Category: Prevalence

A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Most previous estimates of the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have derived largely from treated populations, and have been biased by differential access to health care treatment linked with sex, ethnic identification, and socioeconomic status.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the point prevalence of CFS in an ethnically diverse random community sample.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 28,673 adults in Chicago, Ill, was screened by telephone, and those with CFS-like symptoms were medically evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSES: Self-report questionnaires, psychiatric evaluations, and complete medical examinations with laboratory testing were used to diagnose patients with CFS. Univariate and multivariate statistical techniques were used to delineate the overall rate of CFS in this population, and its relative prevalence was subcategorized by sex, ethnic identification, age, and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS: There was a 65.1% completion rate for the telephone interviews during the first phase of the study. Findings indicated that CFS occurs in about 0.42% (95% confidence interval, 0.29%-0.56%) of this random community-based sample. The highest levels of CFS were consistently found among women, minority groups, and persons with lower levels of education and occupational status.

CONCLUSIONS: Chronic fatigue syndrome is a common chronic health condition, especially for women, occurring across ethnic groups. Earlier findings suggesting that CFS is a syndrome primarily affecting white, middle-class patients were not supported by our findings.

 

Source: Jason LA, Richman JA, Rademaker AW, Jordan KM, Plioplys AV, Taylor RR, McCready W, Huang CF, Plioplys S. A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2129-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527290

 

The chronic fatigue and neurasthenia in the student population

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in community studies, primary care and other medical setting. In spite of a high frequency of fatigue, the incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome is very low. In this paper, we want to know the frequency of chronic fatigue syndrome and neurasthenia; we want to know the association between fatigue and depressive symptoms in students.

METHODS: We studied 277 medical student, administering: 1. a center for disease control questionnaire to assess major criteria and minor criteria of chronic fatigue syndrome, 2. ICD 10 criteria for the diagnoses of neurasthenia and 3. Beck depression inventory.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that the 37,55% of the subjects suffer fatigue. 9 subjects (3,25% of the total) meet the criteria of neurasthenia. 2 subjects (0,72% of the total) meet the chronic fatigue syndrome criteria. The depressive symptoms are most frequent in the subjects with fatigue, but we don’t know if they are the cause or the consequence of the fatigue. With the factorial analyses, we find that symptoms of physical fatigue, mental fatigue and cognitive difficulties are factor independent of each other.

 

Source: Mojarro Práxedes MD, Benjumea Pino P. The chronic fatigue and neurasthenia in the student population. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):14-21. [Article in Spanish] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10380143

 

Patients with fatigue in family practice: prevalence and treatment

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the prevalence and treatment of severe fatigue in general practice.

DESIGN: Secondary data analysis.

METHOD: By means of an episode-oriented morbidity registration by 54 GPs throughout the Netherlands over the period 1985-1994 it was established how often in the course of one year ‘fatigue’ was listed as the reason for consultation, what diagnoses were then made, how long episodes of care because of ‘fatigue’ lasted and what interventions took place (n = 93,297). Of the patients with a care episode because of ‘fatigue’ lasting at least 6 months, age, sex, comorbidity and consumption of care were established; for this purpose use was also made of a file containing data on 4 years in succession (n = 9630).

RESULTS: Per annum, 92 per 1000 listed patients consulted the GP because of fatigue. Somatic or psychic diagnoses were made in 27.7 per 1000 patients listed. The episode of care lasted 4 weeks at most in 86% and at least 6 months in approximately 4%. The GPs’ management of patients with ‘fatigue’ included physical examination in 63% and blood testing in 34%, conversation in 35%, prescription of medication in 24% and referral to a specialist in 3%. Of the 97 patients with fatigue lasting longer than 6 months, 61% had a chronic disease or psychic problems.

CONCLUSION: Fatigue is frequently encountered in general practice, but the estimate that one per 1000 listed patients meets the criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome looks a little high. It appears that GPs, in accordance with recommendations, mostly adopt a policy of wait and see.

 

Source: Kenter EG, Okkes IM. Patients with fatigue in family practice: prevalence and treatment. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Apr 10;143(15):796-801. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10347643

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in a community population in Japan

Abstract:

In order to know the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a community population in Japan, we analyzed data from a population-based interview survey. Two cases out of 137 respondents experienced chronic fatigue during a period of nine months, suffered from 50% or more reduction of daily activity due to fatigue and had no other physical or psychiatric diagnosis. Both of the two cases fulfilled the 1994 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria and the British criteria. The point and nine-month prevalence rates of CFS were both 1.5% (95% confidence intervals, 0.4-5.2%). None fulfilled the 1989 CDC criteria for CFS. The prevalence rate of CFS was higher than those in previous studies in the Western countries, suggesting a need for future research on cross-cultural differences in the definition, prevalence and symptomatology of CFS.

 

Source: Kawakami N, Iwata N, Fujihara S, Kitamura T. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in a community population in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1998 Sep;186(1):33-41. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/tjem/186/1/186_1_33/_article (Full article)

 

Estimating the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome among nurses

Abstract:

The present study assessed the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a sample of nurses. There is a paucity of studies on the prevalence of CFS in healthcare professionals.

Two samples of nurses were recruited through mailed questionnaires. Data were collected on demographic characteristics and symptoms. In addition from the sample, those nurses with CFS-like symptoms were more comprehensively evaluated using a structured clinical interview and reviewing their medical records. A physician review team estimated the prevalence of CFS to be 1,088 per 100,000.

These findings suggest that nurses might represent a high-risk group for this illness, possibly due to occupational stressors such as exposure to viruses in the work setting, stressful shift work that is disruptive to biologic rhythms, or to other possible stressors in the work settings (e.g., accidents).

 

Source: Jason LA, Wagner L, Rosenthal S, Goodlatte J, Lipkin D, Papernik M, Plioplys S, Plioplys AV. Estimating the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome among nurses. Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):91S-93S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9790488

 

The prevalence and morbidity of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective primary care study

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence and public health impact of chronic fatigue and chronic  fatigue syndrome in primary care patients in England.

METHODS: There were 2376 subjects, aged 18 through 45 years. Of 214 subjects who fulfilled criteria for chronic fatigue, 185 (86%) were interviewed in the case-control study. Measures included chronic fatigue, psychological morbidity, depression, anxiety, somatic symptoms, symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome, functional impairment, and psychiatric disorder.

RESULTS: The point prevalence of chronic fatigue was 11.3%, falling to 4.1% if comorbid psychological disorders were excluded. The point prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome was 2.6%, falling to 0.5% if comorbid psychological disorders were excluded. Rates did not vary by social class. After adjustment for psychological disorder, being female was modestly associated with chronic fatigue. Functional impairment was profound and was associated with psychological disorder.

CONCLUSIONS: Both chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome are common in primary care patients and represent a considerable public health burden. Selection bias may account for previous suggestions of a link with higher socioeconomic status.

 

Source: Wessely S, Chalder T, Hirsch S, Wallace P, Wright D. The prevalence and morbidity of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective primary care study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1449-55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380968/ (Full article)

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in 4 family practices in Leiden

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in general practice.

DESIGN: Descriptive.

SETTING: General practice and primary health care centres in Leyden region, the Netherlands.

METHOD: RNUH-LEO is a computerized database which contains the anonymous patient information of one general practice (with two practitioners) and four primary health care centres. The fourteen participating general practitioners were asked what International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) code they used to indicate a patient with chronic fatigue or with CFS. With these codes and with the code for depression patients were selected from the database. It then was determined whether these patients met the criteria of CFS by Holmes et al.

RESULTS: The general practitioners used 10 codes. Including the code for depression a total of 601 patients were preselected from a total of 23,000 patients in the database. Based on the information from the patients’ records in the database, 42 of the preselected patients were selected who might fulfill the Holmes’ criteria of CFS. According to the patients’ own general practitioner, 25 of the 42 patients would fulfil the Holmes’ criteria. The men:women ratio was 1:5. The prevalence of CFS in the population surveyed was estimated to be at least 1.1 per 1,000 patients.

 

Source: Versluis RG, de Waal MW, Opmeer C, Petri H, Springer MP. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in 4 family practices in Leiden. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1523-6. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543740

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands

Erratum in: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997 Sep 13;141(37):2686.

 

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and of primary fibromyalgia syndrome (PFS) in the Netherlands.

DESIGN: Questionnaire.

SETTING: Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to all the 6657 general practitioners in the Netherlands in order to inform them of the existence of CFS and to ask them if they had any CFS or PFS patients in their practices.

RESULTS: Sixty percent (n = 4027) of the general practitioners returned the questionnaire. Of all the general practitioners, 27% said they had no CFS patients, 23% said they had 1 CFS patient, while 21% had 2 CFS patients, and 29% said they had 3 or more CFS patients in their practice. Concerning PFS the results were 17% (no PFS patients), 18%, 18% and 47%, respectively. With a mean practice of 2486 patients per general practice, the estimated prevalence of CFS was 112 per 100,000 and that of PFS 157 per 100,000 persons. Of the CFS patients 81% were women and 55% were 25-44 years old; for PFS these figures were 87% and 48% respectively.

CONCLUSION: Extrapolation of the study results indicates that there are at least 17,000 CFS patients and 24,000 PFS patients in the Netherlands. The found prevalence is probably an under-estimation.

 

Source: Bazelmans E, Vercoulen JH, Galama JM, van Weel C, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1520-3. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543739

 

Surveillance for chronic fatigue syndrome–four U.S. cities, September 1989 through August 1993

Abstract:

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Although chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been recognized as a cause of morbidity in the United States, the etiology of CFS is unknown. In addition, information is incomplete concerning the clinical spectrum and prevalence of CFS in the United States.

REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: This report summarizes CFS surveillance data collected in four U.S. cities from September 1989 through August 1993.

DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: A physician-based surveillance system for CFS was established in four U.S. metropolitan areas: Atlanta, Georgia; Wichita, Kansas; Grand Rapids, Michigan; and Reno, Nevada. The objectives of this surveillance system were to collect descriptive epidemiologic information from patients who had unexplained chronic fatigue, estimate the prevalence and incidence of CFS in defined populations, and describe the clinical course of CFS. Patients aged > or = 18 years who had had unexplained, debilitating fatigue or chronic unwellness for at least 6 months were referred by their physicians to a designated health professional(s) in their area. Those patients who participated in the surveillance system a) were interviewed by the health professional(s); b) completed a self-administered questionnaire that included their demographic information, medical history, and responses to the Beck Depression Inventory, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, and the Sickness Impact Profile; c) submitted blood and urine samples for laboratory testing; and d) agreed to a review of their medical records. On the basis of this information, patients were assigned to one of four groups: those whose illnesses met the criteria of the 1988 CFS case definition (Group I); those whose fatigue or symptoms did not meet the criteria for CFS (Group II); those who had had an identifiable psychological disorder before onset of fatigue (Group III); and those who had evidence of other medical conditions that could have caused fatigue (Group IV). Patients assigned to Group III were further evaluated to determine the group to which they would have been assigned had psychological illness not been present, the epidemiologic characteristics of the illness and the frequency of symptoms among patients were evaluated, and the prevalence and incidence of CFS were estimated for each of the areas.

RESULTS: Of the 648 patients referred to the CFS surveillance system, 565 (87%) agreed to participate. Of these, 130 (23%) were assigned to Group I; 99 (18%), Group II; 235 (42%), Group III; and 101 (18%), Group IV. Of the 130 CFS patients, 125 (96%) were white and 111 (85%) were women. The mean age of CFS patients at the onset of illness was 30 years, and the mean duration of illness at the time of the interview was 6.7 years. Most (96%) CFS patients had completed high school, and 38% had graduated from college. The median annual household income/for CFS patients was $40,000. In the four cities, the age-, sex-, and race-adjusted prevalences of CFS for the 4-year surveillance period ranged from 4.0 to 8.7 per 100,000 population. The age-adjusted 4-year prevalences of CFS among white women ranged from 8.8 to 19.5 per 100,000 population.

INTERPRETATION: The results of this surveillance system were similar to those in previously published reports of CFS. Additional studies should be directed toward determining whether the data collected in this surveillance system were subject to selection bias (e.g., education and income levels might have influenced usage of the health-care system, and the populations of these four surveillance sites might not be representative of the U.S. population).

ACTIONS TAKEN: In February 1997, CDC began a large-scale, cross-sectional study at one surveillance site (Wichita) to describe more completely the magnitude and epidemiology of unexplained chronic fatigue and CFS.

 

Source: Reyes M, Gary HE Jr, Dobbins JG, Randall B, Steele L, Fukuda K, Holmes GP, Connell DG, Mawle AC, Schmid DS, Stewart JA, Schonberger LB, Gunn WJ,Reeves WC. Surveillance for chronic fatigue syndrome–four U.S. cities, September 1989 through August 1993. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1997 Feb 21;46(2):1-13. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046433.htm (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria in patients with other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue

Abstract:

To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) criteria in other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue, 297 consecutive outpatients under the age of 40 from a general medicine practice were studied. After excluding the three with chronic fatigue syndrome, the remaining 294 individuals were divided into those with unexplained chronic fatigue (64 patients) those without (the remaining 230 patients).

Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria noted to be significantly more common in those with unexplained fatigue compared to those without include: fever, painful adenopathy, muscle weakness, myalgia, headache, migratory arthralgia, neuropsychologic symptoms, and sleep disorder. Like chronic fatigue syndrome, unexplained chronic fatigue often started suddenly.

I conclude that the CFS criteria are noted more commonly than expected in other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue.

 

Source: Chester AC. Chronic fatigue syndrome criteria in patients with other forms of unexplained chronic fatigue. J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):45-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9201646