The chronic fatigue syndrome: a reappraisal and unifying hypothesis

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is one of the most common medical problems in Western countries. Research work in virology, immunology, metabolic medicine and psychiatry in this area is reviewed and a disease model proposed. The chronic fatigue syndrome can be considered as a continuum ranging from cases with chronic viraemia on the one hand to instances of frank psychiatric illness on the other. In the majority of patients the fully evolved syndrome may involve an interaction of premorbid factors (psychological, immunological), environmental trigger factors (virus) and enhancing factors (emotional response to illness). A Venn diagram is a convenient way of expressing this concept.

 

Source: Byrne E. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a reappraisal and unifying hypothesis. Clin Exp Neurol. 1991;28:128-38. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1821821

 

Mitochondrial abnormalities in the postviral fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

We have examined the muscle biopsies of 50 patients who had postviral fatigue syndrome (PFS) for from 1 to 17 years. We found mild to severe atrophy of type II fibres in 39 biopsies, with a mild to moderate excess of lipid.

On ultrastructural examination, 35 of these specimens showed branching and fusion of mitochondrial cristae. Mitochondrial degeneration was obvious in 40 of the biopsies with swelling, vacuolation, myelin figures and secondary lysosomes. These abnormalities were in obvious contrast to control biopsies, where even mild changes were rarely detected.

The findings described here provide the first evidence that PFS may be due to a mitochondrial disorder precipitated by a virus infection.

 

Source: Behan WM1, More IA, Behan PO. Mitochondrial abnormalities in the postviral fatigue syndrome. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;83(1):61-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1792865

 

Dual infections of the immune system in patients with chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection mimicking chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The etiologic bases of CFS are undetermined at the present time. It is very important to distinguish the patients with CFS as defined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition of Holmes et al. from patients with physical and laboratory findings suggesting dual infections and/or underlying immunodeficiency. Particularly fruitful might be a longitudinal immunovirologic study of patients who exhibit CFS following a well-documented viral infection.

 

Source: Purtilo DT. Dual infections of the immune system in patients with chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection mimicking chronic fatigue syndrome. Can Dis Wkly Rep. 1991 Jan;17 Suppl 1E:29-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1669350

 

Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed

Comment on: Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed. [CMAJ. 1990]

 

As a physician with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) since the early days of the Lake Tahoe, Calif., outbreak, in 1984, I read Olga Lechky’s report (Can MedAssoc J 1990; 143: 413- 415) with particular interest. It was refreshing to hear Dr. Richard Proschek, assistant medical director of Mutual Life of Canada, admit that the industry’s attitude to CFS is one of hostility. Unfortunately for the thousands of severely debilitated patients with the condition this scepticism and hostility are not restricted to that industry, which in many instances has behaved with compassion and responsibility toward its clients. The hostile viewpoint is also widely prevalent in the medical profession and is often freely communicated to patients.

To hold that CFS is not a real disease it is necessary to imagine that in 1984 people of all ages began to manufacture a condition with clearly defined symptoms that begins as a flu-like illness, persists and evolves. How many diseases fit this description? When, before 1984, did depression present so? Can it be true that thousands of our brightest citizens, including children, Olympic aspirants, several members of some families, alarming numbers of teachers, 50% of a symphony orchestra and 10% of the population of Incline Village, Nev., abruptly and concurrently elected to drop out of life, then continued to complain in the face of widespread scepticism, hostility, marital breakdown and, frequently, isolation? What, other than an infectious agent, could cause this?

Proschek’s bias arises from his position. Physicians in practice, however, see many CFS patients who have no insurance or are quite wealthy. The degree to which imagination must extend to accommodate a diagnosis of secondary gain in these people is beyond belief. Many physicians lament the lack of a blood test for CFS. What, pray, is the test for malingering, a diagnosis we seem to have no difficulty making?

You can read the rest of this letter here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1452931/pdf/cmaj00229-0013.pdf

 

Source: Sean J. O’Sullivan, MD. Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed. CMAJ. 1990 Dec 15;143(12):1283-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1452931/

 

Is chronic fatigue syndrome synonymous with effort syndrome?

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), including myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and postviral syndrome (PVS), is a term used today to describe a condition of incapacity for making and sustaining effort, associated with a wide range of symptoms. None of the reviews of CFS has provided a proper consideration of the effort syndrome caused by chronic habitual hyperventilation.

In 100 consecutive patients, whose CFS had been attributed to ME or PVS, the time course of their illness and the respiratory psychophysiological studies were characteristic of chronic habitual hyperventilation in 93.

It is suggested that the labels ‘CFS’, ‘ME’ or ‘PVS’ should be withheld until chronic habitual hyperventilation – for which conventional rehabilitation is available – has been definitively excluded.

 

Source: Rosen SD, King JC, Wilkinson JB, Nixon PG. Is chronic fatigue syndrome synonymous with effort syndrome? J R Soc Med. 1990 Dec;83(12):761-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2125315

 

Hyperventilation disorders

Hyperventilation syndrome falls into the shadowy hinterland between physiology, psychiatry, psychology and medicine. In this respect it joins a long list of syndromes from the past of which effort syndrome is just one example. Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and postviral fatigue syndrome are recent attempts to impose a unitary definition on what is probably a complex interaction between many different organic and psychological factors. The recent introduction of terms such as somatization disorder recognize this aetiological heterogeneity (1).

The symptoms of hypocapnia induced by voluntary overbreathing were first described by Haldane in 1908, the first case of spontaneous hyperventilation by Goldman in 1922 (2), and the term Hyperventilation Syndrome was first used by Dalton, Kerr and Gliebe in 1937 to describe patients with symptoms both of hypocapnia and anxiety (3). Since then, many different interpretations of this term have appeared in the literature encompassing patients with widely different aetiologies. Much research in this area is bedevilled by failure to define clearly the detailed characteristics of the patients studied; by the assumption of definitions for which there is no universal agreement; and by the presentation of scientifically unsound data lacking in rigorous quantitative proof and with perpetuation of circular arguments. The papers in this issue of the journal make a commendable attempt to reintroduce the reader to the historical perspectives of this subject and to clarify some of the issues, but unfortunately also have some of the shortcomings common to so many of the studies in this very difficult field.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292944/pdf/jrsocmed00129-0005.pdf

 

Source: Gardner W. Hyperventilation disorders. J R Soc Med. 1990 Dec;83(12):755-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292944/

 

The chronic fatigue syndrome. A multifactorial approach and the treatment possibilities

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome is a poorly defined symptoms complex characterized primarily by chronic or recurrent debilitating fatigue and various combinations of other symptoms, including psychological symptoms, sore throat, lymph node pain, headache, myalgia, arthralgias. Psychological disturbances, ranging from mild depression or anxiety to severe behavioral abnormalities, are always present. Chronic fatigue syndrome is the name that more accurately describes this symptom complex of unknown cause.

A viral aetiology has long been hypothesized: many viruses are potential candidates, including any of the 23 Coxsackie A or 6 Coxsackie B viruses, herpes viruses, particularly Epstein-Barr virus and varicella. These studies, though interesting, remain unconvincing because of methodological flaws such as a poor case definition and inadequate control groups.

This syndrome may represent an infection by a yet unidentified virus. It is more likely due to an abnormal immune response toward different intracellular pathogens. There is no treatment to ameliorate the chronic fatigue syndrome. Epidemiological studies are essential with explicit operational case definition before progress can be made in the management of this distressing disorder.

 

Source: Pinardi G, Scarlato G. The chronic fatigue syndrome. A multifactorial approach and the treatment possibilities. Recenti Prog Med. 1990 Dec;81(12):773-7. [Article in Italian] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2075278

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome

This is a syndrome that may or may not follow what appears to be an acute infectious illness, and may occur in epidemic or sporadic forms consisting of persisting or relapsing ‘fatigue’ or easy fatiguability of at least six months’ duration, for which no other cause is apparent. It is associated with a number of other variable features including mild fever, sore throat, painful lymph nodes, headaches, muscle pain, migratory arthralgia, photophobia, forgetfulness, irritability, concentration difficulties, depression, and sleep disturbance. It has been recognised since the early 1930s and known by a wide variety of names including Iceland disease, Royal Free disease, epidemic neuromyasthenia, myalgic encephalomyelitis, postviral syndrome, and more recently chronic fatigue syndrome.( 1 )

Although predominantly a disorder of young adults, it has been recognised in children with either an acute or insidious onset. At least 10-15 cases of the sporadic form are seen each year at the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, with lethargy, headache, abdominal pain, and subjective muscular weakness being the most common manifestations. Abnormal physical findings are usually conspicuous by their absence but occasionally pharyngeal injection, tender cervical lymph nodes, and muscle tenderness are present. A proportion of patients have an ‘atypical’ lymphocytosis, increased plasma creatine phosphokinase activity, circulating immune complexes, minor changes on electroencephalography and electromyelography, increased serum Epstein-Barr and Coxsackie B antibody titres, and VPI antigen in serum. Some workers have demonstrated enteroviral RNA in muscle biopsy material.(2 )Although an infective aetiology has been invoked, however, the full nature of the illness remains obscure and is probably a mixture of an initial infective insult followed by or associated with an important psychological component.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1792622/pdf/archdisch00656-0012.pdf

 

Source:  Lask B, Dillon MJ. Postviral fatigue syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Nov;65(11):1198. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1792622/

 

Myalgic encephalomyelitis: an alternative theory

Note: in this editorial published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine ,Volume 83, August 1990, Dr. Wilson discusses the role allergy plays in the development of post-viral fatigue syndromes.

 

In his discussion paper on myalgic encephalomyelitis (April 1989 JRSM, p 215), Wessley drew attention to the destruction of body and mind, and subsequent suicidal despair, and torment, of patients suffering from myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) or the postviral fatigue syndrome (PVFS). He referred to the reported relationship between identification of the VPI antigen and the presence of disease symptoms. He stated that more attention requires to be paid to methodological detail which he defined as population sample definition, and adoption of operational criteria. He suggested that a new term should be used to describe the observed symptoms: chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and enquired what constitutes the syndrome? Unfortunately he did not refer to the necessity for taking a complete clinical and family history in all patients. In his definition of CFS, he did not refer to any of the somatic symptoms which are always present. Yet, he stated that cases of this disease can only be selected by the (presumably holistic) clinical history. It appears that a new kind of approach based on absence of prejudice, more exhaustive and thorough clinical history taking, a wider approach to clinical examination of the patients, and a critical assessment of the origin of this psychosomatic disease would be of value in our investigations.

You can read the rest of the article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292769/pdf/jrsocmed00133-0005b.pdf

 

Source: Wilson CW. Myalgic encephalomyelitis: an alternative theory. J R Soc Med. 1990 Aug;83(8):481-483. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292769/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome–a new disease picture?

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome has recently been more frequently diagnosed. Yet it is unknown if this syndrome represents a disease entity of its own or merely a diagnostic label for a miscellaneous group of disorders. Further investigations are needed to find out if the syndrome has an organic or psychosomatic aetiology, or a mixture of both. In the meantime it is the responsibility of the clinician to make this decision in each individual case.

 

Source:  Nix WA. Chronic fatigue syndrome–a new disease picture? Nervenarzt. 1990 Jul;61(7):390-6. [Article in German] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2202912