Tag: long covid recovery

Symptom Patterns, Recovery, and Impact of Long COVID: Findings From a Longitudinal Survey

Abstract:

Background: Long COVID is a predominantly multisystem, often disabling, condition that develops following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to characterize the pattern, triggers, and impact of Long COVID symptoms.
Methods: Data from a 1-year follow-up of an online survey originally conducted in November 2020 were used. Surveys were coproduced with people living with Long COVID. Participants were adults with Long COVID following confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection who were not hospitalized in the first 2 weeks of illness. The baseline survey recruited from social media and online support groups using convenience nonprobability sampling.
Results: Of the 2210 first survey participants invited, 1153 (52%) responded to the follow-up survey. The mean age was 47.7 years (standard deviation 10.6) with 84% females, 83% UK-based, 78% university-qualified, and 90% reporting good to excellent health before SARS-CoV-2 infection. Median duration of illness was 19.8 months (interquartile range, 19.3–20.1) at follow-up. Only 5% of participants reported full recovery, and 45% reported a constant pattern of illness (as opposed to fluctuating or relapsing) compared to 17% at baseline. An equal proportion reported being unable to work at baseline (20.4%) and follow-up (20.6%). However, a higher proportion reported being made redundant or taking early retirement at follow-up (8.9%) than at baseline (2.2%).
Conclusions: This study highlights the prolonged nature of Long COVID as well as the impact on work. This has the potential to widen health inequalities and increase hardship in individuals whose life circumstances and job types may not allow them to make necessary adaptations.

Source: Nida Ziauddeen, Marija Pantelic, Margaret E O’Hara, Claire Hastie, Nisreen A Alwan, Symptom Patterns, Recovery, and Impact of Long COVID: Findings From a Longitudinal Survey, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Volume 13, Issue 2, February 2026, ofag040, https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag040 https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/13/2/ofag040/8495807?login=false (Full text)

Altered brain tissue microstructure and neurochemical profiles in long COVID and recovered COVID-19 individuals: A multimodal MRI study

Abstract:

Background: Diverse neurological symptoms are experienced by long COVID and COVID-19 recovered individuals. However, the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 in the brain of both groups are underexplored. This study aimed to investigate changes in tissue microstructural and brain neurochemical levels in long COVID and recovered COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls.

Methods: We recruited 47 participants (long COVID = 19, COVID-recovered healthy controls = 12, and healthy controls without COVID-19 infection = 16) who underwent 3T MRI scans. We acquired T1 and T2 weighted images to assess myelin signal, diffusion weighted images to assess tissue microstructure, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy data to estimate brain neurochemical levels.

Findings: Our multimodal MRI study showed altered T1w/T2w signal between long COVID vs COVID-recovered-healthy controls, long COVID vs healthy controls, and COVID-recovered-healthy controls vs healthy controls. Furthermore, T1w/T2w signal intensity was significantly correlated with physical and cognitive function. Diffusion weighted imaging also showed altered tissue microstructure in these three group comparisons. However, brain neurochemicals were only significantly different between long COVID vs COVID-recovered-healthy controls.

Interpretation: This is one of the first studies to report different myelin signal and brain neurochemical changes between long COVID, COVID-recovered-healthy controls, and healthy controls without SARS-CoV-2 infection. These brain changes provide compelling evidence for the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 on brain function.

Source: Thapaliya K, Marshall-Gradisnik S, Inderyas M, Barnden L. Altered brain tissue microstructure and neurochemical profiles in long COVID and recovered COVID-19 individuals: A multimodal MRI study. Brain Behav Immun Health. 2025 Nov 25;50:101142. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2025.101142. PMID: 41404601; PMCID: PMC12704066. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12704066/ (Full text)

Evidence of clinical and brain recovery in post-COVID-19 condition: a three-year follow-up study

Abstract:

Fatigue and cognitive dysfunction linked to persistent brain changes have been reported for up to two years after COVID-19. In this study, we followed the clinical, neuroimaging and fluid biomarker trajectories over three years post SARS-CoV-2 infection to evaluate potential signs and underlying factors of brain recovery.

We conducted a monocentric, longitudinal study using resting-state functional and structural T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 51 patients with Post-COVID-19 Condition (mean age 50 years, 33 female) collected at a mean time of 6, 23 and 38 months after COVID-19 infection. The trajectory of brain changes was compared to 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age 37 years, 13 female) with similar time intervals between brain scans and analysed in relation to clinical, neuropsychological and fluid biomarkers including interleukins and neurodestruction markers at all timepoints. In addition, hand grip strength to evaluate muscular fatigue, was assessed at the final follow-up visit.

Self-reported fatigue improved over time but was still moderate on average three years after COVID-19 infection, while measures of hand grip strength and cognitive performance were largely unaffected. We found a significant increase of both lateral ventricles (∼8%) and the third (∼6%) ventricle accompanied by a structural volume reduction in adjacent areas including the thalamus, pallidum, caudate nucleus and putamen. An increased neuronal activation pattern was widespread and pronounced in these areas. The brainstem no longer exhibited volume loss as reported in our pervious study, but enhanced functional connectivity. Laboratory markers including interleukins and neuronal injury markers remained within the normal reference ranges across all study timepoints.

Our study revealed an overall slow but evident clinical improvement, including improved fatigue, regular muscular strength and recovery as well as normal cognitive function without signs of systemic inflammation three years after COVID-19. Clinical improvement is reflected by a pattern of brain recovery along periventricular regions. This pattern is characterized by structural stabilization and increased connectivity starting in the brainstem as well as efficient neuronal recruitment and increased activation in the basal ganglia, with no evidence of neuronal injury. These results highlight the positive long-term recovery trajectory in post-COVID patients.

Source: Ravi Dadsena, Sophie Wetz, Anna Hofmann, Ana Sofia Costa, Sandro Romanzetti, Stella Andrea Lischewski, Christina Krockauer, Carolin Balloff, Ferdinand Binkofski, Jörg B Schulz, Kathrin Reetz, Julia Walders, Evidence of clinical and brain recovery in post-COVID-19 condition: a three-year follow-up study, Brain Communications, 2025;, fcaf366, https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf366 https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/advance-article/doi/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf366/8262587 (Full study available as PDF file)

A multi-omics recovery factor predicts long COVID in the IMPACC study

Abstract:

Background. Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, ~10-35% of COVID-19 patients experience long COVID (LC), in which debilitating symptoms persist for at least three months. Elucidating biologic underpinnings of LC could identify therapeutic opportunities.

Methods. We utilized machine learning methods on biologic analytes provided over 12-months after hospital discharge from >500 COVID-19 patients in the IMPACC cohort to identify a multi-omics “recovery factor”, trained on patient-reported physical function survey scores. Immune profiling data included PBMC transcriptomics, serum O-link and plasma proteomics, plasma metabolomics, and blood CyTOF protein levels. Recovery factor scores were tested for association with LC, disease severity, clinical parameters, and immune subset frequencies. Enrichment analyses identified biologic pathways associated with recovery factor scores.

Results. LC participants had lower recovery factor scores compared to recovered participants. Recovery factor scores predicted LC as early as hospital admission, irrespective of acute COVID-19 severity. Biologic characterization revealed increased inflammatory mediators, elevated signatures of heme metabolism, and decreased androgenic steroids as predictive and ongoing biomarkers of LC. Lower recovery factor scores were associated with reduced lymphocyte and increased myeloid cell frequencies. The observed signatures are consistent with persistent inflammation driving anemia and stress erythropoiesis as major biologic underpinnings of LC.

Conclusion. The multi-omics recovery factor identifies patients at risk of LC early after SARS-CoV-2 infection and reveals LC biomarkers and potential treatment targets.

Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04378777.

Funding. This study was funded by NIH, NIAID and NSF.

Source: Gisela Gabernet, Leying Guan, Lauren I.R. Ehrlich, et al. A multi-omics recovery factor predicts long COVID in the IMPACC study. J Clin Invest. September 9, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI193698. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/193698/ (Full study available as PDF file)

Initiating Long Covid RECOVERy

Introduction:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic paralyzed the United States, rendering thousands critically ill and ultimately killing more than 1 million Americans. Many survivors, particularly those with adult respiratory distress syndrome, required prolonged rehabilitation. Many more people, including those who did not require hospitalization for their acute illness, presented with a host of other persistent, disabling symptoms. The latter condition was termed “Long Covid” and turned out to be the most prevalent postacute sequelae of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The symptom complex that characterizes Long Covid resembles that seen in other infection-associated chronic conditions, notably overlapping with those of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Overlapping symptoms include fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, neurocognitive dysfunction characterized by impaired executive function, exercise intolerance, fluctuating heart rate and sense of dizziness particularly in the upright position, and postexertional malaise, a signature symptom of ME/CFS. The drivers of these conditions remain unknown, and no treatments have proven effective. Data suggest that many individuals with Long Covid may return to health months or years after onset, but debilitating symptoms and unknown long-term outcomes remain in too many people. Of greatest concern is that, for some individuals, Long Covid may last a lifetime.

Read the rest of this article HERE>>

Source: Marrazzo J, Gibbons GH, Koroshetz W. Initiating Long Covid RECOVERy. Sci Transl Med. 2024 Nov 13;16(773):eadr9971. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adr9971. Epub 2024 Nov 13. PMID: 39536123. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adr9971 (Full text)

Trajectories of functional limitations, health-related quality of life and societal costs in individuals with long COVID: a population-based longitudinal cohort study

Abstract:

Objectives: To examine trajectories of functional limitations, fatigue, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and societal costs of patients referred to long COVID clinics.

Design: A population-based longitudinal cohort study using real-time user data.

Setting: 35 specialised long COVID clinics in the UK.

Participants: 4087 adults diagnosed with long COVID in primary or secondary care deemed suitable for rehabilitation and registered in the Living With Covid Recovery (LWCR) programme between 4 August 2020 and 5 August 2022.

Main outcome measures: Generalised linear mixed models were fitted to estimate trajectories of functional limitations, using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS); scores of ≥20 indicate moderately severe limitations. Other outcomes included fatigue using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) reversed score (scores of ≥22 indicate impairment), HRQL using the EQ-5D-5L, and long COVID-related societal costs, encompassing healthcare costs and productivity losses.

Results: The mean WSAS score at 6 months after registration in the LWCR was 19.1 (95% CI 18.6, 19.6), with 46% of the participants (95% CI 40.3%, 52.4%) reporting a WSAS score above 20 (moderately severe or worse impairment). The mean change in the WSAS score over the 6-month period was -0.86 (95% CI -1.32, -0.41). The mean reversed FACIT-F score at 6 months was 29.1 (95% CI 22.7, 35.5) compared with 32.0 (95% CI 31.7, 32.3) at baseline. The mean EQ-5D-5L score remained relatively constant between baseline (0.63, 95% CI 0.62, 0.64) and 6 months (0.64, 95% CI 0.59, 0.69). The monthly societal cost per patient related to long COVID at 6 months was £931, mostly driven by the costs associated with working days lost.

Conclusions: Individuals referred to long COVID clinics in the UK reported small improvements in functional limitations, fatigue, HRQL and ability to work within 6 months of registering in the LWCR programme.

Source: Wang J, Goodfellow H, Walker S, Blandford A, Pfeffer P, Hurst JR, Sunkersing D, Bradbury K, Robson C, Henley W, Gomes M. Trajectories of functional limitations, health-related quality of life and societal costs in individuals with long COVID: a population-based longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 13;14(11):e088538. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088538. PMID: 39537389. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e088538 (Full text)

Two-Year Longitudinal Study Reveals That Long COVID Symptoms Peak and Quality of Life Nadirs at 6–12 Months Postinfection

Abstract:

Background: Few longitudinal studies available characterize long COVID outcomes out to 24 months, especially in people with nonsevere acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study sought to prospectively characterize incidence and duration of long COVID symptoms and their association with quality of life (QoL) from 1–24 months after mild-to-moderate COVID-19 using validated tools in a diverse cohort of unvaccinated people infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020.

Methods: At 1–3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-COVID-19, 70 participants had orthostatic vital signs measured, provided blood, and completed surveys characterizing symptoms, QoL, and return to pre-COVID-19 health and activities using validated tools (FLU-PRO+, Fatigue Severity Scale, Insomnia Severity Index, General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition, Patient Health Questionnaire Depression 8-Item, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, EuroQol EQ-5D-5L).

Results: During the study period, 33% of participants experienced long COVID (had not returned to pre-COVID-19 health status and reported at least 1 symptom >90 days postinfection); 8% had not returned to their pre-COVID-19 health status 24 months postinfection. Long COVID symptoms peaked 6 months post-COVID-19, frequently causing activity limitations. Having long COVID was significantly associated with decreased QoL in multiple domains. Frequencies of orthostatic hypotension and tachycardia reflected levels reported in the general population. Within-person weight increased significantly between months 1 and 6. Long COVID was associated with pre-COVID-19 obesity and hyperlipidemia, but not with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels 1–3 months postinfection.

Conclusions: Long COVID occurs in a significant proportion of unvaccinated people, even if the acute illness was not severe. Long COVID prevalence peaked 6–12 months post-COVID-19, and a small proportion of participants still reported not returning to their pre-COVID-19 health status 24 months post-COVID-19.

Source: Demko ZO, Yu T, Mullapudi SK, Varela Heslin MG, Dorsey CA, Payton CB, Tornheim JA, Blair PW, Mehta SH, Thomas DL, Manabe YC, Antar AAR. Two-Year Longitudinal Study Reveals That Long COVID Symptoms Peak and Quality of Life Nadirs at 6-12 Months Postinfection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 6;11(3):ofae027. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae027. PMID: 38449921; PMCID: PMC10917418. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10917418/ (Full text)

Longitudinal Progression of Patients with Long COVID Treated in a Post-COVID Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Abstract:

Background: In addition to the morbidity and mortality associated with acute infection, COVID-19 has been associated with persistent symptoms (>30 days), often referred to as Long COVID (LC). LC symptoms often cluster into phenotypes, resembling conditions such as fibromyalgia, postural orthostatic tachycardiac syndrome (POTS), and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). LC clinics have been established to best address the needs of LC patients and continuity of care. We developed a cross-sectional survey to assess treatment response through our LC Clinic (LCC).

Methods: A 25-question survey (1-10 Likert scale) was expert- and content-validated by LCC clinicians, patients, and patient advocates. The survey assessed LC symptoms and the helpfulness of different interventions, including medications and supplements. A total of 852 LCC patients were asked to complete the survey, with 536 (62.9%) responding.

Results: The mean time from associated COVID-19 infection to survey completion was 23.2 ± 6.4 months. The mean age of responders was 52.3 ± 14.1 (63% females). Self-reported symptoms were all significantly improved (P < .001) from the initial visit to the LCC (baseline) to the time of the follow-up survey. However, only 4.5% (24/536) of patients rated all symptoms low (1-2) at the time of the survey, indicating low levels of full recovery in our cohort. The patients rated numerous interventions as being helpful, including low-dose naltrexone (45/77; 58%), vagal nerve stimulation (18/34; 53%), and fisetin (28/44; 64%).

Conclusions: Patients report general improvements in symptoms following the initial LCC visit, but complete recovery rates remain low at 23.2 ± 6.4 months.

Source: Hurt RT, Yadav S, Schroeder DR, Croghan IT, Mueller MR, Grach SL, Aakre CA, Gilman EA, Stephenson CR, Overgaard J, Collins NM, Lawson DK, Thompson AM, Natividad LT, Mohamed Elfadil O, Ganesh R. Longitudinal Progression of Patients with Long COVID Treated in a Post-COVID Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241258671. doi: 10.1177/21501319241258671. PMID: 38813984. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21501319241258671 (Full text)

Recovery of neurophysiological measures in post-COVID fatigue: a 12-month longitudinal follow-up study

Abstract:

One of the major consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the significant incidence of persistent fatigue following resolution of an acute infection (i.e. post-COVID fatigue). We have shown previously that, in comparison to healthy controls, those suffering from post-COVID fatigue exhibit changes in muscle physiology, cortical circuitry, and autonomic function. Whether these changes preceded infection, potentially predisposing people to developing post-COVID fatigue, or whether the changes were a consequence of infection was unclear.

Here we present results of a 12-month longitudinal study of 18 participants from the same cohort of post-COVID fatigue sufferers to investigate these correlates of fatigue over time. We report improvements in self-perception of the impact of fatigue via questionnaires, as well as significant improvements in objective measures of peripheral muscle fatigue and autonomic function, bringing them closer to healthy controls. Additionally, we found reductions in muscle twitch tension rise times, becoming faster than controls, suggesting that the improvement in muscle fatigability might be due to a process of adaptation rather than simply a return to baseline function.

Source: Maffitt NJ, Germann M, Baker AME, Baker MR, Baker SN, Soteropoulos DS. Recovery of neurophysiological measures in post-COVID fatigue: a 12-month longitudinal follow-up study. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59232-y. PMID: 38632415; PMCID: PMC11024107. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024107/ (Full text)

Remission of severe forms of long COVID following monoclonal antibody (MCA) infusions: A report of signal index cases and call for targeted research

Abstract:

Objective: Long COVID has afflicted tens of millions globally leaving many previously-healthy persons severely and indefinitely debilitated. The objective here was to report cases of complete, rapid remission of severe forms of long COVID following certain monoclonal antibody (MCA) infusions and review the corresponding pathophysiological implications.

Design: Case histories of the first three index events (among others) are presented. Unaware of others with similar remissions, each subject independently completed personal narratives and standardized surveys regarding demographics/occupation, past history, and the presence and respective severity grading of 33 signs/symptoms associated with long COVID, comparing the presence/severity of those symptoms during the pre-COVID, long-COVID, post-vaccination, and post-MCA phases.

Setting: Patient interviews, e-mails and telephone conversations.

Subjects: Three previously healthy, middle-aged, highly-functioning persons, two women and one man (ages 60, 43, and 63 years respectively) who, post-acute COVID-19 infection, developed chronic, unrelenting fatigue and cognitive impairment along with other severe, disabling symptoms. Each then independently reported incidental and unanticipated complete remissions within days of MCA treatment.

Interventions: The casirivimab/imdevimab cocktail.

Measurements and main results: Irrespective of sex, age, medical history, vaccination status, or illness duration (18, 8 and 5 months, respectively), each subject experienced the same complete remission of their persistent disabling disease within a week of MCA infusion. Each rapidly returned to normal health and previous lifestyles/occupations with normalized exercise tolerance, still sustained to date over two years later.

Conclusions: These index cases provide compelling clinical signals that MCA infusions may be capable of treating long COVID in certain cases, including those with severe debilitation. While the complete and sustained remissions observed here may only apply to long COVID resulting from pre-Delta variants and the specific MCA infused, the striking rapid and complete remissions observed in these cases also provide mechanistic implications for treating/managing other post-viral chronic conditions and long COVID from other variants.

Source: Scheppke KA, Pepe PE, Jui J, Crowe RP, Scheppke EK, Klimas NG, Marty AM. Remission of severe forms of long COVID following monoclonal antibody (MCA) infusions: A report of signal index cases and call for targeted research. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 4;75:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.051. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37944296. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073567572300534X (Full text)