Managing chronic fatigue syndrome: overview and case study

Abstract:

1. The basic principles of envelope theory are explained. By not overexerting themselves, people with CFS can avoid the setbacks and relapses that commonly occur in response to overexertion while increasing their tolerance to activity. 2. By collecting time series data on fluctuations in energy levels, important clinical observations can be made in respect to a client’s unique condition and experience with CFS.

 

Source: Jason LA, Melrose H, Lerman A, Burroughs V, Lewis K, King CP, Frankenberry EL. AAOHN J. 1999 Jan;47(1):17-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10205371

 

How I manage chronic fatigue syndrome

About 12 years ago, I was asked to do a domicillary visit to see a 10 year old girl who in the spring had taken her secondary school entrance examination; caught a heavy cold with a persistent sore throat, which was taking a long time to clear; had a perpetual headache; dizziness on standing; extreme tiredness, which became worse if she tried to do anything; paraesthesia of the hands and feet intermittently; and disturbed sleep. Her general practitioner suggested postural hypotension, but I could find little abnormal except for some unsteadiness when she tried to walk. Routine haematological and biochemical tests were normal, as was computed tomography of her head. The physiotherapist that I referred her to reported that their attempts to mobilise her were actually making her worse, and wondered if she had a neuromuscular disease.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1717724/pdf/v079p00375.pdf

 

Source: Franklin A. How I manage chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1998 Oct;79(4):375-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1717724/pdf/v079p00375.pdf (Full article)

 

What we know about chronic fatigue syndrome and its relevance to the practicing physician

Abstract:

A number of recent reports have emphasized laboratory abnormalities, clinical tests, and therapeutic approaches that appear to have great promise in the evaluation and management of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Because of the heterogeneity of CFS, the cost of many of these assays and procedures, and the frequent lack of skilled consultants able to apply relevant sophisticated procedures, the solo healthcare provider is often left with uncertain options in patient management. This article summarizes current approaches to patient management, utilizing available information relevant to CFS.

 

Source: Levine PH. What we know about chronic fatigue syndrome and its relevance to the practicing physician. Am J Med. 1998 Sep 28;105(3A):100S-103S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9790490.

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Dilemmas in diagnosis and clinical management

Abstract:

There has been a resurgence of interest in recent years in both chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. These perplexing and common clinical conditions are a source of significant patient morbidity and frame one of the more enduring dilemmas of contemporary Western medical thought, namely the ambiguous interface between mind and body. In this article, the current definitions are reviewed, and a framework for an emerging psychobiological model of these syndromes is presented. These issues are synthesized into a pragmatic approach to clinical management.

 

Source: Demitrack MA. Chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Dilemmas in diagnosis and clinical management. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1998 Sep;21(3):671-92, viii. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9774804

 

Indications for management in long-term, physically unexplained fatigue symptoms

Abstract:

In meetings arranged by the minister of Public Health, Welfare and Sports between general practitioners and specialists concerning chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), suggestions for the diagnosis, treatment and assistance and support of patients with protracted physically unexplained fatiguesymptoms, were established in the light of current scientific insight.

The term ‘CFS’ is applicable in cases of fatigue complaints, of at least 6 months’ standing, reported by the patient himself and evaluated medically, for which no physical explanation has been found and which cause considerable disabilities in professional social and/or personal functioning.

The management depends on the duration of the illness. A distinction is made between an acute phase (up to one month after the first consultation; the policy is mostly expectative), a subacute phase (until 6 months after the onset of the complaints and disabilities; the management is aimed at making the patient accept the condition and persuading him or her to make an effort to promote health) and a chronic phase (from 6 months after the onset of the complaints and disabilities; the management is aimed at health-promoting behaviour and cognitions). Further (laboratory) examinations are useful only if the symptoms have not disappeared after one month (this is the case in approximately 20% of the patients); such examinations may be useful in older patients earlier.

It is important that the CFS patient learns to realize that it is useless to continue to spend energy on searching for causes and possible therapies, but that he should try to promote his own health, for instance by means of a quantified programme of activities linked to a time schedule (instead of to a level of fatigue).

Comment in:

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

Chronic fatigue syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997

 

Source: van der Meer JW, Rijken PM, Bleijenberg G, Thomas S, Hinloopen RJ, Bensing JM. Indications for management in long-term, physically unexplained fatigue symptoms.Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1516-9. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543738

Managing patients suffering from acute and chronic fatigue

Abstract:

The subjective experience of fatigue is common and debilitating, and affects many individuals in various healthcare settings. The condition requires adequate assessment, innovative planning and interventions, and patient-centred evaluations by the nursing profession. Fatigue, whether acute or chronic, needs to be recognized as a true and valid condition in order for treatment to be successful. There are many considerations to be taken into account when working with the fatigued, and this article suggests how the areas needing most attention may be tackled. Chronic fatigue and acute fatigue can be quite different conditions, requiring different approaches, of which nurses need to be aware. In order to reduce the effects of fatigue on the client, nurses need to fully understand the factors surrounding the phenomenon of fatigue to provide expert care, to help educate the patient, and improve the quality of life.

 

Source: Cook NF, Boore JR. Managing patients suffering from acute and chronic fatigue. Br J Nurs. 1997 Jul 24-Aug 13;6(14):811-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9283306

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update for clinicians in primary care

Abstract:

Cases of long-standing (6 months or longer) fatigue that are not explained by an existing medical or psychiatric diagnosis are referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). CFS is a condition of unknown etiology that presents with a complex array of symptoms in patients with diverse health histories. A diagnosis of CFS is largely dependent upon ruling out other organic and psychologic causes of fatigue. CFS can present the clinician with a unique set of challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. A review of recent research suggests that the management of CFS requires an individualized approach for each patient. An historic overview of the condition is presented along with current theories of causation, diagnosis considerations, symptom management, and health promotion strategies.

 

Source: Houde SC, Kampfe-Leacher R. Chronic fatigue syndrome: an update for clinicians in primary care. Nurse Pract. 1997 Jul;22(7):30, 35-6, 39-40 passim. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9253014

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have become increasingly recognized as a common clinical problem, yet one that physicians often find difficult to manage. In this review we suggest a practical, pragmatic, evidence-based approach to the assessment and initial management of the patient whose presentation suggests this diagnosis. The basic principles are simple and for each aspect of management we point out both potential pitfalls and strategies to overcome them.

The first, and most important task is to develop mutual trust and collaboration. The second is to complete an adequate assessment, the aim of which is either to make a diagnosis of CFS or to identify an alternative cause for the patient’s symptoms. The history is most important and should include a detailed account of the symptoms, the associated disability, the choice of coping strategies, and importantly, the patient’s own understanding of his/her illness. The assessment of possible comorbid psychiatric disorders such as depression or anxiety is mandatory.

When the physician is satisfied that no alternative physical or psychiatric disorder can be found to explain symptoms, we suggest that a firm and positive diagnosis of CFS be made.

The treatment of CFS requires that the patient is given a positive explanation of the cause of his symptoms, emphasizing the distinction among factors that may have predisposed them to develop the illness (lifestyle, work stress, personality), triggered the illness (viral infection, life events) and perpetuated the illness (cerebral dysfunction, sleep disorder, depression, inconsistent activity, and misunderstanding of the illness and fear of making it worse).

Interventions are then aimed to overcoming these illness-perpetuating factors. The role of antidepressants remains uncertain but may be tried on a pragmatic basis. Other medications should be avoided. The only treatment strategies of proven efficacy are cognitive behavioral ones. The most important starting point is to promote a consistent pattern of activity, rest, and sleep, followed by a gradual return to normal activity; ongoing review of any ‘catastrophic’ misinterpretation of symptoms and the problem solving of current life difficulties.

We regard chronic fatigue syndrome as important not only because it represents potentially treatable disability and suffering but also because it provides an example for the positive management of medically unexplained illness in general.

 

Source: Sharpe M, Chalder T, Palmer I, Wessely S. Chronic fatigue syndrome. A practical guide to assessment and management. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1997 May;19(3):185-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218987

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

“Biopsychosocial approach” may be difficult in practice

This week a joint working group of the Royal Colleges of Physicians, Psychiatrists, and General Practitioners in Britain issued a report on chronic fatigue syndrome.’ The report constitutes, arguably, the finest contemporary position statement in the field, and physicians and patients are well advised to read it, but it is sure to engender disagreement on both sides of the Atlantic.

The term chronic fatigue syndrome is relatively new. It first appeared in the 1988 proposal by the United States Centers for Disease Control to formalise a working case definition for symptoms that had been variously named and attributed to numerous causes for over two centuries. Through field testing, the case definition was revised and simplified in 1994. In essence, it classifies a constellation of prolonged and debilitat ing symptoms as worthy of medical attention and study (see box). Related case criteria were developed by consensus at Oxford in 199 .4 Neither the American nor the Oxford criteria assume the syndrome to be a single nosological entity. As the royal colleges’ report concludes, the term chronic fatigue syndrome is appropriate because it carries none of the inaccurate aetiological implications of the alternative acronyms-myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and immune dysfunction syndrome.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359057/pdf/bmj00562-0007.pdf

 

Source: Straus SE. Chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):831-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2359057/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by chronic, disabling fatigue, impaired concentration, muscle pain, and other somatic symptoms. The conceptual difficulties associated with all medically unexplained illnesses contribute to the controversy surrounding CFS, which has centered around whether it is best regarded as a medical or as a psychiatric condition. Clinically, such an approach is not helpful, and current research suggests that both pathophysiologic changes and psychosocial factors are important. Pragmatic management based on a detailed assessment of the individual is outlined.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1996 Sep;19(3):549-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8856816