Tag: post-treatment Lyme disease

Posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review and comparison of pathogenesis

Abstract:

Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne illness in the United States and has been causing significant morbidity since its discovery in 1977. It is well-documented that about 10% of patients properly treated with antibiotics never fully recover, but instead go on to develop a chronic illness dubbed, posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS) characterized by severe fatigue, cognitive slowing, chronic pain, and sleep difficulties. This review includes 18 studies that detail the symptoms of patients with PTLDS and uses qualitative analysis to compare them to myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a strikingly similar syndrome.

In the majority of the PTLDS studies, at least four of the six major symptoms of ME/CFS were also noted, including substantial impairment in activity level and fatigue for more than 6 months, post-exertional malaise, and unrefreshing sleep. In one of the included PTLDS articles, 26 of the 29 ME/CFS symptoms were noted. This study adds to the expanding literature on the post-active phase of infection syndromes, which suggests that chronic illnesses such as PTLDS and ME/CFS have similar pathogenesis despite different infectious origins.

Key points

  • This systematic review uses qualitative analysis to compare posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome to myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, both of which are post-active phases of infection syndromes.
  • The result of this review suggests that chronic illnesses such as PTLDS and ME/CFS have similar pathogenesis despite different infectious origins.

Source: Bai, NA, Richardson, CS. Posttreatment Lyme disease syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review and comparison of pathogenesis. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2023; 1– 8. doi:10.1002/cdt3.74 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cdt3.74 (Full text)

Cytokine Hub Classification of PASC, ME-CFS and other PASC-like Conditions

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) is a growing healthcare and economic concern affecting as many as 10%-30% of those infected with COVID-19. Though the symptoms have been well-documented, they significantly overlap with other common chronic inflammatory conditions which could confound treatment and therapeutic trials.

Methods: A total of 236 patients including 64 with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), 50 with myalgic encephalomyelitis-chronic fatigue syndrome (ME-CFS), 29 with post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD), and 42 post-vaccine individuals with PASC-like symptoms (POVIP) were enrolled in the study. We performed a 14-plex cytokine/chemokine panel previously described to generate raw data that was normalized and run in a decision tree model using a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm. The algorithm was used to classify these conditions in distinct groups despite their similar symptoms.

Results: PASC, ME-CSF, POVIP, and Acute COVID-19 disease categories were able to be classified by our cytokine hub based CART algorithm with an average F1 score of 0.61 and high specificity (94%).

Conclusions: Proper classification of these inflammatory conditions with very similar symptoms is critical for proper diagnosis and treatment.

Source: Bruce K. Patterson, Jose Guevara-Coto, Edgar B. Francisco et al. Cytokine Hub Classification of PASC, ME-CFS and other PASC-like Conditions, 27 April 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1598634/v1]  https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1598634/v1 (Full text)

Researchers highlight COVID-19 neurological symptoms and need for rigorous studies

Press Release, NINDS/NIH, Jan 20, 2022:

SARS-CoV-2 was initially identified as a respiratory virus, but it can affect the entire body, including the nervous system. In a new Viewpoint published in Science, Avindra Nath, M.D., clinical director of the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), and Serena Spudich, M.D., Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, highlight what is currently known about the effects of SARS-CoV-2 on the brain, the importance of increased research into the underlying causes of Long Covid and possible ways to treat its symptoms.

Neurological symptoms that have been reported with acute COVID-19 include loss of taste and smell, headaches, stroke, delirium, and brain inflammation. There does not seem to be extensive infection of brain cells by the virus, but the neurological effects may be caused by immune activation, neuroinflammation, and damage to brain blood vessels.

Acute COVID-19 infection can sometimes lead to long-lasting effects, that have collectively been termed “Long Covid,” and can include a wide variety of symptoms in the brain and nervous system that range from a loss of taste and smell, impaired concentration, fatigue, pain, sleep disorders, autonomic disorders and/or headache to psychological effects such as depression or psychosis.

Drs. Nath and Spudich outline the current scientific understanding of the potential body responses to acute COVID-19 infection and how those responses could lead to Long Covid symptoms. They also draw parallels between the symptoms experienced by individuals with Long Covid to those living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) or post-Lyme disease, which suggests there could be common risk factors involved.

Finally, owing to the significant variability in symptoms from person to person and the fact that many individuals with Long Covid were healthy prior to a relatively mild COVID-19 infection, the authors highlight the urgent need for significant research efforts into identifying the full extent of Long Covid complications and their causes. This kind of research, which would include the careful study of individuals with Long Covid categorized by their specific symptoms, is crucial to the development of diagnostic and therapeutic tools to identify and treat what is becoming an ever-increasing public health concern. The NIH RECOVER COVID initiative is an ambitious research program to reach these goals.

WHO:

Avindra Nath, M.D., clinical director, NINDS. To arrange an interview, please contact NINDSPressTeam@ninds.nih.gov.

ARTICLE:

Spudich S. and Nath A. “Nervous system consequences of COVID-19” Science. January 21, 2022. DOI: 10.1126/science.abm2052.

Spinal fluid proteins distinguish Lyme disease from chronic fatigue syndrome

Patients who suffer from Neurologic Post Treatment Lyme disease (nPTLS) and those with the chronic fatigue syndrome report similar symptoms. However unique proteins discovered in spinal fluid can distinguish those two groups from one another and also from people in normal health, according to new research conducted by a team led by Steven E. Schutzer, MD, of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey — New Jersey Medical School, and Richard D. Smith, Ph.D., of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

This finding, published in the journal PLoS ONE, also suggests that both conditions involve the central nervous system and that protein abnormalities in the central nervous system are causes and/or effects of both conditions.

The investigators analyzed spinal fluid from three groups of people. One group consisted of 43 patients who fulfilled the clinical criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The second group consisted of 25 patients who had been diagnosed with, and treated for, Lyme disease but did not completely recover. The third group consisted of 11 healthy control subjects. “Spinal fluid is like a liquid window to the brain,” says Dr. Schutzer. By studying the spinal fluid, the research team hoped to find abnormalities that could be used as markers of each condition and could lead to improvements in diagnosis and treatment.

Taking advantage of previously unavailable methods for detailed analysis of spinal fluid, the investigators analyzed the fluid by means of high powered mass spectrometry and special protein separation techniques. They found that each group had more than 2,500 detectable proteins. The research team discovered that there were 738 proteins that were identified only in CFS but not in either healthy normal controls or patients with nPTLS and 692 proteins found only in the nPTLS patients. Previously there had been no available candidate biomarkers to distinguish between the two syndromes, nor even strong evidence that the central nervous system is involved in those conditions.

This research represents the most comprehensive analysis of the complete CSF proteome (collection of proteins) to date for both Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Neurologic Post Treatment Lyme disease (nPTLS). Prior to this study, many scientists believed that CFS was an umbrella category that included nPTLS. However these results call those previous suppositions into question.

According to Dr. Schutzer, spinal fluid proteins can likely be used as a marker of disease, and this study provides a starting point for research in that area. “One next step will be to find the best biomarkers that will give conclusive diagnostic results,” he says. “In addition, if a protein pathway is found to influence either disease, scientists could then develop treatments to target that particular pathway.”

“Newer techniques that are being developed by the team will allow researchers to dig even deeper and get more information for these and other neurologic diseases,” says Dr. Smith. “These exciting findings are the tip of our research iceberg”

Journal Reference: Steven E Schutzer, Thomas E Angel, Tao Liu, Athena A Schepmoes, Therese R Clauss, Joshua N Adkins, David G Camp, Bart K Holland, Jonas Bergquist, Patricia K Coyle, Richard D Smith, Brian A Fallon, Benjamin H Natelson. Distinct Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomes Differentiate Post-Treatment Lyme Disease from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. PLoS ONE, 23 Feb 2011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017287

 

Source: Public Library of Science. “Spinal fluid proteins distinguish Lyme disease from chronic fatigue syndrome.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 23 February 2011. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/02/110223171235.htm

 

Anti-neural antibody response in patients with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms versus those with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms (PTLDS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) have several clinical features in common, including fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive difficulties (Gaudino et al., 1997). Immunologic mechanisms have been suspected to play a role in both PTLDS and ME/CFS. However, biomarkers for the two conditions are currently lacking, creating a barrier to better understand them. In a previous study published in BBI, we developed a semi-quantitative immunoblot assay to compare antibody reactivity to neural antigens in a group of PTLDS patients and controls (Chandra et al., 2010).

You can read the rest of this study here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638178/

 

Source: Ajamian M, Cooperstock M, Wormser GP, Vernon SD, Alaedini A. Anti-neural antibody response in patients with post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms versus those with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Aug;48:354-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638178/ (Full article)

 

Distinct cerebrospinal fluid proteomes differentiate post-treatment lyme disease from chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Neurologic Post Treatment Lyme disease (nPTLS) and Chronic Fatigue (CFS) are syndromes of unknown etiology. They share features of fatigue and cognitive dysfunction, making it difficult to differentiate them. Unresolved is whether nPTLS is a subset of CFS.

METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Pooled cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from nPTLS patients, CFS patients, and healthy volunteers were comprehensively analyzed using high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS), coupled with immunoaffinity depletion methods to reduce protein-masking by abundant proteins. Individual patient and healthy control CSF samples were analyzed directly employing a MS-based label-free quantitative proteomics approach. We found that both groups, and individuals within the groups, could be distinguished from each other and normals based on their specific CSF proteins (p<0.01). CFS (n = 43) had 2,783 non-redundant proteins, nPTLS (n = 25) contained 2,768 proteins, and healthy normals had 2,630 proteins. Preliminary pathway analysis demonstrated that the data could be useful for hypothesis generation on the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these two related syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS: nPTLS and CFS have distinguishing CSF protein complements. Each condition has a number of CSF proteins that can be useful in providing candidates for future validation studies and insights on the respective mechanisms of pathogenesis. Distinguishing nPTLS and CFS permits more focused study of each condition, and can lead to novel diagnostics and therapeutic interventions.

 

Source: Schutzer SE, Angel TE, Liu T, Schepmoes AA, Clauss TR, Adkins JN, Camp DG, Holland BK, Bergquist J, Coyle PK, Smith RD, Fallon BA, Natelson BH. Distinct cerebrospinal fluid proteomes differentiate post-treatment lyme disease from chronic fatigue syndrome. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e17287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017287. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3044169/ (Full article)

 

Post-Lyme syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuropsychiatric similarities and differences

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and post-Lyme syndrome (PLS) share many features, including symptoms of severe fatigue and cognitive difficulty.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the neuropsychiatric differences in these disorders to enhance understanding of how mood, fatigue, and cognitive performance interrelate in chronic illness.

METHODS: Twenty-five patients with CFS, 38 patients with PLS, and 56 healthy controls participated in the study. Patients with CFS met 1994 criteria for CFS and lacked histories suggestive of Lyme disease. Patients with PLS were seropositive for Lyme disease, had met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, or had histories strongly suggestive of Lyme disease and were experiencing severe fatigue that continued 6 months or more following completion of antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. All subjects completed self-report measures of somatic symptoms and mood disturbance and underwent neuropsychological testing. All patients also underwent a structured psychiatric interview.

RESULTS: Patients with CFS and PLS were similar in several somatic symptoms and in psychiatric profile. Patients with CFS reported more flulike symptoms than patients with PLS. Patients with PLS but not patients with CFS performed significantly worse than controls on tests of attention, verbal memory, verbal fluency, and motor speed. Patients with PLS without a premorbid history of psychiatric illness did relatively worse on cognitive tests than patients with PLS with premorbid psychiatric illness compared with healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite symptom overlap, patients with PLS show greater cognitive deficits than patients with CFS compared with healthy controls. This is particularly apparent among patients with PLS who lack premorbid psychiatric illness.

 

Source: Gaudino EA, Coyle PK, Krupp LB. Post-Lyme syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome. Neuropsychiatric similarities and differences. Arch Neurol. 1997 Nov;54(11):1372-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9362985