Explaining Fatigue and Post-Exertional Malaise in Long COVID and ME/CFS: From Skeletal Muscle To Exercise Immunology

Abstract:

The SARS-CoV-2 viral outbreak in 2020 resulted in a record number of global hospitalizations and deaths. Although most people recover from an initial COVID infection within 3 months, around 10% of people have symptoms that do not improve after 3 months, which is called long COVID. Other viruses and bacterial infections can also result in long-term symptoms, which is known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

One of the most common symptoms of long COVID or ME/CFS is post-exertional malaise, which is the worsening of symptoms or development of new symptoms after physical, mental or emotional stress. This can lead to patients leading less physically active lifestyles. Physical activity is known to be beneficial for overall health and wellbeing, mostly by increasing exercise capacity, which is a significant predictor in long-term health. Physical inactivity.

It is thought that many symptoms of long COVID and ME/CFS can be explained by lower physical activity of patients. However, people who are less physically active don’t experience post-exertional malaise, implying there are disease-specific changes. Many of the benefits that come from exercise come from a persons ability to adapt to an exercise session. Usually, exercise will create a short energy deficit, which then may result in small amounts of muscle damage. This then triggers a short-lived immune response, led first by neutrophils and macrophages, which result in activation of fibroadipogenic progenitor cells (FAP cells) and satellite cells (muscle stem cells). FAP cells and satellite cells communicate to repair damage to the muscle itself, while immune cells clear debris surrounding the muscle. In healthy situations, this creates a stronger, more resilient muscle. It is unknown whether these responses are still seen in long COVID or ME/CFS. The goal of this thesis then to 1) understand muscle changes in patients with long COVID and ME/CFS, 2) to better understand how these changes may relate to PEM, 3) to understand whether the muscle changes in patients are a result of physical inactivity.

Within the thesis, I find that patients with long COVID and ME/CFS have specific patterns of skeletal muscle that separate them from healthy individuals. This is highlighted by more fast-twitch fibre types, slow-twitch muscle atrophy, lower mitochondrial respiration that is separate from just mitochondrial loss, less metabolites related to oxidative capacity and antioxidation, less lipids that are required for cell membrane maintenance, and lower amounts of satellite cells and FAP cells.

Beyond this, I find that ME/CFS can be distinguished from long COVID by less capillaries, less slow-twitch fibres, less local immune cells, and lower amounts of several essential amino acids. As well, I find evidence that physical inactivity alone cannot explain long COVID and ME/CFS symptoms. Where all of long COVID, ME/CFS, and physical inactivity have lower whole-body aerobic capacity, physical inactivity causes a decrease in muscle fibre size, loss of mitochondria, increases in muscle lipotoxic lipids, and decreases in metabolites related to carnitine metabolism. These changes are not seen in either long COVID nor ME/CFS, and support the idea that long COVID and ME/CFS have disease specific muscle changes.

Overall, I find that the reduced whole-body capacity of long COVID and ME/CFS patients is not cause by physical inactivity, and is defined by reduced muscle oxidative ability. The lower amounts of local cells that would normally support exercise and damage responses are lower in both long COVID and ME/CFS, which partially explains the occurrence of PEM. This also suggests that patients experiencing PEM should not undertake normal rehabilitation, however it might be that more individually tailored, and severely monitored approaches may still be beneficial.
Source: Charlton, B. T. (2026). Explaining Fatigue and Post-Exertional Malaise in Long COVID and ME/CFS: From Skeletal Muscle To Exercise Immunology. [PhD-Thesis – Research and graduation internal, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam]. https://doi.org/10.5463/thesis.1979 https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/explaining-fatigue-and-post-exertional-malaise-in-long-covid-and-/ https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/517511531/aio01877%20braeden%20charltonfinal%20-%206acf4153820e1.pdf (Full text)

Chronic unexplained fatigue

Abstract:

Fatigue is a common symptom in the community and the commonest associations are with stress or mood disturbance. One in a hundred people complain of unexplained and prolonged fatigue, with half that number meeting the strictest criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Discrete fatigue syndromes have been described, particularly after Epstein Barr virus infection. The majority of patients with CFS have a syndrome similar to the ICD-10 definition of neurasthenia. Mood and somatoform disorders are common comorbid or differential diagnoses. The prognosis is poor, particularly in patients attending hospitals and those with comorbid psychiatric disorders. The aetiology of both CFS and chronic unexplained fatigue are essentially unknown, perhaps reflecting the heterogenenous natures of both the symptom and syndrome. There is reasonable evidence to suggest that particular infections may trigger both prolonged fatigue and CFS. Maintaining factors are different from triggering factors and include mood and sleep disorders, illness beliefs and behaviours, and possibly inactivity. Treatments aimed at reversing these maintaining factors show promise.

 

Source: White PD. Chronic unexplained fatigue. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 1999 Dec;11(4):130-3. doi: 10.1017/S0924270800035870. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976541

 

Muscle fibre characteristics and lactate responses to exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To examine the proportions of type 1 and type 2 muscle fibres and the degree of muscle fibre atrophy and hypertrophy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in relation to lactate responses to exercise, and to determine to what extent any abnormalities found might be due to inactivity.

METHODS: Quadriceps needle muscle biopsies were obtained from 105 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and the proportions of type 1 and 2 fibres and fibre atrophy and hypertrophy factors were determined from histochemical preparations, using a semiautomated image analysis system. Forty one randomly selected biopsies were also examined by electron microscopy. Lactate responses to exercise were measured in the subanaerobic threshold exercise test (SATET).

RESULTS: Inactivity would be expected to result in a shift to type 2 fibre predominance and fibre atrophy, but type 1 predominance (23%) was more common than type 2 predominance (3%), and fibre atrophy was found in only 10.4% of cases. Patients with increased lactate responses to exercise did have significantly fewer type 1 muscle fibres (p<0.043 males, p<0.0003 females), but there was no evidence that this group was less active than the patients with normal lactate responses. No significant ultrastructural abnormalities were found.

CONCLUSION: Muscle histometry in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome generally did not show the changes expected as a result of inactivity. However, patients with abnormal lactate responses to exercise had a significantly lower proportion of mitochondria rich type 1 muscle fibres.

 

Source: Lane RJ, Barrett MC, Woodrow D, Moss J, Fletcher R, Archard LC. Muscle fibre characteristics and lactate responses to exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;64(3):362-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2169994/ (Full article)