Category: Psychiatry/Psychology

Fatigue Is Associated With Altered Monitoring and Preparation of Physical Effort in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is characterized by disabling fatigue, which is suggested to be maintained by dysfunctional beliefs. Fatigue and its maintenance are recently conceptualized as arising from abnormally precise expectations about bodily inputs and from beliefs of diminished control over bodily states, respectively. This study used functional neuroimaging to identify the neural correlates of fatigue and its maintenance by beliefs during a physical effort task.

METHODS: We isolated behavioral adjustments and cerebral activity during feedback processing and motor preparation, in the context of a task in which patients with CFS (n = 85) and healthy control subjects (n = 29) produced 30%, 50%, and 70% of their right-hand maximal voluntary contraction, and received directional feedback on performance (e.g., too little force).

RESULTS: Patients with CSF showed an effort-dependent behavioral bias toward less effort investment in response to directional feedback for the highest effort level as compared with healthy control subjects. This bias was associated with reduced feedback-related activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These effects were proportional to state-related fatigue and prior beliefs about CFS patients’ ability to perform the task. Patients with CFS also showed higher activity in the supplementary motor area, proportional to their state-related fatigue, and reduced connectivity between the supplementary motor area and sensorimotor cortex during motor preparation as compared with control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings link fatigue symptoms to alterations in behavioral choices on effort investment, prefrontal functioning, and supplementary motor area connectivity, with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex being associated with prior beliefs about physical abilities.

Copyright © 2018 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: van der Schaaf ME, Roelofs K, de Lange FP, Geurts DEM, van der Meer JWM, Knoop H, Toni I. Fatigue Is Associated With Altered Monitoring and Preparation of Physical Effort in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Apr;3(4):392-404. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628071

Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome—a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT

Abstract:

Background: The PACE trial was a well-powered randomised trial designed to examine the efficacy of graded exercise therapy (GET) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome. Reports concluded that both treatments were moderately effective, each leading to recovery in over a fifth of patients. However, the reported analyses did not consistently follow the procedures set out in the published protocol, and it is unclear whether the conclusions are fully justified by the evidence.

Methods: Here, we present results based on the original protocol-specified procedures. Data from a recent Freedom of Information request enabled us to closely approximate these procedures. We also evaluate the conclusions from the trial as a whole.

Results: On the original protocol-specified primary outcome measure – overall improvement rates – there was a significant effect of treatment group. However, the groups receiving CBT or GET did not significantly outperform the Control group after correcting for the number of comparisons specified in the trial protocol. Also, rates of recovery were consistently low and not significantly different across treatment groups. Finally, on secondary measures, significant effects were almost entirely confined to self-report measures. These effects did not endure beyond two years.

Conclusions: These findings raise serious concerns about the robustness of the claims made about the efficacy of CBT and GET. The modest treatment effects obtained on self-report measures in the PACE trial do not exceed what could be reasonably accounted for by participant reporting biases.

Source: Carolyn E. Wilshire, Tom Kindlon, Robert Courtney, Alem Matthees, David Tuller, Keith Geraghty and Bruce Levin. Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome—a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT. BMC PsychologyBMC series. Received: 29 May 2017; Accepted: 22 February 2018; Published: 22 March 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3 (Full article) © The Author(s) 2018.

A reexamination of the cognitive behavioral model of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The cognitive behavioral model of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) suggests that cognitions and reduced activity level perpetuate the fatigue and impairment that individuals with CFS experience. The two empirical evaluations of this model resulted in conflicting findings. The current study examines the influence of case definition fulfillment on the applicability of this model to CFS.

METHOD: A moderated mediation analysis was conducted on 990 individuals with CFS to reexamine the behavioral pathway of this model. Case definition fulfillment was entered as a moderator.

RESULTS: Findings were generally inconsistent with the cognitive behavioral model of CFS. Case definition fulfillment significantly moderated the relation between activity level and physical impairment (β = -0.08, p = 0.03); individuals who met more stringent case definitions demonstrated a weaker relation between activity level and impairment.

CONCLUSIONS: This model may not accurately represent the experience of individuals with CFS, particularly those who fulfill more stringent case definitions.

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Source: Sunnquist M, Jason LA. A reexamination of the cognitive behavioral model of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Clin Psychol. 2018 Feb 19. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22593. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457646

Studies and surveys implicate potential iatrogenic harm of cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy for myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome patients

Abstract:

Cognitive behavorial therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) are declared to be effective and safe therapies for Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Medical policies in various countries, e.g. the UK and the Netherlands, recommend CBT and GET as evidence-based treatments. But studies and patient surveys in several countries indicate that CBT often has no effect at all and that GET has detrimental effects in a large subgroup of patients.

Editorial

ME is a disease characterized by distinctive muscular symptoms, including muscle weakness and myalgia after minor exertion lasting for days, neurological symptoms implicating cerebral dysfunction, symptoms indicating circulatory impairment and other symptoms [1,2]. CFS is primarily defined by (unexplained) chronic fatigue, which must be accompanied by at least four out of eight ‘additional’’ symptoms [3]. ME and CFS are incorrectly conceived as ‘similar disorders’ [4]. But the case criteria define three patient groups: ME and/or CFS patients [5], labeled as ME/CFS patients within this context.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) are declared to be effective [6,7] and safe [7,8] therapies for Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Medical policies in various countries, e.g. the UK [9] and the Netherlands [10], recommend CBT and GET as evidence-based treatments.

However various studies implicate that CBT, GET and other behavioral interventions, including graded activity, have negative effects on (subgroups of) ME/CFS patients.

Núñez and co-workers [11] observed that adding CBT and GET to pharmacological treatment had a negative effect on SF-36 physical functioning and pain scores. Jason and others [12,13] found that ‘non-pharmacologic therapies’ had a negative effect on the mean SF- 36 physical functioning score (changes from 5 to -35) of a large subgroup of CFS patients, with lymphocyte subsets data suggesting an elevated humoral immune response (Th2/B Cell). Although ‘Guided graded Exercise Self-help’ (GET) was qualified as “a moderately effective and safe intervention” [14], the investigators acknowledged that a patient subgroup had deteriorated after the GET trial, possibly due to “a worse exacerbation of symptoms in response to GET” [15].

In various surveys [16-18] most ME/CFS patients experienced no improvement after CBT and more than half of the patients reported GET made them worse. A detailed analysis [18] of a large-scale patient survey in the UK [19] shows that, when combinations of therapies are excluded, 73% of the patients they stayed the same after CBT, while 8% of the patients improved and 18% got worse. No less than 74% of the patients reported worsening of their symptoms after GET, 14% of the patients experienced no change and only 12% reported improvement after GET. In a recent patient survey in the Netherlands [20] 11% reported CBT had improved their health situation, 36% experienced no change, and 53% reported CBT had worsened their condition. 63% reported GET had made their symptoms (much) worse and 34% reported no change. Only 3% of the patients experienced improvement after GET. One could argue that patient surveys (through the internet) are potentially prone to many biases, but a study [21] found that ‘’unsolicited’ web-based patient ratings of care correlate well with conventional research findings, i.e. formal measurements.

As affirmed by the medical authorities in the US recently, “ME/CFS is a serious, chronic, complex, multisystem disease” [4] with “strong evidence” indicating that “immunologic and inflammatory pathologic conditions, neurotransmitter signaling disruption, microbiome perturbation, and metabolic or mitochondrial abnormalities are potentially important for the definition and treatment of ME/CFS [22]. Exertion has (prolonged) negative effects in ME/CFS [4]. For that reason studies and surveys indicating potential harm of CBT and GET in large subgroups of ME/CFS patients should be taken seriously. The ‘safety claim’ is at odds with several observations.

References

  1. Dowsett EG, Ramsay AM, McCartney RA, et al. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis – a persistent enteroviral infection? Postgrad. Med. J.66(777), 526-530 (1990).

  2. Ramsay AM, Dowsett EG, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Then and now. In Hyde BM, Goldstein J, Levine P, editors. The Clinical and Scientific Basis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Ottawa: The Nightingale Research Foundation pp. 81-84 (1992).

  3. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehen­sive approach to its definition and study. Ann. Intern. Med. 121(12), 953-959 (1994).

  4. Institute of Medicine. Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syn­drome: redefining an illness. Washington, (2015).

  5. Twisk FNM. Replacing Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome with Systemic Exercise Intolerance Disease is not the way forward. Diagnostics (Basel). 6(1), 10 (2016).

  6. Malouff JM, Thorsteinsson EB, Rooke SE, et al. Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28(5), 736-745 (2008).

  7. Larun L, Brurberg KG, Odgaard-Jensen J, et al. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4, CD003200 (2017).

  8. Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Chronic fatigue syndrome: where to PACE from here? Lancet. 377(9768), 786-788 (2011)

  9. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Chronic fatigue syndrome/ myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy): diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) in adults and children. London (UK), (2007).

  10. CBO. Richtlijn diagnose, behandeling, begeleiding en beoordeling van patiënten met het chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom (CVS). Utrecht (NL), (2013).

  11. Núñez M, Fernández-Solà J, Nuñez E, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: group cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise versus usual treatment. A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up. Clin. Rheumatol. 30(3), 381-389 (2011).

  12. Jason LA, Torres-Harding S, Friedberg F, et al. Non-pharmacologic interventions for CFS: a randomized trial. J. Clin. Psychol. Med. Settings. 14(4), 275-296 (2007).

  13. Jason LA, Torres-Harding S, Brown M, et al. Predictors of change following participation in non-pharmacologic interventions for CFS. Trop. Med. Health. 36(1), 23-32 (2008).

  14. Clark LV, McCrone P, Ridge D, et al. Graded Exercise Therapy guided Self-hElp Treatment (GETSET) for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomised controlled trial in secondary care. J. Psychosom. Res. 5(2), 59-60 (2016).

  15. Cheshire A, Ridge D, Clark L, et al. Why patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/ Myalgic Encephalomyelitis improve or deteriorate with graded exercise therapy. J. Psychosom. Res. 85, 59 (2016).

  16. Kirke KD. PACE investigators’ response is misleading regarding patient survey results. J. Health. Psych. 22(9), 1168-1176 (2017).

  17. Twisk FNM, Maes M. A review on cognitive behavorial therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) / chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): CBT/GET is not only ineffective and not evidence-based, but also potentially harmful for many patients. Neuro. Endocrinol. Lett. 30(3), 284-299 (2009).

  18. Geraghty K, Hann M, Kurtev S. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients’ reports of symptom changes following cognitive behavioural therapy, graded exercise therapy and pacing treatments: Analysis of a primary survey compared with secondary surveys. J. Health. Psychol. (2017).

  19. ME Association. “No decisions about me without me”. ME/CFS illness management survey results, part 1. Gawcott, Bucks (England), (2015).

  20. De Kimpe A, Crijnen B, Kuijper J, et al. Zorg voor ME – Enquête onder ME-patiënten naar hun ervaringen met de zorg in Nederland (2016).

  21. Greaves F, Pape UJ, King D, et al. Associations between Internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study. BMJ. Qual. Saf. 21(7), 600-605 (2012).

  22. Green CR, Cowan P, Elk R, et al. National Institutes of Health pathways to prevention workshop: Advancing the research on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/ chronic fatigue syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med. 162(12), 860-865 (2015).

Source: Frank N.M. Twisk. Studies and surveys implicate potential iatrogenic harm of cognitive behavioral therapy and graded exercise therapy for myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Research on Chronic Diseases. http://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/studies-and-surveys-implicate-potential-iatrogenic-harm-of-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-and-graded-exercise-therapy-for-myalgic-en-12190.html

The presence of co-morbid mental health problems in a cohort of adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To report on the prevalence of mental health disorders in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome(CFS) and to compare the diagnoses identified by a brief clinician-administered psychiatric interview with self-report screening questionnaires.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Consecutive attenders to specialist CFS clinics in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS: N = 52 adolescents, age 12-18 years with CFS.

MEASURES: Self-report questionnaires and a brief structured psychiatric diagnostic interview, administered by a researcher.

RESULTS: On the psychiatric interview, 34.6% met a diagnosis of major depressive disorder and 28.8% had an anxiety disorder. Of these, 15% had co-morbid anxiety and depression. Those with a depression diagnosis reported significantly greater interference on the school and social adjustment scale. They also scored significantly higher on trait anxiety, but not on state anxiety. There were no differences between those who had an anxiety disorder and those who did not on fatigue, disability or depressive symptoms. Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI) score was associated with a depression diagnosis on the psychiatric interview. However, neither the state nor the trait subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was associated with an anxiety diagnosis.

CONCLUSION: Clinicians should assess for the presence of anxiety and depressive disorders in adolescents with CFS using a validated psychiatric interview. Treatment should be flexible enough to accommodate fatigue, depression and anxiety. Transdiagnostic approaches may suit this purpose. Goals should include pleasurable activities particularly for those who are depressed.

Source: Loades ME, Rimes KA, Ali S, Lievesley K, Chalder T. The presence of co-morbid mental health problems in a cohort of adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1:1359104517736357. doi: 10.1177/1359104517736357. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096528

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Lightning Process in addition to specialist medical care for paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial

Editor’s Comment: Numerous critiques of the Lightning Process have been made by physicians, medical practitioners, and patient organizations. There are cases in which LP has resulted in long-lasting physical harm. (You can read about these cases here and here.)  Dr. Charles Shepherd, an ME/CFS specialist, does not recommend LP for any ME/CFS patients.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Lightning Process (LP) in addition to specialist medical care (SMC) compared with SMC alone, for children with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalitis (ME).

DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised controlled open trial. Participants were randomly assigned to SMC or SMC+LP. Randomisation was minimised by age and gender.

SETTING: Specialist paediatric CFS/ME service.

PATIENTS: 12-18 year olds with mild/moderate CFS/ME.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Function Subscale (SF-36-PFS) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included pain, anxiety, depression, school attendance and cost-effectiveness from a health service perspective at 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS: We recruited 100 participants, of whom 51 were randomised to SMC+LP. Data from 81 participants were analysed at 6 months. Physical function (SF-36-PFS) was better in those allocated SMC+LP (adjusted difference in means 12.5(95% CI 4.5 to 20.5), p=0.003) and this improved further at 12 months (15.1 (5.8 to 24.4), p=0.002). At 6 months, fatigue and anxiety were reduced, and at 12 months, fatigue, anxiety, depression and school attendance had improved in the SMC+LP arm. Results were similar following multiple imputation. SMC+LP was probably more cost-effective in the multiple imputation dataset (difference in means in net monetary benefit at 12 months £1474(95% CI £111 to £2836), p=0.034) but not for complete cases.

CONCLUSION: The LP is effective and is probably cost-effective when provided in addition to SMC for mild/moderately affected adolescents with CFS/ME.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN81456207.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Source: Crawley EM, Gaunt DM, Garfield K, Hollingworth W, Sterne JAC, Beasant L, Collin SM, Mills N, Montgomery AA. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Lightning Process in addition to specialist medical care for paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child. 2017 Sep 20. pii: archdischild-2017-313375. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313375. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28931531

Contesting the psychiatric framing of ME/CFS

Abstract:

ME/CFS is a medically contested illness and its understanding, framing and treatment has been the subject of heated debate. This paper examines why framing the condition as a psychiatric issue—what we refer to as ‘psychiatrisation’—has been so heavily contested by patients and activists. We argue that this contestation is not simply about stigmatising mental health conditions, as some have suggested, but relates to how people diagnosed with mental illness are treated in society, psychiatry and the law. We highlight the potentially harmful consequences of psychiatrisation which can lead to people’s experiential knowledge being discredited. This stems, in part, from a psychiatric-specific form of ‘epistemic injustice’ which can result in unhelpful, unwanted and forced treatments.

This understanding helps explain why the psychiatrisation of ME/CFS has become the focus of such bitter debate and why psychiatry itself has become such a significant field of contention, for both ME/CFS patients and mental health service users/survivors. Notwithstanding important differences, both reject the way psychiatry denies patient explanations and understandings, and therefore share a collective struggle for justice and legitimation. Reasons why this shared struggle has not resulted in alliances between ME and mental health activists are noted.

Source: Helen Spandler, Meg Allen. Contesting the psychiatric framing of ME/CFS. Social Theory & Health. First Online: 16 August 2017. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41285-017-0047-0

Cognitive and behavioral coping in people with Chronic fatigue syndrome: An exploratory study searching for intervention targets for depressive symptoms

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to find relevant coping factors for the development of psychological interventions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome who suffer from depressive symptoms. A total of 30 adults with chronic fatigue syndrome filled in the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the COPE and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The findings suggested that cognitive coping strategies have a stronger influence than behavioral coping strategies on depressive symptoms. Especially, the cognitive coping strategies refocusing positive, positive reappraisal and catastrophizing were of importance. These findings suggest that these coping strategies should be part of psychological programs for people with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Source: Kraaij V, Bik J, Garnefski N. Cognitive and behavioral coping in people with Chronic fatigue syndrome: An exploratory study searching for intervention targets for depressive symptoms. J Health Psychol. 2017 May 1:1359105317707259. doi: 10.1177/1359105317707259. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28810458

Differential effects of childhood trauma subtypes on fatigue and physical functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: There is wide consensus that childhood trauma plays an important role in the aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The current study examines the differential effects of childhood trauma subtypes on fatigue and physical functioning in individuals suffering from CFS.

METHODS: Participants were 155 well-documented adult, predominantly female CFS patients receiving treatment at the outpatient treatment centre for CFS of the Antwerp University Hospital in Belgium. Stepwise regression analyses were conducted with outcomes of the total score of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) measuring fatigue and the scores on the physical functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 Health Status Survey (SF-36) as the dependent variables, and the scores on the five subscales of the Traumatic Experiences Checklist (TEC) as the independent variables.

RESULTS: The patients’ fatigue (β=1.38; p=0.025) and physical functioning scores (β=-1.79; p=0.034) were significantly predicted by childhood sexual harassment. There were no significant effects of emotional neglect, emotional abuse, bodily threat, or sexual abuse during childhood.

CONCLUSION: Of the childhood trauma subtypes investigated, sexual harassment emerged as the most important predictor of fatigue and poor physical functioning in the CFS patients assessed. These findings have to be taken into account in further clinical research and in the assessment and treatment of individuals coping with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Source: De Venter M, Illegems J, Van Royen R, Moorkens G, Sabbe BGC, Van Den Eede F. Differential effects of childhood trauma subtypes on fatigue and physical functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome.Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 19;78:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.07.006. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28806608

Distress signals: Does cognitive behavioural therapy reduce or increase distress in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis?

Abstract:

Reducing the psychological distress associated with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis is seen as a key aim of cognitive behavioural therapy. Although cognitive behavioural therapy is promoted precisely in this manner by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, the evidence base on distress reduction from randomised controlled trials is limited, equivocal and poor quality. Crucially, data derived from multiple patient surveys point to worsening and increase distress; however, despite being invited, such data have been dismissed as second class by National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Crucially, the claim by National Institute of Clinical Excellence that cognitive behavioural therapy reduces distress in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis is not only at odds with what patients repeatedly report in surveys, but with their own gold-standard randomised controlled trial and meta-analytic data.

Source: Laws KR. Distress signals: Does cognitive behavioural therapy reduce or increase distress in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis? J Health Psychol. 2017 Aug;22(9):1177-1180. doi: 10.1177/1359105317710246. Epub 2017 May 17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805513