illness severity – Page 3 – American ME and CFS Society

A comparison of health status in patients meeting alternative definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Several diagnostic definitions are available for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) that varies significantly in their symptom criteria. This pilot study was conducted to determine whether simple biological and clinical measures differed between CFS/ME patients meeting the 1994 Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, the International Consensus Criteria (ICC), as well as healthy controls.

METHODS: A total of 45 CFS/ME patients and 30 healthy controls from the South East Queensland region of Australia provided a blood sample, reported on their current symptoms, as well as aspects of their physical and social health using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the World Health Organisation Disability Adjustment Schedule 2.0 (WHO DAS 2.0). Differences were examined using independent sample t-testing.

RESULTS: Patients fulfilling the ICC definition reported significantly lower scores (p < 0.05) for physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, and social functioning than those that only fulfilled the 1994 CDC definition. ICC patients reported significantly greater (p < 0.05) disability across all domains of the WHO DAS 2.0.

CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings suggest that the ICC identifies a distinct subgroup found within patients complying with the 1994 CDC definition, with more severe impairment to their physical and social functioning.

Source: Johnston SC, Brenu EW, Hardcastle SL, Huth TK, Staines DR, Marshall-Gradisnik SM. A comparison of health status in patients meeting alternative definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 30;12:64. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4008489/ (Full article)

Are Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome different illnesses? A preliminary analysis

Abstract:

Considerable discussion has transpired regarding whether chronic fatigue syndrome is a distinct illness from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. A prior study contrasted the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria with the Fukuda and colleagues’ chronic fatigue syndrome criteria and found that the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria identified a subset of patients with greater functional impairment and physical, mental, and cognitive problems than the larger group who met Fukuda and colleagues’ criteria. The current study analyzed two discrete data sets and found that the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria identified more impaired individuals with more severe symptomatology.

Source: Jason LA, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Evans M, Newton JL. Are Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome different illnesses? A preliminary analysis. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jan;21(1):3-15. doi: 10.1177/1359105313520335. Epub 2014 Feb 7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4125561/ (Full article)

Impact of the fibromyalgia in the chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Different studies have showed association of the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) with other pathologies, including fibromyalgia (FM). The objective of this study is to analyze whether there are differences in the clinic and in the assessment of fatigue in CFS patients associated or not with FM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, single-site observational study was undertaken on a consecutive cases of a register of CFS patients at CFS Unit in Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, from January 2008 until March 2011. The variables analyzed were FM comorbidity, sleep and fatigue characteristics and cognitive, neurological and autonomic symptoms. Questionnaires of fatigue impact scale, fatigue strength and impact on quality of life SF-36 were evaluated.

RESULTS: We included 980 CFS patients (mean age: 48±9 years; 91% women). Fibromyalgia was present in 528 patients (54%). The level of fatigue (P=.001) and pain (P<.001) was higher in FM patients. Patients with CFS and FM had more prevalence of sleep-related phenomena. The percentage of patients and the degree of severity of cognitive symptoms, neurological and autonomic dysfunction was higher in FM patients (P<.001). FM patients scored higher on the fatigue impact scale (P<.001) and showed worse results in the quality of life questionnaire (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS: FM co-morbidity worse clinical parameters, fatigue and the perception of quality of life in CFS patients.

Source: Faro M, Sáez-Francàs N, Castro-Marrero J, Aliste L, Collado A, Alegre J. Impact of the fibromyalgia in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Jun 16;142(12):519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2013.06.030. Epub 2014 Jan 2. [Article in Spanish] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24387955

Examining the energy envelope and associated symptom patterns in chronic fatigue syndrome: does coping matter?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE/Hypothesis: The objective of this study was to examine sub-types of individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome based on variables that are associated with the energy envelope theory and to examine the role of coping strategies in explaining the differences found between the subtypes.

METHODS: Cluster analysis was used. Grouping variables included physical functioning, post-exertional malaise severity, and the extent to which an individual was outside of the energy envelope. These clusters were evaluated using discriminant function analysis to determine whether they could be differentiated based on coping styles.

RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified three groups. Clusters 1 and 2 were consistent with the energy envelope theory. However, Cluster 3 was characterized by patients with the most impairment, but they were to a lesser extent exceeding their energy envelope. Coping strategies explained a small percentage (10%) of the variance in differentiating the clusters.

DISCUSSION: Energy maintenance may be associated with improved functioning and less severe symptoms for some. However, patients in Cluster 3 were closer to remaining within their energy envelope and also used higher levels of adaptive coping but were more impaired than Cluster 2. This suggests that adaptive coping strategies were not associated with improved health, as members of Cluster 3 were severely limited in functioning.

Source: Brown AA, Evans MA, Jason LA. Examining the energy envelope and associated symptom patterns in chronic fatigue syndrome: does coping matter? Chronic Illn. 2013 Dec;9(4):302-11. doi: 10.1177/1742395313478220. Epub 2013 Apr 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3893101/ (Full article)

Is chronic fatigue syndrome in older patients a different disease? — a clinical cohort study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a disabling disorder characterised by persistent fatigue with a typical age of diagnosis of 35-50 years. CFS does present in those aged over 50 but whether this is a different disease in older age groups has not been considered. Therefore, we performed a clinical cohort study to examine and differentiate the clinical and autonomic features in CFS patients aged over 50.

DESIGN: A total of 179 Fukuda diagnosed CFS patients were recruited, and 25 older CFS patients (50 + years) were matched case by case for gender and length of history to 25 younger CFS patients (16-29 years). A range of symptomatic-based questionnaires were used in addition to heart rate variability and baroreceptor sensitivity to assess autonomic function.

RESULTS: Chronic fatigue syndrome can present for the first time in an older population. Older CFS patients demonstrate increased fatigue (Fatigue impact scale; 85 ± 33 vs. 107 ± 27, P = 0·02) (Chalder fatigue scale; 9 ± 3 vs. 11 ± 1, P = 0·002) and caseness for depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale; 7 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 4; P = 0·005). There is a greater autonomic dysfunction in older CFS patients, with reduced parasympathetic function (HFnu; 49·1 ± 18 vs. 36·2 ± 18, P = 0·01, RR30 : 15; ± , P = 0·02) and increased sympathetic function (LFnu; 51·5 ± 17 vs. 63·8 ± 18, P = 0·01). Baroreflex sensitivity was substantially reduced (BRS; 19·7 ± 12 vs. 9·9 ± 5, P = 0·0004), and left ventricular ejection time prolonged (LVET; 274·6 ± 16 vs. 285·8 ± 9, P = 0·004).

CONCLUSIONS: Older CFS patients demonstrate a disease phenotype very different from younger patients. The combination of differing underlying pathogenic mechanisms and the physiological aspects of ageing result in a greater disease impact in older CFS patients.

Source: Lewis I, Pairman J, Spickett G, Newton JL. Is chronic fatigue syndrome in older patients a different disease? — a clinical cohort study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 Mar;43(3):302-8. doi: 10.1111/eci.12046. Epub 2013 Feb 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23397955

Functional capacity evaluations of persons with chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS) is estimated to affect 2 to 5 million people in the United States. Despite its high incidence, persons with CFIDS have been neglected by the medical community mainly because there is no singular confirming diagnostic test or proven effective treatment.

The CFIDS population is incorrectly stereotyped as upper-middle-class, white, female hypochondriacs; consequently, symptoms often are belittled or ignored. In reality, CFIDS is a severe medical condition that affects women, men, and children of any race and often causes long-term or total disability.

The results of a modified functional capacity evaluation developed by the author and completed on 86 persons with CFIDS between 1988 and 1990 confirm that this population has severe physical and cognitive disabilities that affect their professional, familial, and social lives. The results of these evaluations are used to present a profile of persons with CFIDS that can serve as a basis for understanding this population and for guiding intervention.

Source: Barrows DM. Functional capacity evaluations of persons with chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome. Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Apr;49(4):327-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7785715

The impact of catastrophic beliefs on functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This study investigated the association between catastrophic beliefs and disability in the context of Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). A sample of 282 CFS sufferers were asked about the consequences of pushing themselves beyond their present physical state. Responses were coded into catastrophic or non-catastrophic categories. While not differing on the length of illness or psychological adjustment, subjects demonstrating catastrophic responses evidenced significantly higher levels of fatigue and were more disabled in terms of their ability to work both in their normal occupation and around the house. Catastrophizers also showed greater disability in terms of their sleep and rest, social communication, and recreational activities. The role of catastrophic beliefs and personal perceptions of CFS in maintaining the illness is discussed.

Source: Petrie K, Moss-Morris R, Weinman J. The impact of catastrophic beliefs on functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Jan;39(1):31-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7760301

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Immunological findings vary between populations

Comment on: Longitudinal study of outcome of chronic fatigue syndrome. [BMJ. 1994]

Editor,-We were interested in Andrew Wilson and colleagues’ paper investigating predictors of the long term outcome of the chronic fatigue syndrome in patients in Australia. We have investigated the association between immune activation and presumed cutaneous anergy in 68 Scottish patients with the syndrome (19 cases conformed to the Centers for Disease Control’s criteria, 18 cases had been diagnosed by a consultant, 28 cases had been diagnosed by a general practitioner, and three patients referred themselves) and 22 family contacts. We assessed delayed hypersensitivity responses (using Multitest antigens and tuberculin skin tests) and evaluated peripheral blood activation markers (CD8, CD38/ CD llb/HLA-DR) using flow cytometry. Patients were classified into three groups on the basis of current severity of illness and mobility.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540184/pdf/bmj00440-0055b.pdf

Source: Abbot NC, Spence VA, Lowe JG, Potts RC, Hassan AH, Belch JJ, Beck JS. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Immunological findings vary between populations. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1299. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540184/