Patients with ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain report similar level of sickness behavior as individuals injected with bacterial endotoxin at peak inflammation

Abstract:

Background: Chronic sickness behavior is implicated in ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain but the level of subjective sickness behavior in these conditions has not been investigated or compared to other clinical and non-clinical samples, or to the level in experimental inflammation. Furthermore, the relationship between sickness behavior and self-rated health and functioning is not known in patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain. The aim of the present study was to investigate how sickness behavior in patients with chronic conditions differs from that in individuals with experimental acute sickness, primary care patients, the general population and healthy subjects. In addition, we wanted to explore how sickness behavior is related to self-rated health and health-related functioning.

Methods: Sickness behavior was quantified using the sickness questionnaire (SicknessQ). Self-ratings were collected at one time-point in 6 different samples. Levels of sickness behavior in patients with ME/CFS (n ​= ​38) and patients with chronic pain (n ​= ​190) were compared to healthy subjects with lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-induced inflammation (n ​= ​29), primary care patients (n ​= ​163), individuals from the general population (n ​= ​155) and healthy subjects (n ​= ​48), using linear regression. Correlations and moderated regression analyses were used to investigate associations between sickness behavior and self-rated health and health-related functioning in ME/CFS, chronic pain and the general population.

Results: LPS-injected individuals (M ​= ​16.3), patients with ME/CFS (M ​= ​16.1), chronic pain (M ​= ​16.1) and primary care patients (M ​= ​10.7) reported significantly higher SicknessQ scores than individuals from the general population (M ​= ​5.4) and healthy subjects (M ​= ​3.6) all p‘s ​< ​0.001). In turn, LPS-injected individuals, patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain reported significantly higher SicknessQ scores than primary care patients (p’s ​< ​0.01). Higher levels of sickness behavior were associated with poorer self-rated health and health-related functioning (p’s ​< ​0.01), but less so in patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain than in individuals from the general population.

Conclusions: Patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain report similar high levels of sickness behavior; higher than primary care patients, and comparable to levels in experimental inflammation. Further study of sickness behavior in ME/CFS and chronic pain populations is warranted as immune-to-brain interactions and sickness behavior may be of importance for functioning as well as in core pathophysiological processes in subsets of patients.

Source: Jonsjö MA, Åström J, Jones MP, Karshikoff B, Lodin K, Holmström L, Agréus L, Wicksell RK, Axelsson J, Lekander M, Olsson GL, Kemani M, Andreasson A. Patients with ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain report similar level of sickness behavior as individuals injected with bacterial endotoxin at peak inflammation. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2019 Dec 17;2:100028. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2019.100028. PMID: 38377418; PMCID: PMC8474484. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8474484/ (Full text)

Patients with ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain report similar level of sickness behavior as individuals injected with bacterial endotoxin at peak inflammation

Abstract:

Background: Chronic sickness behavior is implicated in ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain but the level of subjective sickness behavior in these conditions has not been investigated or compared to other clinical and non-clinical samples, or to the level in experimental inflammation. Furthermore, the relationship between sickness behavior and self-rated health and functioning is not known in patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain. The aim of the present study was to investigate how sickness behavior in patients with chronic conditions differs from that in individuals with experimental acute sickness, primary care patients, the general population and healthy subjects. In addition, we wanted to explore how sickness behavior is related to self-rated health and health-related functioning.

Methods: Sickness behavior was quantified using the sickness questionnaire (SicknessQ). Self-ratings were collected at one time-point in 6 different samples. Levels of sickness behavior in patients with ME/CFS (n=38) and patients with chronic pain (n=190) were compared to healthy subjects with lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-induced inflammation (n=29), primary care patients (n=163), individuals from the general population (n=155) and healthy subjects (n=48), using linear regression. Correlations and moderated regression analyses were used to investigate associations between sickness behavior and self-rated health and health-related functioning in ME/CFS, chronic pain and the general population.

Results: LPS-injected individuals (M=16.3), patients with ME/CFS (M=16.1), chronic pain (M=16.1) and primary care patients (M=10.7) reported significantly higher SicknessQ scores than individuals from the general population (M=5.4) and healthy subjects (M=3.6) all p’s<0.001). In turn, LPS-injected individuals, patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain reported significantly higher SicknessQ scores than primary care patients (p’s<0.01). Higher levels of sickness behavior were associated with poorer self-rated health and health-related functioning (p’s<0.01), but less so in patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain than in individuals from the general population.

Conclusions: Patients with ME/CFS and chronic pain report similar high levels of sickness behavior; higher than primary care patients, and comparable to levels in experimental inflammation. Further study of sickness behavior in ME/CFS and chronic pain populations is warranted as immune-to-brain interactions and sickness behavior may be of importance for functioning as well as in core pathophysiological processes in subsets of patients.

Source: Martin A.Jonsjö, JennyÅström, Michael P.Jones, Bianka Karshikoff, Karin Lodin, Linda Holmström, Lars Agréus, Rikard K.Wicksell, John Axelsson, Mats Lekander, Gunnar L.Olsson, Mike Kemani, Anna Andreasson. Patients with ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) and chronic pain report similar level of sickness behavior as individuals injected with bacterial endotoxin at peak inflammation. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity – Health. Available online 17 December 2019, 100028. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666354619300298  (Full study)

A narrative review on the similarities and dissimilarities between myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and sickness behavior

Abstract:

It is of importance whether myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a variant of sickness behavior. The latter is induced by acute infections/injury being principally mediated through proinflammatory cytokines. Sickness is a beneficial behavioral response that serves to enhance recovery, conserves energy and plays a role in the resolution of inflammation.

There are behavioral/symptomatic similarities (for example, fatigue, malaise, hyperalgesia) and dissimilarities (gastrointestinal symptoms, anorexia and weight loss) between sickness and ME/CFS. While sickness is an adaptive response induced by proinflammatory cytokines, ME/CFS is a chronic, disabling disorder, where the pathophysiology is related to activation of immunoinflammatory and oxidative pathways and autoimmune responses.

While sickness behavior is a state of energy conservation, which plays a role in combating pathogens, ME/CFS is a chronic disease underpinned by a state of energy depletion. While sickness is an acute response to infection/injury, the trigger factors in ME/CFS are less well defined and encompass acute and chronic infections, as well as inflammatory or autoimmune diseases. It is concluded that sickness behavior and ME/CFS are two different conditions.

 

Source: Morris G, Anderson G, Galecki P, Berk M, Maes M. A narrative review on the similarities and dissimilarities between myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and sickness behavior. BMC Med. 2013 Mar 8;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751187/ (Full article)

 

Inflammatory fatigue and sickness behaviour – lessons for the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Persistent and severe fatigue is a common part of the presentation of a diverse range of disease processes. There is a growing body of evidence indicating a common inflammatory pathophysiology underlying many conditions where fatigue is a primary patient concern, including chronic fatigue syndrome. This review explores current models of how inflammatory mediators act on the central nervous system to produce fatigue and sickness behaviour, and the commonality of these processes in conditions as diverse as surgical trauma, infection, various cancers, inflammatory bowel disease, connective tissue diseases and autoimmune diseases. We also discuss evidence indicating chronic fatigue syndrome may have important pathophysiological similarities with cytokine mediated sickness behaviour, and what lessons can be applied from sickness behaviour to chronic fatigue syndrome with regards to the diagnosis and management.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Arnett SV, Clark IA. Inflammatory fatigue and sickness behaviour – lessons for the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 10;141(2-3):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22578888

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a psychoneuroimmunological perspective

Abstract:

This article casts light on the contribution that psychoneuroimmunology can make in the search for the cause of chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs). Several studies suggest that psychosocial and physical stress may play an important predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating role in cfs. Moving on from these studies we now discuss recent research into the stress-related pathophysiological mechanisms of the illness. Although there is evidence for a hypofunctional stress response, a hyperactive immune response and disturbances in the interaction between both, the findings are not consistent. Longitudinal studies are needed to unravel the pathophysiology of cfs still further. In such studies the concept of ‘sickness response’ and ‘sickness behaviour’ may perform an important heuristic function.

 

Source: van Houdenhove B, Heijnen CJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a psychoneuroimmunological perspective. Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2009;51(8):603-10. [Article in Dutch] http://www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/en/issues/413/articles/2821 (Full article)

 

Stress-associated changes in the steady-state expression of latent Epstein-Barr virus: implications for chronic fatigue syndrome and cancer

Abstract:

Antibodies to several Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded enzymes are observed in patients with different EBV-associated diseases. The reason for these antibody patterns and the role these proteins might play in the pathophysiology of disease, separate from their role in virus replication, is unknown.

In this series of studies, we found that purified EBV deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase) can inhibit the replication of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro and upregulate the production of TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10. It also enhanced the ability of natural killer cells to lyse target cells. The EBV dUTPase also significantly inhibited the replication of mitogen-stimulated lymphocytes and the synthesis of IFN-gamma by cells isolated from lymph nodes and spleens obtained from mice inoculated with the protein.

It also produced sickness behaviors known to be induced by some of the cytokines that were studied in the in vitro experiments. These symptoms include an increase in body temperature, a decrease in body mass and in physical activity.

The data provide a new perspective on how an early nonstructural EBV-encoded protein can cause immune dysregulation and produce clinical symptoms observed in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) separate from its role in virus replication and may serve as a new approach to help identify one of the etiological agents for CFS. The data also provide additional insight into the pathophysiology of EBV infection, inflammation, and cancer.

 

Source: Glaser R, Padgett DA, Litsky ML, Baiocchi RA, Yang EV, Chen M, Yeh PE, Klimas NG, Marshall GD, Whiteside T, Herberman R, Kiecolt-Glaser J, Williams MV. Stress-associated changes in the steady-state expression of latent Epstein-Barr virus: implications for chronic fatigue syndrome and cancer. Brain Behav Immun. 2005 Mar;19(2):91-103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15664781

 

Atypical depression as a secondary symptom in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has gained prominence since 1988 and a substantial amount of research has been done in this domain. However, it is still regarded as a controversial condition. Moreover, most of the symptoms of CFS itself are non-specific, occurring in many illnesses; some of the symptoms are also common in depression. Indeed, an area of continued controversy and debate involves the diagnostic overlap between CFS and psychiatric disorders. Through anecdotal evidence, atypical depression appears to be common in CFS. Recent developments in psychobiology underscore the role of the acute phase response and its associated sickness behavior in affective disorders. Thus, we hypothesize that atypical depression is sickness behavior rather than an affective disorder as shown by anecdotal evidence in CFS.

 

Source: Van Hoof E, Cluydts R, De Meirleir K. Atypical depression as a secondary symptom in chronic fatigue syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2003 Jul;61(1):52-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12781640