Patients with severe ME/CFS deserve better than unproven theories

Rapid Response:

Patients with severe ME/CFS deserve better than unproven theories

Dear Editor

Miller et al argue that chronic fatigue conditions are “a dysfunctional biological response orchestrated in the brain, influenced by expectations and conditioned responses,” and as a result, even people with severe ME/CFS can recover by “reframing beliefs about illness, along with specialist rehabilitation.”

Interventions based on this model have been tested in randomised trials in people since the 1990s in people with mild to moderate symptoms. Many of the participants would not have had ME/CFS as currently diagnosed, which carries a higher risk of harm from exertion. [1-3] Even in that easier context, short-term effects have been negligible or modest, without longterm benefits. Harms were not thoroughly studied. [1-3] This does not amount to strong evidence of substantial symptomatic improvement, let alone disease modification or full recovery.

Miller et al offer no direct strong evidence to support their claim that with their approach, “even those with severe ME/CFS can recover.” They cite the experience of a unit in Leeds, based on charts of discharged patients from a quality assurance report, where no patients were rated as “not at all ill” on discharge. [4] This kind of data is not defined as research, intended to be generalisable to other patients. [5] It was a very small group, too: Only six of the patients in that report had the diagnosis ME/CFS.

The weight of the authors’ argument, then, relies on their pathophysiologic rationale, which does not account for the full range of physical impacts of the illness. They point to other literature positing similar hypotheses, but these theories remain unproven. The pathophysiology of ME/CFS remains uncertain, [1-3] and it is not even clear that there is just one type of ME/CFS with the same underlying mechanisms. [6] Heterogeneous results in studies that have attempted to establish a core part of the model – that activity level and biological impairment are related – may be related to varying diagnostic criteria. [7]

Medicine has a long history of ascribing beliefs and/or responses to stress as the cause of diseases that were not yet fully understood. It wasn’t all that long ago that asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, and peptic ulcers fell into this category. [8] It’s been proven wrong so often now, we should be highly skeptical of these theories.

Perhaps part of why psychologically-based rationales for disease can be widely accepted is because the harm this can do is underappreciated. Miller et al argued that their narrative inspires hope, and people with severe ME/CFS deserve that. But when the unproven theory can’t deliver on the claims, what then? In a study Miller et al cited, researchers found that being told the disease was psychosomatic was the most common reason for suicidal thoughts for people with ME/CFS. [9] It’s not the first study to suggest that being told they are effectively to blame for not recovering is a contributing factor to the increased risk of suicidality in people with ME/CFS. [10]

A critical part of hope for people suffering illness is being able to trust that the medical community will work objectively to find better treatments and ways to support them, rather than promote unproven theories. People with ME/CFS deserve better than being told that their minds can overcome what’s the matter with their bodies – if only they try hard enough, for long enough.

References

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management. 29 Oct 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206

2. Chou R, McDonagh M, Griffin JC, Grusing S. Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): An Updated Systematic Evidence Review prepared for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/156092

3. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Current scientific knowledge on myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). 2023. https://www.iqwig.de/en/projects/n21-01.html

4. Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. National Inpatient Centre for Psychological Medicine: annual review 2020-21. May 2021. https://www.leedsandyorkpft.nhs.uk/our-services/wp-content/uploads/sites…

5. Health Research Authority. Defining research. October 2022. https://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/docs/DefiningResearchTable…

6. Bastos VC, Greene KA, Tabachnikova A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid immune phenotyping reveals distinct immunotypes of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J Immunol 2025;vkaf087. doi:10.1093/jimmun/vkaf087 pmid:40373264

7. Sunnquist M, Jason LA. A reexamination of the cognitive behavioral model of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Psychol 2018;74:7. doi:10.1002/jclp.22593 pmid:29457646

8. Hange D, Bengtsson C, Sundh V, Bjorkelund. The natural history of psychosomatic symptoms and their association with psychological symptoms: Observations from the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg. Eur J Gen Pract 2007;13:2. doi:10.1080/13814780701377497 pmid:17534741

9. König RS, Paris DH, Sollberger M, Tschopp R. Identifying the mental health burden in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients in Switzerland: A pilot study. Heliyon 2024;10:e27031. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27031 pmid:3843435

10. Chu L, Elliott M, Stein E, Jason LA. Identifying and managing suicidality in Myalgic Encephalitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Healthcare (Basel) 2021;9:6. doi:10.3390/healthcare9060629 pmid:34070367

Source: Hilda Bastian. BMJ 2025;389:r977 https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj.r977/rr-30

Reframing beliefs about their illness does not lead to recovery of tube-fed patients with very severe ME/CFS. Analysis of the BMJ article by Miller et al

Abstract:

The narrative which is presented by Miller et al. as new, has dominated the field of ME/CFS for the last 35 years. It has been tested by numerous studies and has been found to be ineffective and harmful, as concluded by for example NICE in 2021. Additionally, it does not lead to objective improvement and it has a negative instead of a positive effect on work and disability status.

What has happened over the last 35 years is that severely ill patients have been ridiculed, gaslit and ignored by the medical profession. These patients have lost hope in the part of the medical profession which has been instrumental in doing and promoting that. They have not lost hope to recover and they are all hoping to get effective pharmacological treatments sooner rather than later as changing their mindset does not lead to recovery. And if it does, then the diagnosis of ME/CFS was simply wrong.

Source: Vink, Mark and Vink-Niese, Friso, Reframing beliefs about their illness does not lead to recovery of tube-fed patients with very severe ME/CFS. Analysis of the BMJ article by Miller et al. (June 06, 2025). No., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5284667 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5284667 (Full text available as PDF file)

The Implications and Predictability of Sleep Reversal for People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Machine Learning Approach

Abstract:

Background/objectives: Impaired sleep is one of the core symptoms of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), yet the mechanisms and impact of sleep-related issues are poorly understood. Sleep dysfunctions for patients with ME/CFS include frequent napping, difficulties falling asleep, waking up early, and sleep reversal patterns (e.g., sleeping throughout the day and staying awake throughout the night). The current study focuses on sleep reversal for patients with ME/CFS.

Methods: We explored the symptoms and functional impairment of those with and without sleep reversal by analyzing the responses of a large international sample (N = 2313) using the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

Results: We found that those in our Sleep Reversal group (N = 327) compared to those without sleep reversal (N = 1986) reported higher symptom burden for 53 out of 54 DSQ symptoms and greater impairments for all six SF-36 subscales. The most accurate predictors of sleep reversal included age (p < 0.05), body mass index (p < 0.05), eleven DSQ symptoms (p < 0.01), and two SF-36 subscales (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: These features provide clues regarding some of the possible pathophysiological underpinnings of sleep reversal among those with ME/CFS.

Source: Dietrich MP, Pravin R, Furst J, Jason LA. The Implications and Predictability of Sleep Reversal for People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Machine Learning Approach. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 26;13(11):1255. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111255. PMID: 40508869. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/11/1255 (Full text)

Prevalence of EBV, HHV6, HCMV, HAdV, SARS-CoV-2, and Autoantibodies to Type I Interferon in Sputum from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients

Abstract:

An exhausted antiviral immune response is observed in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and post-SARS-CoV-2 syndrome, also termed long COVID. In this study, potential mechanisms behind this exhaustion were investigated.

First, the viral load of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human adenovirus (HAdV), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was determined in sputum samples (n = 29) derived from ME/CFS patients (n = 13), healthy controls (n = 10), elderly healthy controls (n = 4), and immunosuppressed controls (n = 2). Secondly, autoantibodies (autoAbs) to type I interferon (IFN-I) in sputum were analyzed to possibly explain impaired viral immunity.

We found that ME/CFS patients released EBV at a significantly higher level compared to controls (p = 0.0256). HHV6 was present in ~50% of all participants at the same level. HAdV was detected in two cases with immunosuppression and severe ME/CFS, respectively. HCMV and SARS-CoV-2 were found only in immunosuppressed controls. Notably, anti-IFN-I autoAbs in ME/CFS and controls did not differ, except in a severe ME/CFS case showing an increased level.

We conclude that ME/CFS patients, compared to controls, have a significantly higher load of EBV. IFN-I autoAbs cannot explain IFN-I dysfunction, with the possible exception of severe cases, also reported in severe SARS-CoV-2. We forward that additional mechanisms, such as the viral evasion of IFN-I effect via the degradation of IFN-receptors, may be present in ME/CFS, which demands further studies.

Source: Hannestad U, Allard A, Nilsson K, Rosén A. Prevalence of EBV, HHV6, HCMV, HAdV, SARS-CoV-2, and Autoantibodies to Type I Interferon in Sputum from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients. Viruses. 2025 Mar 14;17(3):422. doi: 10.3390/v17030422. PMID: 40143349; PMCID: PMC11946815. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11946815/ (Full text)

Persistent Fatigue, Weakness, and Aberrant Muscle Mitochondria in Survivors of Critical COVID-19

Abstract:

Objectives: Persistent skeletal muscle dysfunction in survivors of critical illness due to acute respiratory failure is common, but biological data elucidating underlying mechanisms are limited. The objective of this study was to elucidate the prevalence of skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue in survivors of critical illness due to COVID-19 and determine if cellular changes associate with persistent skeletal muscle dysfunction.

Design: A prospective observational study in two phases: 1) survivors of critical COVID-19 participating in physical outcome measures while attending an ICU Recovery Clinic at short-term follow-up and 2) a nested cohort of patients performed comprehensive muscle and physical function assessments with a muscle biopsy; data were compared with non-COVID controls.

Setting: ICU Recovery Clinic and clinical laboratory.

Patients/subjects: Survivors of critical COVID-19 and non-COVID controls.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: One hundred twenty patients with a median of 56 years old (interquartile range [IQR], 42-65 yr old), 43% female, and 33% individuals of underrepresented race attended follow-up 44 ± 17 days after discharge. Patients had a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score of 24.0 (IQR, 16-29) and 98 patients (82%) required mechanical ventilation with a median duration of 14 days (IQR, 9-21 d). At short-term follow-up significant physical dysfunction was observed with 93% of patients reporting generalized fatigue and performing mean 218 ± 151 meters on 6-minute walk test (45% ± 30% of predicted). Eleven patients from this group agreed to participate in long-term assessment and muscle biopsy occurring a mean 267 ± 98 days after discharge. Muscle tissue from COVID exhibited a greater abundance of M2-like macrophages and satellite cells and lower activity of mitochondrial complex II and complex IV compared with controls.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that aberrant repair and altered mitochondrial activity in skeletal muscle associates with long-term impairments in patients surviving an ICU admission for COVID-19.

Source: Mayer KP, Ismaeel A, Kalema AG, Montgomery-Yates AA, Soper MK, Kern PA, Starck JD, Slone SA, Morris PE, Dupont-Versteegden EE, Kosmac K. Persistent Fatigue, Weakness, and Aberrant Muscle Mitochondria in Survivors of Critical COVID-19. Crit Care Explor. 2024 Oct 16;6(10):e1164. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001164. PMID: 39412208; PMCID: PMC11487221. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11487221/ (Full text)

A Network Medicine Approach to Investigating ME/CFS Pathogenesis in Severely Ill Patients: A Pilot Study

Abstract:

This pilot study harnessed the power of network medicine to unravel the complex pathogenesis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). By utilizing a network analysis on whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from the Severely Ill Patient Study (SIPS), we identified ME/CFS-associated proteins and delineated the corresponding network-level module, termed the SIPS disease module, together with its relevant pathways. This module demonstrated significant overlap with genes implicated in fatigue, cognitive disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases.

Our pathway analysis revealed potential associations between ME/CFS and conditions such as COVID-19, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, neurodegenerative diseases, and pathways involved in cortisol synthesis and secretion, supporting the hypothesis that ME/CFS is a neuroimmune disorder. Additionally, our findings underscore a potential link between ME/CFS and estrogen signaling pathways, which may elucidate the higher prevalence of ME/CFS in females.

These findings provide insights into the pathogenesis of ME/CFS from a network medicine perspective and highlight potential therapeutic targets. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their implications for improving diagnosis and treatment.

Source: Li-Yuan Hung, Chan-Shuo Wu, Chia-Jung Chang, Peng Li, Kimberly Hicks, Becky Taurog, Joshua J Dibble, Braxton Morrison, Chimere L Smith, Ronald W Davis, Wenzhong Xiao. A Network Medicine Approach to Investigating ME/CFS Pathogenesis in Severely Ill Patients: A Pilot Study.
medRxiv 2024.09.26.24314417; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.26.24314417 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.26.24314417v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

ANZMES Releases Essential Resource for Healthcare Professionals to Manage Hospital Stays of Severe ME/CFS and long COVID Patients

Press Release:

ANZMES (the National Advisory on ME/CFS and a RNZCGP registered provider of continuing education) has released a short reference guide for secondary care. The resource acts as a guide for healthcare professionals in managing hospital stays for patients suffering from severe-very severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and long COVID (lC). It aims to improve patient care by addressing the unique needs and symptoms of patients with severe ME/CFS and lC during their hospital admissions.

“ME/CFS is a complex condition and its severity is often misunderstood by healthcare professionals. Severe patients are housebound. Very severe patients are bedbound, with very high needs requiring 24/7 care. Hospitalisation often occurs due to undernutrition, infections, and dysautonomic issues. Therefore, it is crucial that healthcare professionals have the knowledge to effectively manage patients during hospital admissions so as not to exacerbate their severe and debilitating symptoms,” says ANZMES president, Fiona Charlton.

“Our aim with this new resource is to provide a clear and concise reference guide for healthcare professionals to enhance patient care. While the assessment and evaluation of long COVID may differ from ME/CFS, the management of long COVID closely mirrors it, so we have leveraged our medical team’s expertise to develop a guide to support the effective care of these patients in a hospital setting.” She says.

The resource outlines essential strategies for managing severe symptoms, including intense muscle and joint pain, extreme sensitivity to light, sound, touch, and chemicals, impaired mobility often necessitating a wheelchair, severe gastrointestinal issues, and increased susceptibility to infections due to immune dysfunction.

“For very severe patients, a light touch of the arm can be interpreted by the body as pain. Bright light can cause post-exertional malaise. People with very severe ME/CFS and long COVID spend the majority of their lives in darkened rooms, wearing noise cancelling headphones and eye masks. They are unable to eat properly, or bathe and toilet themselves without full time carers, and it is often a family member who assumes this role.” The impact of this on everyone cannot be underestimated.

An overview of key recommendations include:

  • Sensory Adjustments: Dim lighting, minimise noise, and provide private rooms to reduce sensory stress.
  • Medication and Nutrition: Avoid histamine-releasing anaesthetics and muscle relaxants. Use medications like propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl with caution. Monitor hydration and consider IV saline for orthostatic intolerance.[1]
  • Activity and Rest: Recognise that even minimal interactions, such as being spoken to or exposure to light, can trigger PEM. Prioritise rest and avoid any unnecessary activity.
  • Communication and Cognitive Support: Involve family and caregivers as representatives, especially when the patient cannot communicate; or simplify communication by providing written instructions and allowing extra time for patients to process information.
  • Care and Support: Recognise the psychological impact, validate the severity of conditions, and provide access to counselling and mental health support. Include family members or caregivers in discussions and allow them to stay with the patient if requested.

ANZMES emphasises the importance of personalised care plans, the involvement of patient’s family members and their regular health team to understand the severity of their condition. The guide also encourages connections with local support groups and resources for additional advocacy and support for not only patients, but also their carers to avoid burnout. Remote consultations and home visits are recommended to avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.

ANZMES president, Fiona Charlton concludes “We believe that education is key to improving outcomes for patients with severe-very severe ME/CFS and long COVID. By providing this resource, we aim to enhance the knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals so they are equipped when these patients are admitted under their care.”

Understanding ME/CFS and long COVID:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a long-term, multi-systemic illness affecting the nervous, endocrine, autonomic, and immune systems. Patients experience severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), unrefreshing sleep, cognitive impairment, and orthostatic intolerance. With over 100-200+ potential symptoms, the condition’s impact can vary greatly, making diagnosis and management highly individualised. Roughly 25% of all ME/CFS cases are categorised as mild, 50% as moderate-severe and 25% as very severe.[2] [3]

Long COVID is characterised by persistent, unexplained symptoms following infection with COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) lasting more than 12 weeks and not explained by an alternative diagnosis. Both conditions share symptoms such as extreme fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), with up to 50% of long COVID cases fitting the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.

Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM)

Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM), also referred to as post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE) in the context of long COVID, is a debilitating response to normal, every-day activities in people with ME/CFS. For individuals with severe-very severe ME/CFS or lC, this can be triggered by sensory overload, such as exposure to light or even simple conversations. Repeated episodes of PEM can exacerbate these already severe symptoms, and even minimal exertion can lead to significant setbacks for the patient’s health and wellbeing.

About ANZMES

ANZMES, the Associated New Zealand ME Society, is the National Advisory on ME/CFS. Established in 1980, ANZMES has been at the forefront of research, representation, and education for ME/CFS in Aotearoa/New Zealand. The organisation is a registered provider of continuing medical education with the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners (RNZCGP) and is dedicated to improving the lives of those affected by ME/CFS and long COVID. ANZMES is a founding member of the World ME Alliance.

 

The most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark

Abstract:

A subset of patients suffering from ME/CFS (Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) are severely ill, bedridden, and dependent on personal care. This study aims to describe the medical and social conditions of the most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark and the situation of their caregivers.

Qualitative data were collected during 19 home visits to severely ill patients in Denmark. The patients interviewed were characterised by extremely low physical and mental functioning and longstanding illness. Relative to their dire condition, the participants received very little help from medical professionals and health services such as institutions and hospitals. There was an overall negative interaction with psychiatric interventions, and the relations between patients and the health system were generally characterised by mutual distrust. Social services were often dismissed, and obtaining the services was often described as more of a burden than a benefit.

In conclusion, the most severely ill patients with ME/CFS and their caregivers must be characterised as a systematically neglected patient group not comparable to any other similarly ill group.

Source: la Cour, P. (2024). The most severely ill patients with ME/CFS in Denmark. Cogent Public Health11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27707571.2024.2359958 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/27707571.2024.2359958 (Full text)

Multimodal treatment strategies for homebound people with severe ME/CFS: a scoping review

Abstract:

Purpose: This scoping review aims to provide an overview of previously published treatment strategies that are multimodal, rather than purely drug-based and may be considered for home- or bedbound ME/CFS patients. Thus, the focus lies upon the analyses of telemedicine as well as home treatment elements. In addition, the evaluation and assessment methods used in these studies will be further discussed.

Methods: Using the scoping review method, a literature analysis was conducted resulting in a total of 14 publications which met the predefined criteria. Inclusion was based on models applicable to housebound individuals with ME/CFS, focusing on social medicine and psychological support services rather than individual drug strategies.

Results: The analysis demonstrated that the appropriate treatment methods were predominantly home visits (n=5) or a telemedicine format (n=7). Studies which used alternative settings were included if conversion to a telemedicine format was viable. The important factors highlighted in several studies (n=8), when considering this patient group, were individualisation and flexibility of the treatment methods – and thus the ability to address the day-to-day levels of impairment. The explicit involvement of families in the treatment plan were described in a total of six studies. In ten articles, the treatment concept was additionally evaluated, predominantly using questionnaires (n=7), whilst the questionnaires used were not consistent. Qualitative evaluations were invariably conducted using Brown and Clarke‘s thematic analysis (n=3).

Conclusion: Publications on multimodal treatment strategies for homebound ME/CFS patients are rare. However approaches using home visits or telemedicine are described. The majority of identified publications addressed the need for individualised as well as flexible patient care, whilst some were dedicated to the added value of involving the patients’ family. The data outline the specific challenges associated with the care of severely affected ME/CFS patients that should also be considered in the context of research.

Source: Mayer-Huber S, Kircher A, Eberhartinger M, Stojanov S, Behrends U. Multimodale Behandlungsstrategien für hausgebundene Menschen mit schwerem ME/CFS: ein Scoping Review. Gesundheitswesen. 2024 May 10. German. doi: 10.1055/a-2323-4108. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38729210. https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2323-4108

Longitudinal Cytokine and Multi-Modal Health Data of an Extremely Severe ME/CFS Patient with HSD Reveals Insights into Immunopathology, and Disease Severity

Abstract:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) presents significant challenges in patient care due to its intricate multisystem nature, comorbidities, and global prevalence. To address these complexities, we employed a comprehensive approach, integrating longitudinal cytokine profiling with extensive clinical, health, textual, pharmaceutical, and nutraceutical data, and performed personalized analyses using AI.

Focusing on an exceptionally severe ME/CFS patient with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and marginal symptom improvements, our study highlights the dynamic nature of symptoms, severity, triggers, and modifying factors. As part of this study, we introduced an updated platform and two applications, ME-CFSTrackerApp, and LexiTime, facilitating real-time symptom tracking and enhancing physician-patient communication.

Our longitudinal cytokine profiling underscores the significance of Th2-type cytokines and synergistic activities between mast cells and eosinophils, leading to skewing of Th1 toward Th2 immune responses in ME/CFS pathogenesis, especially in cognitive impairment and sensorial intolerance. This suggests a potentially shared underlying mechanism with major comorbidities.

Additionally, our data reveal potential roles of BCL6 and TP53 pathways in ME/CFS etiology and emphasize the importance of investigating low-dose drugs with partial agonist activity in ME/CFS treatment. Our analyses underscore the patient-centered care approach for better healthcare management.

Source: Fereshteh Jahanbani1, Justin C. Sing, Rajan D. Maynard, Shaghayegh Jahanbani, Janet Dafoe, Whitney Dafoe, Nathan Jones, Kelvin J. Wallace, Azuravesta Rastan, Hannes Rost, Holden Maecker, Michael P. Snyder, Ronald W. Davis. Longitudinal Cytokine and Multi-Modal Health Data of an Extremely Severe ME/CFS Patient with HSD Reveals Insights into Immunopathology, and Disease Severity. Front. Immunol. Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders: Autoinflammatory Disorders. Volume 15 – 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1369295 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1369295/abstract