Tag: long Covid

Prevalence of Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequalae and Average Time to Diagnosis Among Persons Living With HIV

Abstract:

Aims: The aims of this meta-analysis were to assess: the prevalence of Post-Acute COVID-19 sequalae in HIV positive patients; average time of diagnosis; and meta-regress for possible moderators of PACS.
Methods: A standard search strategy was used in PubMed, and then later modified according to each specific database to get the best relevant results. These included Medline indexed journals; PubMed Central; NCBI Bookshelf and publishers’ Web sites in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “long COVID-19 or post-acute COVID-19 syndrome/sequalae”, “persons living with HIV or HIV. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical articles reporting HIV in association with long COVID-19, further, the average time to an event of post-acute COVID-19 sequelae among primary infected patients with COVID-19. Random-effects model was used. Rank Correlation and Egger’s tests were used to ascertain publication bias. Sub-group, sensitivity and meta-regression analysis were conducted. A 95% confidence intervals were presented and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Review Manager 5.4 and comprehensive meta-analysis version 4 (CMA V4) were used for the analysis. The review/trial was PROSPERO registered (CRD42022328509).
Results: A total of 43 studies reported post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Of those, five reported post-acute COVID-19 sequalae in PLHIV. Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 sequalae was 43.1% (95% CI 20.5% to 68.9%) in persons living with HIV (PLWH). The average time to PACS diagnosis was 4 months at 64% [0.64 (95% CI 0.230, 0.913) (P < 0.0000), I2= 93%] and at one year to PACS diagnosis was at 70 %, however with non-significant correlation (P > 0.05). On comorbidities, asthenia was associated with PACS at 17.6 % [0.176 (95% CI 0.067, 0.385) (P = 0.008), I2= 86%] while fatigue at 82%, however not related with PACS event incidence (P < 0.05). Americas, Asian and European regions showed PACS events rates of 82%, 43% and 19 % respectively (P<0.05) relative to HIV infection.
Conclusion: PACS prevalence in PLWH was 43% occurring at an average time of 4 months at 64% and 70 % at 12 months however non-significant with PACS. Asthenia was significantly associated with PACS at 17.6 % while fatigue at 82%, however not related with PACS event incidence. Americas recorded the highest PACS event rates in PLWH.
Source: Muthuka, J.; Nyamai, E.; Onyango, C.; Oluoch, K.; Nabaweesi, R. Prevalence of Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequalae and Average Time to Diagnosis Among Persons Living With HIV. Preprints 2023, 2023081633. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202308.1633.v1 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202308.1633/v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

Persistent symptoms after COVID-19 are not associated with differential SARS-CoV-2 antibody or T cell immunity

Abstract:

Among the unknowns in decoding the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 persistent symptoms in Long Covid is whether there is a contributory role of abnormal immunity during acute infection. It has been proposed that Long Covid is a consequence of either an excessive or inadequate initial immune response.

Here, we analyze SARS-CoV-2 humoral and cellular immunity in 86 healthcare workers with laboratory confirmed mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave. Symptom questionnaires allow stratification into those with persistent symptoms and those without for comparison.

During the period up to 18-weeks post-infection, we observe no difference in antibody responses to spike RBD or nucleoprotein, virus neutralization, or T cell responses. Also, there is no difference in the profile of antibody waning. Analysis at 1-year, after two vaccine doses, comparing those with persistent symptoms to those without, again shows similar SARS-CoV-2 immunity. Thus, quantitative differences in these measured parameters of SARS-CoV-2 adaptive immunity following mild or asymptomatic acute infection are unlikely to have contributed to Long Covid causality. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04318314).

Source: Altmann DM, Reynolds CJ, Joy G, Otter AD, Gibbons JM, Pade C, Swadling L, Maini MK, Brooks T, Semper A, McKnight Á, Noursadeghi M, Manisty C, Treibel TA, Moon JC; COVIDsortium investigators; Boyton RJ. Persistent symptoms after COVID-19 are not associated with differential SARS-CoV-2 antibody or T cell immunity. Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 23;14(1):5139. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40460-1. PMID: 37612310; PMCID: PMC10447583. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447583/ (Full text)

Pediatric and Adult Patients with ME/CFS following COVID-19: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis Using the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaire (MBSQ)

Abstract:

Purpose A subset of patients with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) fulfill the clinical criteria of myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). To establish the diagnosis of ME/CFS for clinical and research purposes, comprehensive scores have to be evaluated.

Methods We developed the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaires (MBSQs) and supplementary scoring sheets (SSSs) to allow for a rapid evaluation of common ME/CFS case definitions. The MBSQs were applied to young patients with chronic fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM) who presented to the MRI Chronic Fatigue Center for Young People (MCFC). Trials were retrospectively registered (NCT05778006, NCT05638724).

Results Using the MBSQs and SSSs, we report on ten patients aged 11 to 25 years diagnosed with ME/CFS after asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild to moderate COVID-19. Results from their MBSQs and from well-established patient-reported outcome measures indicated severe impairments of daily activities and health-related quality of life.

Conclusions ME/CFS can follow SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients younger than 18 years, rendering structured diagnostic approaches most relevant for pediatric PCC clinics. The MBSQs and SSSs represent novel diagnostic tools that can facilitate the diagnosis of ME/CFS in children, adolescents, and adults with PCC and other post-viral syndromes.

What is known ME/CFS is a frequent debilitating illness. For diagnosis, an extensive differential diagnostic workup is required and the evaluation of clinical ME/CFS criteria. ME/CFS following COVID-19 has been reported in adults but not in pediatric patients younger than 19 years of age.

What is new We present novel questionnairs (MBSQs), as tools to assess common ME/CFS case definitions in pediatric and adult patients with post-COVID-19 condition and beyond. We report on ten patients aged 11 to 25 years diagnosed with ME/CFS following asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild to moderate COVID-19.

Source: Laura C. Peo, Katharina Wiehler, Johannes Paulick, Katrin Gerrer, Ariane Leone, Anja Viereck, Matthias Haegele, Silvia Stojanov, Cordula Warlitz, Silvia Augustin, Martin Alberer, Daniel B. R. Hattesohl, Laura Froehlich, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Lorenz Mihatsch, Rafael Pricoco, Uta Behrends. Pediatric and Adult Patients with ME/CFS following COVID-19: A Structured Approach to Diagnosis Using the Munich Berlin Symptom Questionnaire (MBSQ). medRxiv 2023.08.23.23293081; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.23.23293081 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.23.23293081v1.full-text (Full text)

L-Arginine in Restoring ‘Immune Dysregulation’ in Long COVID: It’s the Therapeutic Role Beyond the Routine Dietary Supplement!

Abstract:

COVID-19 pandemic is over now and we are in great peace of relief after three years. This pandemic has observed significant impact on quality of life globally and the put unforgettable imprints on history of mankind. Reason for more havoc in this pandemic was less studied virus by medical scientists regarding its pathophysiology, available treatment options and lack of effective vaccine to tackle this dragon. COVID-19 is the first observed and reported pandemic of corona virus related global disease apart from its previous SARS and MERS. Fast track developments in medical treatment options due to this ultrafast digital and artificial intelligence techniques have curtailed mortality on large scale globally.
Although mortality is significantly reduced, morbidity is documented on a large scale worldwide in this pandemic. Morbidity due to COVID-19 now called as ‘Long COVID’, which is underreported & half-heartedly evaluated globally. Long COVID is related to persistent immune dysregulation occurs during evolution of COVID-19 as natural trend of disease.
Immune dysregulation has documented during course of active viremia, during recovery of viral illness and after post viral phase. Immune dysregulation occurs in ‘selected group’ of cases irrespective of disease severity and vaccination status and observed in cases with negligible illness to advanced one mandates further research. Thus, Immune dysregulation in COVID-19 is predominant cause for long covid and leading to brainstorming effect on medical scientists and researchers as of today.
Globally, one third of recovered or affected cases of COVID-19 are facing long covid and needs prompt treatment options to tackle this dragon related long term effect on body. ‘Immunomodulatory’ or immunity modifying agents are the primary targets to curtail immune dysregulation and long covid. Some experts recommend ‘disease modifying agents’ to treat long covid cases. Still, many miles to go to reach to effective treatment options for long covid and we don’t have effective options for this ‘health issue of global concern’.
L-Arginine is amino acid with multiple beneficial effects such as immunomodulatory effects which will regulates immunological response in inhibit dysregulated immune system additional to its universally known antioxidant, vasodilatory and regenerative and cellular proliferation effects on immune cells. These Immunomodulatory and or diseases modifying effects of L-Arginine makes it the future candidate with ‘game changer’ role for management of Long covid resulting from immune dysregulation as a core pathophysiologic pathway of this Dragon Pandemic.
Source: Patil, Dr Shital, Patil, Swati, Gondhali, Gajanan. L-Arginine in Restoring ‘Immune Dysregulation’ in Long COVID: It’s the Therapeutic Role Beyond the Routine Dietary Supplement!  South Asian Journal of Life Sciences, 5(4):60-74. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373217918_L-Arginine_in_Restoring_%27Immune_Dysregulation%27_in_Long_COVID_It%27s_the_Therapeutic_Role_Beyond_the_Routine_Dietary_Supplement (Full text)

Prevalence, pathogenesis and spectrum of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome: a narrative review

Summary:

  • Neurological symptoms are not uncommon during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and reflect a broad spectrum of neurological disorders of which clinicians should be aware.
  • The underlying pathogenesis of neurological disease in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be due to four mechanisms of nervous system dysfunction and injury: i) direct viral neurological invasion; ii) immune dysregulation; iii) endothelial dysfunction and coagulopathy; and iv) severe systemic COVID-19 disease.
  • Neurological manifestations of acute COVID-19 include headache, peripheral neuropathies, seizures, encephalitis, Guillain–Barré syndrome, and cerebrovascular disease.
  • Commonly reported long term neurological sequelae of COVID-19 are cognitive dysfunction and dysautonomia, which despite being associated with severe acute disease are also seen in people with mild disease.
  • Assessment of cognitive dysfunction after COVID-19 is confounded by a high prevalence of comorbid fatigue, anxiety, and mood disorders. However, other markers of neuroaxonal breakdown suggest no significant neuronal injury apart from during severe acute COVID-19.
  • The long term impact of COVID-19 on neurological diseases remains uncertain and requires ongoing vigilance.

Source: Wesselingh, R. (2023), Prevalence, pathogenesis and spectrum of neurological symptoms in COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 syndrome: a narrative review. Med J Aust. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52063 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52063 (Full text available as PDF file)

 

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of neuroinflammation in covid-19

Abstract:

Although neurological complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are relatively rare, their potential long term morbidity and mortality have a significant impact, given the large numbers of infected patients. Covid-19 is now in the differential diagnosis of a number of common neurological syndromes including encephalopathy, encephalitis, acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis, stroke, and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Physicians should be aware of the pathophysiology underlying these presentations to diagnose and treat patients rapidly and appropriately. Although good evidence has been found for neurovirulence, the neuroinvasive and neurotropic potential of SARS-CoV-2 is limited. The pathophysiology of most complications is immune mediated and vascular, or both. A significant proportion of patients have developed long covid, which can include neuropsychiatric presentations. The mechanisms of long covid remain unclear. The longer term consequences of infection with covid-19 on the brain, particularly in terms of neurodegeneration, will only become apparent with time and long term follow-up.

Source: Brown R L, Benjamin L, Lunn M P, Bharucha T, Zandi M S, Hoskote C et al. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of neuroinflammation in covid-19 BMJ 2023; 382 :e073923 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073923 https://www.bmj.com/content/382/bmj-2022-073923.abstract (Full text available as PDF file)

Long-term health consequences among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to individuals without infection: results of the population-based cohort study CoMoLo Follow-up

Abstract:

Background: Most of the previous studies on health sequelae of COVID-19 are uncontrolled cohorts and include a relatively short follow-up. This population-based multi-center cohort study examined health consequences among individuals about 1 to 1.5 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with non-infected.

Methods: The study population consisted of adults (≥ 18 years) from four municipalities particularly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in the year 2020 who completed a detailed follow-up questionnaire on health-related topics. Exposure was the SARS-CoV-2 infection status (based on IgG antibodies, PCR test, or physician-diagnosis of COVID-19) at baseline (May to December 2020). Outcomes assessed at follow-up (October 2021 to January 2022; mean: 452 days) included recurrent or persistent health complaints, incident diseases, health-related quality of life (PROMIS-29), subjective health, and subjective memory impairment. Logistic and linear regression models were adjusted for baseline sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics (age, sex, municipality, education, smoking, body mass index), pre-existing health conditions (chronic disease/health problem, health-related activity limitation, depressive/anxiety disorder), and follow-up time.

Results: Among 4817 participants, 350 had a SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline and 4467 had no infection at baseline or during follow-up. Those with an infection statistically significantly more often reported 7 out of 18 recurrent or persistent health complaints at follow-up: smell/taste disorders (12.8% vs. 3.4%, OR 4.11), shortness of breath (23.0% vs. 9.5%, 3.46), pain when breathing (4.7% vs. 1.9%, 2.36), fatigue (36.9% vs. 26.1%, 1.76), weakness in legs (12.8% vs. 7.8%, 1.93), myalgia/joint pain (21.9% vs. 15.1%, 1.53) and cough (30.8% vs. 24.8%, 1.34) and 3 out of 6 groups of incident diseases: liver/kidney (2.7% vs. 0.9%, 3.70), lung (3.2% vs. 1.1%, 3.50) and cardiovascular/metabolic (6.5% vs. 4.0%, 1.68) diseases. Those with an infection were significantly more likely to report poor subjective health (19.3% vs. 13.0%, 1.91), memory impairment (25.7% vs. 14.3%, 2.27), and worse mean scores on fatigue and physical function domains of PROMIS-29 than non-infected.

Conclusion: Even after more than one year, individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection showed an increased risk of various health complaints, functional limitations, and worse subjective well-being, pointing toward profound health consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection relevant for public health.

Source: Heidemann C, Sarganas G, Du Y, Gaertner B, Poethko-Müller C, Cohrdes C, Schmidt S, Schlaud M, Scheidt-Nave C. Long-term health consequences among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to individuals without infection: results of the population-based cohort study CoMoLo Follow-up. BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):1587. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16524-8. PMID: 37605232; PMCID: PMC10440884. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10440884/ (Full text)

Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach

Abstract:

Background: Current approaches to support patients living with post-COVID condition, also known as Long COVID, are highly disparate with limited success in managing or resolving a well-documented and long-standing symptom burden. With approximately 2.1 million people living with the condition in the UK alone and millions more worldwide, there is a desperate need to devise support strategies and interventions for patients.

Methods: A three-round Delphi consensus methodology was distributed internationally using an online survey and was completed by healthcare professionals (including clinicians, physiotherapists, and general practitioners), people with long COVID, and long COVID academic researchers (round 1 n = 273, round 2 n = 186, round 3 n = 138). Across the three rounds, respondents were located predominantly in the United Kingdom (UK), with 17.3-15.2% (round 1, n = 47; round 2 n = 32, round 2 n = 21) of respondents located elsewhere (United States of America (USA), Austria, Malta, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Finland, Norway, Malta, Netherlands, Iceland, Canada, Tunisie, Brazil, Hungary, Greece, France, Austrailia, South Africa, Serbia, and India). Respondents were given ∼5 weeks to complete the survey following enrolment, with round one taking place from 02/15/2022 to 03/28/22, round two; 05/09/2022 to 06/26/2022, and round 3; 07/14/2022 to 08/09/2022. A 5-point Likert scale of agreement was used and the opportunity to include free text responses was provided in the first round.

Findings: Fifty-five statements reached consensus (defined as >80% agree and strongly agree), across the domains of i) long COVID as a condition, ii) current support and care available for long COVID, iii) clinical assessments for long COVID, and iv) support mechanisms and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID, further sub-categorised by consideration, inclusion, and focus. Consensus reached proposes that long COVID requires specialised, comprehensive support mechanisms and that interventions should form a personalised care plan guided by the needs of the patients. Supportive approaches should focus on individual symptoms, including but not limited to fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and dyspnoea, utilising pacing, fatigue management, and support returning to daily activities. The mental impact of living with long COVID, tolerance to physical activity, emotional distress and well-being, and research of pre-existing conditions with similar symptoms, such as myalgic encephalomyelitis, should also be considered when supporting people with long COVID.

Interpretation: We provide an outline that achieved consensus with stakeholders that could be used to inform the design and implementation of bespoke long COVID support mechanisms.

Source: Owen R, Ashton REM, Ferraro FV, Skipper L, Bewick T, Leighton P, Phillips BE, Faghy MA. Forming a consensus opinion to inform long COVID support mechanisms and interventions: a modified Delphi approach. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Aug 9;62:102145. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102145. PMID: 37599906; PMCID: PMC10432807. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10432807/ (Full text)

The effect of long-haul COVID-19 toward domains of the health-related quality of life among recovered hospitalized patients

Abstract:

Background: People with long-haul COVID-19 could experience various health problems, from mild to severe. This research aimed to identify the effect of long-haul COVID-19, specifically on the Quality-of-Life domains experienced by COVID-19 patients who have been discharged.

Methods: Data collection was done online, using data from DKI Jakarta hospitalized patients confirmed with and recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infections. We selected patients who have a minimum of 28 days after being hospitalized for COVID-19 positive. The Logistic regression technique was used to analyze the data. The questionnaire used in this research contained questions regarding long-haul COVID-19 symptoms and domains of Quality of Life, which WHOQOL-BREF measured. Before collecting data, we tested the questionnaire with 30 recovered patients hospitalized outside DKI Jakarta.

Results: 172 recovered inpatients who filled out the questionnaire correctly and were aged 18 years and above were randomly selected. Almost one-third (30.2%) of the recovered inpatients had long-haul COVID-19, with 23.8% experiencing one long-haul symptom and 6.4% experiencing more than one symptom. This research also showed that the long-haul effects of COVID-19 affected almost all domains of Quality of Life except the environmental one. Age, gender, and marital status were covariates for the association between long-haul COVID-19 and The Quality of Life.

Conclusion: Continuing health services after the patient is discharged from the hospital is an important program for COVID-19 survivors because it can prevent a decline in the Quality of Life among patients due to the long-haul COVID-19.

Source: Trihandini I, Muhtar M, Karunia Sakti DA, Erlianti CP. The effect of long-haul COVID-19 toward domains of the health-related quality of life among recovered hospitalized patients. Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1068127. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1068127. PMID: 37601220; PMCID: PMC10434763. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10434763/ (Full text)

Compounding for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID, Part 4: The Legacy of Chronic COVID

Abstract:

People infected by severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) risk the development of not only acute coronavirus- disease-2019 (COVID-19) – the signs and symptoms of which range from none to severe illness that requires intensive treatment – but also long COVID (i.e., chronic COVID), a cyclical, progressive, multiphasic illness characterized by myriad debilitating conditions that persist long term. In some patients, those sequelae result in psychiatric disorders that can lead to suicide or other forms of self-harm, incidences of which have increased exponentially since before the COVID pandemic. It has been suggested that long COVID develops in an estimated 10% to 35% of people diagnosed as having COVID-19.

Because the success of therapy for either form of COVID can be complicated by each patient’s pharmacogenomic profile, personal treatment preferences, medical needs, and/or dosing requirements, we have found that in some people so afflicted, manufactured medications are ineffective or intolerable, and that for those individuals, a customized compound often provides relief and promotes recovery. The primary focus of this article is long COVID. The pathogenesis of that disease is reviewed, therapies for the signs and symptoms it engenders are examined, and 2 compounded formulations effective in treating both acute and chronic COVID-19 are presented.

Source: Riepl M, Kaiser J. Compounding for the Treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID, Part 4: The Legacy of Chronic COVID. Int J Pharm Compd. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):284-293. PMID: 37595172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37595172/