Category: Management

A Short-Term Pacing Intervention in People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Pilot Study in Portugal

Abstract:

Background and Objectives: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) remains a disease without a curative treatment. Hence, patient healthcare is mostly based on symptom management and the application of coping strategies, such as pacing. In this strategy, patients learn how to plan their daily physical and cognitive activities according to their perceived energy reservoir (or envelop). However, there is currently no evidence for the feasibility of pacing in Portugal, where ME/CFS is not well recognized.

Materials and Methods: We implemented a 8-week pacing program in Portuguese patients with an official diagnosis of ME/CFS. We focused on recruitment feasibility, protocol adherence, and patient acceptability, with secondary exploratory analysis of pre- and post-intervention variations in the Chalder’s fatigue questionnaire and SF36 physical functioning scores.

Results: We were able to recruit thirteen patients for the study. The patients attended, on average, seven out of the eight sessions expected per participant, with the majority adhering to the research protocol (n=7;53.8%). In a post-intervention survey, the respondents (n=10) considered that the intervention addressed the specific needs of people living with ME/CFS. Concerning the outcome trends, the average fatigue score decreased from 27.5 at baseline to 17.7 after the intervention. The mean physical functioning score increased from 24.6 to 31.7.

Conclusions: This exploratory study supported the feasibility of benchmark studies in Portugal with increased sample size, longer interventions, and including a control group (e.g., specialized medical care), with which eventual placebo effects can be better accounted for.

Source: Ribeiro V, Azevedo P, Westermeier F, Sepúlveda N. A Short-Term Pacing Intervention in People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Pilot Study in Portugal. Medicina (Kaunas). 2026 Feb 6;62(2):331. doi: 10.3390/medicina62020331. PMID: 41752730. https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/62/2/331 (Full text)

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management

Abstract:

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) has garnered substantial scientific and clinical interest, due to its rising global prevalence and significant pathophysiological overlap with post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS). This review systematically elucidates the prevailing diagnostic criteria, summarizes recent advances in understanding the potential pathophysiological mechanisms, and evaluates pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, and symptom-based assessment and management strategies.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from inception to August 2025.

Results: Current diagnostic frameworks for ME/CFS rely primarily on clinical symptomatology and lack definitive biomarkers. Immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation are central to its pathology. Pharmacological management includes immunomodulatory treatments, antioxidant therapies, mitochondrial support, and neuroinflammation intervention. Non-pharmacological strategies such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), activity pacing, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) complement biomedical approaches by alleviating symptom severity and promoting energy conservation.

Conclusion: Among these approaches, CBT serves as an adjunctive therapy for symptom management rather than a curative one, whereas GET is contraindicated due to its potential for harm. Comprehensive clinical assessment and management of ME/CFS requires being symptom oriented and the recognition of individual differences. Recommended directions for future research include developing biomarker-based diagnostic tools, optimizing combination therapies that target multiple pathophysiological pathways simultaneously, and integrating real-world data and digital health technologies for precise monitoring and management of ME/CFS.

Source: Fan J, Jiao J, Chang HQ, Zhong DL, Liu XB, Li J, Chen LM, Jin RJ, Wu X. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): diagnosis and management. J Transl Med. 2025 Dec 9. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07506-y. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41366804. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-025-07506-y

Wearable technology in the management of complex chronic illness: preliminary survey results on self-reported outcomes

Abstract:

Introduction: Complex chronic illnesses like Long Covid (LC) and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) are marked by fluctuating symptoms, often exacerbated by physical, cognitive, or emotional exertion in a phenomenon known as post-exertional malaise (PEM). Home monitoring technologies offer potential benefits by enabling individuals to track symptoms and biometrics, aiding in disease self-management. However, the general effectiveness of such tools is still unknown.

Methods: A random sample of users of the Visible mobile application (Visible Plus; requires both the armband and paid subscription), aged 18 or older and with self-identified complex chronic illnesses such as LC or ME/CFS, were invited to complete an online survey regarding the impact of the app on their chronic disease self-management. Descriptive statistics related to the responses were analyzed and reported.

Results: The survey was distributed to 2,636 people, with 1,301 participants responding (49.3% response rate). The average age was 46 years. 82% of respondents were female, 8% were male, 8% were non-binary, and 2% preferred not to say or preferred to self-describe. Participants self-identified as having ME/CFS only (n = 534, 42%), LC only (n = 396, 31%), ME/CFS and LC (n = 236, 18%), or another illness (n = 122, 10%). Of the n = 2,636 randomly selected subscribers, the mostly commonly listed “other illnesses” were Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS, 6%), fibromyalgia (5.2%), Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS; 1.7%) and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS, 1.2%). Of those with at least 30 days of data, 77% reported seeing an improvements associated with app use, corresponding to 23% of all invited users, 85% (corresponding to 29% of all invited users) reported feeling somewhat (53%) or significantly (32%), and 94% (corresponding to 33% of all invited users) reported a better understanding of their energy budget.

Discussion: Home-monitoring based mobile applications are feasible and acceptable for a motivated subgroup of people with energy-limiting complex chronic illnesses, and are associated with self-reported benefits in energy management and participation in daily activities. The findings of this study should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating and do not represent clinically significant effects, underscoring the need for randomized controlled trials to formally evaluate efficacy. Future studies should incorporate a comparison group to better differentiate intervention effects from improvements gained through lived experience.

Source: Sawyer Abbey , Preston Rory , Leeming Harry , Martin-Fuller Luke , Proal Amy , Putrino David. Wearable technology in the management of complex chronic illness: preliminary survey results on self-reported outcomes. Frontiers in Digital Health, Volume 7 – 2025. DOI=10.3389/fdgth.2025.1662255. ISSN=2673-253X https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1662255/full (Full text)

Attenuating Post-exertional Malaise in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long-COVID: Is Blood Lactate Monitoring the Answer?

Highlights:

  • Lactate monitoring has the potential to extend beyond applied sports settings and could be used to monitor the physiologic and pathophysiological responses to external and internal stimuli in chronic disease areas such as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) and Post-Covid syndrome or Long Covid.
  • It is applicable due to the recurrent, episodic and often disabling post-exertional symptom exacerbation (PESE) otherwise referred to as post-exertional malaise (PEM) which is a characteristic symptom of ME/CFS and Long Covid that can last for days and/or weeks.
  • Lactate monitoring presents an opportunity to support those living with ME/CFS and Long COVID, by allowing patients and practitioners to determine the intensity and anaerobic contribution to everyday tasks which could aid the development of pacing strategies that prevent PEM/PESE.

Source: Faghy PMA, Ashton DRE, McNeils MR, Arena R, Duncan DR. Attenuating Post-exertional Malaise in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long-COVID: Is Blood Lactate Monitoring the Answer? Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Mar 30:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102554. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38561114. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0146280624001932

NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence

Abstract:

In 2021, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence produced an evidence-based guideline on the diagnosis and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a disabling long-term condition of unknown cause. The guideline provides clear support for people living with ME/CFS, their families and carers, and for clinicians. A recent opinion piece published in the journal suggested that there were anomalies in the processing and interpretation of the evidence when developing the guideline and proposed eight areas where these anomalies were thought to have occurred. We outline how these opinions are based on a misreading or misunderstanding of the guideline process or the guideline, which provides a balanced and reasoned approach to the diagnosis and management of this challenging condition.

Source: Barry PW, Kelley K, Tan T, et al. NICE guideline on ME/CFS: robust advice based on a thorough review of the evidence. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry Published Online First: 28 February 2024. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-332731 https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/early/2024/02/28/jnnp-2023-332731 (Full text)

Diagnosis and Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a chronic neurologic disease often preceded by infection. There has been increased interest in ME/CFS recently because of its significant overlap with the post-COVID syndrome (long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID), with several studies estimating that half of patients with post-COVID syndrome fulfill ME/CFS criteria. Our concise review describes a generalist approach to ME/CFS, including diagnosis, evaluation, and management strategies.

Source: Grach SL, Seltzer J, Chon TY, Ganesh R. Diagnosis and Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Oct;98(10):1544-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.032. PMID: 37793728. https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(23)00402-0/fulltext (Full text)

A Scoping Review of ‘Pacing’ for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic

Abstract:

Background Controversy over treatment for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a barrier to appropriate treatment. Energy management or pacing is a prominent coping strategy for people with ME/CFS that involves regulating activity to avoid post exertional malaise (PEM), the worsening of symptoms after an activity. Until now, characteristics of pacing, and the effects on patients’ symptoms had not been systematically reviewed. This is problematic as the most common approach to pacing, pacing prescription, and the pooled efficacy of pacing was unknown. Collating evidence may help advise those suffering with similar symptoms, including long COVID, as practitioners would be better informed on methodological approaches to adopt, pacing implementation, and expected outcomes.

Objectives In this scoping review of the literature, we aggregated type of, and outcomes of, pacing in people with ME/CFS.

Eligibility criteria Original investigations concerning pacing were considered in participants with ME/CFS.

Sources of evidence Six electronic databases (PubMed, Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) were searched; and websites MEPedia, Action for ME, and ME Action were also searched for grey literature.

Methods A scoping review was conducted. Review selection and characterisation was performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms.

Results Authors reviewed 177 titles and abstracts, resulting in included 17 studies: three randomised control trials (RCTs); one uncontrolled trial; one interventional case series; one retrospective observational study; two prospective observational studies; four cross-sectional observational studies; and five cross-sectional analytical studies. Studies included variable designs, durations, and outcome measures. In terms of pacing administration, studies used educational sessions and diaries for activity monitoring. Eleven studies reported benefits of pacing, four studies reported no effect, and two studies reported a detrimental effect in comparison to the control group.

Conclusions Highly variable study designs and outcome measures, allied to poor to fair methodological quality resulted in heterogenous findings and highlights the requirement for more research examining pacing. Looking to the long COVID pandemic, future studies should be RCTs utilising objectively quantified digitised pacing, over a longer duration of examination, using the core outcome set for patient reported outcome measures.

Source: Nilihan E.M. Sanal-Hayes, Marie Mclaughlin, Lawrence D. Hayes, Jacqueline L. Mair, Jane Ormerod, David Carless, Natalie Hilliard, Rachel Meach, Joanne Ingram, Nicholas F. Sculthorpe. A Scoping Review of ‘Pacing’ for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic. medRxiv 2023.08.10.23293935; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935v1.full-text (Full text)

eLearning improves allied health professionals’ knowledge and confidence to manage medically unexplained chronic fatigue states: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of eLearning by allied health professionals on improving the knowledge and confidence to manage people with medically unexplained chronic fatigue states (FS).

Methods: Using a parallel randomized controlled trial design, participants were randomized 1:1 to a 4-week eLearning or wait-list control group. Knowledge and self-reported confidence in clinical skills to implement a therapeutic intervention for patients with FS were assessed at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Secondary outcomes (adherence and satisfaction with online education, knowledge retention) were also assessed. Data was analyzed using intention-to-treat.

Results: There were 239 participants were randomized (eLearning n = 119, control n = 120), of whom 101 (85%) eLearning and 107 (89%) control participants completed baseline assessments and were included in the analysis. Knowledge (out of 100) improved significantly more in the eLearning group compared to the control group [mean difference (95% CI) 8.6 (5.9 to 11.4), p < 0.001]. Knowledge was reduced in the eLearning group at follow-up but was still significantly higher than baseline [6.0 (3.7 to 8.3), p < 0.001]. Median change (out of 5) in confidence in clinical skills to implement the FS intervention was also significantly greater in the eLearning group compared to the control group [knowledge: eLearning (1.2), control (0); clinical skills: eLearning (1), control (0.1); both p < 0.001)]. Average time spent on the eLearning program was 8.8 h. Most participants (80%) rated the lesson difficulty as at the “right level”, and 91% would recommend it to others.

Conclusions: eLearning increased knowledge and confidence to manage FS amongst allied health professionals and was well-accepted.

Registration: ACTRN12616000296437 https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370222&isReview=true.

Source: Jones MD, Casson SM, Barry BK, Li SH, Valenzuela T, Cassar J, Lamanna C, Lloyd AR, Sandler CX. eLearning improves allied health professionals’ knowledge and confidence to manage medically unexplained chronic fatigue states: A randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2023 Aug 16;173:111462. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111462. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37619433. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399923003197 (Full text)

A Scoping Review of Pacing for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic

Abstract:

Background: Controversy over treatment for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a barrier to appropriate treatment. Energy management or pacing is a prominent coping strategy for people with ME/CFS that involves regulating activity to avoid post exertional malaise (PEM), the worsening of symptoms after an activity. Until now, characteristics of pacing, and the effects on patients’ symptoms had not been systematically reviewed. This is problematic as the most common approach to pacing, pacing prescription, and the pooled efficacy of pacing was unknown. Collating evidence may help advise those suffering with similar symptoms, including long COVID, as practitioners would be better informed on methodological approaches to adopt, pacing implementation, and expected outcomes.

Objectives: In this scoping review of the literature, we aggregated type of, and outcomes of, pacing in people with ME/CFS. Eligibility criteria: Original investigations concerning pacing were considered in participants with ME/CFS. Sources of evidence: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) were searched; and websites MEPedia, Action for ME, and ME Action were also searched for grey literature.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Review selection and characterisation was performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms.

Results: Authors reviewed 177 titles and abstracts, resulting in included 17 studies: three randomised control trials (RCTs); one uncontrolled trial; one interventional case series; one retrospective observational study; two prospective observational studies; four cross-sectional observational studies; and five cross-sectional analytical studies. Studies included variable designs, durations, and outcome measures. In terms of pacing administration, studies used educational sessions and diaries for activity monitoring. Eleven studies reported benefits of pacing, four studies reported no effect, and two studies reported a detrimental effect in comparison to the control group.

Conclusions: Highly variable study designs and outcome measures, allied to poor to fair methodological quality resulted in heterogenous findings and highlights the requirement for more research examining pacing. Looking to the long COVID pandemic, future studies should be RCTs utilising objectively quantified digitised pacing, over a longer duration of examination, using the core outcome set for patient reported outcome measures.

Source: Nilihan Sanal-Hayes, Marie Mclaughlin, Lawrence D D Hayes, Jacqueline Mair, Jane Ormerod, David Carless, Natalie Hilliard, Rachel Meach, Joanne Ingram, Nicholas Sculthorpe. A Scoping Review of Pacing for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic. medRxiv 2023.08.10.23293935; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935v1 (Full text available as PDF file)

A technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID and other fatiguing illnesses within a federally qualified health center: protocol for a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement professional cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract:

Background: The clinical burden of Long COVID, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and other post-infectious fatiguing illnesses (PIFI) is increasing. There is a critical need to advance understanding of the effectiveness and sustainability of innovative approaches to clinical care of patients having these conditions.

Methods: We aim to assess the effectiveness of a Long COVID and Fatiguing Illness Recovery Program (LC&FIRP) in a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement, professional cluster, randomized controlled trial in which 20 consenting clinicians across primary care clinics in a Federally Qualified Health Center system in San Diego, CA, will be randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either participate in (1) weekly multi-disciplinary team-based case consultation and peer-to-peer sharing of emerging best practices (i.e., teleECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes)) with monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses or (2) monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses alone (a control group); 856 patients will be assigned to participating clinicians (42 patients per clinician). Patient outcomes will be evaluated according to the study arm of their respective clinicians. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes will be measured at 3- and 6-months post-baseline for clinicians and every 3-months post assignment to a participating clinician for patients. The primary patient outcome is change in physical function measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29. Analyses of differences in outcomes at both the patient and clinician levels will include a linear mixed model to compare change in outcomes from baseline to each post-baseline assessment between the randomized study arms. A concurrent prospective cohort study will compare the LC&FIRP patient population to the population enrolled in a university health system. Longitudinal data analysis approaches will allow us to examine differences in outcomes between cohorts.

Discussion: We hypothesize that weekly teleECHO sessions with monthly interactive webinars and quarterly short courses will significantly improve clinician- and patient-level outcomes compared to the control group. This study will provide much needed evidence on the effectiveness of a technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID, ME/CFS, and other PIFI within a federally qualified health center.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05167227 . Registered on December 22, 2021.

Source: Godino JG, Samaniego JC, Sharp SP, Taren D, Zuber A, Armistad AJ, Dezan AM, Leyba AJ, Friedly JL, Bunnell AE, Matthews E, Miller MJ, Unger ER, Bertolli J, Hinckley A, Lin JS, Scott JD, Struminger BB, Ramers C. A technology-enabled multi-disciplinary team-based care model for the management of Long COVID and other fatiguing illnesses within a federally qualified health center: protocol for a two-arm, single-blind, pragmatic, quality improvement professional cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 12;24(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07550-3. PMID: 37573421. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-023-07550-3 (Full text)