Category: Public Health

Understanding the experiences of caring for a partner with myalgic encephalopathy: a qualitative study of men in Norway

Abstract:

Background: Informal caring is expanding in many countries as populations age. There is a lot of research on how to care responsibilities are experienced by next of kin, but there is little research on men, which is the focus of this study. This specific focus is Myalgic Encephalopathy (ME), which is a condition that often affects women. This means that it is men who often find themselves in a caring role.

Aim: This project aims to explore what it was like for Norwegian men to have a caring role toward a partner with ME and how it affects everyday life.

Method: A qualitative approach was used. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the participants were recruited from different places in Norway. All were between the ages of 30 to 60 years old and were caring for a partner for several years. To analyze the data, thematic analysis was used, to find different patterns in the data.

Results: A data emerged two main themes and seven under the themes “experiencing the impact of caring for a partner with ME on everyday life “and providing different kinds of support. The experience around the role of caring was influenced by several factors, such as changes in finances and family dynamics as well as accessing formal support. Overall, the mean men felt that being in a caring role meant that life was being put on hold.

Conclusion: Findings from this study help to strengthen previous research. Having a caring role for a sick partner with ME was demanding and greatly affects everyday life. Men found the role of care challenging and it could negatively affect the person psychologically. For most people in a caring role, there was potential for better support both emotionally and financially.

Source: Elise Torp. Understanding the experiences of caring for a partner with myalgic encephalopathy: a qualitative study of men in Norway. M.Sc. Thesis. https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/handle/11250/3019314?locale-attribute=en

Unpaid carers are the missing piece in treatment guidelines and research priorities for ME/CFS

Dear Editor,

The recent publication of a new NICE Guideline1 , an All-Party Parliamentary Group Report (APPG)2, and new Research Priorities3 heralds a dramatic shift in approaches and attitudes to Myalgic Encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) in the UK. Largely ignored in all three publications, however, are unpaid carers (known outside the UK as family carers or caregivers). The vast majority of people with ME/CFS rely on their families for care and many of those families have been the driving force behind the changes to research and treatment
that are now unfolding.

There has been limited research on unpaid care in the specific context of ME/CFS, but the few existing studies clearly show that the usual toll of caring for a sick or disabled family member is compounded by the historic prejudice surrounding ME/CFS and the absence of evidence-based treatments.g.4-7.

While we applaud the commitment of NICE, the APPG, and the Priority Setting Partnership, it may still be decades before biomedical breakthroughs are made or translated into effective, widely available treatments for ME/CFS8. In the meantime, families will continue to provide the majority of
care for people with ME/CFS and bear the physical, psychological, and economic scars of doing so.

The new NICE guideline does recommend support for carers, but the supports it recommends are generic. They will do little to address the unique needs of ME/CFS carers or their systemic mistreatment by health and social care professionals. A change in the UK’s approach to ME/CFS is long overdue, but without a focus on unpaid carers the puzzle will always be missing a piece. The wellbeing of carers must also be a priority in ME/CFS
research and effective strategies must be developed to address their needs, and recognise and respect their expertise, in clinical practice and social care.

Kind regards,

Dr Siobhan O’Dwyer, University of Exeter Medical School
Ms Sarah Boothby, Former Carer
Dr Georgia Smith, University of Exeter Medical School
Dr Lucy Biddle, Bristol Medical School
Dr Nina Muirhead, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust
Dr Sharmila Khot, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

Source: O’Dwyer S, Boothby S, Smith G, Biddle L, Muirhead N, Khot S. Unpaid carers are the missing piece in treatment guidelines and research priorities for ME/CFS. BMJ. 2022 Jul 14;378:o1691. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1691. PMID: 35835467.  https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/130699/BMJ_Letter_ODwyer.pdf?sequence=3 (Text available as PDF file)

The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and long COVID in US adults during the BA.5 surge, June-July 2022

Abstract:

Due to changes in SARS-CoV-2 testing practices, passive case-based surveillance may be an increasingly unreliable indicator for monitoring the burden of SARS-CoV-2, especially during surges. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a population-representative sample of 3,042 U.S. adults between June 30 and July 2, 2022, during the Omicron BA.5 surge. Respondents were asked about SARS-CoV-2 testing and outcomes, COVID-like symptoms, contact with cases, and experience with prolonged COVID-19 symptoms following prior infection.

We estimated the weighted age and sex-standardized SARS-CoV-2 prevalence, during the 14-day period preceding the interview. We estimated age and gender adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for current SARS-CoV-2 infection using a log-binomial regression model.

An estimated 17.3% (95% CI 14.9, 19.8) of respondents had SARS-CoV-2 infection during the two-week study period, equating to 44 million cases as compared to 1.8 million per the CDC during the same time period. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was higher among those 18-24 years old (aPR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8, 2.7) and among non-Hispanic Black (aPR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 ,2.2) and Hispanic (aPR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0 , 2.9). SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was also higher among those with lower income (aPR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.3), lower education (aPR 3.7 95% CI 3.0,4.7), and those with comorbidities (aPR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4, 2.0). An estimated 21.5% (95% CI 18.2, 24.7) of respondents with a SARS-CoV-2 infection more than 4 weeks prior reported long COVID symptoms.

The inequitable distribution of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence during the BA.5 surge will likely drive inequities in the future burden of long COVID.

Source: Saba Qasmieh, McKaylee Robertson, Chloe A Teasdale, Sarah Kulkarni, Heidi E Jones, Margaret McNairy, Luisa N Borrell, Denis Nash. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and long COVID in US adults during the BA.5 surge, June-July 2022. medRxiv 2022.09.04.22279588; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.04.22279588 (Full text available as PDF file)

Inequity and disparities mar existing global research evidence on Long COVID

Abstract:

Since the pandemic began in December 2019, SARS-Cov2 has accentuated the wide gap and disparities in socioeconomic and healthcare access at individual, community, country, and regional levels. More than two years into the current pandemic, up to three-fourths of the patients are reporting continued signs and symptoms beyond the acute phase of COVID-19, and Long COVID portends to be a major challenge in the future ahead.

With a comprehensive overview of the literature, we found that most studies concerning long COVID came from high and upper-middle income countries, and people of low-income and lower-and-middle income regions and vulnerable groups with comorbid conditions have been neglected. Apart from the level of income, there is a significant geographical heterogeneity in investigating the Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) or what we call now, long COVID. We believe that these recognizing health disparities is crucial from equity perspective and is the first step toward global health promotion.

Source: Taghrir MH, Akbarialiabad H, Abdollahi A, Ghahramani N, Bastani B, Paydar S, Razani B, Mwangi J, Asadi-Pooya AA, Roozbeh J, Malekmakan L, Kumar M. Inequity and disparities mar existing global research evidence on Long COVID. Glob Health Promot. 2022 Aug 12:17579759221113276. doi: 10.1177/17579759221113276. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35962520. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35962520/

Exposure-response relationship between K. brevis blooms and reporting of upper respiratory and neurotoxin-associated symptoms

Abstract:

In southwest Florida, Karenia brevis (K. brevis) blooms occur frequently, can be very intense and persist over several years. Individuals living in coastal communities around the Gulf of Mexico are particularly vulnerable to brevetoxins released by K. brevis in seawater and carried inland within marine aerosol. Exposure to K. brevis occurs during residential, recreational, and occupational activities and has been associated with upper respiratory tract (URT) symptoms in healthy and medically vulnerable individuals. Additionally, ingestion of brevetoxin-contaminated seafood causes neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP), and severe headaches prompting emergency department visits which occur in excess during K. brevis blooms.

The current study examined a dose-response relationship between K. brevis in coastal waters and URT and NSP-like symptoms and headaches among southwest Florida residents. Data on past medical history (PMH) and medical symptoms were collected from the participants (n = 258) in five southwest Florida counties between June 2019 to August 2021. A dose-response relationship was observed between K. brevis blooms and reporting of URT and NSP-like symptoms and headaches. Reporting of NSP-like symptoms was higher among participants with a PMH of migraines, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and mild memory loss, while the association of headaches with K. brevis blooms was accentuated among individuals with a PMH of migraines.

These results suggest further investigations into the threshold of aerosolized brevetoxin dose required to elicit URT, headaches and/or NSP-like symptoms. These symptoms ultimately cause significant public health safety concerns, primarily among vulnerable populations with preexisting neurological conditions.

Source: Abdullah L, Ferguson S, Niedospial D, Patterson D, Oberlin S, Nkiliza A, Bartenfelder G, Hahn-Townsend C, Parks M, Crawford F, Reich A, Keegan A, Kirkpatrick B, Mullan M. Exposure-response relationship between K. brevis blooms and reporting of upper respiratory and neurotoxin-associated symptoms. Harmful Algae. 2022 Aug;117:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2022.102286. Epub 2022 Jul 12. PMID: 35944953. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35944953/

Prevalence of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) in Australian primary care patients: only part of the story?

Abstract:

Background: ME/CFS is a disorder characterized by recurrent fatigue and intolerance to exertion which manifests as profound post-exertional malaise. Prevalence studies internationally have reported highly variable results due to the 20 + diagnostic criteria. For Australia, the prevalence of ME/CFS based on current case definitions is unknown.

Objectives: To report prevalence of ME/CFS in patients aged ≥ 13 years attending Australian primary care settings for years 2015-2019, and provide context for patterns of primary care attendance by people living with ME/CFS.

Methodology: Conducted in partnership with the Patient Advisory Group, this study adopted a mixed methods approach. De-identified primary care data from the national MedicineInsight program were analyzed. The cohort were regularly attending patients, i.e. 3 visits in the preceding 2 years. Crude prevalence rates were calculated for years 2015-2019, by sex, 10-year age groups, remoteness and socioeconomic status. Rates are presented per 100,000population (95% confidence intervals (CI)). Qualitative data was collected through focus groups and in-depth 1:1 interview.

Results: Qualitative evidence identified barriers to reaching diagnosis, and limited interactions with primary care due to a lack of available treatments/interventions, stigma and disbelief in ME/CFS as a condition. In each year of interest, crude prevalence in the primary care setting ranged between 94.9/100,000 (95% CI: 91.5-98.5) and 103.9/100,000 population (95%CI: 100.3-107.7), equating to between 20,140 and 22,050 people living with ME/CFS in Australia in 2020. Higher rates were observed for age groups 50-59 years and 40-49 years. Rates were substantially higher in females (130.0-141.4/100,000) compared to males (50.9-57.5/100,000). In the context of the qualitative evidence, our prevalence rates likely represent an underestimate of the true prevalence of ME/CFS in the Australian primary care setting.

Conclusion: ME/CFS affects a substantial number of Australians. Whilst this study provides prevalence estimates for the Australian primary care setting, the qualitative evidence highlights the limitations of these. Future research should focus on using robust case ascertainment criteria in a community setting. Quantification of the burden of disease can be used to inform health policy and planning, for this understudied condition.

Source: Orji N, Campbell JA, Wills K, Hensher M, Palmer AJ, Rogerson M, Kelly R, de Graaff B. Prevalence of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) in Australian primary care patients: only part of the story? BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):1516. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13929-9. PMID: 35945527. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-13929-9 (Full text)

Chronic fatigue syndrome: an old public health issue highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic

In some cases, C O VID-19 has been shown to cause both acute as well as prolonged neuropsychiatric manifestations, possibly due to CNS immune cell activation.13,14 Between 13 and 23% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffer from fatigue and PEM-like symptoms more than 6 months after the infection.15 These numbers, although alarming, are hardly surprising. Looking back at the 2002/03 SARS pandemic, a similar proportion of hospitalized patients with a severe course also developed CFS/ME (27% of survivors 4 years after hospitalisation).16Other common pathogens that can lead to CFS/ME include viruses like Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and enteroviruses, bacteria such as mycoplasma, Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease), and Coxiella burnetii (Q fever).17 In fact, in 3 out of 4 cases of CFS/ME, the disease develops following an infectious episode.18 Interestingly, the innate immune response to infections is generally higher among women than men, which could perhaps also explain the higher prevalence of CFS/ME among women given the role that immunity plays in it. With an estimated prevalence of 0.1-0.7%, CFS/ME is far above the threshold value set by the European Union for classification as a rare disease (<5:10,000).

Read the rest of this article HERE. 

Source: Bonk JS, Khedkar PH. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an old public health issue highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2022 Jul 30:e13863. doi: 10.1111/apha.13863. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35906837. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apha.13863 (Full text)

Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Neglected Public Health Issue

Introduction:

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused at least 508,827,830 infections and is associated with a 1.2% mortality rate worldwide (). New SARS-CoV-2 variants have driven new waves of the pandemic as a result of their increased transmissibility and ability to evade the immune response (). The post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) is an important but underestimated public health issue that can have a long-term impact on pulmonary and multiple extrapulmonary tissues and organs through several potential mechanisms (, ). Recent studies demonstrate that approximately 4–69% of patients (including children, adolescents, adults, and senior) suffer from PASC (–). There is considerable evidence concerning post-acute sequelae that will likely outlast the current pandemic and need to be addressed. This article reviews the clinical sequelae of COVID-19 survivors and provides valuable insights required to fill the gaps in medical knowledge.

Source: Wang Z, Yang L. Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Neglected Public Health Issue. Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;10:908757. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908757. PMID: 35784200; PMCID: PMC9247346. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247346/ (Full text)

Detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in urine samples: A noninvasive and sensitive way to assay COVID-19 immune conversion

Abstract:

Serum-based ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) has been widely used to detect anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies. However, to date, no study has investigated patient urine as a biological sample to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus-specific antibodies. An in-house urine-based ELISA was developed using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein.

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in urine was established, with 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with the urine-based ELISA and 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity with a paired serum-based ELISA. The urine-based ELISA that detects anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is a noninvasive method with potential application as a facile COVID-19 immunodiagnostic platform, which can be used to report the extent of exposure at the population level and/or to assess the risk of infection at the individual level.

Source: Ludolf F, Ramos FF, Bagno FF, Oliveira-da-Silva JA, Reis TAR, Christodoulides M, Vassallo PF, Ravetti CG, Nobre V, da Fonseca FG, Coelho EAF. Detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in urine samples: A noninvasive and sensitive way to assay COVID-19 immune conversion. Sci Adv. 2022 May 13;8(19):eabn7424. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abn7424. Epub 2022 May 13. PMID: 35559681; PMCID: PMC9106288. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9106288/ (Full text)

Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2

The omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (PANGO B.1.1.529) spread rapidly across the world, out-competing former variants soon after it was first detected in November, 2021. According to the Our World in Data COVID-19 database, In Europe, the number of confirmed cases reported between December, 2021, and March, 2022 (omicron period) has exceeded all previously reported cases. Omicron appears to cause less severe acute illness than previous variants, at least in vaccinated populations. However, the potential for large numbers of people to experience long-term symptoms is a major concern, and health and workforce planners need information urgently to appropriately scale resource allocation.
In this case-control observational study, we set out to identify the relative odds of long-COVID (defined following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines as having new or ongoing symptoms 4 weeks or more after the start of acute COVID-19) in the UK during the omicron period compared with the delta period. We used self-reported data from the COVID Symptom Study app. (King’s College London Research Ethics Management Application System number 18210, reference LRS-19/20-18210). Data were extracted and pre-processed using ExeTera13 (version 0.5.5).
Read the rest of this article HERE.
Source: Antonelli M, Pujol JC, Spector TD, Ourselin S, Steves CJ. Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2263-2264. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00941-2. PMID: 35717982; PMCID: PMC9212672. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00941-2/fulltext (Full text)