XMRV: does this virus hold the key to myalgic encephalomyelitis/CFS?

Abstract:

In October 2009 a team of researchers from the Whittemore Peterson Institute, in association with the National Cancer Institute and the Cleveland Clinic in the USA, made a discovery that could potentially open the door to useful treatments for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The researchers, led by Judy Mikovits, discovered a significant correlation between ME/CFS and an infectious retrovirus called xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus (XMRV). XMRV is classified as a gammaretrovirus, belonging to the same broad family as HIV, but more closely related to a group of viruses that cause cancers such as leukaemia. XMRV is the first member of the gammaretrovirus genus of retroviruses to be found in humans; the research to fully understand the connection between ME/CFS and XMRV, as well as what it means to have the virus, is ongoing. The disastrous impact of AIDS on human health has significantly raised the profile of retroviruses as human pathogens, and XMRV has potentially serious health implications not only for patients, but also for those caring for people with ME/CFS.

 

Source: Crowhurst G. XMRV: does this virus hold the key to myalgic encephalomyelitis/CFS? Br J Nurs. 2010 Jul 22-Aug 11;19(14):919-22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20647985

 

TLR3 agonists as immunotherapeutic agents

The interaction of innate and adaptive immune responses is extremely complex and just beginning to be understood in detail. The tendency for biomedical research to establish reproducible models, cell systems and receptor pathways, and then to focus on these systems can sometimes result in opportunity that is not appreciated. The Toll-like receptor (TLR)3 pathway as a therapeutic target falls into this category. There is an immense body of data that has been developed for more than 40 years; all of which is highly relevant to the TLR3 story and yet most of which predates the elucidation of the TLR pathways. A new recognition of TLR3, its unique properties that distinguish it from other TLR pathways, the specificity of relevant and long-available TLR agonists, and new studies of this biology utilizing modern assay methodology suggest that this target may be especially valuable as an adjunct to multiple immunotherapy strategies currently in use or in development.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/imt.10.8 (Full article)

 

Source: Christopher F Nicodemus and Jonathan S Berek. TLR3 agonists as immunotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapy, March 2010 ,Vol. 2, No. 2, Pages 137-140 , DOI 10.2217/imt.10.8 (doi:10.2217/imt.10.8)  http://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/full/10.2217/imt.10.8 (Full article)

Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ) is a widely used instrument to assess fatigue in both clinical and nonclinical settings. Psychometric properties of the scale and discriminative abilities were examined.

METHODS: A total of 361 patients with CFS and 1615 individuals in the community were assessed with the CFQ. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to explore the structure of the scale. Receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to investigate the discriminative properties.

RESULTS: Two components, physical and mental fatigue, were identified in the CFS patient group and in the general population samples. Area under the curve for ROC was .91. The fatigue scale effectively discriminates, at high scores, between CFS patients and the general population.

CONCLUSION: Physical and mental fatigue are clearly separable components of fatigue. The CFQ can discriminate reliably between clinical and nonclinical conditions.

Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Cella M, Chalder T. Measuring fatigue in clinical and community settings. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jul;69(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Dec 11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20630259

 

Treatment of the narcoleptiform sleep disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia with sodium oxybate

Abstract:

This study investigates the response of the underlying sleep disorder associated with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM) to treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 118 cases clinically consistent with CFS or FM, treated in a neurology practice. Abnormal findings on sleep studies and associated human leukocyte antigen markers, and a clinical pattern suggestive of narcolepsy, are present in a high proportion of patients. When considered appropriate based on the clinical picture and test results, treatment with sodium oxybate was offered to these patients. Sixty percent of patients treated with oxybate experienced significant relief of pain, while 75% experienced significant relief of fatigue. We postulate that the response to oxybate in CFS and FM suggests a disturbance of sleep similar to narcolepsy. These findings support this novel approach to intervention and further research. The inability to distinguish CFS and FM by testing and response to treatment suggests that they may represent variations of the same disorder or may be closely related disorders.

 

Source: Spitzer AR, Broadman M. Treatment of the narcoleptiform sleep disorder in chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia with sodium oxybate. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):54-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00334.x. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629967

 

Measuring substantial reductions in functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

PURPOSE: All the major current case definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) specify substantial reductions in previous levels of occupational, educational, social, or personal activities to meet criteria. Difficulties have been encountered in operationalizing ‘substantial reductions.’ For example, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) has been used to determine whether individuals met the CFS disability criterion. However, previous methods of using the SF-36 have been prone to including people without substantial reductions in key areas of physical functioning when diagnosing CFS. This study sought to empirically identify the most appropriate SF-36 subscales for measuring substantial reductions in patients with CFS.

METHOD: The SF-36 was administered to two samples of patients with CFS: one recruited from tertiary care and the other a community-based sample; as well as a non-fatigued control group. Receiver operating characteristics were used to determine the optimal cutoff scores for identifying patients with CFS.

RESULTS: The SF-36 Role-Emotional subscale had the worst sensitivity and specificity, whereas the Vitality, Role-Physical, and Social Functioning subscales had the best sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION: Based on the evidence from this study, the potential criteria for defining substantial reductions in functioning and diagnosing CFS is provided.

© 2011 Informa UK, Ltd.

 

Source: Jason L, Brown M, Evans M, Anderson V, Lerch A, Brown A, Hunnell J, Porter N. Measuring substantial reductions in functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(7):589-98. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.503256. Epub 2010 Jul 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170036/ (Full article)

 

Relationships among rhinitis, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue

Abstract:

New information about the pathophysiology of idiopathic nonallergic rhinopathy indicates a high prevalence in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This article shows the relevance of CFS and allied disorders to allergy practice. CFS has significant overlap with systemic hyperalgesia (fibromyalgia), autonomic dysfunction (irritable bowel syndrome and migraine headaches), sensory hypersensitivity (dyspnea; congestion; rhinorrhea; and appreciation of visceral nociception in the esophagus, gastrointestinal tract, bladder, and other organs), and central nervous system maladaptations (central sensitization) recorded by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Neurological dysfunction may account for the overlap of CFS with idiopathic nonallergic rhinopathy. Scientific advances are in fMRI, nociceptive sensor expression, and, potentially, infection with xenotropic murine leukemia-related virus provide additional insights to novel pathophysiological mechanisms of the “functional” complaints of these patients that are mistakenly interpreted as allergic syndromes. As allergists, we must accept the clinical challenges posed by these complex patients and provide proper diagnoses, assurance, and optimum care even though current treatment algorithms are lacking.

 

Source: Baraniuk JN, Zheng Y. Relationships among rhinitis, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):169-78. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3311. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20615318

 

Illness trajectories in the chronic fatigue syndrome: a longitudinal study of improvers versus non-improvers

Abstract:

The natural progression of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in adults is not well established. The aims of this longitudinal study were to (a) compare CFS Improvers and Non-Improvers; (b) determine whether an initial diagnosis of fibromyalgia (FM) was associated with CFS nonimprovement; and (c) determine whether this effect could be explained by the presence of nonspecific physical symptoms.

Consecutive referrals to a tertiary clinic that satisfied case criteria for CFS were invited to enroll in a longitudinal study. After an initial on-site physical examination and psychiatric interview, a total of 94 female care-seekers completed biannual telephone surveys, including the Short Form-36 physical functioning (PF) scale, over a period of 2(1/2) years. There were very few differences between Improvers and Non-Improvers at baseline but at final assessment Improvers had less disability, less fatigue, lower levels of pain, fewer symptoms of depressed mood, and fewer nonspecific physical complaints.

Participants with FM at baseline were 3.23 times (p < 0.05) more likely to become Non-Improvers than those without FM. Participants identified initially as Somatizers were 3.33 times (p < 0.05) more likely to become Non-Improvers. Patients with CFS who bear the added burden of FM are at greater risk of a negative outcome than patients with CFS alone. This effect could not be explained by the presence of multiple, nonspecific symptoms.

 

Source: Ciccone DS, Chandler HK, Natelson BH. Illness trajectories in the chronic fatigue syndrome: a longitudinal study of improvers versus non-improvers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Jul;198(7):486-93. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181e4ce0b. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20611051

 

An intriguing and hitherto unexplained co-occurrence: Depression and chronic fatigue syndrome are manifestations of shared inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative (IO&NS) pathways

Abstract:

There is a significant ‘comorbidity’ between depression and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Depressive symptoms frequently occur during the course of ME/CFS. Fatigue and somatic symptoms (F&S), like pain, muscle tension, and a flu-like malaise, are key components of depression. At the same time, depression and ME/CFS show major clinical differences, which allow to discriminate them with a 100% accuracy.

This paper aims to review the shared pathways that underpin both disorders and the pathways that discriminate them. Numerous studies have shown that depression and ME/CFS are characterized by shared aberrations in inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative (IO&NS) pathways, like systemic inflammation and its long-term sequels, including O&NS-induced damage to fatty acids, proteins and DNA; dysfunctional mitochondria; lowered antioxidant levels, like zinc and coenzyme Q10; autoimmune responses to neoepitopes formed by O&NS; lowered omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid levels; and increased translocation of gram-negative bacteria. Some IO&NS-related pathways, like the induction of indoleamine 2-3-dioxygenase, neurodegeneration and decreased neurogenesis, are more specific to depression, whereas other pathways, like the 2′-5′ oligoadenylate synthetase/RNase L pathway, are specific to ME/CFS.

Most current animal models of depression, e.g. those induced by cytokines, are not reminiscent of human depression but reflect a mixture of depressive and F&S symptoms. The latter symptoms, sometimes called sickness behavior, differ from depression and ME/CFS because the former is a (sub)acute response to infection-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines that aims to enhance recovery, whereas the latter are characterized by long-term sequels in multiple IO&NS pathways.

Depression and ME/CFS are not ‘comorbid’ disorders, but should be regarded as ‘co-associated disorders’ that are clinical manifestations of shared pathways.

Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Maes M. An intriguing and hitherto unexplained co-occurrence: Depression and chronic fatigue syndrome are manifestations of shared inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative (IO&NS) pathways. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 29;35(3):784-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.06.023. Epub 2010 Jul 4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20609377

 

A panel of biomarkers accurately identifies CFS/ME patients and contributes to the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder

Abstract: 

Background: CFS/ME is a debilitating illness for which no specific biomarkers have been identified, although several immune abnormalities including neuroinflammation have been described. The goal of this study was to assemble a panel of immune and inflammatory markers, with the ability to accurately identify CFS/ME cases.

Objectives: From observations made in clinical practice, four markers were selected (immune and inflammatory). These markers were initially investigated to establish differences between CFS/ME cases and controls. We then evaluated their potential usefulness as a diagnostic biomarker by establishing their specificity and sensitivity.

Methods: Venous blood was collected from 70 male and 70 female CFS/ME patients (mean age 43 and 44 years, respectively – Fukuda case definition was used) as well as 70 male and 70 female healthy controls (mean age 43.5 and 44.5 years, respectively).

Serum Interleukin 8 (IL-8), soluble CD14 (sCD14, a surrogate marker for bacterial LPS), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured for all subjects as were absolute CD3- / CD57+ lymphocytes counts (CD57+ lymph), according to accepted clinical laboratory techniques.

We then established median values for all analysed parameters; independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney test and ROC curve analysis were used to investigate difference linked to gender and age.

Results: ROC Statistics (area under the ROC curve) revealed a significant difference between CFS/ME cases and controls (p <0.001) for the four parameters separately, both in the male and female cohorts. Sensitivity was 74.3 – 80 % (females) and 52.1 – 85.9 % (males). Specificity was 57.1 – 98.1 (females) and 65.7 – 88.6 (males).

Logistic regression analysis for the combination of parameters in our panel (IL-8, sCD14, PGE2 and CD57+ lymph) correctly predicted in 89.36 % of male CFS/ME cases and in 97.14 % of female CFS/ME cases.

Conclusions: This panel differentiates CFS/ME cases from controls with high sensitivity and specificity and therefore represents a potential tool in selecting CFS/ME subjects for clinical studies. Each of these four biological markers relate strongly to the disorder.

PGE2 activates dendritic cells and suppresses their ability to attract T cells. It also suppresses the function of macrophages and neutrophils as well as Th1, CTL-, NK-cell mediated type 1 immunity (e.g. CD3- / CD57+ lymphocytes). PGE2 additionally promotes Th2, Th17 and Tregs and also modulates chemokine production (e.g. IL-8).

When taken together, these data suggest that lipopolysaccharide (LPS), likely from gut bacteria, plays an important role in the pathophysiology of CFS/ME.

This screening panel represents an initial step toward identifying biomarkers to broadly diagnose subjects with CFS/ME.

Subsequent markers will be required to subcategorize CFS/ME subjects in order to tailor therapeutic solutions.

 

Source: Kenny L. De Meirleir1,2, Tatjana Mijatovic3, Eugene Bosmans3, Nossa Van den Vonder2, Vincent Lombardi1. A panel of biomarkers accurately identifies CFS/ME patients and contributes to the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disorder. Abstract from IACFS/ME Conference 2016 Program.

1. Nevada Center for Biomedical Research at University
of Nevada, Reno, USA
2. Himmunitas vzw, Brussels, Belgium
3. RED Laboratories NV, Zellik, Belgium

 

ME/CFS: Discrimination Within Social Institutions

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To examine the nature and impact of discrimination experienced by persons with ME/CFS when engaged in interactions with social institutions.

METHOD: The initial phase of the research involved a thorough review of the available literature to establish the interaction of those with ME/CFS with social institutions. Social institutions are the complex social forms that are found within governments, family, universities, hospitals, incorporated entities, legal systems and other social structures and organisations. This paper focuses on the incidence, nature and effect of discriminatory behaviour that participants experience during interactions with social institutions..

In the data collection phase, a pilot study involving an investigation of the Australian perspective of the experience of ME/CFS was obtained. This was expanded in the main study and participants were provided the opportunity to reveal their stories. Participants were required to have a diagnosis of CFS, ME or ME/CFS from a medical practitioner and self-select themselves as compliant to the Fukuda CFS Criteria, Canadian ME/CFS Criteria and Ramsay ME Criteria.

A background questionnaire was provided to give an insight into the history of the participant, particularly interactions with social institutions and pathways to diagnosis. The interview drew upon the questionnaire for guidance, with the primary questions derived from information gained from the literature review. The interviews were transcribed, coded and the relationships and issues identified in order to guide the second phase of the research which was conducted further into the study.

The pilot study involved 3 participants, followed by a second, more comprehensive phase comprising 16 participants. Stories emerged from within those interviews with respect to interactions with society and these were broken down to reveal particular themes relevant to those experiences.

RESULTS: A total of 19 interviews were conducted. The average age of participants was 41.95 with all 14 females and 5 male participants. The mean duration of the condition was 17.66 years, with 8.35 years from onset until diagnosis. A number of issues arose, revealing an insight into the nature of the relationships that exist between persons with ME/CFS and various social institutions. Participants reported interactions that were both positive and negative. Such interactions were directly impacted by the diagnosis of ME/CFS. All participants had experienced some form of discrimination, with the majority being negative discrimination. Within these experiences, issues such as knowledge and understanding of the condition played a significant role in the discriminatory interaction. Misconceptions about the condition played a primary role. Abuse (verbal, physical and mental), withholding or withdrawal of goods and services, individual avoidance, social isolation, adverse employment decision, prescription of no or inappropriate treatment and the like were levelled against participants throughout their and/or a lack of knowledge or desire to go about it.

CONCLUSION: Participants with ME/CFS who engaged with social institutions were subject to various factors (such as abuse, attitudes, behaviours, comments, misinformation, misunderstandings, beliefs and policies) that directly or indirectly arise because of their diagnosis and the contested nature of the condition.

These factors play an important role in the form of discrimination that participants experienced across all social institutions. Positive discrimination was provided in the form of assistance, management, attitudes, comments and accommodations. Participants revealed circumstances in which discrimination was negative, including the refusal of assistance or accommodation, derogatory comments, malicious treatment and behaviours, inappropriate physical environments (due to noise, smells, access, furniture, line ups, public transport, etc.), inappropriate policies or procedures (eg onerous requirements, poor time frames, inability to be accessed remotely) or misinformed statements, treatment that was adverse (ie insufficient, inappropriate, adverse, deficient or damaging, and resulted consequences that were harmful to the physical, emotional or other interests of the participant). Of significance was the incidence of bullying behaviour that was associated with discrimination.

Those with more visible symptoms and presentation of ME/CFS (ie wheelchair and bed bound) received greater assistance at times, while those with more invisible symptoms and presentation found access to assistance a more difficult and at times impossible task.

Negative experiences had an adverse impact upon the person’s condition as well as their emotional wellbeing On occasions the impact and effect was sufficient to constitute trauma. The ability to respond to discriminatory practices was limited by knowledge of process and procedure, the health constrictions that impact the ability to take action, the availability of advocates to assist in such action, and the knowledge of the condition of those taking the action or making decisions. On no occasion was a participant able to follow through on a formal anti-discrimination complaint.

 

Source: Geoffrey Hallmann, Dr Rosanne Coutts, Dr Yvonne Hartmann Southern Cross University. ME/CFS: Discrimination Within Social Institutions. [Abstract from the IACFS/ME 2016 Conference]