Category: Psychiatry/Psychology

The neuropsychological dimensions of postinfectious neuromyasthenia (chronic fatigue syndrome): a preliminary report

Abstract:

Postinfectious neuromyasthenia (PIN) is a clinical syndrome of protracted and incomplete recovery after an apparent viral-like illness. Medical investigation yields few abnormalities which might account for the symptomatology. A substantial number of PIN patients complain of cognitive changes.

Specific complaints include impaired attention, concentration and abstraction skills. This study was designed to systematically investigate whether the aforementioned subjective complaints could be quantified objectively using standard neuropsychological instruments. Results indicated that on all tests but one, the subjects’ performances were significantly higher than those of their age matched groups in the normative data.

Specifically, PIN patients scored significantly better than their age matched norms on tests of concentration, attention and abstraction. What is most striking is the discrepancy between the subjective complaints of cognitive impairment and the objective results of the subjects’ performances on all tests.

These findings suggest that psychological factors may play an important role in the cognitive functioning of individuals diagnosed with postinfectious neuromyasthenia.

 

Source: Altay HT, Toner BB, Brooker H, Abbey SE, Salit IE, Garfinkel PE. The neuropsychological dimensions of postinfectious neuromyasthenia (chronic fatigue syndrome): a preliminary report. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2394541

 

Attributions and self-esteem in depression and chronic fatigue syndromes

Abstract:

There is considerable overlap in symptomatology between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and affective disorder.

We report a comparison of depressive phenomenology and attributional style between a group of CFS subjects seen in a specialized medical setting, which included a high proportion with depression diagnosed by Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), and depressed controls seen in a specialized psychiatric setting.

Significant symptomatic differences between the depressed CFS group and depressed controls were observed for features such as self-esteem and guilt as well as attribution of illness. All the CFS groups tended to attribute their symptoms to external causes whereas the depressed controls experienced inward attribution.

This may have resulted from differences in the severity of mood disorder between the samples, but it is also suggested that an outward style of attribution protects the depressed CFS patients from cognitive changes associated with low mood but at the expense of greater vulnerability towards somatic symptoms such as fatigue.

 

Source: Powell R, Dolan R, Wessely S. Attributions and self-esteem in depression and chronic fatigue syndromes. J Psychosom Res. 1990;34(6):665-73.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2290139

 

Neurasthenia in the 1980s: chronic mononucleosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and anxiety and depressive disorders

Abstract:

In the 1980s, patients suffering from unexplained fatigue and what seemed like a prolonged attack of acute mononucleosis were given the diagnosis of chronic mononucleosis or chronic infection with the Epstein-Barr virus.

Although the diagnosis has great appeal, the Epstein-Barr virus does not cause the syndrome (CFS) of chronic fatigue, which has been renamed and redefined chronic fatigue syndrome to remove the inference that the virus is its cause.

From a historical perspective, both syndromes represent the 1980s equivalent of neurasthenia, a disease of fatigue that influenced the development of psychiatric nosology. Because patients with depression and anxiety also have chronic fatigue and because most patients with CFS have an affective disorder, the assessment of organic causes of this syndrome requires careful psychiatric diagnosis and treatment.

Defining chronic fatigue syndrome as a medical disorder may deprive patients of competent treatment of their affective disorder.

 

Source: Greenberg DB. Neurasthenia in the 1980s: chronic mononucleosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychosomatics. 1990 Spring;31(2):129-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2184452

 

Usefulness of a standard battery of laboratory tests in investigating chronic fatigue in adults

Abstract:

Twenty-two adults with chronic fatigue were studied to determine the clinical usefulness of commonly applied laboratory tests. Subjects with the chief complaint of fatigue persisting for more than one year were followed for an average of seven months at a university family health centre.

During this time a group of commonly recommended tests were carried out and the patients had repeated physical examinations. Physical diseases and laboratory abnormalities were few, and patients with abnormal values and active problems were followed until their fatigue resolved or their abnormalities reverted to normal following therapy. The study demonstrated that the presence of an abnormal laboratory result in a fatigued individual does not necessarily indicate the cause of fatigue.

A psychiatric history was also performed and patients were tested with the symptom check list 90-R (SCL-90-R), a 90-item psychological symptom check list. Seven patients were receiving psychotherapy when they enrolled in the study. Two additional subjects entered therapy after the start of the study. Results on the symptom check list for the study group were largely abnormal, with a majority scoring in the highest quartile for depression, paranoid ideation and psychoticism.

It is concluded that the investigation of patients with fatigue which has lasted for longer than one year should focus on psychological causes. In this group of patients laboratory abnormalities are not useful in guiding evaluation or treatment for their fatigue.

 

Source: Valdini A, Steinhardt S, Feldman E. Usefulness of a standard battery of laboratory tests in investigating chronic fatigue in adults. Fam Pract. 1989 Dec;6(4):286-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2632306

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Note: This letter appeared in the February 15, 1989 edition of the Canadian Medical Association Journal in response to Dr. Ray Holland’s letter of August 1, 1988 . You can read Dr. Holland’s letter as well as Dr. Salit’s response here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268060/?page=1 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268061/

 

A useful supplement to the letters about chronic fatigue syndrome from Drs. Ray G.L. Holland (Can Med Assoc J 1988; 139: 198-199) and Irving E. Salit (ibid: 199) might be the working case definition of this syndrome proposed by Holmes and colleagues,(1) of the US Centers for Disease Control.

Holmes and colleagues have suggested that a case of chronic fatigue syndrome must fulfill two major criteria: that it consist of persistent or relapsing debilitating fatigue of new onset that has reduced the patient’s activity level to below 50% of normal for at least 6 months and that other clinical conditions that may produce similar symptoms have been excluded by thorough evaluation.

In addition, there must be 6 or more of 11 minor features (mild fever, sore throat, painful neck or axillary lymph nodes, generalized muscle weakness, myalgia, easy fatigability, headaches, migratory arthralgia, neuropsychologic complaints, sleep disturbances and rapid onset of the main symptom complex), along with 2 or more of 3 physical findings (low-grade fever, nonexudative pharyngitis, and palpable or tender neck or axillary lymph nodes).

We have found that many people with this clinical picture have concomitant food and chemical sensitivities and may have an intracellular magnesium deficiency in spite of normal serum levels.(2) This is probably the result of the inordinate amount of this essential mineral that they spill in their urine. The generalized aching and muscle tightness these patients experience can frequently be eased by appropriate magnesium (and calcium) supplementation, presumably because of the reduction of neuromuscular irritability.

We were therefore greatly surprised to learn in a later letter from Dr. Holland (ibid: 706) that “it would be nontherapeutic to offer such a patient empathy” and that we must not condone a belief in a “nonexistent disease”.

These statements are difficult to reconcile with the immunologic abnormalities,(3,5) disorders of muscle metabolism (5) and abnormal results of muscle biopsy (5) found in such patients. Specific flow cytometric measurements of lymphocyte dysfunction may prove to be a means of characterizing and diagnosing this syndrome.(6)

Holland, who reminds us of the dictum “Primum non nocere”, should take his own advice to heart. We are only beginning to unravel the secrets of this debilitating condition, which is very likely caused by a combination of triggering factors, including infective and environmental influences.

This condition, called myalgic encephalomyelitis in Britain, is most certainly not psychosomatic, in spite of the frequently associated emotional turmoil.

Most normal healthy people will react “emotionally” when their finances, lifestyle and health are shattered by a debilitating condition, and they may well respond to a sympathetic approach to their total well-being.

~Gerald H. Ross, MD, CCFP, Fellow in environmental medicine

~Jean A. Monro, MB, BS, LRCP, MRCS, Medical director Breakspear Hospital for Allergy and Environmental Medicine Abbots Langley, England

 

References

  1. Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM et al: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 387-389
  2. Rea WJ, Johnson AR, Smiley RE et al: Magnesium deficiency in patients with chemical sensitivity. Clin Ecol 1986; 4:17-20
  3. Tosato G, Straus SE, Werner H et al: Characteristic T cell dysfunction in patients with chronic active EpsteinBarr virus infection (chronic infectious mononucleosis). J Immunol 1985; 134:3082-3088
  4. Kuis W, Roord JJ, Zegers BJM et al: Heterogeneity of immune defects in three children with a chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection. J Clin Immunol 1985; 5: 377-385
  5. Behan PO, Behan WMH, Bell EJ: The postviral fatigue syndrome – an analysis of the findings in 50 cases. J Infect 1985; 10: 211-222
  6. Johnson TS, Gratzner HG, Steinbach T et al: Flow cytometric measurement of lymphocyte immune function in chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Presented at 22nd scientific session, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, Lake Tahoe, Nev, Oct 22-25, 1988

Source: Gerald H. Ross and Jean A. Monro. Chronic fatigue syndrome. CMAJ. 1989 Feb 15; 140(4): 361. PMCID: PMC1268650 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268650/?page=1

 

“Virus of the year”?

Note: This letter by Dr. Ray Holland, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on August 1, 1988, generated several responses. Dr. Salit’s response appears below. 

 

There appears to be a scarcity of information in medical and psychiatric journals (although not in the lay press) on what was initially termed the Epstein-Barr syndrome but was later renamed chronic fatigue syndrome because it can be caused by infective agents other than the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). For example, the last article on the subject in CMAJ appeared in 1985.(1) There the syndrome, consisting of fatigue, depression, myalgia, muscle weakness, headaches and paresthesia, was named sporadic postinfectious neuromyasthenia (PIN), a term preferable to chronic fatigue syndrome because it is not ambiguous and because the condition can be of both infectious and psychologic origin.

Presumably the condition was named chronic fatigue syndrome because fatigue is the main presenting symptom, but in psychologic depression fatigue can also be the main manifestation. It is unfortunate, therefore, that the American Medical Association appears to have adopted such an ambiguous term while lamenting that the lack of a definitive diagnosis leaves both patients and health care providers frustrated.(2)

To confuse matters further, the media have labelled the condition chronic fatigue in overachievers or Yuppie flu. In fact, traditional psychiatrists have for some timed called chronic fatigue in overachievers anhedonia (inability to experience pleasure), which, if untreated, may lead to fatigue, depression and the other symptoms mentioned.

While the clinical picture may be ambiguous, the serologic findings may be more so, even when interpreted along with the clinical findings, because those exposed to EBV may have positive serologic results but no chronic sequelae, in much the same way as most people exposed to tuberculosis have subclinical infection. How high does the antibody titre have to be for a definite diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome in those who were apparently well before the acute viral attack, even if one excludes those with a previous psychiatric history, as Salit did? One must suspect that a high antibody titre that does not correlate with the clinical findings implies a psychologic origin, as does a low antibody titre. However, it appears that many patients who are told that they have positive but inconclusive serologic results of testing for EBV are choosing to believe that they have the disease. The local medical laboratory has informed me that there is not even a range of titres for EBV but that patients must find their own range by correlating values with how they feel! The media seem to infer that cases with negative results of EBV testing either have not been diagnosed because of lack of the necessary technology or have been misdiagnosed, because there is no mention that the cause may be psychologic.

Such a state of affairs is only too likely in today’s society, in which people are actually healthier than ever before but are more disease conscious and in which the media have a lively interest in medical matters. Rather than an epidemic of the disease, there appears to be an epidemic of the diagnosis, such that EBV should be named “virus of the year”.

May primum non nocere prevail as high-tech medicine continues to advance, at an alarming rate.

~Ray G.L. Holland, MD, FRCPC Box 458 Port Colbome, Ont.

References

  1. Salit IE: Sporadic postinfectious neuromyasthenia. Can Med Assoc J 1985; 133: 659-663
  2. Straus SE: EB or not EB – that is the question [E]. JAMA 1987; 257: 2335- 2336

 

[Dr. Salit responds:]

I too believe that the lack of information in medical journals on PIN [postinfectious neuromyasthenia] is a problem. There appears to be confusion about the condition among physicians, granting agencies and medical journals; they are unable to neatly classify the ailment into a nosologic category. The comment has been that the illness is “too vague” or “ill-defined”. This translates into an inability to have studies related to this subject published. Indeed, last year CMAJ rejected my article on immunologic aberrations in PIN, citing similar reasons.

The term chronic fatigue syndrome (1) was probably chosen by US investigators because it is a generic term. In 1985 these investigators thought that the illness was due to EBV; hence the common designation chronic EBV infection.(2) At that time I felt that the illness was induced by many etiologic agents, so I used the term PIN.(3) Most investigators in this area have come around to this way of thinking but have chosen not to use the term PIN.

Dr. Holland indicates that this disease has been acknowledged by psychiatrists in the past under other designations. Indeed, very similar illnesses have been known to different specialists by different names for decades. I have suggested a unifying hypothesis concerning a common pathophysiologic mechanism.(4)

EBV serologic findings have been the most confusing diagnostic aspect of this illness. Some patients after typical acute infectious mononucleosis have a form of chronic mononucleosis that symptomatically resembles PIN.(5) The serologic findings strongly suggest chronic active EBV infection. However, in most cases of PIN the illness probably did not start with acute infectious mononucleosis, and the patients probably do not have continuing active EBV infection. Using a sensitive DNA probe we found that PIN patients were not excreting EBV.(6) Furthermore, there is such extensive overlap between PIN patients and healthy controls that EBV serologic findings cannot be used to make the diagnosis.(7) It is also likely that such patients have moderately elevated titres of antibodies to a variety of other antigens. Most adults in Canada have EBV antibodies from a prior infection. Too often a diagnosis of chronic EBV infection is made on the basis of certain symptoms and the findings of any EBV antibody. This is inappropriate.

Holland says that “there appears to be an epidemic of the diagnosis”. What has become very apparent to me is that there are a large number of people in the community with illnesses that might be included under the rubric PIN. Physicians argue about the existence of this disease, but it is clear to me that PIN patients have an illness (or a deviation from a normal state of health). Despite the fact that we do not understand the disease process that results in this illness, the patients still require appropriate medical care, consisting of empathy, an acknowledgement that they are ill, reassurance that there is an absence of a more severe disease and, finally, guidelines on how best to manage the condition.(4’8’9)

I do not think that primum non nocere should prevail, although I can accept secundum non nocere. First we should show some understanding and compassion.

~ Irving E. Salit, MD, FRCPC Division of Infectious Diseases Toronto General Hospital Toronto, Ont.

References

  1. Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM et al: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 387-389
  2. Jones JF, Ray CG, Minnich LL et al: Evidence for active Epstein-Barr virus infection in patients with persistent, unexplained illnesses: elevated antiearly antigen antibodies. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 1-7 3. Salit IE: Sporadic postinfectious neuromyasthenia. Can Med Assoc J 1985; 133: 659-663
  3. Idem: Chronic EBV infections (postinfectious neuromyasthenia). Med North Am 1987; 10: 1944-1950
  4. Straus SE: The chronic mononucleosis syndrome. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 405- 412
  5. Salit IE, Diaz-Mitoma F, Walmsley S et al: Absence of Epstein-Barr virus excretion in post-infectious neuromyopathies. Presented at the American Society for Microbiology annual meeting, Miami Beach, May 9, 1988
  6. Buchwald D, Sullivan JL, Komaroff AL: Frequency of “chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection” in a general medical practice. JAMA 1987; 257: 2303-2307
  7. Salit IE: Post-infectious fatigue. Can Fam Physician 1987; 133: 1217-1219 9. Taerk GS, Toner B, Salit IE et al: Depression in patients with neuromyasthemia. Int J Psychiatry Med 1987; 17: 49-56

 

Source: R G Holland. “Virus of the year”? CMAJ. 1988 Aug 1; 139(3): 198–199. PMCID: PMC1268060 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268060/?page=1 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268061/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

I was surprised that CMAJ published the letter from Drs. Gerald H. Ross and Jean A. Monro (Can Med Assoc J 1989; 140: 361) supporting such a vague, descriptive and unscientific term as “chronic fatigue syndrome”. As a practising psychiatrist I have attempted to emphasize that there are also primary psychologic causes of chronic fatigue such as depression and panic disorder (ibid: 361, 364); thus, it is more prudent to consider the relative causes of chronic fatigue than to create a “syndrome” that imposes a diagnostic life sentence of an incurable disease.

That a minuscule percentage of cases of chronic fatigue are due to chronic mononucleosis, other chronic infections and chemical sensitivity is not disputed. What is disputed is the number so diagnosed, particularly now that panic disorder – a primarily psychologic condition that causes chronic fatigue but is more amenable to treatment (antidepressant medication and dynamic insight-oriented psychotherapy) – appears to be reaching epidemic proportions. (1) Therefore, at the risk of considerable ideologic unpopularity, it would seem, I must repeat: “Primum non nocere.”

The statement by Ross and Monro that magnesium deficiency is associated with chemical sensitivity means just that and only that.

Ross and Monro’s six references are not definitive enough, the possible exception being the article of Tosato and colleagues (2) if – and only if – the chronic infectious mononucleosis referred to in the title was confirmed by serologic evidence of an acute attack. (3)

Ross and Monro display psychologic “sympathy” with “empathy” and quote me as referring to the term “psychosomatic” when I used the term “psychologic”.

“Syndromes” like “chronic fatigue syndrome” lessen the burden of introspection. In reverence to the “father” of nosology, Thomas Sydenham, and the “father” of psychiatry, Sigmund Freud, I must state, as a traditionally oriented psychiatrist, that it is nontherapeutic to condone self-defeating behaviour.

~Ray Holland, MD, FRCPC Box 458 Port Colborne, Ont.

References

1. Introduction. In Summary Proceedings of “Panic Disorder – Relative Merits of Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy” (satellite symposium of 1988 American Psychiatric Association annual meeting), Medical Group, Mississauga, Ont, 1988
2. Tosato G, Straus SE, Werner H et al: Characteristic T cell dysfunction in patients with chronic active EpsteinBarr virus infection (chronic infectious mononucleosis). J Immunol 1985; 134:3082-3088
3. Evans AS: A virus for all seasons.Buffalo Phys Biomed Sci 1988; 22 (2):14-15

 

Source: R Holland. Chronic fatigue syndrome. CMAJ. 1989 May 1; 140(9): 1016. PMCID: PMC1268972
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268972/pdf/cmaj00190-0022b.pdf

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Note: This letter was written in response to a letter published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on May 1, 1989. You can read Holland’s letter here:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1268972/pdf/cmaj00190-0022b.pdf

 

It is regrettable that the publication of an earlier letter from one of us (G.H.R.) and Dr. Jean A. Monro (Can Med Assocj 1989; 140: 361) generated surprise (and apparent disapproval of CMAJ’s action) on the part of Dr. Ray Holland (ibid 1016).

In expressing his disagreement with the use of the term “chronic fatigue syndrome” Holland also appears to be at odds with the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), whose case definition for this condition (1) was the main point of the earlier letter. We have no disagreement with Holland that “there are also primary psychologic causes of chronic fatigue”. However, the CDC case definition specifically calls for the exclusion of clinical conditions, including psychiatric disease, that may produce similar symptoms.

The whole issue of what triggers psychologic symptoms or illness, however, is an important related matter. Holland reports, quite rightly, that panic disorder appears to be increasingly common. As physicians we have been led to assume that panic disorder has a psychologic origin rather than identifiable extrinsic causes. At the Environmental Health Center – Dallas we have confirmed that panic attacks and other emotional responses may be reproducibly triggered by double-blind testing for sensitivities to foods, inhalants and chemicals. (2)

Similar behavioural effects have been seen in pesticide poisoning (3) and with exposure to other environmental toxins. (4) Specifically, panic attacks have been cited in the psychiatric literature as being triggered by solvent exposure. (5’6)

Being unable to find physical diagnoses for chronic fatigue does not necessarily mean that psychologic illness is the cause. It may simply be that our understanding of the factors precipitating the illness is far from complete. Medical history teaches us that once physical causes for “psychologic” symptoms are discovered the condition moves, as if by magic, from the psychiatric to the medical realm. A good example of this is the relief of behavioural symptoms by correction of thiamin (7) or cobalamin (8) deficiency.

It is our experience that a substantial percentage of chronic fatigue cases (not a minuscule percentage, as Holland suggests) may arise from or be worsened by adverse reactions to components of the patient’s total environment, such as food, inhalants and chemicals.

~Gerald H. Ross, MD, CCFP Fellow in environmental medicine

~William J. Rea, MD, FACS, FAAEM Medical director

~Alfred R. Johnson, DO, FAAEM Environmental Health Center – Dallas; Dallas, Texas

References

1. Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM et al: Chronic fatigue syndrome: a working case definition. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 387-389
2. King DS: Can allergic exposure provoke psychological symptoms? A double-blind test. Biol Psychiatry 1981; 16:3-19
3. Rea Wl, Butler JR, Laseter JL et al: Pesticides and brain function changes in a controlled environment. Clin Ecol 1984; 2:145-150
4. Fein GG, Schwartz PM, Jacobson SW et al: Environmental toxins and behavioral development: a new role for psychological research. Am Psychologist 1983; 38: 1188-1197
5. Dager SR, Holland JP, Cowley DS et al: Panic disorder precipitated by exposure to organic solvents in the work place. Am I Psychiatry 1987; 144:1056-1058
6. Lindstrom K, Ruhimake H, Hamminen K: Occupational solvent exposure and neuropsychiatric disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 1984; 10: 321-323
7. McLaren DS: Clinical manifestations of nutritional disorders. In Shils ME, Young VR (eds): Modem Nutrition in Health and Disease, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1988: 733-745
8. Lindenbaum J, Healton EB, Savage DG, et al: Neuropsychiatric disorders caused by cobalamin deficiency in the absence of anemia or macrocytosis. N EnglJ Med 1988; 318: 1720-1729

 

Source: G H Ross, W J Rea, and A R Johnson. Chronic fatigue syndrome. CMAJ. 1989 Jul 1; 141(1): 11–12. PMCID: PMC1269261  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1269261/

 

Psychiatric diagnoses in patients who have chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Patients with persistent fatigue are often suspected of having psychiatric illnesses, particularly depression. The authors used the Diagnostic Interview Schedule to assess the lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 28 patients who met Centers for Disease Control case definition criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. Compared with studies of the general population and studies of chronically medically ill patients who received the same structured interview, the rates of psychiatric illness in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome appeared high. An examination of the medical histories of the 28 patients indicated that psychiatric disorders more often preceded the chronic fatigue than followed it.

 

Source: Kruesi MJ, Dale J, Straus SE. Psychiatric diagnoses in patients who have chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;50(2):53-6.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2536690

 

Management of chronic (post-viral) fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Simple rehabilitative strategies are proposed to help patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. A model is outlined of an acute illness giving way to a chronic fatigue state in which symptoms are perpetuated by a cycle of inactivity, deterioration in exercise tolerance and further symptoms. This is compounded by the depressive illness that is often part of the syndrome. The result is a self-perpetuating cycle of exercise avoidance. Effective treatment depends upon an understanding of the interaction between physical and psychological factors. Cognitive behavioural therapy is suggested. Cognitive therapy helps the patient understand how genuine symptoms arise from the frequent combination of physical inactivity and depression, rather than continuing infection, while a behavioural approach enables the treatment of avoidance behaviour and a gradual return to normal physical activity.

 

Source: S Wessely, A David, S Butler, and T Chalder. Management of chronic (post-viral) fatigue syndrome. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jan; 39(318): 26–29. PMCID: PMC1711569 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1711569/ (Full article)