Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis as a twentieth-century disease: analytic challenges

Abstract:

The challenges of chronic fatigue syndrome (often called myalgic encephalomyelitis, especially in the UK) (CFS/ME) to analytical and medical approaches are connected with our inability to understand its distressing somatic symptoms in terms of a single identifiable and understandable disease entity. The evidence for the roles of viral aetiologies remains inconclusive, as does our understanding of the involvement of the immune system.

The history and social context of CFS/ME, and its relation to neurasthenia and psychasthenia are sketched. A symbolic attitude to the condition may need to be rooted in an awareness of psychoid levels of operation, and the expression and spread of CFS/ME may sometimes be aided by the ravages of projective identification. Psychic denial, sometimes violent, in sufferers (especially children and adolescents) and their families may be important in the aetiology of CFS/ME. We draw out common threads from psychodynamic work with five cases, four showing some symptomatic improvement, analytic discussions of three cases being presented elsewhere in this issue of JAP.

 

Source: Simpson M, Bennett A, Holland P. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis as a twentieth-century disease: analytic challenges. J Anal Psychol. 1997 Apr;42(2):191-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9161120

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence and outcome

This week’s journal contains two papers from multidisciplinary teams that shed light on syndromes of chronic fatigue and so move us towards resolving the often bitter controversy over myalgic encephalomyelitis. A large community survey by Pawlikowska and colleagues provides estimates of the prevalence of the symptom of fatigue,’ operationally defined chronic fatigue syndrome,2 and self declared (possibly self diagnosed) chronic fatigue syndrome in young and middle aged adults in south east England (p 763).1

They found that fatigue was common, occurred as a continuum, and was highly correlated with emotional distress. Most people attributed their fatigue to social or psychological factors. While 02% of the respondents reported that they had chronic fatigue syndrome, as many as 1% of respondents satisfied several of the criteria for the syndrome. As with many illnesses, the cases were found at the severe end of the continuum of fatigue, without any sharp cut off. Associations of self reported chronic fatigue syndrome with female sex and upper social class confirm what has been found in primary care and hospital studies 34 but are less typical in community surveys.’ 6 Previous studies have consistently identified a strong association between emotional morbidity and chronic fatigue syndrome,7 but this “is inevitable given the similarities of the criteria and the measures used to define them.”‘ Interestingly, the closer cases fulfil the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome the stronger the association with emotional morbidity.

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Prevalence study overlooked. [BMJ. 1994]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. …and study them separately. [BMJ. 1994]

Chronic fatigue syndrome. ME Association is honest about prognosis. [BMJ. 1994]

Comment onProfessional and popular views of chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1994]

 

Source: Lawrie SM, Pelosi AJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence and outcome. BMJ. 1994 Mar 19;308(6931):732-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2539646/

You can read the full article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2539646/pdf/bmj00432-0006.pdf

 

Psychosocial correlates of illness burden in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

We related reported physical symptoms, cognitive appraisals (e.g., negative style of thinking), and coping strategies (e.g., denial/disengagement strategies) with illness burden across several functional domains separately in subsets of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients with (n = 26) and without (n = 39) concurrently diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD).

In regard to cognitive appraisal measures, automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes were strongly associated with a higher illness burden, as indicated in sickness impact profile (SIP) scores. Active-involvement coping strategies measured on COPE scales (active coping, planning, and positive reinterpretation and growth) were not associated with SIP scores, while other coping strategies (mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, and denial) were positively correlated with psychosocial and physical SIP scales, especially those pertaining to interpersonal life-style arenas.

After we accounted for the number of different CFS-specific physical complaints reported and DSM-III-R depression diagnosis status, cognitive appraisals and coping strategies predicted a substantial proportion of the variance in the severity of illness burden. For the most part, the magnitude of these relationships between our predictor model variables and illness burden severity was similar in the MDD and non-MDD subgroups.

 

Source: Antoni MH, Brickman A, Lutgendorf S, Klimas N, Imia-Fins A, Ironson G, Quillian R, Miguez MJ, van Riel F, Morgan R, et al. Psychosocial correlates of illness burden in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S73-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8148457