Abstract:
Background: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex and often misunderstood illness, characterized by post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, and cognitive impairments.
Objective: To investigate how question phrasing in ME/CFS research may influence participant attributions of fatigue/energy problems and unintentionally reinforce psychosomatic assumptions.
Methods: A total of 2248 individuals with ME/CFS from an international sample completed a survey assessing fatigue-related attributions. We analyzed how question wording influenced whether participants attributed their symptoms to physical or psychosocial causes. Particular focus was given to a fatigue attribution item that framed causes in terms of ‘personal life’ or ‘environmental factors.’
Results: Participants were significantly more likely to attribute their fatigue/energy problems to psychosocial factors when prompted with psychosocial framing. Many respondents who previously indicated physical causes as the primary source of their symptoms shifted to psychosocial explanations in response to the differently phrased item. This shift was especially pronounced among participants reporting higher levels of psychological distress.
Conclusions: Leading or biased question phrasing may distort participant responses in ME/CFS research, potentially inflating psychosomatic interpretations of the illness. Researchers should critically examine survey language to avoid introducing unintended bias that could compromise research validity and reinforce stigma.
Source: Campolattara, A. T. T., Jason, L. A., & Tuzzolino, K. C. (2025). The impact of leading questions on ME/CFS research: bias and stigma in study design. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2025.2530338 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2025.2530338