Tag: medical attitudes

Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland

Abstract:

in English, Arabic

Objectives: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex chronic and debilitating multifactorial disease. Adequate patient care is challenged by poor knowledge among health care professionals and the historical misconception that the disease is psychological in nature. This study assessed the health-related challenges faced by patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland and examined whether they receive adequate health care.

Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire between June and September of 2021, among 169 patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland.

Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 38.8 years. Only one-third of ME/CFS affected children and youth were correctly diagnosed before their 18th birthday. The mean time from disease onset to diagnosis was 6.7 years, and patients had an average of 11.1 different appointments and 2.6 misdiagnoses. A poor diagnosis rate and insufficient disease knowledge among health professionals in Switzerland led 13.5% of the patients to travel abroad to seek a diagnosis. Most patients (90.5%) were told at least once that their symptoms were psychosomatic. Swiss patients expressed high dissatisfaction with the health system and indicated that physicians lacked knowledge regarding ME/CFS. Therapies prescribed by physicians or tried by patients, as well as their perceived efficacy, were described. Graded Exercise Therapy (GET) was perceived as harmful by patients, whereas pacing, complementary/alternative medicine, and dietary supplements and medications to alleviate symptoms were reported to be helpful to varying degrees.

Conclusion: This study highlights that poor disease knowledge among health care providers in Switzerland has led to high patient dissatisfaction, and delays in ME/CFS diagnoses and prescription of inappropriate therapies, thus adding to patient distress and disease burden.

Source: Tschopp R, König RS, Rejmer P, Paris DH. Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jan 4;18(4):876-885. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019. PMID: 36852237; PMCID: PMC9957780. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9957780/ (Full text)

Doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions

Abstract:

This study uses machine learning and natural language processing tools to examine the language used by healthcare professionals on a global online forum. It contributes to an underdeveloped area of knowledge, that of physician attitudes toward their patients. Using comments left by physicians on Reddit’s ”Medicine” subreddit (r/medicine), we test if the language from online discussions can reveal doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions. We focus on a set of chronic conditions that usually are more stigmatized and compare them to ones well accepted by the medical community.

We discovered that when comparing diseases with similar traits, doctors discussed some conditions with more negative attitudes. These results show bias does not occur only along the dimensions traditionally analyzed in the economics literature of gender and race, but also along the dimension of disease type. This is meaningful because the emotions associated with beliefs impact physicians’ decision making, prescribing behavior, and quality of care. First, we run a binomial LASSO-logistic regression to compare a range of 21 diseases against myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), depression, and the autoimmune diseases multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Next, we use dictionary methods to compare five more chronic diseases: Lyme disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), Alzheimer’s disease, osteoporosis, and lupus. The results show physicians discuss ME/CFS, depression, and Lyme disease with more negative language than the other diseases in the set. The results for ME/CFS included over four times more negative words than the results for depression.

Source: Brooke Scoles, Catia Nicodemo. Doctors’ attitudes toward specific medical conditions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 204, December 2022, Pages 182-199. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726812200347X (Full text)

Support amid uncertainty: Long COVID illness experiences and the role of online communities

Abstract:

Long COVID is characterized by persistent and debilitating long-term symptoms from COVID-19. Many persons with Long COVID began gathering in online communities during the early phases of the pandemic to share their illness experiences. This qualitative interview study explored the subjective experiences of 20 persons with Long COVID recruited from five online communities. Their understandings of illness and associated implications for social relationships with family and friends, healthcare professionals, and online community members were explored.

Three themes were identified from our analysis, including (1) complex and unpredictable illness experienced amid an evolving understanding of the pandemic; (2) frustration, dismissal, and gaslighting in healthcare interactions; and (3) validation and support from online communities. These findings highlight the significant uncertainty that persons with Long COVID navigated, the features of their often dismaying healthcare experiences, and the ways in which online communities aided them in understanding their illness.

Source: Russell D, Spence NJ, Chase JD, Schwartz T, Tumminello CM, Bouldin E. Support amid uncertainty: Long COVID illness experiences and the role of online communities. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100177. Epub 2022 Oct 4. PMID: 36212783; PMCID: PMC9531408. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531408/ (Full text)

Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome, understood as per (bio) psychosocial discourse, is a political construction, serving actors and structures associated with welfare reform, to the detriment of patients.

The condition typically known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic, disabling condition characterised by post-exertional malaise, often accompanied by cognitive impairment, pain, sleep disturbance, gastro-intestinal and autonomic dysfunction (Goudsmit et al., 2009). ME/CFS is positioned as having multifactorial aetiology, including a genetic predisposition, precipitated by viral, bacterial and parasitic infection, toxins and stress, perpetuated through neuro-immune and metabolic dysfunction (Cortes Rivera et al., 2019). The dominant conceptualisation of ME/CFS in UK healthcare, generated through a biopsychosocial model with a cognitivebehavioural focus, is that of a psychosocial entity which, whilst possibly precipitated by a virus or other stressor, is perpetuated by ‘maladaptive’ illness beliefs, fear-avoidance behaviours, and social reinforcement (Sharpe et al., 1997; Deary et al., 2007; Harvey & Wessely, 2009). This conceptualisation has been critiqued for lacking empirical support.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Hunt, Joanne. Towards a critical psychology of chronic fatigue syndrome: Biopsychosocial narratives and UK welfare reform. Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 18-28  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361017759_Towards_a_critical_psychology_of_chronic_fatigue_syndrome_Biopsychosocial_narratives_and_UK_welfare_reform (Full text)

Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment

Abstract:

While we know a lot more about Long Covid today, patients who were infected with Covid-19 early on in the pandemic and developed Long Covid had to contend with medical professionals who lacked awareness of the potential for extended complications from Covid-19. Long Covid patients have responded by labeling their contentious interactions with medical professionals, organizations, and the broader medical system as “gaslighting.” We argue that the charge of medical gaslighting can be understood as a form of ontological politics. Not only do patients demand that their version of reality be recognized, but they also blame the experts who hold gatekeeping power over their medical care for producing a distorted version of said reality.

By analyzing results from an online survey of Long Covid patients active on social media in the United States (n ​= ​334), we find that experiences of contention and their reframing as “gaslighting” were common amongst our respondents. In short answer responses about their experience obtaining medical care for Long Covid, our respondents described encountering medical professionals who dismissed their experience, leading to lengthy diagnostic odysseys and lack of treatment options for Long Covid. Even though we are limited by characteristics of our sample, there is good reason to believe that these experiences and their contentious reframing as medical gaslighting are exacerbated by gender, class, and racial inequalities.

Source: Au L, Capotescu C, Eyal G, Finestone G. Long covid and medical gaslighting: Dismissal, delayed diagnosis, and deferred treatment. SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Sep 7;2:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100167. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36092770; PMCID: PMC9448633.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001299 (Full text)

Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community

Abstract:

Background: In 2020, the long-lasting effects of the Covid-19 virus were not included in public messages of risks to public health. Long Covid emerged as a novel and enigmatic illness with a serious and life-changing impact. Long Covid is poorly explained by objective medical tests, leading to widespread disbelief and stigma associated with the condition. The aim of this organic research is to explore the physical and epistemic challenges of living with Long Covid.

Methods: Unlike any previous pandemic in history, online Covid communities and ‘citizen science’ have played a leading role in advancing our understanding of Long Covid. As patient-led research of this grassroots Covid community, a team approach to thematic analysis was undertaken of 66 patient stories submitted online to covid19-recovery.org at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic between April and September 2020.

Results: The overriding theme of the analysis highlights the complexities and challenges of living with Long Covid. Our distinct themes were identified: the life-changing impact of the condition, the importance of validation and how, for many, seeking alternatives was felt to be their only option.

Conclusions: Long Covid does not easily fit into the dominant evidence-based practice and the biomedical model of health, which rely on objective indicators of the disease process. Patient testimonies are vital to understanding and treating Long Covid, yet patients are frequently disbelieved, and their testimonies are not taken seriously leading to stigma and epistemic injustice, which introduces a lack of trust into the therapeutic relationship.

Patient contribution: The research was undertaken in partnership with our consumer representative(s) and all findings and subsequent recommendations have been coproduced.

Source: Ireson J, Taylor A, Richardson E, Greenfield B, Jones G. Exploring invisibility and epistemic injustice in Long Covid-A citizen science qualitative analysis of patient stories from an online Covid community. Health Expect. 2022 May 12. doi: 10.1111/hex.13518. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35557480. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.13518 (Full text)

Long Covid at the crossroads: Comparisons and lessons from the treatment of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Abstract:

Whilst parallels have been drawn between Long Covid and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), there is a well-documented history of negative stereotyping and marginalisation of patients with ME/CFS. A socio-politically oriented comparison of scientific, clinical and societal responses to Long Covid and ME/CFS is thus important to prevent similar harms arising among Long Covid patients. We identify four reasons for injustices in the treatment of ME/CFS patients, and discuss the risk of Long Covid following a similar trajectory. We conclude with policy and practice recommendations to help prevent such injustices arising again, including consideration of critical reflexivity in medical education.

Source: Hunt J, Blease C, Geraghty KJ. Long Covid at the crossroads: Comparisons and lessons from the treatment of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar 27:13591053221084494. doi: 10.1177/13591053221084494. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35341334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35341334/

Stigma perceived by patients with functional somatic syndromes and its effect on health outcomes – A systematic review

Abstract:

Background: Patients with functional somatic syndromes (FSS) experience stigma which arguably affects their health.

Aim: To determine the presence of perceived stigma and its effects on physical and mental health in patients with FSS compared to patients with comparable explained conditions.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library was performed to select studies focusing on stigma perceived by patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fibromyalgia (FM) or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), comparing these patients to patients with comparable but explained conditions.

Results: We identified 1931 studies after duplicate removal. After screening we included eight studies: one study about all three FSS, one about IBS, five about FM and one about CFS. We found that patients with IBS did not consistently experience higher levels of stigma than those with a comparable explained condition. Patients with CFS and FM experienced higher levels of stigma compared to patients with comparable explained conditions. All studies showed a correlation between stigma and negative health outcomes.

Discussion: Patients with FSS experience stigma and negative health outcomes. However, experiencing stigma is not restricted to patients with FSS, as many patients with explained health conditions also experience stigma. Whether stigma has more negative health consequences in patients with FSS compared to patients with explained health conditions remains unclear and should be assessed in future research.

Source: Ko C, Lucassen P, van der Linden B, Ballering A, Olde Hartman T. Stigma perceived by patients with functional somatic syndromes and its effect on health outcomes – A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2022 Jan 6;154:110715. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110715. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35016138. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35016138/

 

ME/CFS and the biopsychosocial model: a review of patient harm and distress in the medical encounter

Abstract:

Objective: Despite the growing evidence of physiological and cellular abnormalities in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), there has been a strong impetus to tackle the illness utilizing a biopsychosocial model. However, many sufferers of this disabling condition report distress and dissatisfaction following medical encounters. This review seeks to account for this discord.

Methods: A narrative review methodology is employed to synthesize the evidence for potential iatrogenesis.

Results: We identify seven potential modalities of iatrogenesis or harm reported by patients: difficulties in reaching an acceptable diagnosis; misdiagnosis, including of other medical and psychological conditions; difficulties in accessing the sick role, medical care and social support; high levels of patient dissatisfaction with the quality of medical care; negative responses to controversial therapies (cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy); challenges to the patient narrative and experience; psychological harm (individual and collective distress).

Conclusion: The biopsychosocial framework currently applied to ME/CFS is too narrow in focus and fails to adequately incorporate the patient narrative. Misdiagnosis, conflict, and harm are observable outcomes where doctors’ and patients’ perspectives remain incongruent. Biopsychosocial practices should be scrutinized for potential harms. Clinicians should consider adopting alternative patient-centred approaches.

Implications for rehabilitation: Patients with ME/CFS may report or experience one or more of the modalities of harms and distress identified in this review. It is important health and rehabilitation professionals seek to avoid and minimize harms when treating or assisting ME/CFS patients. There are conflicting models of ME/CFS; we highlight two divergent models, a biopsychosocial model and a biomedical model that is preferred by patients. The ‘biopsychosocial framework’ applied in clinical practice promotes treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise therapy, however, the evidence for their success is contested and many patients reject the notion their illness is perpetuated by dysfunctional beliefs, personality traits, or behaviors. Health professionals may avoid conflict and harm causation in ME/CFS by adopting more concordant ‘patient-centred’ approaches that give greater prominence to the patient narrative and experience of illness.

Source: Geraghty KJ, Blease C. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and the biopsychosocial model: a review of patient harm and distress in the medical encounter. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec;41(25):3092-3102. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1481149. Epub 2018 Jun 21. PMID: 29929450. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29929450/

An Audit of UK Hospital Doctors’ Knowledge and Experience of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

Background and Objectives: There is some evidence that knowledge and understanding of ME among doctors is limited. Consequently, an audit study was carried out on a group of hospital doctors attending a training event to establish how much they knew about ME and their attitudes towards it.

Materials and Methods: Participants at the training event were asked to complete a questionnaire, enquiring about prior knowledge and experience of ME and their approaches to diagnosis and treatment. A total of 44 completed questionnaires were returned. Responses were tabulated, proportions selecting available options determined, 95% confidence limits calculated, and the significance of associations determined by Fisher’s exact test.

Results: Few respondents had any formal teaching on ME, though most had some experience of it. Few knew how to diagnose it and most lacked confidence in managing it. None of the respondents who had had teaching or prior experience of ME considered it a purely physical illness. Overall, 91% of participants believed ME was at least in part psychological. Most participants responded correctly to a series of propositions about the general epidemiology and chronicity of ME. There was little knowledge of definitions of ME, diagnosis, or of clinical manifestations. Understanding about appropriate management was very deficient. Similarly, there was little appreciation of the impact of the disease on daily living or quality of life. Where some doctors expressed confidence diagnosing or managing ME, this was misplaced as they were incorrect on the nature of ME, its diagnostic criteria and its treatment.

Conclusion: This audit demonstrates that most doctors lack training and clinical expertise in ME. Nevertheless, participants recognised a need for further training and indicated a wish to participate in this. It is strongly recommended that factually correct and up-to-date medical education on ME be made a priority at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. It is also recommended that this audit be repeated following a period of medical education.

Source: Hng KN, Geraghty K, Pheby DFH. An Audit of UK Hospital Doctors’ Knowledge and Experience of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 27;57(9):885. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090885. PMID: 34577808. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34577808/