Tag: post-acute covid

Association Between SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19

Abstract:

Determinants of Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 are not known. Here we show that 83.3% of patients with viral RNA in blood (RNAemia) at presentation were symptomatic in the post-acute phase. RNAemia at presentation successfully predicted PASC, independent of patient demographics, worst disease severity, and length of symptoms.

Source: Ram-Mohan N, Kim D, Rogers AJ, Blish CA, Nadeau KC, Blomkalns AL, Yang S. Association Between SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 25;9(2):ofab646. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab646. PMID: 35111870; PMCID: PMC8802799. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802799/ (Full text)

Diagnostic challenges posed by intersections between post-acute covid syndrome and neurocognitive disorders

Introduction:

COVID-19 initially was considered an acute respiratory illness. Its severity was classified on the basis of symptoms of respiratory distress for example, tachypnoea and hypoxia. Accordingly, 80% cases reported asymptomatic or mild illness, about 5–15% being moderate severity and the last 5% requiring hospital-based care (COVID, 2021). Almost everyone was expected to tide over the infection in a couple of weeks. In the acute phase of the illness, central nervous system (CNS) involvement manifests as headaches, confusion, cerebrovascular events like strokes, dizziness and seizures (Wang et al., 2020–Pezzini et al., 2020). Infecting cells bearing the ACE- 2 receptor, it involves multiple organ systems, some of which are now known to run a chronic course. Its understanding as an acute infection has changed as more and more persons now report persistent symptoms running over months (Revised Guidelines on Clinical Management, 2021).

Studies report that between 30% and 40% of those recovered from COVID-19 infections report of lasting symptoms (Chopra et al., 2021). Accurate estimates of persons suffering from Post Acute Covid Syndrome (PACS) are unreliable as yet considering ongoing community transmissions and limitations in health care access. With over 215 million reported cases (coronavirus.jhu.edu, 2021), numbers of those with PACS can overrun any health system. Symptoms persisting beyond 4 weeks after recovery from acute infection range from chest pain and palpitations, shortness of breath, muscle and joint aches and pains, headaches, neuropathy and paraesthesia, fatigue, anosmia, ageusia, myalgia, cardiopulmonary insufficiency, increased propensity for thromboembolic phenomena, micro vascular coagulopathies, demyelinating conditions, cognitive dysfunctions, psychological distress and even sleep and mood disturbances. Collectively, these neuropsychiatric symptoms are sometimes referred to as “brain fog” and can be incapacitating. It is also unclear how long these symptoms will last.

Pathophysiology of COVID-19 related complications is largely unknown. Current research suggests that the chronic inflammation and aberrant immune responses in the host can be a cause of chronic inflammation, resulting in long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms (weeks – months post-acute infection) (Bechter, 2013). Inflammatory markers take much longer to return to pre morbid levels: correlations with PACS are however unclear. Data from the National Survey of Residential Care Facilities in the United States showed that 70% of individuals in these facilities had some cognitive issues, out of which 29% had mild and 19% had severe cognitive impairment (Zimmerman et al., 2014). Coronavirus infection outbreaks in the past like for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (2002–04) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (2012) have also had neuropsychiatric symptoms: depressed mood, anxiety, insomnia, irritability, and memory impairments were noted. Psychological factors may also contribute to the development of some long term neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Roughly, 10% of the current global population is aged 65 or older (United Nations, 2021). Estimates of people living with neurocognitive disorder (NCDs) hover around 50 million worldwide with 10 million new cases added yearly. Globally, 80% of the deaths attributable to COVID-19 infections have occurred amongst persons 65 or older: however, age disaggregated data for COVID-19 infection, survival, lasting morbidity and mortality are unavailable.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Philip S, Shoib S, Gregor Issac T, Javed S. Diagnostic challenges posed by intersections between post-acute covid syndrome and neurocognitive disorders. Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Jan;67:102936. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102936. Epub 2021 Nov 21. PMID: 34844177; PMCID: PMC8606183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8606183/ (Full text)

Multi-disciplinary collaborative consensus guidance statement on the assessment and treatment of cognitive symptoms in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC)

Introduction:

The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has brought with it a plethora of new challenges. In the beginning of the pandemic, efforts were focused on pathogenesis and acute treatment; however, over time, understanding and managing post-COVID sequelae have become the new frontier.1, 2 Generally, the majority of individuals show symptom resolution within 3–4 weeks of COVID-19, but a substantial number of people continue to experience lingering effects and develop protracted illness, regardless of initial symptom severity. Although still being defined, these effects can be collectively referred to as postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC),3 which is the term used in this report. Notably, there are a number of other terms that are found in the literature (eg, long COVID, postacute COVID-19 syndrome, long-haul COVID, chronic COVID). At the time of development, much of the literature focused on patients who were not vaccinated, and the incidence and trajectory of PASC in vaccinated patients with “breakthrough” cases (including but not limited to current and emerging variants of the virus) are evolving. The PASC Collaborative took this into account during the development process and these guidance statements generally apply to individuals who develop PASC regardless of their vaccination status.

This guidance statement has a specific focus on the cognitive-related symptoms of PASC that can occur in people who have been diagnosed with acute COVID-19 infection or presumed to have had the infection and initially experienced mild to severe symptoms. Some patients required hospital acute care, whereas many others were managed in nonhospitalized community settings. This consensus guidance statement is one in a series extending across the breadth of the most prevalent or recognized PASC sequelae. Published and in-process guidance statements from this collaborative include the assessment and management of PASC associated fatigue, breathing and respiratory sequelae, cardiovascular complications, autonomic dysfunction, mental health, and neurologic sequelae. These statements are intended to provide consensus-driven practice guidance to clinicians in the assessment and treatment of individuals presenting with PASC.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Fine JS, Ambrose AF, Didehbani N, Fleming TK, Glashan L, Longo M, Merlino A, Ng R, Nora GJ, Rolin S, Silver JK, Terzic CM, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Sampsel S. Multi-disciplinary collaborative consensus guidance statement on the assessment and treatment of cognitive symptoms in patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):96-111. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12745. Epub 2022 Jan 12. PMID: 34902226. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pmrj.12745 (Full text)

Immunoglobulin signature predicts risk of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Abstract:

Following acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) a significant proportion of individuals develop prolonged symptoms, a serious condition termed post-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome (PACS) or long COVID. Predictors of PACS are needed. In a prospective multicentric cohort study of 215 individuals, we study COVID-19 patients during primary infection and up to one year later, compared to healthy subjects. We discover an immunoglobulin (Ig) signature, based on total IgM and IgG3 levels, which – combined with age, history of asthma bronchiale, and five symptoms during primary infection – is able to predict the risk of PACS independently of timepoint of blood sampling. We validate the score in an independent cohort of 395 individuals with COVID-19. Our results highlight the benefit of measuring Igs for the early identification of patients at high risk for PACS, which facilitates the study of targeted treatment and pathomechanisms of PACS.

Source: Cervia C, Zurbuchen Y, Taeschler P, Ballouz T, Menges D, Hasler S, Adamo S, Raeber ME, Bächli E, Rudiger A, Stüssi-Helbling M, Huber LC, Nilsson J, Held U, Puhan MA, Boyman O. Immunoglobulin signature predicts risk of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 25;13(1):446. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27797-1. PMID: 35078982. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27797-1 (Full text)

Post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19: an unequal burden

COVID-19 and its neurological consequences particularly burden marginalized communities, and so can only be effectively treated by advancing health equity.

Our world has witnessed over 275 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and over 5 million related deaths1. Marginalized communities everywhere continue to be disproportionately affected as the pandemic amplifies longstanding health and healthcare disparities. As an example, in the United States, members of the Black, Indigenous and Latino communities remain two to three times more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, to be hospitalized with COVID-19 and to die from this disease2. Dismantling structural racism is necessary to improve neurological health, as greater attention is focused on understanding and addressing the post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19, or the neurological manifestations of what is sometimes called long COVID.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Nolen, L.T., Mukerji, S.S. & Mejia, N.I. Post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19: an unequal burden. Nat Med 28, 20–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01647-5  (Full text)

Multiple Early Factors Anticipate Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequelae

Summary:

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) represent an emerging global crisis. However, quantifiable risk-factors for PASC and their biological associations are poorly resolved. We executed a deep multi-omic, longitudinal investigation of 309 COVID-19 patients from initial diagnosis to convalescence (2-3 months later), integrated with clinical data, and patient-reported symptoms.
We resolved four PASC-anticipating risk factors at the time of initial COVID-19 diagnosis: type 2 diabetes, SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia, Epstein-Barr virus viremia, and specific autoantibodies. In patients with gastrointestinal PASC, SARS-CoV-2-specific and CMV-specific CD8+ T cells exhibited unique dynamics during recovery from COVID-19. Analysis of symptom-associated immunological signatures revealed coordinated immunity polarization into four endotypes exhibiting divergent acute severity and PASC. We find that immunological associations between PASC factors diminish over time leading to distinct convalescent immune states. Detectability of most PASC factors at COVID-19 diagnosis emphasizes the importance of early disease measurements for understanding emergent chronic conditions and suggests PASC treatment strategies.

Source: : Su, Y., Yuan, D., Chen, D.G., Ng, R.H., Wang, K., Choi, J., Li, S., Hong, S., Zhang, R., Xie, J., Kornilov, S.A., Scherler, K., Pavlovitch-Bedzyk, A.J., Dong, S., Lausted, C., Lee, I., Fallen, S., Dai, C.L., Baloni, P., Smith, B., Duvvuri, V.R., Anderson, K.G., Li, J., Yang, F., Duncombe, C.J., McCulloch, D.J., Rostomily, C., Troisch, P., Zhou, J., Mackay, S., DeGottardi, Q., May, D.H, Taniguchi, R., Gittelman, R.M, Klinger, M., Snyder, T.M, Roper, R., Wojciechowska, G., Murray, K., Edmark, R., Evans, S., Jones, L., Zhou, Y., Rowen, L., Liu, R., Chour, W., Algren, H.A, Berrington, W.R., Wallick, J.A., Cochran, R.A., Micikas, M.E., the ISB-Swedish COVID19 Biobanking Unit, Terri Wrin, Petropoulos, C.J., Cole, H.R., Fischer, T.D., Wei, W., Hoon, D.S.B., Price, N.D., Subramanian, N., Hill, J.A, Hadlock, J., Magis, A.T., Ribas, A., Lanier, L.L., Boyd, S.D., Bluestone, J.A., Chu, H., Hood, L., Gottardo, R., Greenberg, P.D., Davis, M.M., Goldman, J.D., Heath, J.R., Multiple Early Factors Anticipate Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequelae, Cell (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.014. (Full text)

Evaluation of 3-month follow-up of patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Abstract:

Background: In addition to the highly variable clinical presentation of acute COVID-19 infection, it can also cause various post-acute signs and symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate patients with post-acute COVID-19 over 12 weeks of follow-up.

Methods: The study included 151 patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by real-time PCR of a nasopharyngeal swab 1 month earlier, had radiologic findings consistent with COVID-19 pneumonia, and presented to the post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic between May and August 2021. The patients were divided into three groups based on COVID-19 severity: non-severe pneumonia (group 1), severe pneumonia (group 2), and severe pneumonia requiring intensive care (group 3).

Results: Evaluation of laboratory parameters at 4 and 12 weeks showed that group 3 had higher lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) level and lower mean platelet volume than the other groups at both time points (p=0.001 for all). Group 3 also had lower FVC%, FEV1%, and DLCO/VA% compared to groups 1 and 2 at week 4 (p=0.001, 0.004, 0.001, respectively) and compared to group 1 at 12 weeks (p=0.002, 0.03, 0.001, respectively). Patients with persistent dyspnea at 12 weeks had significantly lower FEV1%, FVC%, DLCO/VA%, and saturation levels in room air and significantly higher LDH, pro-BNP, D-dimer, and heart rate compared to those without dyspnea (p=0.001 for all).

Conclusion: Although the lungs are most commonly affected after COVID-19 infection, vascular and endothelial damage also causes multisystem involvement. Our study indicates that laboratory values, radiological signs, and pulmonary functional capacity improved in most patients after 12 weeks of follow-up. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Source: Kerget B, Çelik E, Kerget F, Aksakal A, Uçar EY, Araz Ö, Akgün M. Evaluation of 3-month follow-up of patients with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. J Med Virol. 2022 Jan 9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27579. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35001367. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35001367/

Successful application of pulsed electromagnetic fields in a patient with post-COVID-19 fatigue: a case report

Abstract:

in English, German

Background: Post-COVID-19 fatigue is a frequent symptom in COVID-19 survivors, which substantially limits patients to achieve full recovery and potentially restrains return to work. The previous literature has not yet reported the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields in this indication.

Methods: Over the course of 5 weeks, 10 sessions of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment with a high magnetic flux density were applied to a patient suffering from post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome. Fatigue, work ability, quality of life as well as anxiety, depression, stress level, and resilience were evaluated using validated patient-reported outcome measures.

Results: Fatigue, work ability, quality of life, and psychological well-being improved clearly over the course of the treatment and showed stable results 6 weeks later.

Conclusion: The use of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy with a device that allows sufficient penetration of the body tissue might be a promising physical modality to manage post-COVID-19 fatigue syndrome, which could reduce clinical and economic health consequences. Clinical sham-controlled studies are needed to evaluate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in this indication.

Source: Wagner B, Steiner M, Markovic L, Crevenna R. Successful application of pulsed electromagnetic fields in a patient with post-COVID-19 fatigue: a case report. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2022 Jan 10:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s10354-021-00901-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35006516; PMCID: PMC8743351. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8743351/ (Full text)

Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis Post-COVID-19 Is Not Suggestive of Persistent Central Nervous System Infection

Abstract:

This study was undertaken to assess whether SARS-CoV-2 causes a persistent central nervous system infection. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody index and SARS-CoV-2 RNA were studied in cerebrospinal fluid following COVID-19. Cerebrospinal fluid was assessed between days 1 and 30 (n = 12), between days 31 and 90 (n = 8), or later than 90 days (post-COVID-19, n = 20) after COVID-19 diagnosis. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was absent in all patients, and in none of the 20 patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome were intrathecally produced anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detected. The absence of evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid argues against a persistent central nervous system infection as a cause of neurological or neuropsychiatric post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Source: Schweitzer F, Goereci Y, Franke C, Silling S, Bösl F, Maier F, Heger E, Deiman B, Prüss H, Onur OA, Klein F, Fink GR, Di Cristanziano V, Warnke C. Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis Post-COVID-19 Is Not Suggestive of Persistent Central Nervous System Infection. Ann Neurol. 2022 Jan;91(1):150-157. doi: 10.1002/ana.26262. Epub 2021 Nov 22. PMID: 34724243; PMCID: PMC8653324. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8653324/ (Full text)

Fatigue and Cognitive Impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract:

Importance: COVID-19 is associated with clinically significant symptoms despite resolution of the acute infection (i.e., post-COVID-19 syndrome). Fatigue and cognitive impairment are amongst the most common and debilitating symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Objective: To quantify the proportion of individuals experiencing fatigue and cognitive impairment 12 or more weeks following COVID-19 diagnosis, and to characterize the inflammatory correlates and functional consequences of post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Data sources: Systematic searches were conducted without language restrictions from database inception to June 8, 2021 on PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, Embase, Web of Science, Google/Google Scholar, and select reference lists.

Study selection: Primary research articles which evaluated individuals at least 12 weeks after confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and specifically reported on fatigue, cognitive impairment, inflammatory parameters, and/or functional outcomes were selected.

Data extraction & synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted published summary data and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to pool Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformed proportions using the random-effects restricted maximum-likelihood model.

Main outcomes & measures: The co-primary outcomes were the proportions of individuals reporting fatigue and cognitive impairment, respectively, 12 or more weeks after COVID-19 infection. The secondary outcomes were inflammatory correlates and functional consequences of post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Results: The literature search yielded 10,979 studies, and 81 studies were selected for inclusion. The fatigue meta-analysis comprised 68 studies, the cognitive impairment meta-analysis comprised 43 studies, and 48 studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Meta-analysis revealed that the proportion of individuals experiencing fatigue 12 or more weeks following COVID-19 diagnosis was 0.32 (95% CI, 0.27, 0.37; p < 0.001; n = 25,268; I2=99.1%). The proportion of individuals exhibiting cognitive impairment was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.17, 0.28; p < 0.001; n = 13,232; I2=98.0). Moreover, narrative synthesis revealed elevations in proinflammatory markers and considerable functional impairment in a subset of individuals.

Conclusions & relevance: A significant proportion of individuals experience persistent fatigue and/or cognitive impairment following resolution of acute COVID-19. The frequency and debilitating nature of the foregoing symptoms provides the impetus to characterize the underlying neurobiological substrates and how to best treat these phenomena.

Study Registration PROSPERO (CRD42021256965).

Source: Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, Lee Y, Gill H, Teopiz KM, Rodrigues NB, Subramaniapillai M, Di Vincenzo JD, Cao B, Lin K, Mansur RB, Ho RC, Rosenblat JD, Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Maletic V, McIntyre RS. Fatigue and Cognitive Impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2021 Dec 29;101:93–135. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.12.020. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34973396; PMCID: PMC8715665. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715665/ (Full text)