The effect of granisetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome patients–a pilot study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of granisetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, on fatigue and functional impairment in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHODS: Five female patients were eligible to receive oral granisetron for one month (1 mg a day for the first two weeks and 2 mg a day for the second two weeks). The patients had to be between 18 and 65 years of age and suffering from CFS according to the CDC criteria. The effect was assessed by pre- and post-testing, using validated instruments designed to assess the different dimensions of CFS. Treatment response was also evaluated by visual analogue scales (VAS) for fatigue. Analysis was based on intention to treat.

RESULTS: Treatment with granisetron resulted in significant improvement in fatigue severity and functional impairment. Activity level showed no significant increase.

CONCLUSION: The promising results of this study have encouraged us to perform a placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the treatment of CFS.

Comment in: Pilot studies: one swallow does not make a summer… [Neth J Med. 2003]

 

Source: The GK, Prins J, Bleijenberg G, van der Meer JW. The effect of granisetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome patients–a pilot study.  Neth J Med. 2003 Sep;61(9):285-9. http://www.njmonline.nl/getpdf.php?id=16 (Full article)

 

Pilot studies: one swallow does not make a summer…

Abstract:

What should we expect from pilot studies, done in small series of patients? In the literature there are many examples of small studies with very promising results, that in subsequent larger or better controlled studies proved to be much less promising, or even disastrous. In some instances the initial favourable outcome was due to selection bias. In others the use of nonvalidated methods of measuring outcome made the reproducibility of promising observations problematic. However, we have to start somewhere. In ths issue The et al. report favourable results of granisetron treatment in four out of five patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. A prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial with granisetron in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome is now ongoing.

Comment on: The effect of granisetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome patients–a pilot study. [Neth J Med. 2003]

 

Source: van Gelder T, Smits P. Pilot studies: one swallow does not make a summer… Neth J Med. 2003 Sep;61(9):270-2. http://www.njmonline.nl/getpdf.php?id=13 (Full article)

 

Medication use by persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: results of a randomized telephone survey in Wichita, Kansas

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by profound fatigue, which substantially interferes with daily activities, and a characteristic symptom complex. Patients use a variety of prescribed and self-administered medications, vitamins, and supplements for relief of their symptoms. The objective of this study was to describe utilization of medications and supplements by persons with CFS and non-fatigued individuals representative of the general population of Wichita, Kansas.

METHODS: We used a random-digit dialing telephone survey to identify persons with CFS in the general population of Wichita, Kansas. Subjects who on the basis of telephone interview met the CFS case definition, and randomly selected non-fatigued controls, were invited for a clinic evaluation that included self-reported use of medications and supplements. Sex-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were estimated to measure the association between CFS and use of various drug categories.

RESULTS: We clinically evaluated and classified 90 subjects as CFS during the study and also collected clinical data on 63 who never described fatigue. Subjects with CFS reported using 316 different drugs compared to 157 reported by non-fatigued controls. CFS subjects were more likely to use any drug category than controls (p = 0.0009). Pain relievers and vitamins/supplements were the two most common agents listed by both groups. In addition CFS persons were more likely to use pain relievers, hormones, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, gastro-intestinal, and central nervous system medications (Sex-adjusted odds ratios range = 2.97 – 12.78).

CONCLUSION: Although the reasons for increased use of these agents were not elucidated, the data indicated the CFS patients’ need for symptom relief.

 

Source: Jones JF, Nisenbaum R, Reeves WC. Medication use by persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: results of a randomized telephone survey in Wichita, Kansas. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 2;1:74. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC293479/ (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. The patient centred clinical method–a guide for the perplexed

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue states are common in general practice and over the past 20 years there has been considerable worldwide consensus developed on the criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) also commonly known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME). Chronic fatigue syndrome is an illness characterised by the new onset of disabling fatigue, accompanied by cognitive, musculoskeletal and sleep symptoms. There are no specific diagnostic tests or biological markers and the diagnosis is made by ruling out other causes of fatigue. The pathophysiology of CFS is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the application of the patient centred clinical method to the diagnosis and treatment of CFS.

DISCUSSION: There is no new breakthrough in the diagnosis or management of CFS in spite of much research and controversy. There is considerable evidence that the best place to manage CFS is in primary care under the care of the patient’s own general practitioner, but it has been suggested that doctors feel unable to deal with the problem. The patient centred clinical method offers a constructive guide to management. The author considers that the best hope for sufferers is self management guided by a supportive and helpful health professional, preferably the patient’s own GP.

 

Source: Murdoch JC. Chronic fatigue syndrome. The patient centred clinical method–a guide for the perplexed. Aust Fam Physician. 2003 Nov;32(11):883-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14650782

 

The head-up tilt test in the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome

Fatigue, as a symptom, refers to a sense of lethargy or loss of energy. Fatigue is common in infections, endocrine disorders, heart failure, chronic diseases of the lungs, liver or kidneys, malignancies, anemia, nutritional deficits, inflammatory arthritis, Parkinson’s disease, depression, anxiety states, effect of certain medications, or drug withdrawal [1]. Population-based studies show that fatigue is one of the most common somatic symptoms, with as much as 20± 30% of the population complaining of chronic fatigue [2]. Only a small fraction of these satisfy the clinical definition criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome [1].

You can read the rest of this article here: https://www.ima.org.il/FilesUpload/IMAJ/0/54/27402.pdf

 

Source: Naschitz JE, Sabo E, Dreyfuss D, Yeshurun D, Rosner I. The head-up tilt test in the diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Nov;5(11):807-11. https://www.ima.org.il/FilesUpload/IMAJ/0/54/27402.pdf (Full article)

 

Successful intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in 3 cases of parvovirus B19-associated chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Three cases of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) that followed acute parvovirus B19 infection were treated with a 5-day course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; 400 mg/kg per day), the only specific treatment for parvovirus B19 infection. We examined the influence of IVIG treatment on the production of cytokines and chemokines in individuals with CFS due to parvovirus B19. IVIG therapy led to clearance of parvovirus B19 viremia, resolution of symptoms, and improvement in physical and functional ability in all patients, as well as resolution of cytokine dysregulation.

 

Source: Kerr JR, Cunniffe VS, Kelleher P, Bernstein RM, Bruce IN.  Successful intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in 3 cases of parvovirus B19-associated chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 May 1;36(9):e100-6. Epub 2003 Apr 22. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/36/9/e100.long (Full article)

 

Use of IVIG in secondary immunodeficiencies

Abstract:

The research connects usefulness of intravenous preparates of immunoglobulins in patients with secondary immunodeficiencies. Basing on the data of literature there was discussed the using IVIG in patients with HIV infection and with the chronic fatigue syndrome. There was also discussed the matter of using IVIG after multiorgans traumas, burns and operations with high risk complications.

 

Source: Zeman K, Lewandowicz-Uszyńska A. Use of IVIG in secondary immunodeficiencies. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2002;56 Suppl:91-102. [Article in Polish] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12661419

 

 

Chronic unexplained fatigue

Comment on: Chronic unexplained fatigue. [Postgrad Med J. 2002]

 

I found the editorial on chronic fatigue syndrome by White both surprising and disappointing, because he used the title “Chronic unexplained fatigue” and the subtitle “A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”, but his editorial, by ignoring very important facts about chronic fatigue syndrome, actually perpetuates that riddle, rather than helping to solve it.

If a puzzling and poorly manageable condition shares more than 40 features, including all of its diagnostic criteria, with a well known and easily treatable disease, this astounding clinical overlap should not be ignored, because reason not only suggests that the mysterious illness may simply be a form of the well known disease, but also hints that it is worthwhile assessing whether the classic therapy for that treatable disease could be effective for the enigmatic condition as well.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1757928/pdf/v078p00763a.pdf

 

Source: Baschetti R. Chronic unexplained fatigue. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Dec;78(926):763; author reply 763. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1757928/pdf/v078p00763a.pdf

 

Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis

This article summarises the research evidence presented in a recent issue of Effective Health Care on interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/ myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). It provides an overview of the evidence from a systematic review of randomised controlled trials commissioned by the Department of Health. The results of the systematic review were found to be similar to those of another systematic review carried out in the USA at the same time, and the two have been combined and published together in 2001.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743629/pdf/v011p00284.pdf

 

Source: Bagnall AM, Whiting P, Richardson R, Sowden AJ. Interventions for the treatment and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):284-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1743629/pdf/v011p00284.pdf (Full article)

 

The prognosis after multidisciplinary treatment for patients with postinfectious chronic fatigue syndrome and noninfectious chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The prognosis after multidisciplinary treatment for patients with postinfectious chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS, n = 9) and noninfectious CFS (n = 9) was clarified. After treatment, natural killer (NK) cell activity increased in the postinfectious CFS group but did not recover to within normal range in the noninfectious CFS group. In the postinfectious CFS group, physical and mental symptoms improved, and 8 patients returned to work. In the noninfectious CFS group, symptoms did not improve, and only 3 patients returned to work. The prognosis of postinfectious CFS group was better than that of noninfectious CFS group. Classification of CFS patients into postinfectious and noninfectious groups is useful for choosing the appropriate treatment in order to obtain better prognosis.

 

Source: Masuda A, Nakayama T, Yamanaka T, Koga Y, Tei C. The prognosis after multidisciplinary treatment for patients with postinfectious chronic fatigue syndrome and noninfectious chronic fatigue syndrome. J Behav Med. 2002 Oct;25(5):487-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12442563