Tag: CBT

The effect of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome on self-reported cognitive impairments and neuropsychological test performance

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) often have concentration and memory problems. Neuropsychological test performance is impaired in at least a subgroup of patients with CFS. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for CFS leads to a reduction in fatigue and disabilities.

AIM: To test the hypothesis that CBT results in a reduction of self-reported cognitive impairment and in an improved neuropsychological test performance.

METHODS: Data of two previous randomised controlled trials were used. One study compared CBT for adult patients with CFS, with two control conditions. The second study compared CBT for adolescent patients with a waiting list condition. Self-reported cognitive impairment was assessed with questionnaires. Information speed was measured with simple and choice reaction time tasks. Adults also completed the symbol digit-modalities task, a measure of complex attentional function.

RESULTS: In both studies, the level of self-reported cognitive impairment decreased significantly more after CBT than in the control conditions. Neuropsychological test performance did not improve.

CONCLUSIONS: CBT leads to a reduction in self-reported cognitive impairment, but not to improved neuropsychological test performance. The findings of this study support the idea that the distorted perception of cognitive processes is more central to CFS than actual cognitive performance.

 

Source: Knoop H, Prins JB, Stulemeijer M, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. The effect of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome on self-reported cognitive impairments and neuropsychological test performance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;78(4):434-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077788/ (Full article)

 

Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in U.K. primary care: challenges and opportunities

Abstract:

Calls for the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in primary care have been based largely on considerations of the availability and accessibility of resources rather than with reference to a firm evidence base. Treatments such as cognitive-behavioural therapy and graded exercise therapy, which have proven effective for CFS in secondary and specialist care settings, have not been adequately tested in primary care. There are several factors that may affect the generalizability of such treatments. Patients seen in primary care may differ from those seen in secondary care, in terms of both illness beliefs and social characteristics, and these factors need to be taken into account when developing and adapting treatments for primary care. While some primary care physicians experience difficulties in the diagnosis of CFS, we argue that early and authoritative diagnosis and the provision of a tangible explanation for patients’ symptoms are likely to be beneficial. Because of the scarcity of qualified specialist therapists, we need to train primary care practitioners to deliver treatments, and we need more research into the feasibility and effectiveness of doing this. Finally, the primary care setting offers opportunities for the guided development of patient self-help approaches.

 

Source: Wearden AJ, Chew-Graham C. Managing chronic fatigue syndrome in U.K. primary care: challenges and opportunities. Chronic Illn. 2006 Jun;2(2):143-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17175657

 

Long-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy by general practitioners for fatigue: a 4-year follow-up study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: In an earlier study, we found that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered by general practitioners (GPs) for fatigue among employees on sick leave was not effective after 12 months. In this study we aim to assess the long-term efficacy of CBT by GPs for fatigue. It was hypothesized that the intervention could prevent deterioration as well as relapse of fatigue complaints and relapse into absenteeism in the long term.

METHODS: Patients who participated in the original randomized controlled trial were followed up 4 years later. Fatigue and absenteeism were the main outcomes.

RESULTS: Fatigue and absenteeism were high in the intervention and control groups at the 4-year follow-up. There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group on fatigue and absenteeism. The intervention group however tended toward less-favorable outcomes as compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: Like that of chronic fatigue syndrome, the prognosis of less-advanced fatigue is rather poor. CBT delivered by GPs is not effective in the long term.

 

Source: Leone SS, Huibers MJ, Kant I, van Amelsvoort LG, van Schayck CP, Bleijenberg G, Knottnerus JA. Long-term efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy by general practitioners for fatigue: a 4-year follow-up study. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):601-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17084137

 

Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial

Abstract:

Outcomes for cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have rarely been compared to those in routine clinical practice. Taking the case of CBT for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), we evaluated the results of a successful RCT against those of the same treatment given in the same setting as part of routine practice. Fatigue and social adjustment scores were compared for patients who received CBT for CFS as part of a RCT (N=30) and patients who received CBT as part of everyday clinical practice (N=384). The results in the RCT were superior to those in routine clinical practice. Between pre-treatment and 6-month follow-up, the RCT showed a larger reduction in fatigue and greater improvement in social adjustment than those in routine treatment. The changes in fatigue scores were similar for both groups during treatment but were greater in the RCT between post-treatment and follow-up. Potential reasons for the superior results of the RCT include patient selection, therapist factors and the use of a manualised treatment protocol. Practitioners need to pay particular attention to relapse prevention and ensuring adequate follow-up in addition to encouraging patients to continue with cognitive-behavioural strategies once treatment has ended.

 

Source: Quarmby L, Rimes KA, Deale A, Wessely S, Chalder T. Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jun;45(6):1085-94. Epub 2006 Oct 30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17074300

 

A step backwards for the patients

During the publication of the report on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome / myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS / ME) 9.6.2006 I expressed strong concerns that the report would have negative consequences for patients. Especially I expressed the requirement to undergo graded exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy for the granting of benefits would have disastrous consequences for those affected.

It was unfortunately not many weeks before the statement was true – discounts in insurance law with reference to the findings of the report. In the meta-analysis of the Knowledge Centre  is included internationally criticized studies. They have methodological weaknesses, partly because treatment trials are done on heterogeneous populations (selection bias). It is problematic to generalize findings to patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis, because one cannot know which patients in a heterogeneous group that has benefited from the treatment. Those who wrote the report chose knowingly omitting information about major user surveys showing that graded exercise therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy generally either do not work or are injured.

You can read the rest of this comment here:  http://tidsskriftet.no/2006/10/brev-til-redaktoren/et-tilbakeskritt-pasientene

 

Source: Stormorken E. A step backwards for the patients. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Oct 19;126(20):2688-9; author reply 2689. [Article in Norwegian] http://tidsskriftet.no/2006/10/brev-til-redaktoren/et-tilbakeskritt-pasientene (Full article)

Favourable results of a rehabilitation programme with cognitive behavioural therapy and graded physical activity in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a specific course of interdisciplinary rehabilitation might lead to clinically significant changes in fatigue, experienced disability and physical function in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome (CFS).

DESIGN: Prospective and uncontrolled.

METHOD: ‘Het Roessingh’, a rehabilitation centre in Enschede, the Netherlands, has developed an interdisciplinary clinical rehabilitation programme for patients with CFS in cooperation with the ‘Nijmeegs Kenniscentrum Chronische Vermoeidheid’ [Chronic-Fatigue Knowledge Centre] in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. In this programme, physical, mental and social activities are gradually increased on the basis of cognitive behavioural principles and graded activity. Of the 127 successive persons who enrolled for the therapy during the period from August 2000 to December 2004, 99 fulfilled the inclusion criteria; they had a median duration of symptoms of 6 years. The results of treatment were evaluated by a measurement with the ‘Checklist individuele spankracht’ [Checklist individual muscle tone] before and after treatment and the scores on the ‘Patiëntspecifieke beperkingen’ [Patient-specific disability] and the Short form-36. The measured data were complete in 74 patients.

RESULTS: Before rehabilitation, the levels of fatigue, disability and distress were high. After treatment, the studied population showed significant improvement in fatigue, experienced disability and physical function. The magnitude of the improvement was generally ‘average’. At the end of treatment, 70% of the patients were clinically less fatigued, 68% experienced less disability and 55% functioned better physically. In 34% the level of fatigue was normalised after treatment, but 9.5% of the patients was more fatigue.

CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation programme offered for CFS led to significant improvements in function and fatigue.

Comment in: [Treatment of patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome]. [Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006]

 

Source: Torenbeek M, Mes CA, van Liere MJ, Schreurs KM, ter Meer R, Kortleven GC, Warmerdam CG. Favourable results of a rehabilitation programme with cognitive behavioural therapy and graded physical activity in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Sep 23;150(38):2088-94. [Article in Dutch] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17036861

 

 

Treatment of patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In the last few years, the chronic-fatigue syndrome has been recognised as an important health problem. In a recent report, the Health Council of the Netherlands suggested that the capacity for treatment be increased. Cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise training are treatment options of first choice.

A recently published, uncontrolled evaluation of a Dutch clinical rehabilitation programme based partly on these methods proved to be successful. Unfortunately, due to the uncontrolled character of the study, it remains unclear which elements in the treatment were responsible for the success. Which patients should be included in a costly clinical rehabilitation programme also remains unclear. More in general, there is room for empirical studies of treatment allocation, not in the least because of the frequently occurring comorbidity. Good progress has been made in the treatment of the chronic-fatigue syndrome, but we are still far removed from evidence-based, stepped care, treatment programmes.

Comment on: [Favourable results of a rehabilitation programme with cognitive behavioural therapy and graded physical activity in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome]. [Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006]

 

Source: Jonker K, van Hemert AM. Treatment of patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Sep 23;150(38):2067-8. [Article in Dutch] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17036854

 

Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether any particular intervention or combination of interventions is effective in the treatment, management and rehabilitation of adults and children with a diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome / myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).

DESIGN: Substantive update of a systematic review published in 2002. Randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials of any intervention or combination of interventions were eligible for inclusion. Study participants could be adults or children with a diagnosis of CFS/ME based on any criteria. We searched eleven electronic databases, reference lists of articles and reviews, and textbooks on CFS/ME. Additional references were sought by contact with experts.

RESULTS: Seventy studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies on behavioural, immunological, pharmacological and complementary therapies, nutritional supplements and miscellaneous other interventions were identified. Graded exercise therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy appeared to reduce symptoms and improve function based on evidence from RCTs. For most other interventions, evidence of effectiveness was inconclusive and some interventions were associated with significant adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS: Over the last five years, there has been a marked increase in the size and quality of the evidence base on interventions for CFS/ME. Some behavioural interventions have shown promising results in reducing the symptoms of CFS/ME and improving physical functioning. There is a need for research to define the characteristics of patients who would benefit from specific interventions and to develop clinically relevant objective outcome measures.

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Soc Med. 2007]

 

Source: Chambers D, Bagnall AM, Hempel S, Forbes C. Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review. J R Soc Med. 2006 Oct;99(10):506-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1592057/ (Full article)

 

Cognitive behavioural therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised controlled trial of an outpatient group programme

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that group cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) will produce an effective and cost-effective management strategy for patients in primary care with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy (CFS/ME).

DESIGN: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial was adopted with three arms. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after first assessment and results were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

SETTING: A health psychology department for the management of chronic illness in a general hospital in Bristol, UK.

PARTICIPANTS: Adults with a diagnosis of CFS/ME referred by their GP.

INTERVENTIONS: The three interventions were group CBT incorporating graded activity scheduling, education and support group (EAS) and standard medical care (SMC).

OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Short Form with 36 Items (SF-36) physical and mental health summary scales. Other outcome measures included the Chalder fatigue scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, General Health Questionnaire, physical function (shuttles walked, walking speed and perceived fatigue), health utilities index and cognitive function (mood, recall and reaction times).

RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were recruited to the trial and 52 were randomised to receive CBT, 50 to EAS and 51 to SMC. Twelve patients failed to attend for the 12-month follow-up and 19 patients attended one follow-up, but not both. The sample was found to be representative of the patient group and the characteristics of the three groups were similar at baseline. Three outcome measures, SF-36 mental health score, Chalder fatigue scale and walking speed, showed statistically significant differences between the groups. Patients in the CBT group had significantly higher mental health scores [difference +4.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) +0.72 to +7.97, p = 0.019], less fatigue (difference -2.61, 95% CI -4.92 to -0.30, p = 0.027) and were able to walk faster (difference +2.83 shuttles, 95% CI +1.12 to +5.53, p = 0.0013) than patients in the SMC group. CBT patients also walked faster and were less fatigued than those randomised to EAS (walking speed: difference +1.77, 95% CI +0.025 to +3.51, p = 0.047; fatigue: difference -3.16, 95% CI -5.59 to -0.74, p = 0.011).

Overall, no other statistically significant difference across the groups was found, although for many measures a trend towards an improved outcome with CBT was seen. Except for walking speed, which, on average, increased by +0.87 shuttles (95% CI +0.09 to +1.65, p = 0.029) between the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the scores were similar at 6 and 12 months. At baseline, 30% of patients had an SF-36 physical score within the normal range and 52% had an SF-36 mental health score in the normal range. At 12 months, the physical score was in the normal range for 46% of the CBT group, 26% of the EAS group and 44% of SMC patients. For mental health score the percentages were CBT 74%, EAS 67% and SMC 70%. Of the CBT group, 32% showed at least a 15% increase in physical function and 64% achieved a similar improvement in their mental health. For the EAS and SMC groups, this improvement in physical and mental health was achieved for 40 and 60% (EAS) and 49 and 53% (SMC), respectively. The cost-effectiveness of the intervention proved very difficult to assess and did not yield reliable conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS: Group CBT did not achieve the expected change in the primary outcome measure as a significant number did not achieve scores within the normal range post-intervention. The treatment did not return a significant number of subjects to within the normal range on this domain; however, significant improvements were evident in some areas. Group CBT was effective in treating symptoms of fatigue, mood and physical fitness in CFS/ME. It was found to be as effective as trials using individual therapy in these domains. However, it did not bring about improvement in cognitive function or quality of life. There was also evidence of improvement in the EAS group, which indicates that there is limited value in the non-specific effects of therapy. Further research is needed to develop better outcome measures, assessments of the broader costs of the illness and a clearer picture of the characteristics best fitted to this type of intervention.

 

Source: O’Dowd H, Gladwell P, Rogers CA, Hollinghurst S, Gregory A. Cognitive behavioural therapy in chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised controlled trial of an outpatient group programme. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct;10(37):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17014748

 

How relevant are exercise capacity measures for evaluating treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome? Results from a prospective, multidisciplinary outcome study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of a multidisciplinary treatment programme for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial variables, and exercise capacity measures.

DESIGN: A six-month prospective outcome study.

SETTING: University outpatient rehabilitation clinic; group setting.

SUBJECTS: One hundred and sixteen women fulfilling chronic fatigue syndrome criteria.

INTERVENTIONS: Cognitive behaviourally and graded exercise-based strategies; emphasis on adaptive lifestyle changes.

MEASURES: Short Form General Health Survey (SF-36); Symptom Checklist (SCL-90); Causal Attribution List (CAL); Self-Efficacy Scale (SE); maximum progressive bicycle ergometer test with respiratory gas analysis; and isokinetic leg strength test, before and after treatment.

RESULTS: The total group significantly improved on nearly all reported HRQoL/psychosocial variables. Changes in exercise capacity measures were rather modest and did not correlate or only weakly correlated with HRQoL/psychosocial variables. Subgroup analyses indicated that less fit patients improved significantly more on exercise capacity measures than their more fit counterparts. Patients who were fitter at baseline scored better on pretreatment HRQoL/psychosocial variables, but both subgroups improved similarly on these variables.

CONCLUSIONS: Health-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome improves after a six-month cognitive behaviourally and graded exercise-based multidisciplinary treatment programme. Increase in exercise capacity measures is not a necessary condition for reported improvements, except for less fit patients.

 

Source: Pardaens K, Haagdorens L, Van Wambeke P, Van den Broeck A, Van Houdenhove B. How relevant are exercise capacity measures for evaluating treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome? Results from a prospective, multidisciplinary outcome study. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Jan;20(1):56-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16502751