Chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative investigation of patients’ beliefs about the illness

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a disabling chronic condition of uncertain cause. Previous studies have found that patients seen in hospital clinics with the syndrome often strongly believe that their illness is physical in nature and minimize the role of psychological and social factors. There is also evidence that patients cope by avoiding activity. However, almost all of these studies have assessed illness beliefs only by questionnaire.

The aim of this study was to explore the nature and origin of illness beliefs in more detail using in-depth interviews and a qualitative analysis of patient responses. Sixty-six consecutive referrals meeting Oxford criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome were recruited. Analysis of responses indicated that, whereas the most commonly described explanation for the illness was a physical one, more than half the patients also believed “stress” had played a role. Patients believed that they could partially control the symptoms by reducing activity but felt helpless to influence the physical disease process and hence the course of the illness.

Patients reported that they had arrived at these beliefs about the illness after prolonged reflection on their own experience combined with the reading of media reports, self help books, and patient group literature. The views of health professionals played a relatively small role. There is potentially a considerable opportunity to help patients arrive at a wider and more enabling explanation of their illness when they first present to primary care.

 

Source: Clements A, Sharpe M, Simkin S, Borrill J, Hawton K. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative investigation of patients’ beliefs about the illness. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jun;42(6):615-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9226609

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a controversial condition that many occupational physicians find difficult to advise on. In this article we review the nature and definition of CFS, the principal aetiologic hypotheses and the evidence concerning prognosis. We also outline a practical approach to patient assessment, diagnosis and management. The conclusions of this review are then applied to the disability discrimination field. The implications of the new UK occupational health legislation are also examined. Despite continuing controversy about the status, aetiology and optimum management of CFS, we argue that much can be done to improve the outcome for patients with this condition. The most urgent needs are for improved education and rehabilitation, especially in regard to employment. Occupational physicians are well placed to play an important and unique role in meeting these needs.

 

Source: Mounstephen A, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health. Occup Med (Lond). 1997 May;47(4):217-27. http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/4/217.long (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have become increasingly recognized as a common clinical problem, yet one that physicians often find difficult to manage. In this review we suggest a practical, pragmatic, evidence-based approach to the assessment and initial management of the patient whose presentation suggests this diagnosis. The basic principles are simple and for each aspect of management we point out both potential pitfalls and strategies to overcome them.

The first, and most important task is to develop mutual trust and collaboration. The second is to complete an adequate assessment, the aim of which is either to make a diagnosis of CFS or to identify an alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms. The history is most important and should include a detailed account of the symptoms, the associated disability, the choice of coping strategies, and importantly, the patient’s own understanding of his/her illness. The assessment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety is mandatory.

When the physician is satisfied that no alternative physical or psychiatric disorder can be found to explain symptoms, we suggest that a firm and positive diagnosis of CFS be made.

The treatment of CFS requires that the patient is given a positive explanation of the cause of his symptoms, emphasizing the distinction among factors that may have predisposed them to develop the illness (lifestyle, work stress, personality), triggered the illness (viral infection, life events) and perpetuated the illness (cerebral dysfunction, sleep disorder, depression, inconsistent activity, and misunderstanding of the illness and fear of making it worse).

Interventions are then aimed to overcoming these illness-perpetuating factors. The role of antidepressants remains uncertain but may be tried on a pragmatic basis. Other medications should be avoided. The only treatment strategies of proven efficacy are cognitive behavioral ones. The most important starting point is to promote a consistent pattern of activity, rest, and sleep, followed by a gradual return to normal activity; ongoing review of any ‘catastrophic’ misinterpretation of symptoms and the problem solving of current life difficulties.

We regard chronic fatigue syndrome as important not only because it represents potentially treatable disability and suffering but also because it provides an example for the positive management of medically unexplained illness in general.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Chalder T, Palmer I, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):185-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218987

 

Increased prolactin response to buspirone in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

We studied the endocrine and subjective responses that followed acute administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone (0.5 mg/kg orally) in 11 male patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and a group of matched healthy controls.

Patients with CFS had significantly higher plasma prolactin concentrations and experienced more nausea in response to buspirone than did controls. However, the growth hormone response to buspirone did not distinguish CFS patients from controls.

Our data question whether the enhancement of buspirone-induced prolactin release in CFS is a consequence of increased sensitivity of post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors. It is possible that the increased prolactin response to buspirone in CFS could reflect changes in dopamine function.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Clements A, Hawton K, Young AH, Sargent P, Cowen PJ. Increased prolactin response to buspirone in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Affect Disord. 1996 Nov 4;41(1):71-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8938208

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by chronic, disabling fatigue, impaired concentration, muscle pain, and other somatic symptoms. The conceptual difficulties associated with all medically unexplained illnesses contribute to the controversy surrounding CFS, which has centered around whether it is best regarded as a medical or as a psychiatric condition. Clinically, such an approach is not helpful, and current research suggests that both pathophysiologic changes and psychosocial factors are important. Pragmatic management based on a detailed assessment of the individual is outlined.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1996 Sep;19(3):549-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8856816

 

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients presenting with thechronic fatigue syndrome.

DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with final assessment at 12 months.

SETTING: An infectious diseases outpatient clinic.

SUBJECTS: 60 consecutively referred patients meeting consensus criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS: Medical care comprised assessment, advice, and follow up in general practice. Patients who received cognitive behaviour therapy were offered 16 individual weekly sessions in addition to their medical care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportions of patients (a) who achieved normal daily functioning (Karnofsky score 80 or more) and (b) who achieved a clinically significant improvement in functioning (change in Karnofsky score 10 points or more) by 12 months after randomisation.

RESULTS: Only two eligible patients refused to participate. All randomised patients completed treatment. An intention to treat analysis showed that 73% (22/30) of recipients of cognitive behaviour therapy achieved a satisfactory outcome as compared with 27% (8/30) of patients who were given only medical care (difference 47 percentage points; 95% confidence interval 24 to 69). Similar differences were observed in subsidiary outcome measures. The improvement in disability among patients given cognitive behaviour therapy continued after completion of therapy. Illness beliefs and coping behaviour previously associated with a poor outcome changed more with cognitive behaviour therapy than with medical care alone.

CONCLUSION: Adding cognitive behaviour therapy to the medical care of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome is acceptable to patients and leads to a sustained reduction in functional impairment.

Comment in:

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Good general care may offer as much benefit as cognitive behaviour therapy. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients were not representative of all patients with the syndrome. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Cognitive behavior therapy should be compared with placebo treatments. [BMJ. 1996]

ACP J Club. 1996 May-Jun;124(3):71.

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Use an interdisciplinary approach. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Patients’ beliefs about their illness were probably not a major factor. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Evening primrose oil and magnesium have been shown to be effective. [BMJ. 1996]

Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Essential elements of the treatment must be identified. [BMJ. 1996]

 

Source: Sharpe M, Hawton K, Simkin S, Surawy C, Hackmann A, Klimes I, Peto T, Warrell D, Seagroatt V. Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):22-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/

Note: You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2349693/pdf/bmj00523-0026.pdf

 

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach

Abstract:

Observations concerning the characteristics of patients who presented to a medical clinic with a principal complaint of chronic medically unexplained fatigue (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or CFS) are described, including the cognitions (thoughts and assumptions) elicited from a sample of these patients who were treated using cognitive behavioural therapy. On the basis of these observations a cognitive theory of the aetiology of CFS is proposed. These observations have implications for the treatment of patients with CFS.

 

Source: Surawy C, Hackmann A, Hawton K, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jun;33(5):535-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7598674

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group

Abstract:

The complexities of the chronic fatigue syndrome and the methodologic problems associated with its study indicate the need for a comprehensive, systematic, and integrated approach to the evaluation, classification, and study of persons with this condition and other fatiguing illnesses. We propose a conceptual framework and a set of guidelines that provide such an approach. Our guidelines include recommendations for the clinical evaluation of fatigued persons, a revised case definition of the chronic fatigue syndrome, and a strategy for subgrouping fatigued persons in formal investigations.

Comment in:

The chronic fatigue syndrome. [Ann Intern Med. 1995]

The chronic fatigue syndrome. [Ann Intern Med. 1995]

The chronic fatigue syndrome. [Ann Intern Med. 1995]

The chronic fatigue syndrome. [Ann Intern Med. 1995]

 

Source: Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7978722

 

Abnormalities of sleep in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome have abnormalities of sleep which may contribute to daytime fatigue.

DESIGN: A case-control study of the sleep of patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome and that of healthy volunteers.

SETTING: An infectious disease outpatient clinic and subjects’ homes.

SUBJECTS: 12 patients who met research criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome but not for major depressive disorder and 12 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and weight.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective reports of sleep from patients’ diaries and measurement of sleep patterns by polysomnography. Subjects’ anxiety, depression, and functional impairment were assessed by interview.

RESULTS: Patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome spent more time in bed than controls (544 min v 465 min, p < 0.001) but slept less efficiently (90% v 96%, p < 0.05) and spent more time awake after initially going to sleep (31.9 min v 16.6 min, p < 0.05). Seven patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome had a sleep disorder (four had difficulty maintaining sleep, one had difficulty getting to sleep, one had difficulty in both initiating and maintaining sleep, and one had hypersomnia) compared with none of the controls (p = 0.003). Those with sleep disorders showed greater functional impairment than the remaining five patients (score on general health survey 50.4% v 70.4%, p < 0.05), but their psychiatric scores were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome had sleep disorders, which are likely to contribute to daytime fatigue. Sleep disorders may be important in the aetiology of the syndrome.

 

Source: Morriss R, Sharpe M, Sharpley AL, Cowen PJ, Hawton K, Morris J. Abnormalities of sleep in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1161-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1677618/ (Full article)

 

Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) as currently defined overlaps with other syndromes including chronic pain, fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression. It also resembles historical descriptions of neurasthenia. The role of psychological (cognitive) and behavioural therapies in CFS is examined.

There are both pragmatic and theoretical arguments for their application to CFS. It is pragmatic to target obvious and treatable factors including inactivity and depression. A theoretical model in which psychological, physiological and social factors interact offers a plausible rationale for such treatment but is not yet empirically proven. While there is evidence for the efficacy of this type of therapy in related syndromes, the evidence in CFS is inconclusive.

A randomized controlled trial of combined cognitive and behavioural therapy currently in progress is described. Initial results suggest that most patients receiving cognitive behaviour therapy improve, especially in terms of functional impairment. It remains to be seen whether this therapy will prove to be more effective than standard general practitioner care. In the meantime cognitive behaviour therapy offers a pragmatic and rational therapy for patients with CFS.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Non-pharmacological approaches to treatment. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:298-308; discussion 308-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491104