The prevalence and morbidity of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective primary care study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence and public health impact of chronic fatigue and chronic  fatigue syndrome in primary care patients in England.

METHODS: There were 2376 subjects, aged 18 through 45 years. Of 214 subjects who fulfilled criteria for chronic fatigue, 185 (86%) were interviewed in the case-control study. Measures included chronic fatigue, psychological morbidity, depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome, functional impairment, and psychiatric disorder.

RESULTS: The point prevalence of chronic fatigue was 11.3%, falling to 4.1% if comorbid psychological disorders were excluded. The point prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome was 2.6%, falling to 0.5% if comorbid psychological disorders were excluded. Rates did not vary by social class. After adjustment for psychological disorder, being female was modestly associated with chronic fatigue. Functional impairment was profound and was associated with psychological disorder.

CONCLUSIONS: Both chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome are common in primary care patients and represent a considerable public health burden. Selection bias may account for previous suggestions of a link with higher socioeconomic status.

 

Source: Wessely S, Chalder T, Hirsch S, Wallace P, Wright D. The prevalence and morbidity of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective primary care study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1449-55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380968/ (Full article)

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in 4 family practices in Leiden

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in general practice.

DESIGN: Descriptive.

SETTING: General practice and primary health care centres in Leyden region, the Netherlands.

METHOD: RNUH-LEO is a computerized database which contains the anonymous patient information of one general practice (with two practitioners) and four primary health care centres. The fourteen participating general practitioners were asked what International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) code they used to indicate a patient with chronic fatigue or with CFS. With these codes and with the code for depression patients were selected from the database. It then was determined whether these patients met the criteria of CFS by Holmes et al.

RESULTS: The general practitioners used 10 codes. Including the code for depression a total of 601 patients were preselected from a total of 23,000 patients in the database. Based on the information from the patients’ records in the database, 42 of the preselected patients were selected who might fulfill the Holmes’ criteria of CFS. According to the patients’ own general practitioner, 25 of the 42 patients would fulfil the Holmes’ criteria. The men:women ratio was 1:5. The prevalence of CFS in the population surveyed was estimated to be at least 1.1 per 1,000 patients.

 

Source: Versluis RG, de Waal MW, Opmeer C, Petri H, Springer MP. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in 4 family practices in Leiden. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1523-6. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543740

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands

Erratum in: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997 Sep 13;141(37):2686.

 

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and of primary fibromyalgia syndrome (PFS) in the Netherlands.

DESIGN: Questionnaire.

SETTING: Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to all the 6657 general practitioners in the Netherlands in order to inform them of the existence of CFS and to ask them if they had any CFS or PFS patients in their practices.

RESULTS: Sixty percent (n = 4027) of the general practitioners returned the questionnaire. Of all the general practitioners, 27% said they had no CFS patients, 23% said they had 1 CFS patient, while 21% had 2 CFS patients, and 29% said they had 3 or more CFS patients in their practice. Concerning PFS the results were 17% (no PFS patients), 18%, 18% and 47%, respectively. With a mean practice of 2486 patients per general practice, the estimated prevalence of CFS was 112 per 100,000 and that of PFS 157 per 100,000 persons. Of the CFS patients 81% were women and 55% were 25-44 years old; for PFS these figures were 87% and 48% respectively.

CONCLUSION: Extrapolation of the study results indicates that there are at least 17,000 CFS patients and 24,000 PFS patients in the Netherlands. The found prevalence is probably an under-estimation.

 

Source: Bazelmans E, Vercoulen JH, Galama JM, van Weel C, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1520-3. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543739

 

Surveillance for chronic fatigue syndrome–four U.S. cities, September 1989 through August 1993

Abstract:

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Although chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been recognized as a cause of morbidity in the United States, the etiology of CFS is unknown. In addition, information is incomplete concerning the clinical spectrum and prevalence of CFS in the United States.

REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: This report summarizes CFS surveillance data collected in four U.S. cities from September 1989 through August 1993.

DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: A physician-based surveillance system for CFS was established in four U.S. metropolitan areas: Atlanta, Georgia; Wichita, Kansas; Grand Rapids, Michigan; and Reno, Nevada. The objectives of this surveillance system were to collect descriptive epidemiologic information from patients who had unexplained chronic fatigue, estimate the prevalence and incidence of CFS in defined populations, and describe the clinical course of CFS. Patients aged > or = 18 years who had had unexplained, debilitating fatigue or chronic unwellness for at least 6 months were referred by their physicians to a designated health professional(s) in their area. Those patients who participated in the surveillance system a) were interviewed by the health professional(s); b) completed a self-administered questionnaire that included their demographic information, medical history, and responses to the Beck Depression Inventory, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, and the Sickness Impact Profile; c) submitted blood and urine samples for laboratory testing; and d) agreed to a review of their medical records. On the basis of this information, patients were assigned to one of four groups: those whose illnesses met the criteria of the 1988 CFS case definition (Group I); those whose fatigue or symptoms did not meet the criteria for CFS (Group II); those who had had an identifiable psychological disorder before onset of fatigue (Group III); and those who had evidence of other medical conditions that could have caused fatigue (Group IV). Patients assigned to Group III were further evaluated to determine the group to which they would have been assigned had psychological illness not been present, the epidemiologic characteristics of the illness and the frequency of symptoms among patients were evaluated, and the prevalence and incidence of CFS were estimated for each of the areas.

RESULTS: Of the 648 patients referred to the CFS surveillance system, 565 (87%) agreed to participate. Of these, 130 (23%) were assigned to Group I; 99 (18%), Group II; 235 (42%), Group III; and 101 (18%), Group IV. Of the 130 CFS patients, 125 (96%) were white and 111 (85%) were women. The mean age of CFS patients at the onset of illness was 30 years, and the mean duration of illness at the time of the interview was 6.7 years. Most (96%) CFS patients had completed high school, and 38% had graduated from college. The median annual household income/for CFS patients was $40,000. In the four cities, the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted prevalences of CFS for the 4-year surveillance period ranged from 4.0 to 8.7 per 100,000 population. The age-adjusted 4-year prevalences of CFS among white women ranged from 8.8 to 19.5 per 100,000 population.

INTERPRETATION: The results of this surveillance system were similar to those in previously published reports of CFS. Additional studies should be directed toward determining whether the data collected in this surveillance system were subject to selection bias (e.g., education and income levels might have influenced usage of the health-care system, and the populations of these four surveillance sites might not be representative of the U.S. population).

ACTIONS TAKEN: In February 1997, CDC began a large-scale, cross-sectional study at one surveillance site (Wichita) to describe more completely the magnitude and epidemiology of unexplained chronic fatigue and CFS.

 

Source: Reyes M, Gary HE Jr, Dobbins JG, Randall B, Steele L, Fukuda K, Holmes GP, Connell DG, Mawle AC, Schmid DS, Stewart JA, Schonberger LB, Gunn WJ,Reeves WC. Surveillance for chronic fatigue syndrome–four U.S. cities, September 1989 through August 1993. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1997 Feb 21;46(2):1-13. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046433.htm (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria in patients with other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue

Abstract:

To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) criteria in other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue, 297 consecutive outpatients under the age of 40 from a general medicine practice were studied. After excluding the three with chronic fatigue syndrome, the remaining 294 individuals were divided into those with unexplained chronic fatigue (64 patients) those without (the remaining 230 patients).

Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria noted to be significantly more common in those with unexplained fatigue compared to those without include: fever, painful adenopathy, muscle weakness, myalgia, headache, migratory arthralgia, neuropsychologic symptoms, and sleep disorder. Like chronic fatigue syndrome, unexplained chronic fatigue often started suddenly.

I conclude that the CFS criteria are noted more commonly than expected in other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue.

 

Source: Chester AC. Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria in patients with other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):45-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9201646

 

Descriptive epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome based on a nationwide survey in Japan

Abstract:

In order to clarify the epidemiological features of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), a nationwide survey was conducted using the Japanese version of the CDC Criteria prepared by the CFS Research Group of Japan. All clinical departments of internal medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry and neurology at university hospitals and at ordinary hospitals with 200 or more beds were surveyed.

Major results were as follows: (1) Period prevalence adjusted for response rate was 0.85 (0.63 for males and 1.02 for females) per 100,000 population during the year 1992; (2) Based on the first and final dates of hospital visits, the prevalences on January 1 of 1992 and 1993 were 0.40 and 0.60 per 100,000 population, respectively, suggesting an increasing trend; (3) Reported new cases during 1992 were 301, and the response adjusted-incidence was estimated to be 0.46 per 100,000 person-years; (4) The proportion of post-infectious CFS cases was 14.8% for both sexes, and tended to be slightly higher among females than males, but was not related to age. Three clusterings of two cases were reported.

 

Source: Minowa M, Jiamo M. Descriptive epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome based on a nationwide survey in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;6(2):75-80. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jea1991/6/2/6_2_75/_pdf (Full article)

 

Estimating rates of chronic fatigue syndrome from a community-based sample: a pilot study

Abstract:

Most of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) epidemiological studies have relied on physicians who refer patients having at least six months of chronic fatigue and other symptoms. However, there are a number of potential problems when using this method to derive prevalence statistics.

For example, some individuals with CFS might not have the economic resources to access medical care. Other individuals with CFS might be reluctant to use medical personnel, particularly if they have encountered physicians skeptical of the authenticity of their illness. In addition, physicians that are skeptical of the existence of CFS might not identify cases.

In the present pilot study, a random community sample (N = 1,031) was interviewed by telephone in order to identify and comprehensively evaluate individuals with symptoms of CFS and those who self-report having CFS. Different definitions of CFS were employed, and higher rates (0.2%) of CFS were found than in previous studies. Methodological benefits in using more rigorous epidemiological methods when estimating CFS prevalence rates are discussed.

 

Source: Jason LA, Taylor R, Wagner L, Holden J, Ferrari JR, Plioplys AV, Plioplys S, Lipkin D, Papernik M. Estimating rates of chronic fatigue syndrome from a community-based sample: a pilot study. Am J Community Psychol. 1995 Aug;23(4):557-68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8546110

 

Chronic fatigue and the chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence in a Pacific Northwest health care system

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the point prevalence of the chronic fatigue syndrome and unexplained debilitating chronic fatigue in a community-based sample of persons and to describe demographic, clinical, and psychosocial differences among those with the chronic fatigue syndrome, those with chronic fatigue, and healthy controls.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING: A health maintenance organization in Seattle, Washington.

PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 4000 members of the health maintenance organization was surveyed by mail for the presence of chronic fatigue.

MEASUREMENTS: Persons with chronic fatigue were evaluated using a questionnaire that requested information about medical history and fatigue and related symptoms; validated measures of functional status and psychological distress; a physical examination; and standardized blood tests. A structured psychiatric interview was done in persons who appeared to meet the original Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Participants completed self-report measures at 12 and 24 months. Those with chronic fatigue were reevaluated in person 1 year after study enrollment.

RESULTS: 3066 (77%) of the 4000 members surveyed responded. Chronic fatigue was reported by 590 persons (19%). Of these, 388 (66%) had a medical or psychiatric condition that could account for the fatigue. Of the 74 persons (37%) with chronic fatigue who were enrolled in the study, only 3 met the CDC criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome. The remaining 71 persons were designated as having chronic fatigue alone. Seventy-four healthy, age- and sex-matched controls who were drawn from the same sample but who denied having chronic fatigue were also studied. Demographic characteristics were similar in persons with the chronic fatigue syndrome, persons with chronic fatigue alone, and controls. Those with the chronic fatigue syndrome or chronic fatigue alone had more frequent cervical and axillary adenopathy, poorer functional status, and greater psychological distress than controls. Women and minorities were not overrepresented among cases with chronic fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS: Using different assumptions about the likelihood that persons who did not participate in the study had the chronic fatigue syndrome, the estimated crude point prevalence of the syndrome in this community ranged from 75 to 267 cases per 100,000 persons. The point prevalence of chronic fatigue alone was strikingly higher; it ranged from 1775 to 6321 cases per 100,000 persons.

 

Source: Buchwald D, Umali P, Umali J, Kith P, Pearlman T, Komaroff AL. Chronic fatigue and the chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence in a Pacific Northwest health care system. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 15;123(2):81-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7778839

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome in the community. Prevalence and associations

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a poorly understood condition, apparently related to both psychiatric disturbance and infectious illness. Little progress has been made in identifying aetiology, owing to a lack of epidemiological studies using case-definition criteria.

METHOD: A community postal survey of a random sample of over 1000 patients registered at a local health centre comprised a fatigue questionnaire and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ).

RESULTS: Total fatigue scores were modestly higher in women than men. Fatigue was most frequently attributed to psychosocial factors. Fatigue and GHQ scores were strongly correlated. Two men and two women satisfied British criteria for CFS, a prevalence of 0.56% (95% Cl 0.16-1.47%); three were probable psychiatric cases.

CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported sociodemographic associations of CFS may reflect medical referral patterns. A strong association exists with psychological morbidity, but relabelling CFS as a psychiatric disorder is not justified.

 

Source: Lawrie SM, Pelosi AJ. Chronic fatigue syndrome in the community. Prevalence and associations. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;166(6):793-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7663830

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Italian patients with persistent fatigue

Abstract:

Our study was carried out to determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) within a selected population of patients suffering from persistent fatigue. We studied subjects with recurrent or persistent fatigue lasting 6 months and fulfilling at least four minor Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for the diagnosis of CFS.

Evaluation included both clinical examination and laboratory testing. All subjects filled out a questionnaire specifically designed to gain information about the length and severity of symptoms, and patients with a previously diagnosed illness associated with fatigue were excluded.

The study was carried out at the Fatigue Clinic of an internal medicine unit (Clinica Medica I) of the University of Rome “La Sapienza”. Sixty-three subjects, residents of the Lazio region (central Italy), completed the diagnostic assessment. Alternative diagnoses were established in 37 (59%) of the 63 patients. A diagnosis of CFS based on the CDC criteria was established in only 6 cases.

In 2 subjects, CFS had appeared following infectious mononucleosis, and no definitive diagnosis could be formulated for 18 patients. In Italy, CFS seems to be an infrequent cause of severe and persistent fatigue in a selected population. Numerous morbid conditions may be responsible for a clinical picture closely resembling CFS. We recommend that patients suffering from fatigue be thoroughly evaluated.

 

Source: Conti F, Priori R, De Petrillo G, Rusconi AC, Arpino C, Valesini G. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in Italian patients with persistent fatigue. Ann Ital Med Int. 1994 Oct-Dec;9(4):219-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7893570