Psychiatric management of PVFS

Abstract:

Psychiatric management of PVFS (considered as a subtype of CFS) is a pragmatic approach to a disorder for which strictly biomedical treatments have so far had little to offer. Psychiatric assessment embraces a comprehensive (biopsychosocial) approach, and distinguishes factors that perpetuate the condition from those that may have precipitated it. Treatments are targeted at perpetuating factors.

Few controlled treatment trials have been reported in patients selected specifically as meeting criteria for CFS. There is evidence available, however, that suggests useful management strategies. An uncontrolled study of treatment of CFS with combined antidepressant drug and psychological treatment has produced promising results. In addition there is useful evidence arising from the study and treatment of the individual symptoms of CFS, occurring both in isolation as part of other syndromes.

The results of controlled trials of antidepressant drugs, and of psychological and rehabilitative treatment are awaited. It is already possible to offer provisional guidelines for treatment.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Psychiatric management of PVFS. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):989-1005. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794095

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome and psychiatry

Abstract:

The postviral fatigue syndrome overlaps with psychiatry at a number of points. First, there is the influence that some psychological states have on physiological processes, such as immunity. Second, psychological symptoms, particularly depression but also anxiety, are a major feature of the syndrome. Third, difficulties in the doctor-patient relationship are common.

Each of these three areas are discussed in detail. Special attention is given to the possible mechanisms underlying the occurrence of psychological symptoms, which are sufficient to make a psychiatric diagnosis in at least two thirds of cases.

It is concluded that the bulk of the scientific evidence points to psychiatric disturbances being primary but that this does not account for the syndrome in its entirety and other mechanisms probably operate as well. Much of the conflict between doctor and patient arises from misconceptions about the nature and cause of psychological disturbances.

 

Source: David AS. Postviral fatigue syndrome and psychiatry. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):966-88. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794094

 

Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: lessons from the past

Abstract:

This chapter outlines the recorded epidemiological history of PVFS (including the early epidemics of myalgic encephalomyelitis) and the development of the concept, including the realisation that endemic cases also occur.

Cases of PVFS are still not recorded by the Surveillance Centre for Communicable Diseases, so it is very difficult to detect and monitor any outbreak in the community, since each GP may only have two or three such patients and would, therefore, not be aware of an epidemic in the community as a whole if it occurred.

Epidemiological issues raised by the early epidemics, including the delineation of the syndrome, the question of bias, the role of hysteria and the role of depression; the issue of symptom distribution, and its implications for aetiology; and a multiaxial framework for understanding the association with psychological symptoms are discussed. The value of a future multidisciplinary research programme designed to disentangle direct and predisposing causes of PVFS is emphasised.

 

Source: Jenkins R. Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: lessons from the past. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):952-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794093

 

Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: a critical review

Abstract:

Numerous reports in medical journals, lay magazines, and newspapers bear witness to the level of interest in the postviral fatigue syndrome and the heated controversy about the true nature of this condition. For many, it represents a ‘rag bag’ diagnosis into which unsolved diagnostic problems are discarded. Others are in no doubt that there is a discrete syndrome, probably with a specific causation.

The real answer almost certainly lies somewhere in between, but the truth can only be established through epidemiological studies designed to answer key questions. Does it exist at all, and, if so, how frequently does it occur? Who is most likely to get it and what is its cause? What is the nature of its implied association with viral infections and what is the role of other frequently postulated factors, such as psychiatric morbidity? What is its natural history and is there any evidence that any of the treatment/management regimes on offer can effectively lead to symptomatic relief or improve prognosis?

In this chapter, we consider the evidence on these key questions, identify some of the deficiencies in our current knowledge and highlight the kind of research which is still required.

 

Source: Wallace PG. Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: a critical review. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):942-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794092

 

History of postviral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

In writing a history of any illness there is always a dilemma whether to attempt the story of the condition ‘itself’, the medical attempts to define its nature, or to glimpse it via our changing reactions. The easiest is a straightforward account of the attempts of scientists to solve a problem–the classic medical detective story. However, this is often more fiction than fact.

Medicine rarely moves smoothly from ignorance to knowledge, but often in a more circular fashion. A historical approach is thus not solely a record of who did what, but also contributes to our understanding of the problems under scrutiny in this issue. Terminology is never easy in this subject, but the following conventions will be used: The terms neurasthenia and ME will be used in their actual context (as authors themselves used them), without defining either. Post-infectious fatigue syndrome (PIFS) will cover similar conditions when related to infective episodes. All will be used in a neutral fashion, to refer to changing realities as understood by doctors and historians.

This chapter attempts both chronological description and social analysis. The justification for this approach is clear in the case of neurasthenia, since ‘as so little was known of its pathological basis physicians’ statements regarding the disease were composed more of social and cultural elements than of scientific knowledge. Although much has changed, a contemporary account still reveals as much about cultural attitudes as the advance of science.

 

Source: Wessely S. History of postviral fatigue syndrome. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):919-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794091

 

Psychiatric perspectives: an overview

Abstract:

This chapter reviews the evidence concerning the importance of psychological and social factors in the aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome. The diagnosis is often offered to doctors by patients; and we consider attribution, stigma, collusion between doctor and patient, and abnormal illness behaviour in this context. We then give a brief description of a model for common mental disorders, and show how chronic fatigue syndrome relates to this model. It emerges that there are special vulnerability factors in these patients’ personalities before the viral illness, but the disorder is seen as being released by the viral illness. By the time the disorder becomes established the original causal nexus is seen as no longer so important, and the disorder can be seen as a form of abnormal illness behaviour maintained by special factors. The implications for treatment are then considered.

 

Source: Woods TO, Goldberg DP. Psychiatric perspectives: an overview. r Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):908-18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794090

 

Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is a disorder which is characterised by profound fatigue together with a variety of other subjective clinical features which persist over a prolonged period of time. The aetiology remains at present uncertain and therefore rational therapeutic strategies are difficult to plan. This paper reviews currently used forms of treatment aimed at correcting the possible pathophysiological mechanisms and discusses the problems associated with the management of this condition.

 

Source: McBride SJ, McCluskey DR. Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):895-907. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794089

 

Muscle biochemistry and pathophysiology in postviral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Patients with postviral fatigue syndrome (PVFS) usually complain of the skeletal muscle-related symptoms of fatigue and myalgia. It is not surprising therefore that the muscles have recently been the object of intensive studies which have used a variety of biochemical and physiological techniques. The aim of this chapter is to review these findings, and to discuss their significance or otherwise to the presenting symptoms and course of the condition.

 

Source: Edwards RH, Newham DJ, Peters TJ. Muscle biochemistry and pathophysiology in postviral fatigue syndrome. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):826-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794087

 

Neurophysiology of postviral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The exact pathophysiology of excessive fatigue in patients with postviral fatigue syndrome (PVFS) remains uncertain in spite of increasing investigation. One objective abnormality of neuromuscular function is the increased jitter on single fibre EMG studies. While this is a sensitive technique which indicates a disturbance in the peripheral part of the motor unit, it is non-specific and its role in the pathophysiology remains unclear.

Impaired muscular activation with added force in response to superimposed electrical stimulation suggests an extra-muscular and/or central component of fatigue. Conventional neurophysiological studies and those of strength and endurance have shown no objective abnormality in patients compared with controls. The previous reports of disturbed muscle metabolism on NMR spectroscopy have not been confirmed in more recent studies and no consistent abnormality of excitation-contraction coupling has so far emerged.

Finally, unlike patients with depression, cognitive evoked potential studies suggest impaired attention, memory and stimulus evaluation in postviral fatigue syndrome. In future studies, the importance of utilising approved clinical criteria for patient inclusion cannot be overemphasized. Control groups should include sedentary or deconditioned as well as depressed subjects to help standardise these important variables.

 

Source: Jamal GA, Miller RG. Neurophysiology of postviral fatigue syndrome. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):815-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794086

 

Clinical spectrum of postviral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Many different neurological and psychiatric syndromes follow viral infections, but their clinical pictures and pathogeneses are poorly understood. The syndromes include acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (post-infectious encephalomyelitis), the Guillain-Barre syndrome (post-infectious neuritis) and Reye’s syndrome.

Recently, attention has been focused on another common postviral neurological syndrome, i.e. the postviral fatigue syndrome (PVFS)–termed myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and a host of other designations. PVFS occurs both sporadically and in epidemics, with cases being reported from all over Europe, the United States, Australasia and South Africa.

It is difficult to make the diagnosis and this has meant, in the past, that it is not until an epidemic has occurred that random cases which presented in the preceding years are realised to represent the same condition. With renewed interest in the syndrome and greater attention from physicians, however, diagnosis of sporadic cases is now becoming more common.

 

Source: Behan PO, Bakheit AM. Clinical spectrum of postviral fatigue syndrome. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):793-808. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794085