significantly enhanced HRQOL (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.35; p = 0.04, GRADE: moderate certainty), and significantly improved well-being (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.47 to −0.15; p < 0.01, GRADE: moderate certainty) compared to in-person care. Thus, telehealth emerges as a viable alternative to conventional care, significantly reducing healthcare utilization and enhancing both HRQOL and well-being for homebound people.

These findings underscore the potential of telehealth to mitigate healthcare disparities and emphasize the need for accessible, equitable telehealth services codeveloped with end users and relevant stakeholders to save resources and maximize health outcomes for vulnerable populations in community settings.

Source: Pinero de Plaza, Maria AlejandraGulyani, AartiBulto, Lemma N.Allande-Cussó, ReginaPearson, VincentLange, BelindaMarin, TaniaGebremichael, LemlemBrown, ShannonDafny, HilaSajeev, SheldaBulamu, NormaBeleigoli, AllineNesbitt, KatieMcMillan, PenelopeClark, RobynTieu, MatthewKitson, AlisonChampion, StephanieHines, SoniaHendriks, Jeroen M.Telehealth as a Care Solution for Homebound People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Healthcare Utilization, Quality of Life, and Well-Being OutcomesHealth & Social Care in the Community2025, 7224151, 32 pages, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1155/hsc/7224151 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/hsc/7224151 (Full text)