Pharmacological treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: focusing on the role of antidepressants

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by chronic, medically unexplained fatigue associated with effort- and stress-intolerance, widespread pain, and impairment in sleep and concentration. Although this constellation of symptoms is highly prevalent in clinical practice, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CFS are poorly understood. Current evidence indicates similarities in symptomatology, and possibly etiology and pathogenesis, between CFS and depression. Additionally, there is significant overlap between CFS and the syndrome of fibromyalgia for which antidepressants have shown consistent efficacy.

Data regarding antidepressant treatment of CFS is less copious and less uniformly positive, such that antidepressant use in CFS remains controversial. The current review aims to summarize available data related to antidepressants and other psychotropic agents in CFS to provide a platform for clinicians to make decisions in their treatment of this challenging syndrome.

We identified relevant studies through a PubMed literature search with a combination of the following search terms: ‘fatigue,’ ‘depression,’ ‘antidepressant,’ ‘etiology’ (e.g., ‘neurobiology,’ ‘neurotransmitter,’ ‘genetic’), ‘diagnosis,’ and ‘treatment’ (e.g., ‘antidepressant’ plus the specific name). In addition, studies were also identified via the reference sections of retrieved articles. The authors thoroughly reviewed major findings from the scanned literatures and eventually synthesized them, providing summary, interpretation, and future directions.

 

Source: Pae CU, Marks DM, Patkar AA, Masand PS, Luyten P, Serretti A. Pharmacological treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: focusing on the role of antidepressants. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Jul;10(10):1561-70. Doi: 10.1517/14656560902988510. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19514866

 

On the question of infectious aetiologies for multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia and the chronic fatigue syndrome and their treatment with antibiotics

Abstract:

Close similarities in the courses of multiple sclerosis and schizophrenia laid the theoretical ground for attempting to find a common infectious aetiology for the two diseases. Chlamydia pneumoniae, which belongs to the rickettsial family of microorganisms has been linked to both diseases. It is postulated that since rickettsial microorganisms are ubiquitous in human populations they and the human species normally live in peaceful coexistence. In rare cases, for unknown reasons, varieties of them may become aggressive and pathogenic.

The kynurenic acid hypothesis of schizophrenia has attracted much attention. It also seems to have initiated a paradigmatic shift from the hitherto prevailing serological research approach to one which focuses on immunological factors.

An open clinical pilot study in which, during 2006, eight female and five male patients with psychotic symptoms were treated with a combination of antibiotics is presented, to which, in the beginning of 2007 two female patients suffering from severe and long standing chronic fatigue syndrome were added. On one year follow-up, six out of the eight female patients showed stable excellent treatment results, whereas two were rated as showing significant treatment results. Four of the five men who entered the study were suffering from chronic schizophrenia, whereas the fifth, was a case of severe acute catatonic schizophrenia.

Two of the male patients showed significant treatment results, whereas three of them were rated as having had a slight to moderate improvement. No less than three of the women had suffered their first episode of psychosis after giving birth to their first (and only) child. This finding, as these women all responded excellently to treatment with antibiotics, indicates that post partum psychosis could be regarded as an infectious complication of childbirth of, as to the causative agent, unknown aetiology. High priority ought therefore be given to initiate controlled clinical trials with antibiotic treatment of this serious condition. The otherwise promising results of the pilot study seem to warrant further and controlled clinical trials with treatment with antibiotics of patients with psychotic symptoms.

As the second patient with psychotic symptoms to enter the study, had a long standing history of chronic fatigue, where an initial treatment with the antidepressant fluoxetine had only worsened her condition, whereas ninety days of treatment with antibiotics, combined with vitamin B injections, effected a complete recovery, the author decided, when two patients with long standing and incapacitating chronic fatigue syndromes sought the clinic in February and March 2007, to include them in the study. The first of them, after sixty days of treatment with antibiotics showed excellent treatment results on follow-up one year later, whereas the second, who also took the combination of antibiotics for sixty days, was rated as having shown a significant improvement.

Comment in: Hypotheses concerning rickettsial microorganisms, autoimmune diseases and new treatment strategies. [Med Hypotheses. 2010]

 

Source: Frykholm BO. On the question of infectious aetiologies for multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia and the chronic fatigue syndrome and their treatment with antibiotics. Med Hypotheses. 2009 Jun;72(6):736-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.11.045. Epub 2009 Mar 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19269110

 

Protective effects of antidepressants against chronic fatigue syndrome-induced behavioral changes and biochemical alterations

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by profound fatigue, which substantially interferes with daily activities. The aim of this study was to explore the protective effects of antidepressants in an animal model of CFS in mice. Male albino mice were forced to swim individually for a period of 6-min session each for 7 days. Imipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg), desipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg) and citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg) were administered 30 min before forced swimming test on each day.

Various behavior tests (immobility time, locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior by plus maze and mirror chamber) followed by biochemical parameters (lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione, catalase and nitrite level) were assessed in chronic stressed mice. Chronic forced swimming for 7 days significantly caused increase in immobility period, impairment in locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, and oxidative stress (raised lipid peroxidation, nitrite activity and reduced glutathione and catalase activity) as compared with naïve mice (P < 0.05).

Seven days of pretreatment with imipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg), desipramine (10 and 20 mg/kg), and citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg) significantly reduced immobility time, improved locomotor activity and anti-anxiety effect (in both plus maze and mirror chamber test), and attenuated oxidative stress in chronic stressed mice as compared with control (chronic fatigues) (P < 0.05). These results suggested that these drugs have protective effect and could be used in the management of chronic fatigue like conditions.

 

Source: Kumar A, Garg R. Protective effects of antidepressants against chronic fatigue syndrome-induced behavioral changes and biochemical alterations. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;23(1):89-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00638.x. Epub 2009 Jan 10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19207541

 

Nitric oxide modulation mediates the protective effect of trazodone in a mouse model of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The present study was conducted with the aim of elucidating the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) in the neuroprotective effects of trazodone used to treat chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in mice.

Male albino mice were forced to swim for a six minute session each day for 7 days and the immobility period was recorded every other day. Trazodone (5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) was administered each day 30 min before the forced swim test. In addition, L-arginine (100 mg/kg) and L-NAME (5 mg/kg) were administered 15 min before administration of trazodone (5 mg/kg).

Various behavioral tests, including locomotor (actophotometer) and anxiety (mirror chamber and plus maze) tests, as well as biochemical parameters (lipid peroxidation, reduced glutathione, catalase, and nitrites) were evaluated on the 8th day.

Forced swimming for 7 days caused a chronic fatigue-like condition, anxiety-like behavior, impairments in locomotor activity, and oxidative damage (increased lipid peroxidation and nitrite levels, and depletions in the reduced forms of glutathione and catalase activity) in animals. Pretreatment with L-NAME (5 mg/kg) potentiated the antioxidant effect of trazodone (5 mg/kg). However, L-arginine (100 mg/kg) pretreatment reversed the protective effect of trazodone (5 mg/kg) (p<0.05). The present study suggests the possible involvement of NO signaling in the protective effect of trazodone.

 

Source: Kumar A, Garg R, Kumar P. Nitric oxide modulation mediates the protective effect of trazodone in a mouse model of chronic fatigue syndrome. Pharmacol Rep. 2008 Sep-Oct;60(5):664-72. http://www.if-pan.krakow.pl/pjp/pdf/2008/5_664.pdf (Full article)

 

Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. mirtazapine for chronic fatigue and neurasthenia: randomised placebo-controlled trial

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes.

AIMS: To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme compared with placebo-controlled mirtazapine medication in patients with chronic fatigue, and to study the effect of combined medication and CCBT.

METHOD: A three-armed randomised clinical trial of mirtazapine, placebo and a CCBT programme was conducted to investigate treatment effect in a patient group (n=72) with chronic fatigue referred to a specialist clinic. The CCBT programme was compared with mirtazapine or placebo therapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks treatment with a mixed crossover-combination design. Assessments were done at 12 weeks and 24 weeks.

RESULTS: By 12 weeks the treatment effect was significantly better in the group initially receiving CCBT, as assessed with the Fatigue Scale (P=0.014) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.001). By 24 weeks the treatment group initially receiving CCBT for 12 weeks followed by mirtazapine for 12 weeks showed significant improvement compared with the other treatment groups on the Fatigue Scale (P<0.001) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.002). Secondary outcome measures showed overall improvement with no significant difference between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal interventions may have positive treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome. Sequence of interventions seem to be of importance.

 

Source: Stubhaug B, Lie SA, Ursin H, Eriksen HR. Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. mirtazapine for chronic fatigue and neurasthenia: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;192(3):217-23. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.031815. http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/192/3/217.long (Full article)

 

Open-label study of s-citalopram therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome and co-morbid major depressive disorder

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating disorder with prominent symptoms of malaise, fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, and impaired concentration. The symptoms of CFS may often overlap those of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Treatment of CFS has generally been disappointing. We hypothesized that s-citalopram therapy may improve the symptoms of both disorders in CFS patients with co-morbid depression.

METHODS: 16 patients received s-citalopram 10 mg to 20 mg daily for up to 12 weeks. Outcome measures of CFS included the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ), the multi-dimensional Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), the CFS symptom rating (CFS-SR) 100 mm visual analogue scale, and the clinical global impressions severity (CGI/S) and change (CGI/C) ratings. Secondary outcomes of MDD included the Hamilton Depression Rating (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the CGI/S and CGI/C ratings of MDD.

RESULTS: We observed reductions in the mean CFQ score (p<0.0005), FIS score (p<0.0005), and CGI/S (p<0.0005) and CGI/C (p<0.0005) ratings over time. There was a significant improvement in 5 of the 8 CFS-SR symptoms: post-exertion malaise (p=0.001), headaches (p<0.0005), un-refreshing sleep (p<0.0005), and impaired memory and concentration (p<0.0005). There was also a reduction in mean HAM-D (p<0.0005), BDI (p<0.0005), CGI/S (p=0.001) and CGI/C (p<0.0005) ratings of MDD.

LIMITATIONS: The sample size was limited and the study design was not double-blind or placebo controlled.

CONCLUSION: We observed a significant reduction in both CFS and co-morbid MDD symptom severity ratings, and improvement in 5 of 8 core somatic symptoms of CFS during s-citalopram therapy.

 

Source: Amsterdam JD, Shults J, Rutherford N. Open-label study of s-citalopram therapy of chronic fatigue syndrome and co-morbid major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):100-6. Epub 2007 Aug 3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17804135

 

An investigation of the long-term benefits of antidepressant medication in the recovery of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Two hundred and seventy-five patients fulfilling the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) completed measures assessing illness history, global ratings of well being, sleep, activity and psychopathology at baseline, 6 months, 18 months and 3 year follow-up. Forty-nine of these patients had been prescribed antidepressant medication, namely Tricyclic drugs or Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRI).

Data from the current study suggests that patients in the antidepressant medication group recover at a faster rate over time when compared to the untreated patient sample. In addition, the positive effects of antidepressant therapy are maintained at the 3-year follow-up point. It appears from these data that the SSRI in particular are responsible for improvements in the condition. Most importantly, these improvements include a reduction in the levels of fatigue recorded by patients. These findings have not been demonstrated in previous studies of the effect of antidepressant therapy for patients with this illness and this may reflect the short time periods studied in the earlier research.

 

Source: Thomas MA, Smith AP. An investigation of the long-term benefits of antidepressant medication in the recovery of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;21(8):503-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16981220

 

Bupropion augmentation in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome with coexistent major depression episode

Abstract:

While psychoeducational strategies and general support are always indicated for the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), pharmacological strategies are yet not well established. Antidepressants such as selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors have been shown to influence positively symptoms and immunological parameters. However, a considerable part of CFS patients do not satisfactorily respond to them. Bupropion, a centrally acting catecholamine-transporter blocker without classic psycho-analeptic properties, shows theoretical potential to improve fatigue symptoms. In the reported case paroxetine was augmented with bupropion at high dosage, a strategy which consecutively led to a rapid relief of CFS-symptoms.

 

Source: Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Connemann BJ, Wolf RC, Braun M, Freudenmann RW. Bupropion augmentation in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome with coexistent major depression episode. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2006 Jul;39(4):152-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16871471

 

Women experienced chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia as stigmatising

Comment on: Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. [Qual Health Res. 2002]

 

Any clinician who has taken the trouble to get to know a patient with fibromyalgia or CFS will recognise the basic finding of the study by Åsbring and Närvänen — patients attending specialist clinics with either condition (the similarities between the 2 outweigh the differences) feel acutely a sense of discrimination and stigmatisation. Many describe negative interactions with the medical profession.1 This is most acute when doctors are perceived to be “psychologising” the condition. Indeed, patients in this study found the act of prescribing antidepressants to be “violating”. This is regrettable because evidence exists that antidepressants can reduce pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbances in patients with fibromyalgia,2 although similar evidence does not exist for patients with CFS.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://ebmh.bmj.com/content/5/4/127.long

 

Source: Wessely S. Women experienced chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia as stigmatising. Evid Based Ment Health. 2002 Nov;5(4):127. http://ebmh.bmj.com/content/5/4/127.long (Full comment)

 

Systematic review of mental health interventions for patients with common somatic symptoms: can research evidence from secondary care be extrapolated to primary care?

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To determine the strength of evidence for the effectiveness of mental health interventions for patients with three common somatic conditions (chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic back pain). To assess whether results obtained in secondary care can be extrapolated to primary care and suggest how future trials should be designed to provide more rigorous evidence.

DESIGN: Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES: Five electronic databases, key texts, references in the articles identified, and citations from expert clinicians.

STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials including participants with one of the three conditions for which no physical cause could be found. Two reviewers screened sources and independently extracted data and assessed quality.

RESULTS: Sixty one studies were identified; 20 were classified as primary care and 41 as secondary care. For some interventions, such as brief psychodynamic interpersonal therapy, little research was identified. However, results of meta-analyses and of randomised controlled trials suggest that cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy are effective for chronic back pain and chronic fatigue syndrome and that antidepressants are effective for irritable bowel syndrome. Cognitive behaviour therapy and behaviour therapy were effective in both primary and secondary care in patients with back pain, although the evidence is more consistent and the effect size larger for secondary care. Antidepressants seem effective in irritable bowel syndrome in both settings but ineffective in chronic fatigue syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS: Treatment seems to be more effective in patients in secondary care than in primary care. This may be because secondary care patients have more severe disease, they receive a different treatment regimen, or the intervention is more closely supervised. However, conclusions of effectiveness should be considered in the light of the methodological weaknesses of the studies. Large pragmatic trials are needed of interventions delivered in primary care by appropriately trained primary care staff.

Comment in: Review: cognitive behavioural interventions may be effective for chronic fatigue syndrome and chronic back pain. [Evid Based Ment Health. 2003]

 

Source: Raine R, Haines A, Sensky T, Hutchings A, Larkin K, Black N. Systematic review of mental health interventions for patients with common somatic symptoms: can research evidence from secondary care be extrapolated to primary care? BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1082. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC131187/ (Full article)