Serum concentrations of 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase, neopterin, and beta-glucan in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in patients with major depression

Chronic fatigue syndrome is characterised by debilitating severe fatigue persisting for more than six months. Furthermore, it is associated with physical symptoms, such as mild fever, sore throat, arthralgia, and myalgia, as well as psychological symptoms such as headache, insomnia, depressive state, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. It has often been claimed that the onset of chronic fatigue syndrome follows an infection or infection-like illness; hence a certain microorganism(s) or virus may cause it. Another possible candidate for inducing chronic fatigue syndrome is cellular or humoral immune dysfunction, which has been found in patients with the disease. There is controversy also as to whether or not chronic fatigue syndrome and major depression (mood disorder) represent different entities.

Mild fever, pharyngitis, and lymphadenopathy, which are suggestive of the existence of inflammation, are often associated with chronic fatigue syndrome, but the peripheral leucocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein concentration are usually normal in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Hence, it is possible that certain cytokines may produce the symptoms in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and, possibly, those with major depression. For example, interferon is known to cause fever, fatigue, and psychoneurological abnormalities. We conducted this study to clarify whether or not 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase (2,5-AS), neopterin, adenosine deaminase, endotoxin, or B-glucan participate in the pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1073106/pdf/jnnpsyc00038-0135b.pdf

 

Source: Matsuda J, Gohchi K, Gotoh N. Serum concentrations of 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase, neopterin, and beta-glucan in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and in patients with major depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;57(8):1015-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1073106/

 

The effect of social adversity on the fatigue syndrome, psychiatric disorders and physical recovery, following glandular fever

Abstract:

Two hundred and fifty patients attending primary care with glandular fever or an upper respiratory tract infection were studied prospectively up to 6 months after onset. Of these patients 228 were interviewed with the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule and the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schzophrenia, giving Research Diagnostic Criteria for psychiatric disorders.

The experience of severe social adversity (provoking agents) had a significant association with psychiatric disorder at 2 months (odds ratio = 5.3) and 6 months (odds ratio = 5.8) after onset of infection. This association was especially significant for depressive illness (odds ratio = 9.1 at 2 months and 11.9 at 6 months).

In contrast, social adversity had little association with the development of the post-infectious fatigue syndrome, or delayed physical recovery. Social adversity may be an important maintaining factor for psychiatric disorders, especially depressive illness, following acute infections.

 

Source: Bruce-Jones WD, White PD, Thomas JM, Clare AW. The effect of social adversity on the fatigue syndrome, psychiatric disorders and physical recovery, following glandular fever. Psychol Med. 1994 Aug;24(3):651-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7991747

 

Cognitive functioning and depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To assess cognitive function in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) and to evaluate the role of depressive symptoms in cognitive performance.

DESIGN: Case-control. All subjects were given a neuropsychological battery, self-report measures of depression and fatigue, and a global cognitive impairment rating by a neuropsychologist “blinded” to clinical diagnosis. Patients with MS and CFS were additionally evaluated with a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition) disorders.

SETTING: Institutional and private neurological practices and the community at large.

PATIENTS: Twenty patients with CFS diagnosed in accord with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-revised criteria who had cognitive complaints; 20 patients with clinically definite MS who were ambulatory and were matched for fatigue severity, age, and education to CFS subjects; and 20 age- and education-matched healthy controls.

RESULTS: Patients with CFS had significantly elevated depression symptoms compared with patients with MS and healthy controls (P < .001) and had a greater lifetime prevalence of depression and dysthymia compared with MS subjects. Patients with CFS, relative to controls, performed more poorly on the Digit Symbol subtest (P = .023) and showed a trend for poorer performance on logical memory (P = .087). Patients with MS compared with controls had more widespread differences of greater magnitude on the Digit Span (P < .004) and Digit Symbol (P < .001), Trail Making parts A (P = .022) and B (P = .037), and Controlled Oral Word Association (P = .043) tests. Patients with MS also showed a trend of poorer performance on the Booklet Category Test (P = .089). When patients with CFS and MS were directly compared, MS subjects had lower scores on all measures, but the differences reached significance only for the Digit Span measure of attention (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CFS compared with MS have more depressive symptoms but less cognitive impairment. Relative to controls, a subset of CFS subjects did poorly on tests of visuomotor search and on the logical memory measure of the Wechsler Memory Scale-revised. Poor performance of logical memory in CFS appears to be related to depression, while visuomotor deficits in CFS are unrelated. Cognitive deficits in patients with MS are more widespread compared with those in patients with CFS and are independent of depressive symptoms.

 

Source: Krupp LB, Sliwinski M, Masur DM, Friedberg F, Coyle PK. Cognitive functioning and depression in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1994 Jul;51(7):705-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8018045

 

Neuropsychiatric status of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: an overview

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness that results in debilitating fatigue as well as rheumatological, infectious, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The present paper is a brief overview of the neuropsychological and psychiatric research on CFS. Studies from our laboratory contrasting CFS with patients with multiple sclerosis, depression, and healthy controls are detailed. Our hypothesis of neuropsychological impairments in CFS is discussed.

 

Source: Deluca J, Johnson SK, Natelson BH. Neuropsychiatric status of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: an overview. Toxicol Ind Health. 1994 Jul-Oct;10(4-5):513-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7778111

 

The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: science and speculation

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by fatigue, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and various other somatic complaints. Treatment studies to date reflect both the diversity of medical disciplines involved in the management of patients with CFS and the multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed.

There have been few attempts to study integrated treatment programs, and although several controlled studies have been reported, no treatment has been shown clearly to result in long-term benefit in the majority of patients. Good clinical care integrating medical and psychologic concepts, together with symptomatic management, may prevent significant secondary impairment in the majority of patients.

Future treatment studies should examine differential response rates for possible subtypes of the disorder (eg, documented viral onset, concurrent clinical depression), evaluate the extent of any synergistic effects between therapies (ie, medical and psychologic), and employ a wide range of biologic and psychologic parameters as markers of treatment response.

 

Source: Wilson A, Hickie I, Lloyd A, Wakefield D. The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: science and speculation. Am J Med. 1994 Jun;96(6):544-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8017453

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. …and study them separately

Comment on: Chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence and outcome. [BMJ. 1994]

 

Editor,-The struggle over myalgic encephalomyelitis and the chronic fatigue syndrome is not, as S M Lawrie and A J Pelosi suggest, whether they are physical or mental illnesses. Both sides in this debate accept that most illnesses combine organic and psychological factors. The struggle is about methodology and definition and, in particular, how different methodologies and definitions inevitably lead to different findings on the degree to which depression is a perpetuating agent in these conditions.

One side favours studying the chronic fatigue syndrome as a single entity, arguing that there is insufficient knowledge at present to differentiate between different chronic fatigue syndromes. This side prefers Sharpe et al’s broad definition of the syndrome, which includes depressive illness, anxiety disorders, and the hyperventilation syndrome.2 Unsurprisingly, studies that use these criteria find higher levels of depression ) or “psychosocial disorders”-yet another woolly term).

The other side argues that there is sufficient knowledge to distinguish specific chronic fatigue syndromes, particularly the much studied myalgic encephalomyelitis, and that it must be better science in these cases to study such syndromes in their own right. Furthermore, it argues that the study groups used in research based on broadbrush criteria will have been so aetiologically heterogeneous as to invalidate the findings. This side, which includes the national patient organisations, equates myalgic encephalomyelitis with Holmes et als tighter definition of the chronic fatigue syndrome, which focuses more on organic symptoms and, again unsurprisingly, finds lower levels of depression similar to those found in patients with cancer and multiple sclerosis-that is, the levels that might be predicted in any chronic illness.3

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540172/pdf/bmj00440-0054a.pdf

 

Source: Anderson N. Chronic fatigue syndrome. …and study them separately. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1298. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540172/

 

Alpha-delta sleep in patients with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue

Abstract:

Our prospective, standardized cohort study was designed to assess the presence of alpha wave intrusions during non-rapid eye movement sleep (alpha-delta sleep) and its relationship to fibromyalgia, major depression, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in patients with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue.

The study group comprised 30 consecutive patients seen at a university hospital referral clinic for evaluation of chronic fatigue. All patients had nocturnal polysomnography, dolorimetric tender point assessment for fibromyalgia, a comprehensive history, physical, and laboratory evaluation, and a structured psychiatric interview. Alpha-delta sleep was identified in 8 of the 30 patients (26%), major depression in 20 (67%), CFS in 15 (50%), and fibromyalgia in 4 (13%). Ten of the 30 patients (33%) had a primary sleep disorder (sleep apnea, periodic limb movements, or narcolepsy).

Alpha-delta sleep was not significantly correlated with fibromyalgia, CFS, major depression, or primary sleep disorders, but was significantly more common among patients who had chronic fatigue without major depression. We conclude that primary sleep disorders are relatively common among patients with chronic fatigue and must be diligently sought and treated. Alpha-delta sleep is not a marker of fibromyalgia or CFS, but may contribute to the illness of nondepressed patients with these conditions.

Comment in: Sleep disorders and chronic fatigue. [South Med J. 1994]

 

Source: Manu P, Lane TJ, Matthews DA, Castriotta RJ, Watson RK, Abeles M. Alpha-delta sleep in patients with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue. South Med J. 1994 Apr;87(4):465-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8153772

 

SPECT imaging of the brain: comparison of findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, AIDS dementia complex, and major unipolar depression

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Chronic fatigue syndrome is an illness of unknown origin that begins abruptly with a flulike state and has symptoms suggesting both a chronic viral encephalitis and an affective disorder. We compared single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with those of patients with AIDS dementia complex and unipolar depression.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime to examine 45 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, 27 patients with AIDS dementia complex, and 14 patients with major unipolar depression. Scans of 38 healthy persons were used as controls. Comparison of regional defects between groups, as well as midcerebral uptake indexes (an objective measure of global radionuclide uptake), was performed by using analysis of variance with the Student-Newman-Keuls option. Correlation between the number of regional defects and the midcerebral uptake index was determined by using the Spearman rank-correlation test.

RESULTS: Patients with AIDS dementia complex had the largest number of defects (9.15 per patient) and healthy patients had the fewest defects (1.66 per patient). Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and depression had similar numbers of defects per patient (6.53 and 6.43, respectively). In all groups, defects were located predominantly in the frontal and temporal lobes. The midcerebral uptake index was found to be significantly lower (p < .002) in the patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (.667) and patients with AIDS dementia complex (.650) than in patients with major depression (.731) or healthy control subjects (.716). Also, a significant negative correlation was found between the number of defects and midcerebral uptake index in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and AIDS dementia complex, but not in depressed patients or control subjects.

CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that chronic fatigue syndrome may be due to a chronic viral encephalitis; clinical similarities between chronic fatigue syndrome and depression may be due to a similar distribution and number of defects in the two disorders.

 

Source: Schwartz RB, Komaroff AL, Garada BM, Gleit M, Doolittle TH, Bates DW, Vasile RG, Holman BL. SPECT imaging of the brain: comparison of findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, AIDS dementia complex, and major unipolar depression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Apr;162(4):943-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8141022

 

Psychosocial correlates of illness burden in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

We related reported physical symptoms, cognitive appraisals (e.g., negative style of thinking), and coping strategies (e.g., denial/disengagement strategies) with illness burden across several functional domains separately in subsets of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients with (n = 26) and without (n = 39) concurrently diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD).

In regard to cognitive appraisal measures, automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes were strongly associated with a higher illness burden, as indicated in sickness impact profile (SIP) scores. Active-involvement coping strategies measured on COPE scales (active coping, planning, and positive reinterpretation and growth) were not associated with SIP scores, while other coping strategies (mental disengagement, behavioral disengagement, and denial) were positively correlated with psychosocial and physical SIP scales, especially those pertaining to interpersonal life-style arenas.

After we accounted for the number of different CFS-specific physical complaints reported and DSM-III-R depression diagnosis status, cognitive appraisals and coping strategies predicted a substantial proportion of the variance in the severity of illness burden. For the most part, the magnitude of these relationships between our predictor model variables and illness burden severity was similar in the MDD and non-MDD subgroups.

 

Source: Antoni MH, Brickman A, Lutgendorf S, Klimas N, Imia-Fins A, Ironson G, Quillian R, Miguez MJ, van Riel F, Morgan R, et al. Psychosocial correlates of illness burden in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S73-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8148457

 

A comparison of cognitive behavioral treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome and primary depression

Abstract:

To evaluate the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we studied three patient groups: a CFS-treatment group (n = 22), a primary depression-treatment group (n = 20), and a no-treatment control group of subjects with CFS (n = 22). For the CFS-treatment group, a trend toward reduced depression-symptom scores was noted, but there were no significant changes in stress-related symptoms or fatigue severity.

For the most depressed treated subjects with CFS, significant score reductions were observed in measures of depression, stress, fatigue severity, and fatigue-related thinking. In the depression group, significant reductions in depression, stress, and fatigue severity scores were found. No significant changes in any measure were observed in the CFS control group.

A new fatigue-related cognitions scale, developed to assess cognitive and emotional reactions to fatigue, showed a significant reduction in such reactions in the CFS-treatment group, a finding suggesting that depression in this group was mediated by maladaptive thinking. The results suggest that a subset of CFS patients with cognition-related depressive symptomatology may respond to short-term behavioral intervention.

Comment in: Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Clin Infect Dis. 1995]

 

Source: Friedberg F, Krupp LB. A comparison of cognitive behavioral treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome and primary depression. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Jan;18 Suppl 1:S105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8148435