Category: Public Health

Intimate partner violence and women living with episodic disabilities: a scoping review protocol

Abstract:

Background: Violence towards women with disabilities is most commonly perpetrated by current or former intimate partners and more than half of disabled women experience intimate partner violence in their lifetime. Disabilities differ by presence, type, and complexity, yet are commonly researched collectively. A more nuanced understanding of the relationship between intimate partner violence and episodic disability is required to better support women living with these concurrent challenges. The objective of this scoping review is to investigate and synthesize the literature reporting on intimate partner violence for women living with an episodic disability to identify key concepts and knowledge gaps on this topic. Ultimately, this review aims to improve health services for this stigmatized group of women with episodic disabilities.

Methods: This scoping review will consider all studies that focus on women (18 years of age or older) who have experienced intimate partner violence and have an episodic disability. Episodic disabilities will include multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, lupus, or rheumatoid arthritis. The broad review question is what is known about intimate partner violence within the context of women living with an episodic disability? Databases to be searched include MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, and Scopus with no limits on language or time frame. Joanna Briggs Institute methodology will guide this scoping review to address the review questions outlined in the protocol. For papers that meet the inclusion criteria, data will be extracted, and findings will be presented in tables and narrative form. A PRISMA table will be included to enhance the transparency of the process. A descriptive qualitative approach to analysis will be conducted following Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis. The findings of the scoping review will be presented through a thematic narrative.

Discussion: Findings from this review will be used to identify important priorities for future research based on knowledge gaps and inform both health care practices and health and social interventions for women living with intimate partner violence and episodic disabilities.

Source: Campbell KA, Ford-Gilboe M, Stanley M, MacKinnon K. Intimate partner violence and women living with episodic disabilities: a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. 2022 May 18;11(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01972-x. PMID: 35585642. https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-022-01972-x  (Full text)

Covid-19: How Europe is approaching long covid

Maarte Preller leads a Facebook group for patients with long covid in Austria. It has nearly 1500 members so far. In September, Preller, and others like her across Europe, established a new network of patient associations, formed partly through social media websites, called Long Covid Europe. The group is demanding better research and treatment for the tangle of ongoing symptoms that afflict many people who have had covid-19.

A patchwork of small studies has given some indication of what long covid on the continent is like. In a study of 130 cases, 40% of patients reported “persistent fatigue” 60 days after their first symptoms, while 30% reported breathlessness. Another, of 143 patients in Italy, revealed 55% had three or more symptoms 60 days after they were discharged from hospital.1

A preprint posted in January 2022 of an ongoing study of 70 000 Norwegian patients listed altered smell or taste, poor memory, fatigue, and shortness of breath as common symptoms in the country’s first wave (in early 2021), while those infected from autumn 2021 onwards tended to mention muscle and joint pain more. The data suggest that symptoms were experienced for 11-12 months after infection in the first wave and for one to two months in the second.2

A World Health Organization policy brief published earlier this year found that surveillance of long covid was not happening routinely in European countries.1 There are few specialist clinics for the condition—access to such a service largely depends on where you live—and in many countries action seems to be limited to guidance and monitoring.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Baraniuk C. Covid-19: How Europe is approaching long covid. BMJ. 2022 Jan 20;376:o158. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o158. PMID: 35058230. https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o158.full (Full text)

Post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19: an unequal burden

COVID-19 and its neurological consequences particularly burden marginalized communities, and so can only be effectively treated by advancing health equity.

Our world has witnessed over 275 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and over 5 million related deaths1. Marginalized communities everywhere continue to be disproportionately affected as the pandemic amplifies longstanding health and healthcare disparities. As an example, in the United States, members of the Black, Indigenous and Latino communities remain two to three times more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2, to be hospitalized with COVID-19 and to die from this disease2. Dismantling structural racism is necessary to improve neurological health, as greater attention is focused on understanding and addressing the post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19, or the neurological manifestations of what is sometimes called long COVID.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Nolen, L.T., Mukerji, S.S. & Mejia, N.I. Post-acute neurological consequences of COVID-19: an unequal burden. Nat Med 28, 20–23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01647-5  (Full text)

Direct Costs of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in Latvia

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a disease of various etiologies, characterised by chronic fatigue not alleviated by rest, and multi-system disorder leading to deterioration in quality of life. There are not sufficient studies to reveal the economic impact of this disease on society, significantly due to the low level of diagnostic. Therefore, the aim of this research is to determine the approximate direct costs of ME/CFS to society in Latvia, assuming that these data could be suitable for other European countries too, and to consider possibilities to enhance diagnostic.

Source: Araja, Diana & Berkis, Uldis & Lunga, Asja & Murovska, Modra. (2022). POSA63 Direct Costs of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in Latvia. Value in Health. 25. S45. 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.208. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357962677_POSA63_Direct_Costs_of_Myalgic_EncephalomyelitisChronic_Fatigue_Syndrome_MECFS_in_Latvia

Global surveillance, research, and collaboration needed to improve understanding and management of long COVID

The scale of chronic ill health and disability after COVID-19 has been described as the next big global health challenge. Prevalence estimates of a post-COVID-19 condition, long COVID, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 vary according to definition, methodology, and population. A recent systematic review reported persistent symptoms at 3–6 months in a median of 57% (range 13–92) of hospitalised patients (six studies) and 26% (2–62) of non-hospitalised patients (ten studies). This study and other reviews identified few studies from low-income settings, but with more than 245 million SARS-CoV-2 infections reported globally, millions of people are likely to already be experiencing long-term illness. While COVID-19 vaccines have reduced the risk of severe COVID-19 and death, continued high rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection will lead to further disability, having a huge impact on individuals, their families, health services, and society.

Read the rest of this article HERE.

Source: Ward H, Flower B, Garcia PJ, Ong SWX, Altmann DM, Delaney B, Smith N, Elliott P, Cooke G. Global surveillance, research, and collaboration needed to improve understanding and management of long COVID. Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2057-2059. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02444-2. Epub 2021 Nov 10. PMID: 34774190; PMCID: PMC8580495. (Full text)

Polio Vaccination and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Background: Previous research has suggested that enteroviruses may be implicated in the development and persistence of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). One method of investigating this topic has been to use a polio vaccination challenge, and a previous study showed that CFS patients had more shedding than healthy controls. There was no effect of the vaccination on the clinical condition or wellbeing of the CFS patients.

Methods: In the previous study, the control group were more likely to have had a recent booster vaccination. This was controlled in the present study, where 18 CFS patients were randomly assigned to vaccination or placebo conditions. Nine healthy volunteers were also given the polio vaccination.

Results: The results confirmed that vaccination had no negative effects on the CFS group. Although there was more virus shedding in the CFS polio group than in the control polio group, this difference was not significant.

Conclusion: This study confirms that polio vaccination is not contraindicated in CFS patients but could not confirm that they are more susceptible to enterovirus infection.

Source: Smith AP and Thomas M. Polio Vaccination and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases 8(4): 43-49. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/146095/1/poliocfs.pdf (Full text)

Long term predictors of breathlessness, exercise intolerance, chronic fatigue and well-being in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A cohort study with 4 months median follow-up

Abstract:

Background: Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is an emerging healthcare burden. We therefore aimed to determine predictors of different functional outcomes after hospital discharge in patients with COVID-19.

Methods: An ambidirectional cohort study was conducted between May and July 2020, in which PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients underwent a standardized telephone assessment between 6 weeks and 6 months post discharge. We excluded patients who died, had a mental illness or failed to respond to two follow-up phone calls. The medical research council (MRC) dyspnea scale, metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score for exercise tolerance, chronic fatigability syndrome (CFS) scale and World Health Organization-five well-being index (WHO-5) for mental health were used to evaluate symptoms at follow-up.

Results: 375 patients were contacted and 153 failed to respond. The median timing for the follow-up assessment was 122 days (IQR, 109-158). On multivariate analyses, female gender, pre-existing lung disease, headache at presentation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, critical COVID-19 and post-discharge ER visit were predictors of higher MRC scores at follow-up. Female gender, older age >67 years, arterial hypertension and emergency room (ER) visit were associated with lower MET exercise tolerance scores. Female gender, pre-existing lung disease, and ER visit were associated with higher risk of CFS. Age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, pre-existing lung disease and duration of symptoms were negatively associated with WHO-5 score.

Conclusions: Several risk factors were associated with an increased risk of PACS. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who are at risk for PACS may benefit from a targeted pre-emptive follow-up and rehabilitation programs.

Source: Tleyjeh IM, Saddik B, Ramakrishnan RK, AlSwaidan N, AlAnazi A, Alhazmi D, Aloufi A, AlSumait F, Berbari EF, Halwani R. Long term predictors of breathlessness, exercise intolerance, chronic fatigue and well-being in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A cohort study with 4 months median follow-up. J Infect Public Health. 2021 Nov 18;15(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.11.016. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34861604; PMCID: PMC8600938. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600938/ (Full text)

Who has long-COVID? A big data approach

Abstract:

Background Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), otherwise known as long-COVID, have severely impacted recovery from the pandemic for patients and society alike. This new disease is characterized by evolving, heterogeneous symptoms, making it challenging to derive an unambiguous long-COVID definition. Electronic health record (EHR) studies are a critical element of the NIH Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative, which is addressing the urgent need to understand PASC, accurately identify who has PASC, and identify treatments.

Methods Using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative’s (N3C) EHR repository, we developed XGBoost machine learning (ML) models to identify potential long-COVID patients. We examined demographics, healthcare utilization, diagnoses, and medications for 97,995 adult COVID-19 patients. We used these features and 597 long-COVID clinic patients to train three ML models to identify potential long-COVID patients among (1) all COVID-19 patients, (2) patients hospitalized with COVID-19, and (3) patients who had COVID-19 but were not hospitalized.

Findings Our models identified potential long-COVID patients with high accuracy, achieving areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.91 (all patients), 0.90 (hospitalized); and 0.85 (non-hospitalized). Important features include rate of healthcare utilization, patient age, dyspnea, and other diagnosis and medication information available within the EHR. Applying the “all patients” model to the larger N3C cohort identified 100,263 potential long-COVID patients.

Interpretation Patients flagged by our models can be interpreted as “patients likely to be referred to or seek care at a long-COVID specialty clinic,” an essential proxy for long-COVID diagnosis in the current absence of a definition. We also achieve the urgent goal of identifying potential long-COVID patients for clinical trials. As more data sources are identified, the models can be retrained and tuned based on study needs.

Source: Pfaff ER, Girvin AT, Bennett TD, Bhatia A, Brooks IM, Deer RR, Dekermanjian JP, Jolley SE, Kahn MG, Kostka K, McMurry JA, Moffitt R, Walden A, Chute CG, Haendel MA, The N3C Consortium. (2021). Who has long-COVID? A big data approach [preprint]. UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science Supported Publications. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.18.21265168. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/umccts_pubs/253

Shadow Burden of Undiagnosed Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) on Society: Retrospective and Prospective-In Light of COVID-19

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a poorly understood, complex, multisystem disorder, with severe fatigue not alleviated by rest, and other symptoms, which lead to substantial reductions in functional activity and quality of life. Due to the unclear aetiology, treatment of patients is complicated, but one of the initial problems is the insufficient diagnostic process. The increase in the number of undiagnosed ME/CFS patients became specifically relevant in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this research was to investigate the issues of undiagnosed potential ME/CFS patients, with a hypothetical forecast of the expansion of post-viral CFS as a consequence of COVID-19 and its burden on society.

Methods: The theoretical research was founded on the estimation of classic factors presumably affecting the diagnostic scope of ME/CFS and their ascription to Latvian circumstances, as well as a literature review to assess the potential interaction between ME/CFS and COVID-19 as a new contributing agent. The empirical study design consisted of two parts: The first part was dedicated to a comparison of the self-reported data of ME/CFS patients with those of persons experiencing symptoms similar to ME/CFS, but without a diagnosis. This part envisaged the creation of an assumption of the ME/CFS shadow burden “status quo”, not addressing the impact of COVID-19. The second part aimed to investigate data from former COVID-19 patients’ surveys on the presence of ME/CFS symptoms, 6 months after being affected by COVID-19. Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were used to analyse the obtained data.

Results: The received data assumed that the previously obtained data on the ME/CFS prevalence of 0.8% in the Latvian population are appropriate, and the literature review reports a prevalence of 0.2-1.0% in developed countries. Regarding the reciprocity of ME/CFS and COVID-19, the literature review showed a lack of research in this field. The empirical results show quite similar self-esteem among ME/CFS patients and undiagnosed patients with longstanding disease experience, while former COVID-19 patients show a significantly lower severity of these problems. Notably, “psychological distress (anxiety)” and “episodic fatigue” are significantly predominant symptoms reported by former COVID-19 patients in comparison with ME/CFS patients and undiagnosed patients prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of our analysis predict that the total amount of direct medical costs for undiagnosed patients (out-of-pocket payments) is more than EUR 15 million p.a. (in Latvia), and this may increase by at least 15% due to the consequences of COVID-19.

Conclusions: ME/CFS creates a significant shadow burden on society, even considering only the direct medical costs of undiagnosed patients-the number of whom in Latvia is probably at least five times higher than the number of discerned patients. Simultaneously, COVID-19 can induce long-lasting complications and chronic conditions, such as post-viral CFS, and increase this burden. The Latvian research data assume that ME/CFS patients are not a high-risk group for COVID-19; however, COVID-19 causes ME/CFS-relevant symptoms in patients. This increases the need for monitoring of patients for even longer after recovering from COVID-19’s symptoms, in order to prevent complications and the progression of chronic diseases. In the context of further epidemiological uncertainty, and the possibility of severe post-viral consequences, preventive measures are becoming significantly more important; an integrated diagnostic approach and appropriate treatment could reduce this burden in the future.

Source: Araja D, Berkis U, Lunga A, Murovska M. Shadow Burden of Undiagnosed Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) on Society: Retrospective and Prospective-In Light of COVID-19. J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 6;10(14):3017. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143017. PMID: 34300183. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34300183/

European Network on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (EUROMENE): Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis, Service Provision, and Care of People with ME/CFS in Europe

Abstract:

Designed by a group of ME/CFS researchers and health professionals, the European Network on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (EUROMENE) has received funding from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)-COST action 15111-from 2016 to 2020. The main goal of the Cost Action was to assess the existing knowledge and experience on health care delivery for people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in European countries, and to enhance coordinated research and health care provision in this field. We report our findings and make recommendations for clinical diagnosis, health services and care for people with ME/CFS in Europe, as prepared by the group of clinicians and researchers from 22 countries and 55 European health professionals and researchers, who have been informed by people with ME/CFS.

Source: Nacul L, Authier FJ, Scheibenbogen C, Lorusso L, Helland IB, Martin JA, Sirbu CA, Mengshoel AM, Polo O, Behrends U, Nielsen H, Grabowski P, Sekulic S, Sepulveda N, Estévez-López F, Zalewski P, Pheby DFH, Castro-Marrero J, Sakkas GK, Capelli E, Brundsdlund I, Cullinan J, Krumina A, Bergquist J, Murovska M, Vermuelen RCW, Lacerda EM. European Network on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (EUROMENE): Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis, Service Provision, and Care of People with ME/CFS in Europe. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 19;57(5):510. doi: 10.3390/medicina57050510. PMID: 34069603. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34069603/