Tag: Canadian Consensus Criteria

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia: PR3-versus MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis, an exploratory cross-sectional study

Summary:

Background: Persistent fatigue is a common complaint in ANCA-vasculitis (AAV) patients and has a profound impact on patient’s quality of life. The symptoms associated with this fatigue mirror those found in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia. Etiologic and pathophysiologic differences exist between PR3- and MPO-ANCA disease, yet differences in their fatigue manifestations have not been well researched. We compared fatigue and its associations in healthy controls, AAV patients and fibromyalgia controls.

Methods: The Canadian consensus criteria were used for ME/CFS diagnosis, and American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia diagnosis. Factors such as cognitive failure, depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances were assessed by patient reported questionnaires. Clinical factors such as BVAS, vasculitis damage index, CRP and BMI were also collected.

Findings: Our AAV cohort comprised 52 patients, with a mean age of 44.7 (20–79), 57% (30/52) of the patients were female. We found 51.9% (27/52) of patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS, with 37% (10/27) of those having comorbid fibromyalgia. Rates of fatigue were higher in MPO-ANCA patients, than in PR3-ANCA patients, and their symptoms were more similar to the fibromyalgia controls. Fatigue in PR3-ANCA patients was related to inflammatory markers. These differences may be due to the varied pathophysiology of the PR3- and MPO-ANCA serotypes.

Interpretation: A large proportion of AAV patients suffer from debilitating fatigue consequential enough to meet the diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS. Fatigue associations were not the same between PR3- and MPO-ANCA patients, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms may be different. Future studies should consider ANCA serotype, as further research may inform different clinical treatment strategies for AAV patients suffering from ME/CFS.

Source: Charmaine van Eeden, Naima Mohazab, Desiree Redmond, Elaine Yacyshyn, Alison Clifford, Anthony S. Russell, Mohammed S. Osman, and Jan Willem Cohen Tervaer. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia: PR3-versus MPO-ANCA-associated vasculitis, an exploratory cross-sectional study. The Lancet Regional Health – Americas 2023;20: 100460.  https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X(23)00034-0/fulltext# (Full text)

Immunogenetic studies in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)

Myalgic encephalopathy/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic and debilitating disease that affects about 0.1-0.2% of the general population. The core symptoms are persistent debilitating fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM) and cognitive dysfunction. Most symptoms of ME/CFS are not disease specific. Additionally, there is a lack of both biomarkers and diagnostic tests for the disease, which makes accurate diagnosis difficult.

More than 20 different patient classifications and diagnostic criteria have emerged over the last four decades. Due to this, the patient population can be quite heterogeneous in terms of clinical symptoms and the extent to which the disease impacts quality of life.

There are several different theories that aim to explain the disease development of ME/CFS. In this thesis, we have taken as our starting point the growing evidence for an immunological background for ME/CFS pathogenesis. Several studies have pointed to altered NK cells, autoantibodies and T cell abnormalities in ME/CFS patients.

In addition, several genetic studies reported significant associations in various immunologically relevant genes. Most of these previous studies have been suboptimal and included heterogeneous patient populations and/or few patients in total.

Therefore, we aimed to gain a better understanding of the role of immunologically relevant genes and disease development of ME/CFS.

To do this, we employed known strategies from genetic studies in autoimmune disease and applied them to ME/CFS. We used strict quality control and included, to the best of our knowledge, the largest cohort diagnosed with the Canadian consensus criteria.

In paper I, the main goal was to follow up previously performed work by our group that reported associations between ME/CFS and HLA-C: 07: 04 and HLA-DQB1: 03: 03 alleles. The HLA (human leukocyte antigen) region consists a multitude of immunologically relevant genes in addition to the HLA genes, and there is extensive and complex linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the region.

The previously observed association signals in the HLA region were fine-mapped by genotyping five additional classical HLA loci and 5,342 SNPs (single nucleotide variants) in 427 Norwegian ME/CFS patients, diagnosed according to the Canadian consensus criteria, and 480 healthy Norwegian controls. The analysis revealed two independent association signals (p ≤ 0.001) represented by the genetic variants rs4711249 in the HLA class I region and rs9275582 in the HLA class II region.

The primary association signal in the HLA class II region was located in the vicinity of the HLA-DQ genetic region, most likely due to the HLA-DQB1 gene. In particular, amino acid position 57 (aspartic acid / alanine) in the peptide binding pit of HLA-DQB1, or an SNP upstream of HLA-DQB1 seemed to explain the association signal we observed in the HLA class II region.

In the HLA class I region, the putative primary locus was not as clear and could possibly lie outside the classical HLA genes (the association signal spans several genes DDR1, GTF2H4, VARS2, SFTA2 and DPCR1) with expression levels influenced by the ME/CFS associated SNP genotypes.

Interestingly, we also observed that > 60% of the patients who responded to cyclophosphamide treatment for ME/CFS had either the rs4711249 risk allele and/or DQB1* 03:03 versus 12% of the patients who did not respond to the treatment. Our findings suggest the involvement of the HLA region, and in particular the HLA-DQB1 gene, in ME/CFS.

Although our study is the largest to date, it is still a relatively small study in the context of genetic studies. Our findings need to be replicated in much larger, statistically more representative, cohorts.

In particular, it is necessary to investigate the involvement of HLA- 12 DQB1, a gene that contains alleles that increase the risk of several established autoimmune diseases such as celiac disease.

In paper II, we aimed to investigate immunologically relevant genes using a genotyping array (iChip) targeting immunological gene regions previously associated with different autoimmune diseases.

In addition to the Norwegian cohort of 427 ME/CFS patients (the Canadian consensus criteria), we also analyzed data from two replication cohorts, a Danish one of 460 ME/CFS patients (Canadian consensus criteria) and a data set from the UK Biobank of 2105 self-reported CFS patients.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ME/CFS genetic association study of this magnitude and it included more than 2,900 patients in total (of whom 887 are diagnosed according to Canadian consensus criteria).

We found no ME/CFS risk variants with a genome wide significance level (p<5×10-8), but we identified six gene regions (TPPP, LINC00333, RIN3. IGFBP/IGFBP3, IZUMO1/MAMSTR and ZBTB46/STMN3) with possible association with ME/CFS which require further follow-up in future studies in order to assess whether they are real findings or not.

Interestingly, these genes are expressed in disease-relevant tissue, e.g. brain, nerve, skeletal muscle and blood, including immune cells (subgroups of T cells, B cells, NK cells and monocytes).

Furthermore, several of the ME/CFS associated SNP genotypes are associated with differential expression levels of these genes. Although we could not identify statistically convincing associations with genetic variants across the three cohorts, we believe that our data sets and analysis represent an important step in the ME/CFS research field.

Our study demonstrated that for the future understanding of the genetic architecture of ME/CFS much larger studies are required to established reliable associations.

In paper III, we wanted to investigate previous findings from a genome wide association study of 42 ME/CFS patients who reported significant association with two SNPs in the T cell receptor alpha (TRA) locus (P-value<5×10-8).

In order to replicate these previously reported findings, we used a large Norwegian ME/CFS cohort (409 cases and 810 controls) and data from the UK Biobank (2105 cases and 4786 controls). We examined a number of SNPs in the TRA locus, including the two previous ME/CFS-associated variants, rs11157573 and rs17255510. No statistically significant associations were observed in either the Norwegian cohort or UK biobank cohorts.

Nevertheless, other SNPs in the region showed weak signs of association (P-value <0.05) in the UK Biobank cohort and meta-analyzes of Norwegian and UK Biobank cohorts, but did not remain associated after applying correction for multiple testing. Thus, we could not confirm associations with genetic variants in the TRA locus in this study.

Source: Riad Hajdarevic. PhD thesis (University of Oslo) Electronic copies must be ordered. https://www.med.uio.no/klinmed/english/research/news-and-events/events/disputations/2022/hajdarevic-riad.html

The Development of a Consistent Europe-Wide Approach to Investigating the Economic Impact of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS): A Report from the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE)

Abstract:

We have developed a Europe-wide approach to investigating the economic impact of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), facilitating acquisition of information on the economic burden of ME/CFS, and international comparisons of economic costs between countries. The economic burden of ME/CFS in Europe appears large, with productivity losses most significant, giving scope for substantial savings through effective prevention and treatment.

However, economic studies of ME/CFS, including cost-of-illness analyses and economic evaluations of interventions, are problematic due to different, arbitrary case definitions, and unwillingness of doctors to diagnose it. We therefore lack accurate incidence and prevalence data, with no obvious way to estimate costs incurred by undiagnosed patients. Other problems include, as for other conditions, difficulties estimating direct and indirect costs incurred by healthcare systems, patients and families, and heterogeneous healthcare systems and patterns of economic development across countries.

We have made recommendations, including use of the Fukuda (CDC-1994) case definition and Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC), a pan-European common symptom checklist, and implementation of prevalence-based cost-of-illness studies in different countries using an agreed data list. We recommend using purchasing power parities (PPP) to facilitate international comparisons, and EuroQol-5D as a generic measure of health status and multi-attribute utility instrument to inform future economic evaluations in ME/CFS.

Source: Pheby DFH, Araja D, Berkis U, Brenna E, Cullinan J, de Korwin JD, Gitto L, Hughes DA, Hunter RM, Trepel D, Wang-Steverding X. The Development of a Consistent Europe-Wide Approach to Investigating the Economic Impact of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS): A Report from the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE). Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 7;8(2). pii: E88. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020088. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32272608

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Investigating care practices pointed out to disparities in diagnosis and treatment across European Union

Abstract:

ME/CFS is a chronic, complex, multisystem disease that often limits the health and functioning of the affected patients. Diagnosing patients with ME/CFS is a challenge, and many different case definitions exist and are used in clinical practice and research. Even after diagnosis, medical treatment is very challenging. Symptom relief and coping may affect how patients live with their disease and their quality of life. There is no consensus on which diagnostic criteria should be used and which treatment strategies can be recommended for patients.

The purpose of the current project was to map the landscape of the Euromene countries in respect of national guidelines and recommendations for case definition, diagnosis and clinical approaches for ME/CFS patients. A 23 items questionnaire was sent out by email to the members of Euromene. The form contained questions on existing guidelines for case definitions, treatment/management of the disease, tests and questionnaires applied, and the prioritization of information for data sampling in research. We obtained information from 17 countries. Five countries reported having national guidelines for diagnosis, and five countries reported having guidelines for clinical approaches.

For diagnostic purposes, the Fukuda criteria were most often recommended, and also the Canadian Consensus criteria, the International Consensus Criteria and the Oxford criteria were used. A mix of diagnostic criteria was applied within those countries having no guidelines. Many different questionnaires and tests were used for symptom registration and diagnostic investigation. For symptom relief, pain and anti-depressive medication were most often recommended. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Graded Exercise treatment were often recommended as disease management and rehabilitative/palliative strategies.

The lack of consistency in recommendations across European countries urges the development of regulations, guidance and standards. The results of this study will contribute to the harmonization of diagnostic criteria and treatment for ME/CFS in Europe.

Source: Strand EB, Nacul L, Mengshoel AM, Helland IB, Grabowski P, Krumina A, Alegre-Martin J, Efrim-Budisteanu M, Sekulic S, Pheby D, Sakkas GK, Sirbu CA, Authier FJ; European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE). Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Investigating care practices pointed out to disparities in diagnosis and treatment across European Union. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225995. eCollection 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225995 (Full article)

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Toward An Empirical Case Definition

Abstract:

Current case definitions of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have been based on consensus methods, but empirical methods could be used to identify core symptoms and thereby improve the reliability. In the present study, several methods (i.e., continuous scores of symptoms, theoretically and empirically derived cut off scores of symptoms) were used to identify core symptoms best differentiating patients from controls. In addition, data mining with decision trees was conducted. Our study found a small number of core symptoms that have good sensitivity and specificity, and these included fatigue, post-exertional malaise, a neurocognitive symptom, and unrefreshing sleep. Outcomes from these analyses suggest that using empirically selected symptoms can help guide the creation of a more reliable case definition.

 

Source: Jason LA, Kot B, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Evans M, Jantke R, Williams Y, Furst J, Vernon SD. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Toward An Empirical Case Definition. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2015;3(1):82-93. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4443921/ (Full article)

 

Study findings challenge the content validity of the Canadian Consensus Criteria for adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

AIM: The 2003 Canadian Consensus Criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are often assumed to suggest low-grade systemic inflammation, but have never been formally validated. This study explored the content validity of the Criteria in a sample of adolescents with CFS selected according to a wide case definition.

METHODS: A total of 120 patients with CFS with a mean age of 15.4 years (range 12-18 years) included in the NorCAPITAL project were post hoc subgrouped according to the Canadian Consensus Criteria. Those who satisfied the criteria (Criteria positive) and those who did not (Criteria negative) were compared across a wide range of disease markers and markers of prognosis.

RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were classified as Criteria positive, 69 were classified as Criteria negative, and five could not be classified. All disease markers were equal across the two groups, except the digit span backward test of cognitive function, which showed poorer performance in the Criteria-positive group. Also, the prognosis over a 30-week period was equal between the groups.

CONCLUSION: This study questions the content validity of the Canadian Consensus Criteria, as few differences were found between adolescent patients with CFS who did and did not satisfy the Criteria.

©2015 Foundation Acta Paediatrica. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

Source: Asprusten TT, Fagermoen E, Sulheim D, Skovlund E, Sørensen Ø, Mollnes TE, Wyller VB. Study findings challenge the content validity of the Canadian Consensus Criteria for adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2015 May;104(5):498-503. doi: 10.1111/apa.12950. Epub 2015 Mar 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25640602

 

Are Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome different illnesses? A preliminary analysis

Abstract:

Considerable discussion has transpired regarding whether chronic fatigue syndrome is a distinct illness from Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. A prior study contrasted the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria with the Fukuda and colleagues’ chronic fatigue syndrome criteria and found that the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria identified a subset of patients with greater functional impairment and physical, mental, and cognitive problems than the larger group who met Fukuda and colleagues’ criteria. The current study analyzed two discrete data sets and found that the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis International Consensus Criteria identified more impaired individuals with more severe symptomatology.

© The Author(s) 2014.

 

Source: Jason LA, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Evans M, Newton JL. Are Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome different illnesses? A preliminary analysis. J Health Psychol. 2016 Jan;21(1):3-15. doi: 10.1177/1359105313520335. Epub 2014 Feb 7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4125561/ (Full article)

 

Contrasting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Much debate is transpiring regarding whether chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) are different illnesses. Several prior studies that compared the Fukuda et al. CFS criteria to the Canadian ME/CFS criteria found that the Canadian criteria identified patients with more functional impairments and greater physical, mental, and cognitive problems than those who met Fukuda et al. criteria.[3,4] These samples were located in the Chicago metropolitan area, so the results could not be generalized to other locations. In addition, past studies used a symptom questionnaire that was not specifically developed to tap the Canadian criteria.

PURPOSE: The present comparative study of CFS and ME/CFS criteria was intended to correct the methodological problems of prior studies.

METHODS: This article used data from three distinct samples to compare patients who met criteria for the ME/CFS Canadian clinical case definition [1] to those who met the Fukuda et al. CFS case definition.[2].

RESULTS: Findings indicated that fewer individuals met the Canadian criteria than the Fukuda et al. criteria. Those who met the Canadian criteria evidenced more severe symptoms and physical functioning impairment.

CONCLUSIONS: Future research should continue to compare existing case definitions and determine which criteria best select for this illness.

 

Source: Jason LA, Brown A, Evans M, Sunnquist M, Newton JL. Contrasting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Fatigue. 2013 Jun 1;1(3):168-183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728084/ (Full article)

 

The adoption of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis case definitions to assess prevalence: a systematic review

Abstract:

PURPOSE: Prevalence estimates have been based on several case definitions of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The purpose of this work is to provide a rigorous overview of their application in prevalence research.

METHODS: A systematic review of primary studies reporting the prevalence of CFS since 1990 was conducted. Studies were summarized according to study design, prevalence estimates, and case definition used to ascertain cases.

RESULTS: Thirty-one studies were retrieved, and eight different case definitions were found. Early estimates of CFS prevalence were based on the 1988 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Australian, and Oxford. The 1994 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, has been adopted internationally, as a general standard. Only one study has reported prevalence according to the more recent, Canadian Consensus Criteria. Additional estimates were also found according to definitions by Ho-Yen, the 2005 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention empirical definition, and an epidemiological case definition.

CONCLUSIONS: Advances in clinical case definitions during the past 10 years such as the Canadian Consensus Criteria have received little attention in prevalence research. Future assessments of prevalence should consider adopting more recent developments, such as the newly available International Consensus Criteria. This move could improve the surveillance of more specific cases found within CFS.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Johnston S, Brenu EW, Staines DR, Marshall-Gradisnik S. The adoption of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis case definitions to assess prevalence: a systematic review. Ann Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2013.04.003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23683713

 

Data mining: comparing the empiric CFS to the Canadian ME/CFS case definition

Abstract:

This article contrasts two case definitions for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). We compared the empiric CFS case definition (Reeves et al., 2005) and the Canadian ME/CFS clinical case definition (Carruthers et al., 2003) with a sample of individuals with CFS versus those without. Data mining with decision trees was used to identify the best items to identify patients with CFS. Data mining is a statistical technique that was used to help determine which of the survey questions were most effective for accurately classifying cases. The empiric criteria identified about 79% of patients with CFS and the Canadian criteria identified 87% of patients. Items identified by the Canadian criteria had more construct validity. The implications of these findings are discussed.

© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

 

Source: Jason LA, Skendrovic B, Furst J, Brown A, Weng A, Bronikowski C. Data mining: comparing the empiric CFS to the Canadian ME/CFS case definition. J Clin Psychol. 2012 Jan;68(1):41-9. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20827. Epub 2011 Aug 5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228898/ (Full article)