Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome

Update in: Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. [Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015]

 

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness characterised by persistent medically unexplained fatigue. CFS is a serious health-care problem with a prevalence of up to 3%. Treatment strategies for CFS include psychological, physical and pharmacological interventions.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative effectiveness of exercise therapy and control treatments for CFS.

SEARCH STRATEGY: CCDANCTR-Studies and CENTRAL were searched using “Chronic Fatigue” and Exercise. The Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and CFS conferences were handsearched. Experts in the field were contacted. Clinicaltrials.gov and controlled-trials.com were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Only Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT) including participants with a clinical diagnosis of CFS and of any age were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The full articles of studies identified were inspected by two reviewers (ME and HMG). Continuous measures of outcome were combined using standardised mean differences. An overall effect size was calculated for each outcome with 95% confidence intervals. One sensitivity analysis was undertaken to test the robustness of the results.

MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies were identified for possible inclusion in this review, and five of those studies were included. At 12 weeks, those receiving exercise therapy were less fatigued than the control participants (SMD -0.77, 95% CIs -1.26 to -0.28). Physical functioning was significantly improved with exercise therapy group (SMD -0.64, CIs -0.96 to -0.33) but there were more dropouts with exercise therapy (RR 1.73, CIs 0.92 to 3.24). Depression was non-significantly improved in the exercise therapy group compared to the control group at 12 weeks (WMD -0.58, 95% CIs -2.08 to 0.92). Participants receiving exercise therapy were less fatigued than those receiving the antidepressant fluoxetine at 12 weeks (WMD -1.24, 95% CIs -5.31 to 2.83). Participants receiving the combination of the two interventions, exercise + fluoxetine, were less fatigued than those receiving exercise therapy alone at 12 weeks, although again the difference did not reach significance (WMD 3.74, 95% CIs -2.16 to 9.64). When exercise therapy was combined with patient education, those receiving the combination were less fatigued than those receiving exercise therapy alone at 12 weeks (WMD 0.70, 95% CIs -1.48 to 2.88).

REVIEWERS’ CONCLUSIONS: There is encouraging evidence that some patients may benefit from exercise therapy and no evidence that exercise therapy may worsen outcomes on average. However the treatment may be less acceptable to patients than other management approaches, such as rest or pacing. Patients with CFS who are similar to those in these trials should be offered exercise therapy, and their progress monitored Further high quality randomised studies are needed.

 

Source: Edmonds M, McGuire H, Price J. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD003200. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15266475

 

The nosology of sub-acute and chronic fatigue syndromes that follow infectious mononucleosis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: A previous principal components analysis of symptoms occurring after infectious mononucleosis suggested that a discrete fatigue syndrome occurs, which is independent of psychiatric disorder. This work has not been replicated and no latent class analysis of subjects has been published.

METHOD: We prospectively examined a cohort of 150 American primary care patients 2 and 6 months after the onset of corroborated infectious mononucleosis. A subset of 50 subjects was studied 4 years after onset. We performed principal components analyses of both psychological and somatic symptoms and latent class analyses of subjects.

RESULTS: Principal components analyses consistently delineated two fatigue factors at 2 and 6 months and one fatigue factor at 4 years. These factors were separate from a mixed anxiety and depressive factor. A four-class solution for the latent class analyses consisted of most subjects with few symptoms, a few with many symptoms, a group with predominantly mood symptoms and some subjects with fatigue symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms of the principal factors with fatigue were similar to those previously described. Both the factors and classes were independent of an equally delineated mood factor and class. These results support the existence of two discrete chronic fatigue syndromes after infectious mononucleosis, one of which is still demonstrable 4 years after onset.

 

Source: White PD, Thomas JM, Sullivan PF, Buchwald D. The nosology of sub-acute and chronic fatigue syndromes that follow infectious mononucleosis. Psychol Med. 2004 Apr;34(3):499-507. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15259835

 

In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The pathogenic mechanisms of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) are not clearly known. Fatigue, poor short-term memory and muscle pain are the most disabling symptoms in CFS. Research data on magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of muscles and brain in CFS patients suggest a cellular metabolic abnormality in some cases.

31P MRS of skeletal muscles in a subset of patients indicate early intracellular acidosis in the exercising muscles. 1H MRS of the regional brain areas in CFS have shown increased peaks of choline derived from the cell membrane phospholipids.

Cell membrane oxidative stress may offer a common explanation for the observed MRS changes in the muscles and brain of CFS patients and this may have important therapeutic implications. As a research tool, MRS may be used as an objective outcome measure in the intervention studies. In addition, regional brain 1H MRS has the potential for wider use to substantiate a clinical diagnosis of CFS from other disorders of unexplained chronic fatigue.

 

Source: Chaudhuri A, Behan PO. In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy in chronic fatigue syndrome. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2004 Sep;71(3):181-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15253888

 

Electrodermal dissociation of chronic fatigue and depression: evidence for distinct physiological mechanisms

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has an estimated prevalence between 0.5% and 3%, yet its diagnosis remains contentious. CFS is characterized by subjective symptoms that can be difficult to verify; moreover, depression is a commonly reported CFS complaint, whereas fatigue is a common symptom of depression.

Our primary goal was dissociation of these disorders using psychophysiological methods. As previous research has implicated the autonomic nervous system in CFS, we conducted what we believe to be the first analysis of bilateral electrodermal and skin temperature responses of dextral females in a cross-modal orienting task, to investigate differences between these two patient groups and controls.

A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) examining three measures of electrodermal activity revealed prestimulus tonic skin conductance levels (SCLs) were markedly lower for the CFS group, with no difference between controls and depressives. Concurrent skin temperature levels were higher for the CFS group than the other two groups.

These findings indicate that, despite overtly similar cognitive and symptom profiles, depression and CFS patients can be differentiated with psychophysiological measures. This study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that CFS and depression have distinct neurobiological profiles, consistent with unique aetiologies.

Copyright 2004 Elsevier B.V.

 

Source: Pazderka-Robinson H, Morrison JW, Flor-Henry P. Electrodermal dissociation of chronic fatigue and depression: evidence for distinct physiological mechanisms. Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 Aug;53(3):171-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15246671

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs)

Abstract:

The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is described based on the revision of Fukuda et al. The question “whether CFS can be discussed as a homogenous disorder?” has been reviewed and the answer is “no”. Other overlapping syndromes are mentioned. Disorders with fatigue as a symptom are depression, somatisation, irritable bowel syndrome, effort-syndrome, hyperventilation, conservation-withdrawal.

Among the pathogenetic factors of CFS immune systems disorders, neuroendocrine abnormalities, autonomic activity, neuroimaging, neuropsychological abnormalities, exercise capacity and muscle function and psychological processes (attribution, perception, symptom avoidance and neutralisation of conflicts) are discussed.

Since CFS cannot be comprehended without knowledge of the ontogenetic development of the affect “fatigue”, it is extensively described. Based on this knowledge, fatigue as an affect and the CFS are embedded in a context, which has as its basis the fight-flight reaction and the conservation-withdrawal reaction. Weighing the evidence, it is concluded that CFS in its varieties can best be understood as a manifestation of the activation of the two biological emergency reactions: fight-flight and conservation-withdrawal.

The physician should interview and examine each individual patient according to the Harvey Cushing dictum: The physician should not only study the diseased organ, but the man with his diseased organ, and not only these. He should comprehend the man with his diseased organ in his environment. This leads to study of the biological, psychological and social factors contributing to each patient’s illness. Work-up and therapy have to be based on this integrated approach. The latter encompasses conflict centred psychotherapy, stepwise increasing physical activation and antidepressive drugs.

 

Source: Adler RH. Chronic fatigue syndrome (cfs). Swiss Med Wkly. 2004 May 15;134(19-20):268-76. http://www.smw.ch/for-readers/archive/backlinks/?url=/docs/archive200x/2004/19/smw-10213.html (Full article)

 

Patient organisations in ME and CFS seek only understanding

Comment on: General practitioners’ perceptions of chronic fatigue syndrome and beliefs about its management, compared with irritable bowel syndrome: qualitative study. [BMJ. 2004]

 

Editor—To compare general practitioners’ attitudes to patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and those with irritable bowel syndrome was disappointing in the study by Raine et al.1 Particularly disappointing was that the study was conducted in the months after the chief medical officer recognised—with considerable attendant publicity—the severity and impact of chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis on the lives of those affected.2

One outcome of the study was that pressure groups were perceived as influencing clinical encounters, making it harder to legitimise the symptoms. That the authors labelled patients’ organisations “pressure groups” was interesting in itself.

The organisations cover a range of views on the illness and the solutions needed. This organisation carries out an information role for patients and professionals and provides a range of services no different from that of any other medium sized charity (www.afme.org.uk). We campaign vigorously of course for recognition of chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis and for funding to remedy years of neglect in this field.

We are not “antidoctor” and our members mostly view their general practitioners as supportive and understanding but faced with a complex illness and lacking a toolkit to help.

Far from patients’ organisations wishing to politicise the consulting room, we simply ask for a little more understanding, mixed with a little humility and matched with an eagerness to obtain training and information about diagnosis and treatment.

You can read the rest of this comment here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC449878/

 

Source: Clark C. Patient organisations in ME and CFS seek only understanding. BMJ. 2004 Jul 10;329(7457):112-3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC449878/ (Full article)

 

Neural correlates of the chronic fatigue syndrome–an fMRI study

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by a debilitating fatigue of unknown aetiology. Patients who suffer from CFS report a variety of physical complaints as well as neuropsychological complaints. Therefore, it is conceivable that the CNS plays a role in the pathophysiology of CFS. The purpose of this study was to investigate neural correlates of CFS, and specifically whether there exists a linkage between disturbances in the motor system and CFS.

We measured behavioural performance and cerebral activity using rapid event-related functional MRI in 16 CFS patients and 16 matched healthy controls while they were engaged in a motor imagery task and a control visual imagery task. CFS patients were considerably slower on performance of both tasks, but the increase in reaction time with increasing task load was similar between the groups.

Both groups used largely overlapping neural resources. However, during the motor imagery task, CFS patients evoked stronger responses in visually related structures. Furthermore, there was a marked between-groups difference during erroneous performance. In both groups, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex was specifically activated during error trials. Conversely, ventral anterior cingulate cortex was active when healthy controls made an error, but remained inactive when CFS patients made an error.

Our results support the notion that CFS may be associated with dysfunctional motor planning. Furthermore, the between-groups differences observed during erroneous performance point to motivational disturbances as a crucial component of CFS.

 

Source: de Lange FP, Kalkman JS, Bleijenberg G, Hagoort P, van der Werf SP, van der Meer JW, Toni I. Neural correlates of the chronic fatigue syndrome–an fMRI study. Brain. 2004 Sep;127(Pt 9):1948-57. Epub 2004 Jul 7. http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/127/9/1948.long (Full article)

 

Harmful psychiatrization

Ulrik Fredrik Malt’s response( 1 ) to my post about myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome in the journal no. 9/2004 ( 2 ) and what he calls the ME group, is irrelevant to the core issue. Is the response really an apologia for his own views and practices, a practice that does not conform with practices at other university hospitals? Other universities conform correctly to ICD-10, which classifies myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome as a neurological disorder (diagnostic code G93.3), and have introduced the new clinical criteria ( 3 ). It is not up to individual doctors to classify a disorder in the category that suits them. It is evident that the Malt places himself above ICD-10.

Myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome has more than 30 years been classified as a neurological disorder and will remain so in the upcoming revision of the ICD. The psychiatrization which has been ongoing for many years, has caused major problems for those affected. Patients are ignored, rejected, distrusted, persecuted, mistreated, not taken seriously and suspected of malingering. Contagion and disability are downplayed, and many patients do not get Social Security benefits and assistance on a par with other seriously ill patients. Under the auspices of the US Department of Health a declaration has been adopted which states that “patients have been harmed as a result of disrespect, indifference and ignorance of the medical community” ( 4 ). According to the statement, one must “aggressively embark on disrespect that these patients meet both the general population and the medical community.” It stressed further that there is an urgent need for training of health professionals. In this connection healthcare professionals are advised not to read about myalgic encephalomyelitis / chronic fatigue syndrome in textbooks of psychiatry and instead read other research and literature ( 5 ).

Psychiatrization and trivialization of this suffering must end and textbooks corrected. Health authorities should urgently address this issue as they have done in England.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1045776

 

Source: Stormorken E.  Harmful psychiatrization. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Jul 1;124(13-14):1826-7; author reply 1827. [Article in Norwegian] http://tidsskriftet.no/article/1045776 (Full article)

 

Association of medically unexplained fatigue with ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism in Gulf War veterans

Abstract:

Genes associated with muscle metabolism and physical endurance were evaluated for variants that may contribute to the etiology of medically unexplained severe and chronic fatigue. Subjects included 49 Gulf War veterans and 61 nonveterans with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or idiopathic chronic fatigue (ICF) and 30 veterans and 45 nonveterans who served as healthy controls. Increased risk for CFS/ICF was associated with alterations of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene within the Gulf War veteran sample only. The I allele frequency was decreased in affected versus unaffected veterans (0.15 versus 0.48; odds ratio [OR], 5.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-13.35; P < 0.0001). Correspondingly, the II genotype was decreased fourfold in affected veterans (0.08 versus 0.35; OR = 5.87; 95% CI: 1.21-28.36; P = 0.02), and the DD genotype was increased twofold (0.78 versus 0.39; OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.6-18.4; P = 0.007). Veterans with the DD genotype were eight times more likely to develop CFS/ICF than were those with the II genotype (OR, 8.30; 95% CI, 1.50-56.09; P = 0.009).

 

Source: Vladutiu GD, Natelson BH. Association of medically unexplained fatigue with ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism in Gulf War veterans. Muscle Nerve. 2004 Jul;30(1):38-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15221876

 

Outpatient rehabilitative treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME)

Abstract:

AIMS: To assess the outcome of outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitative treatment (graded activities/exercise programme, family sessions, and supportive care) compared with supportive care alone for children and adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME).

METHODS: Fifty six young people (aged 9-17 years) with CFS/ME by standard criteria were followed up for 3-24 months. All subjects received supportive care. Families additionally opted to either enter the rehabilitation programme (supportive care plus graded activities/exercise programme and family sessions) or have no additional treatment.

RESULTS: Twenty two (39%) subjects had supportive care alone and 26 (46%) entered the programme. Treatment groups were comparable at baseline in terms of age, severity and duration of illness, Wellness score, and school attendance. At end of follow up, those in the programme group had significantly higher Wellness score and school attendance than those having supportive care alone. The programme significantly reduced the overall severity of illness: after the programme, 43% had complete resolution of CFS/ME compared to only 4.5% of those having supportive care alone. The presence of depressed mood and family beliefs about the aetiology of CFS/ME were not significantly associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient rehabilitative treatment offers significant potential to improve the prognosis of CFS/ME in childhood and adolescence.

 

Source: Viner R, Gregorowski A, Wine C, Bladen M, Fisher D, Miller M, El Neil S. Outpatient rehabilitative treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME). Arch Dis Child. 2004 Jul;89(7):615-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1719984/  (Full article)