Tag: covid-19

Endothelial dysfunction is the key of long COVID-19 symptoms: The results of TUN-EndCOV study

Abstract:

Background: The COVID-19 disease is a multisystem disease due to in part to the vascular endothelium injury. Lasting effects and long-term sequalae could persist after the infection and may be due to persistent endothelial dysfunction.

Purpose: Our study focused on the study of endothelial function measurement by digital thermal monitoring (DTM) of endothelial quality index with E4 diagnosis Polymath in a large cohort of long COVID-19 patients to determine whether long COVID-19 symptoms are due to endothelial dysfunction.

Methods: This is a prospective multicenter longitudinal observational cohort study. Endothelial function was evaluated with “E4-Diagnose” Polymath Tunisia based on the Endothelium Quality Index (EQI). A complete echocardiographic evaluation analysis was performed. Primary outcomes were defined as the occurrence of long COVID-19 symptoms in patients with endothelial dysfunction measured by EQI.

Results: A total of 798 patients were included in this study. Patients were included at an average time of 68.93 ± 43.1 days. The mean EQI was 2.02 ± 0.99 [0–5]. A total of 397 (49.7%) patients had poor or very poor EQI and 211 (26.4%) patients had very poor EQI. The median age was 49.94 ± 14.2 (18–80) years. A total of 618 patients (77.4%) had long COVID-19 symptoms. Patients with long COVID-19 symptoms had a reduced EQI (1.99 ± 0.97 vs. 2.09 ± 1.05, P = 0.24). Among long COVID-19 symptoms, fatigue was the most common symptom reported in 42.2%. Fatigue and chest pain were significantly associated to the endothelial dysfunction (P = 0.04 and 0.001 respectively). Patients with chest pain had significantly lower EQI (1.74 ± 1.0 vs. 2.09 ± 0.9, P ≤ 10−3) and LVGLS (−16.35 ± 3.0 vs. −17.16 ± 2.5, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Long COVID-19 symptoms specifically chest pain and fatigue are due to persistent poor endothelial quality index. These findings allow a better care of patients with long COVID-19 symptoms.

Source: S. Charfeddine, H. Ibnhadjamor, S. Torjmen, S. Kraiem, R. Hammami, A. Bahloul, N. Kallel, N. Moussa, I. Touil, S. Milouchi, J. Elghoul, Z. Meddeb, Y. Thabet, J. Jdidi, K. Bouslema, S. Abdesselem, L. Abid. Endothelial dysfunction is the key of long COVID-19 symptoms: The results of TUN-EndCOV study. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements, Volume 14, Issue 1, 2022, Page 126, ISSN 1878-6480, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvdsp.2021.10.004. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187864802100642X)

Impaired systemic oxygen extraction long after mild COVID-19: potential perioperative implications

Editor:

The extraordinary number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections world-wide has made it inevitable that patients who have recovered from COVID-19 will present for anaesthesia and surgery. Recent data indicate that in the United States alone, roughly one-third of the population had been infected by the end of 20201. With this in mind, we read with interest the recent correspondence by Silvapulle and colleagues2 underscoring the wide range of symptoms that often follow recovery from COVID-19 and the complexity of considering residual physiologic abnormalities when assessing perioperative risk. They note that patients suffering from “long COVID” have been reported to exhibit demonstrable abnormalities in several biomarkers as well as cardiac, neurologic, haematologic, renal, hepatic, and endocrine impairment. Based on current evidence, the authors suggest that patients previously experiencing mild COVID-19 but without clear evidence of these sequelae can be regarded as having minimal additional perioperative risk. In this context, the relatively young person who suffered mild COVID-19 a year earlier, complains of exertional fatigue but admits to being sedentary and unfit, and has no objective evidence of cardiopulmonary disease or other organ dysfunction will likely raise little concern.

While the morbidity and mortality associated with severe COVID-19 has appropriately received considerable attention, most SARS-CoV-2 infections result in relatively mild, self-limited symptoms not requiring hospitalization. Nonetheless, some of these patients subsequently experience persistent fatigue and reduced exercise capacity that is not attributable to cardiopulmonary impairment diagnosed by conventional means3. Several mechanisms have been proposed including anaemia, deconditioning, and red blood cell abnormalities4. However, many of the studies describing these mechanisms were conducted in patients following hospitalization and/or within a few months of recovery.

A central focus of perioperative management has always been maintenance of systemic oxygen delivery (DO2) and tissue perfusion. Toward this end, research has defined how the fundamental relationships between DO2, tissue oxygen consumption (VO2), and oxygen extraction (EO2) shift from the intraoperative setting where VO2 tends to be reduced, to the postoperative period when VO2 increases5. Although a range of postoperative complications has been linked to suboptimal tissue DO26,  7, the incidence of these complications appears relatively low in relation to the documented incidence of perioperative hypoxaemia8,  9, particularly when considered in light of potential coincidence with other common factors such as anaemia, hypovolaemia, and transient hypotension. A contributing factor may be that, as with most physiological systems, evolutionary pressure has yielded compensatory mechanisms for reduced DO2 to many organs. Under most circumstances, when DO2 is low, VO2 is maintained by augmented EO2 to prevent tissue hypoxia10. This compensatory EO2 reserve persists until limits that vary among tissue beds are reached and VO2 becomes DO2-dependent. Ultimately, in the perioperative setting where alterations in regional VO2/DO2 balance occur with regularity it is probable that this EO2 reserve is working continuously ‘behind the scenes’ for organ protection.

But what if this seemingly occult protective mechanism is impaired? Clinical experience imparts heightened suspicion of tissue vulnerability in patients with defined end-organ impairment or risk factors for reduced functional reserve such as aging, smoking, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. But how does this affect that relatively young person who admits to being sedentary and unfit but has no objective evidence of cardiopulmonary disease, and whose only other notable medical history is mild COVID-19 a year earlier? A recent report proposed the existence of a specific “long COVID phenotype” with exertional intolerance and dyspnoea despite normal pulmonary function11, raising the question of whether there is more to this patient than meets the eye.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Paul M. Heerdt, Ben Shelley, Inderjit Singh. Impaired systemic oxygen extraction long after mild COVID-19: potential perioperative implications. Published: December 27, 2021. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.036

Disturbances in sleep, circadian rhythms and daytime functioning in relation to coronavirus infection and Long-COVID – A multinational ICOSS study

Abstract:

This protocol paper describes the second survey produced by the International Covid Sleep Study (ICOSS) group with the aim to examine the associations between SARS-CoV-2 infection and sleep, sleepiness, and circadian problems as potential predisposing factors for more severe COVID-19 disease profile and for development of Long-COVID in the general population. The survey consists of 47 questions on sleep, daytime sleepiness, circadian rhythm, health, mental wellbeing, life habits, and socioeconomic situation before and during the pandemic, and conditional questions to those reporting having had coronavirus infection, being vaccinated, or suffering from particular sleep symptoms or sleep disorders. Surveys will be administered online between May and November 2021 in Austria, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Sweden and USA. Data collected by the survey will give valuable information on the open questions regarding COVID-19 disease risk factors, symptomatology and evolution of Long-COVID, and on other long-term consequences related to the pandemic.

Source: Merikanto I, Dauvilliers Y, Chung F, Holzinger B, De Gennaro L, Wing YK, Korman M, Partinen M; 2nd ICOSS members. Disturbances in sleep, circadian rhythms and daytime functioning in relation to coronavirus infection and Long-COVID – A multinational ICOSS study. J Sleep Res. 2021 Dec 28:e13542. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13542. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34964184. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34964184/

Multisystem Involvement in Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)

Abstract:

Objective: To describe cerebrovascular, neuropathic and autonomic features of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with chronic fatigue, brain fog and orthostatic intolerance consistent with PASC. Controls included postural tachycardia syndrome patients (POTS) and healthy participants. Analyzed data included surveys and autonomic (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, sudomotor and tilt tests), cerebrovascular (cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) monitoring in middle cerebral artery), respiratory (capnography monitoring) and neuropathic (skin biopsies for assessment of small fiber neuropathy) testing and inflammatory/autoimmune markers.

Results: Nine PASC patients were evaluated 0.7±0.3 years after a mild COVID-19 infection, treated as home observations. Autonomic, pain, brain fog, fatigue and dyspnea surveys were abnormal in PASC and POTS (n=10), compared to controls (n=15). Tilt table test reproduced the majority of PASC symptoms. Orthostatic CBFv declined in PASC (-20.0±13.4%) and POTS (-20.3±15.1%), compared to controls (-3.0±7.5%,p=0.001) and was independent of end-tidal carbon dioxide in PASC, but caused by hyperventilation in POTS. Reduced orthostatic CBFv in PASC included both subjects without (n=6) and with (n=3) orthostatic tachycardia. Dysautonomia was frequent (100% in both PASC and POTS) but was milder in PASC (p=0.013). PASC and POTS cohorts diverged in frequency of small fiber neuropathy (89% vs. 60%) but not in inflammatory markers (67% vs. 70%). Supine and orthostatic hypocapnia was observed in PASC.

Interpretation: PASC following mild COVID-19 infection is associated with multisystem involvement including: 1) cerebrovascular dysregulation with persistent cerebral arteriolar vasoconstriction; 2) small fiber neuropathy and related dysautonomia; 3) respiratory dysregulation; 4) chronic inflammation.

Source: Novak P, Mukerji SS, Alabsi HS, Systrom D, Marciano SP, Felsenstein D, Mullally WJ, Pilgrim DM. Multisystem Involvement in Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Ann Neurol. 2021 Dec 24. doi: 10.1002/ana.26286. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34952975. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34952975/

Year-long COVID-19 infection reveals within-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in a patient with B cell depletion

Abstract:

B-cell depleting therapies may lead to prolonged disease and viral shedding in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and this viral persistence raises concern for viral evolution. We report on the sequencing of early and late samples from a 335-day infection in an immunocompromised patient. The virus accumulated a unique deletion in the amino-terminal domain of the spike protein, and complete deletion of ORF7b and ORF8, the first report of its kind in an immunocompromised patient. Overall, the unique viral mutations found in this study highlight the importance of analyzing viral evolution in protracted SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in immunosuppressed hosts.

Source: Nussenblatt V, Roder AE, Das S, de Wit E, Youn JH, Banakis S, Mushegian A, Mederos C, Wang W, Chung M, Pérez-Pérez L, Palmore T, Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN, Ghedin E. Year-long COVID-19 infection reveals within-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in a patient with B cell depletion. J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 23:jiab622. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab622. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34940844. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34940844/

Levocetirizine and montelukast in the COVID-19 treatment paradigm

Abstract:

Levocetirizine, a third-generation antihistamine, and montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, exhibit remarkable synergistic anti-inflammatory activity across a spectrum of signaling proteins, cell adhesion molecules, and leukocytes. By targeting cellular protein activity, they are uniquely positioned to treat the symptoms of COVID-19. Clinical data to date with an associated six-month follow-up, suggests the combination therapy may prevent the progression of the disease from mild to moderate to severe, as well as prevent/treat many of the aspects of ‘Long COVID,’ thereby cost effectively reducing both morbidity and mortality. To investigate patient outcomes, 53 consecutive COVID-19 test (+) cases (ages 3-90) from a well-established, single-center practice in Boston, Massachusetts, between March – November 2020, were treated with levocetirizine and montelukast in addition to then existing protocols [2]. The data set was retrospectively reviewed.

Thirty-four cases were considered mild (64%), 17 moderate (32%), and 2 (4%) severe. Several patients presented with significant comorbidities (obesity: n = 22, 41%; diabetes: n = 10, 19%; hypertension: n = 24, 45%). Among the cohort there were no exclusions, no intubations, and no deaths. The pilot study in Massachusetts encompassed the first COVID-19 wave which peaked on April 23, 2020 as well as the ascending portion of the second wave in the fall. During this period the average weekly COVID-19 case mortality rate (confirmed deaths/confirmed cases) varied considerably between 1 and 7.5% [37]. FDA has approved a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 clinical trial design, replete with electronic diaries and laboratory metrics to explore scientific questions not addressed herein.

Source: May BC, Gallivan KH. Levocetirizine and montelukast in the COVID-19 treatment paradigm. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Dec 15;103:108412. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108412. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34942461; PMCID: PMC8673734. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8673734/ (Full text)

Intravenous immunoglobulin as an important adjunct in the prevention and therapy of coronavirus 2019 disease

Abstract:

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) challenged globally with its morbidity and mortality. A small percentage of affected patients (20%) progress into the second stage of the disease clinically presenting with severe or fatal involvement of lung, heart and vascular system, all contributing to multiple-organ failure. The so-called ‘cytokines storm’ is considered the pathogenic basis of severe disease and it is a target for treatment with corticosteroids, immunotherapies and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).

We provide an overview of the role of IVIg in the therapy of adult patients with COVID-19 disease. After discussing the possible underlying mechanisms of IVIg immunomodulation in COVID-19 disease, we review the studies in which IVIg was employed. Considering the latest evidence that show a link between new coronavirus and autoimmunity, we also discuss the use of IVIg in COVID-19 and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination related autoimmune diseases and the post-COVID-19 syndrome.

The benefit of high-dose IVIg is evident in almost all studies with a rapid response, a reduction in mortality and improved pulmonary function in critically ill COVID-19 patients. It seems that an early administration of IVIg is crucial for a successful outcome. Studies’ limitations are represented by the small number of patients, the lack of control groups in some and the heterogeneity of included patients. IVIg treatment can reduce the stay in ICU and the demand for mechanical ventilation, thus contributing to attenuate the burden of the disease.

Source: Danieli MG, Piga MA, Paladini A, Longhi E, Mezzanotte C, Moroncini G, Shoenfeld Y. Intravenous immunoglobulin as an important adjunct in the prevention and therapy of coronavirus 2019 disease. Scand J Immunol. 2021 Nov;94(5):e13101. doi: 10.1111/sji.13101. Epub 2021 Sep 16. PMID: 34940980; PMCID: PMC8646640. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8646640/ (Full text)

Physical, cognitive and mental health impacts of COVID-19 following hospitalisation – a multi-centre prospective cohort study

Abstract:

Background The impact of COVID-19 on physical and mental health, and employment following hospitalisation is poorly understood.

Methods PHOSP-COVID is a multi-centre, UK, observational study of adults discharged from hospital with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 involving an assessment between two- and seven-months later including detailed symptom, physiological and biochemical testing. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for patient-perceived recovery with age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, and severity of acute illness as co-variates. Cluster analysis was performed using outcomes for breathlessness, fatigue, mental health, cognition and physical function.

Findings We report findings of 1077 patients discharged in 2020, from the assessment undertaken a median 5 [IQR4 to 6] months later: 36% female, mean age 58 [SD 13] years, 69% white ethnicity, 27% mechanical ventilation, and 50% had at least two co-morbidities. At follow-up only 29% felt fully recovered, 20% had a new disability, and 19% experienced a health-related change in occupation. Factors associated with failure to recover were female, middle-age, white ethnicity, two or more co-morbidities, and more severe acute illness. The magnitude of the persistent health burden was substantial and weakly related to acute severity. Four clusters were identified with different severities of mental and physical health impairment: 1) Very severe (17%), 2) Severe (21%), 3) Moderate with cognitive impairment (17%), 4) Mild (46%), with 3%, 7%, 36% and 43% feeling fully recovered, respectively. Persistent systemic inflammation determined by C-reactive protein was related to cluster severity, but not acute illness severity.

Interpretation We identified factors related to recovery from a hospital admission with COVID-19 and four different phenotypes relating to the severity of physical, mental, and cognitive health five months later. The implications for clinical care include the potential to stratify care and the need for a pro-active approach with wide-access to COVID-19 holistic clinical services.

Source: Sigfrid, Louise, et al. “Long Covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: A prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol.” medRxiv (2021).  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.22.21254057v1.full-text (Full text)

Long covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after covid-19: a prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol

Abstract:

Background: This study sought to establish the long-term effects of Covid-19 following hospitalisation.

Methods: 327 hospitalised participants, with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited into a prospective multicentre cohort study at least 3 months post-discharge. The primary outcome was self-reported recovery at least ninety days after initial Covid-19 symptom onset. Secondary outcomes included new symptoms, disability (Washington group short scale), breathlessness (MRC Dyspnoea scale) and quality of life (EQ5D-5L).

Findings: 55% of participants reported not feeling fully recovered. 93% reported persistent symptoms, with fatigue the most common (83%), followed by breathlessness (54%). 47% reported an increase in MRC dyspnoea scale of at least one grade. New or worse disability was reported by 24% of participants. The EQ5D-5L summary index was significantly worse following acute illness (median difference 0.1 points on a scale of 0 to 1, IQR: -0.2 to 0.0). Females under the age of 50 years were five times less likely to report feeling recovered (adjusted OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.64 to 15.74), were more likely to have greater disability (adjusted OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 15.94), twice as likely to report worse fatigue (adjusted OR 2.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 3.31) and seven times more likely to become more breathless (adjusted OR 7.15, 95% CI 2.24 to 22.83) than men of the same age.

Interpretation: Survivors of Covid-19 experienced long-term symptoms, new disability, increased breathlessness, and reduced quality of life. These findings were present in young, previously healthy working age adults, and were most common in younger females.

Source: Sigfrid L, Drake TM, Pauley E, Jesudason EC, Olliaro P, Lim WS, Gillesen A, Berry C, Lowe DJ, McPeake J, Lone N, Munblit D, Cevik M, Casey A, Bannister P, Russell CD, Goodwin L, Ho A, Turtle L, O’Hara ME, Hastie C, Donohue C, Spencer RG, Donegan C, Gummery A, Harrison J, Hardwick HE, Hastie CE, Carson G, Merson L, Baillie JK, Openshaw P, Harrison EM, Docherty AB, Semple MG, Scott JT; ISARIC4C investigators. Long Covid in adults discharged from UK hospitals after Covid-19: A prospective, multicentre cohort study using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Sep;8:100186. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100186. Epub 2021 Aug 6. PMID: 34386785; PMCID: PMC8343377. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8343377/ (Full text)

Covid-19: Middle aged women face greater risk of debilitating long term symptoms

Middle aged women have a higher risk of experiencing a range of debilitating ongoing symptoms, such as fatigue, breathlessness, muscle pain, anxiety, depression, and “brain fog” after hospital treatment for covid-19, suggest the findings of two unpublished studies available as preprints.

Seven in 10 patients admitted to hospital with covid-19 reported “long covid” symptoms an average of five months after discharge in the larger PHOSP-COVID study, and symptoms were more prevalent in women aged 40-60.1 White ethnicity, two or more comorbidities at admission, and receiving invasive ventilation while in hospital increased the risk, but severity of acute covid-19 disease did not seem to affect the likelihood of experiencing long covid symptoms.

Only 29% of the 1077 patients studied felt fully recovered when followed up, on average five months after discharge. Over a quarter had clinically significant symptoms of anxiety and depression, 12% had symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, 17% had at least mild cognitive impairment, 46% had lower physical performance than age and sex matched controls, and 20% had a new disability.

Before hospital admission 68% of patients had worked full time, but 18% of these had not returned to work and 19% had had to change their way of working because of longlasting effects.

The researchers grouped patients into four clusters according to the severity of their physical and mental symptoms post-covid: very severe (17% of patients), severe (21%), moderate with cognitive impairment (17%), and mild (46%).

Rachael Evans, National Institute for Health Research clinical scientist at the University of Leicester and a study author, said, “The symptoms are very real, but they don’t have a straightforward relationship with heart and lung damage, or certainly heart and lung damage can’t explain all the symptoms.”

Immune response

A smaller second study, from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC), found that women under 50 were five times less likely to report feeling recovered, twice as likely to report worse fatigue, seven times more likely to become more breathless, and more likely to have greater disability than men of the same age who had been admitted to hospital with covid-19.2 Disability usually affected memory, mobility, communication, vision, or hearing. More than half of the 327 patients assessed in this study did not feel fully recovered when followed up on average seven months later, and persistent symptoms were reported by 93.3%, with fatigue and breathlessness the most common.

Chris Brightling, professor of respiratory medicine at the University of Leicester and a PHOSP-COVID study researcher, speculated that sex based differences in the immune response may be responsible for the higher prevalence of long covid symptoms in women, noting that autoimmune diseases were more prevalent in women than in men at age 40-60.

“Maybe there’s a difference in the immune response acutely, such that men are more likely to have a more severe condition at the time of the infection,” he told a press conference at the Science Media Centre on 24 March. “It may be that the immune response is different in women, so you then have a continued inflammatory reaction that then leads to a higher likelihood of having long covid.”

Higher levels of C reactive protein, a marker of systemic inflammation, were seen in patients in the most severe long covid symptoms. Brightling said that a number of immune and chronic inflammatory conditions can also cause elevated C reactive protein.

About 450 000 people have been admitted to hospital with covid-19 in the UK, so a “very large” proportion of these would potentially be affected by long covid, he said, adding, “Clearly there’s an even larger number of people that have had covid in the community, and a portion of those will also have long covid.”

Source: Torjesen I. Covid-19: Middle aged women face greater risk of debilitating long term symptoms BMJ 2021; 372 :n829 doi:10.1136/bmj.n829 https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n829 (Full text)