Tag: Walitt

Altered effort and deconditioning are not valid explanations of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Letter:

Response to B. Walitt et al. Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45107-3 (2024)

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex, systemic disease with significant pathophysiological uncertainties and variable presentations1. Here, we challenge Walitt et al.’s2 conclusion that post-infectious (PI) ME/CFS is a disorder defined by altered effort preference, leading to activity avoidance and subsequent deconditioning. We believe this interpretation risks reinforcing skepticism about the serious biological nature of ME/CFS and its hallmark of post-exertional malaise (PEM), as well as its potential misclassification as a mental health condition.

Walitt et al.2 utilized a single CPET to evaluate systems-level physiological responses to exercise. However, this methodology does not allow for measuring responses after an initial exertion, which is critically important for fully understanding PEM3. Over the past two decades, 2-day CPET has been used to characterize the systems-level metabolism of ME/CFS3. This paradigm uses an initial maximal CPET to establish the individual’s baseline performance and as a participant-referenced method to induce PEM4. A second maximal CPET is then conducted 24 h later to measure physiological and perceptual responses to exercise during the post-exertional state4. Standard objective criteria to evaluate effort are used to ensure maximal testing, including the respiratory exchange ratio at peak exertion4. This removes uncertainty related to effort. Meta-analyses involving participants with ME/CFS who have completed 2-day CPET indicate characteristic declines in the volume of oxygen consumed, work rate, and heart rate (HR) at submaximal exertion on the second CPET. These findings are reliably observed in people with ME/CFS but not deconditioned individuals5,6,7. Accordingly, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) cautioned that “a single CPET may be insufficient to document the abnormal response of ME/CFS patients to exercise.”1 (p. 106)

Using a single CPET introduces a threat to validity in Walitt et al.’s study2, as it did not allow for the measurement of submaximal performance decrement in the post-exertional state1,3,4,5,6. This is important because deconditioning and PEM are not mutually exclusive. Special care must be taken when applying and interpreting CPET results1. Failure to use 2-day CPET prevented the authors from adequately testing their conclusion that PEM is related to participants’ effort preference, as they did not evaluate physiological performance under conditions involving objective, standardized criteria for maximal exertion. Unfortunately, the use of a single CPET in this study contributed to the authors’ misinterpretation that PEM is synonymous with reduced effort and deconditioning.

Read the rest of this letter here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64538-0

Source: Davenport, T.E., Scheibenbogen, C., Zinn, M.A. et al. Altered effort and deconditioning are not valid explanations of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Nat Commun 16, 9176 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64538-0 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64538-0 (Full text)

Prevalence and severity of neurologic symptoms in Long-COVID and the role of pre-existing conditions, hospitalization, and mental health

Abstract:

Background: Long-COVID refers to ongoing, relapsing, or new symptoms present 30 or more days after Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This study examined the prevalence and severity of neurologic symptoms at greater than 1 month following acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and the influence of pre-existing neurologic and psychiatric conditions, current depression and anxiety status, and hospitalization on the presence and severity of these symptoms.

Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited primarily self-referred Long-COVID participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Online questionnaires inquiring about pre-existing conditions, neurologic symptoms and their severity pre, during and post COVID-19, and current anxiety and depression screening were completed by 213 participants at a median time of 8 months after infection. Descriptive analyses and prevalence modeling were performed.

Results: The most frequent neurologic symptoms post COVID-19 were fatigue, concentration/memory difficulties, unrefreshed sleep, and dysarthria/word finding difficulties (73.2–86.4%). Neurologic symptoms were highly prevalent with significantly greater odds post COVID-19 compared to pre for all symptoms and higher prevalence at time periods farther from infection, including those implicit in fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Several severe neurologic symptoms were significantly more prevalent post COVID-19. Moderate to severe anxiety (34%) and depression (27%) were observed post COVID-19. Preexisting neurologic or psychiatric conditions did not demonstrate any significant difference in neurologic symptom prevalence post COVID-19. Those who met criteria for moderate or severe anxiety post COVID-19 had a significant difference in prevalence of fatigue, sensitivity to touch and unrefreshed sleep. Similarly, fatigue, concentration/memory difficulty and unrefreshed sleep were more prevalent in moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in neurologic symptom prevalence in a hospitalized group when compared to non- hospitalized.

Conclusion: Long-COVID has a high burden of long lasting and severe neurological sequelae. These sequelae are independent of pre-existing self-reported neurologic and psychiatric conditions, as well as previous hospitalization. Current moderate to severe anxiety and depression status can impact fatigue, cognition, and sleep post COVID-19. Focus on the biological impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the nervous system will be essential in ameliorating the tremendous symptom burden left in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Source: Huff Hanalise V. , Roberts Henry , Bartrum Elizabeth , Norato Gina , Grayson Nicholas , Fleig Katherine , Wilkerson Miciah J. , Stussman Barbara J. , Nath Avindra , Walitt Brian. Prevalence and severity of neurologic symptoms in Long-COVID and the role of pre-existing conditions, hospitalization, and mental health. Frontiers in Neurology, Volume 16 – 2025 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1562084 10.3389/fneur.2025.1562084 ISSN:1664-2295 https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1562084/full (Full text)

Unwilling or unable? Interpreting effort task performance in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Introduction:

In a recent, high-profile study of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (PI-ME/CFS), Walitt et al. (2024) assessed the performance of patients and healthy volunteers on the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), among a host of other measures. The EEfRT is a widely used behavioral index of reward motivation and effort-based decision-making that requires repeatedly choosing between an easy task and a hard task, each involving rapid, repetitive button-pressing (Treadway et al., 2009). Walitt et al.’s study—the first to investigate effort-based decision-making in PI-ME/CFS—found that patients were less likely to choose the hard task than healthy volunteers. The authors interpreted this difference as evidence of altered “effort preference,” which they defined as “how much effort a person subjectively wants to exert” (p. 9). Walitt et al. concluded that “effort preference, not fatigue, is the defining motor behavior of this illness” (p. 10). Here we interrogate this conclusion. Were PI-ME/CFS patients less likely to choose the hard task because they wanted to exert less effort, consciously or otherwise? Or were they less able to complete the hard task, and thus chose it less often? We argue that the data support the latter interpretation.

Source: Kirvin-Quamme A, Kirke KD, Junge O, Edwards JCW, Holmes KJ. Unwilling or unable? Interpreting effort task performance in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 13;16:1593269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1593269. PMCID: PMC12202612. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12202612/ (Full text)

Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment

Abstract:

Background: Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a central feature of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and has emerged as a prominent feature of Long COVID. The optimal clinical approach to PEM is inconclusive, and studies of the impact of exercise have yielded contradictory results.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine PEM in Long COVID by assessing the prevalence of self-reported PEM across study cohorts and symptom responses of Long COVID patients to a standardized exercise stressor. Secondarily, Long COVID symptom responses to exercise were compared to those of ME/CFS and healthy volunteers.

Methods: Data from three registered clinical trials comprised four cohorts in this study: Long COVID Questionnaire Cohort (QC; n = 244), Long COVID Exercise Cohort (EC; n = 34), ME/CFS cohort (n = 9), and healthy volunteers (HV; n = 9). All cohorts completed questionnaires related to physical function, fatigue, and/or PEM symptoms. EC also performed a standardized exercise test (cardiopulmonary exercise test, CPET), and the PEM response to CPET was assessed using visual analog scales and qualitative interviews (QIs) administered serially over 72 h. EC PEM measures were compared to ME/CFS and HV cohorts. A secondary analysis of QI explored positive responses to CPET among EC, ME/CFS and HV.

Results: Self-reported PEM was 67% in QC and estimated at 27% in EC. Only 2 of 34 EC patients (5.9%) were observed to develop PEM after a CPET. In addition, PEM responses after CPET in Long COVID were not as severe and prolonged as those assessed in ME/CFS. Twenty-two of 34 EC patients (64.7%) expressed at least one of 7 positive themes after the CPET.

Conclusion: Self-report of PEM is common in Long COVID. However, observable PEM following an exercise stressor was not frequent in this small cohort. When present, PEM descriptions during QI were less severe in Long COVID than in ME/CFS. Positive responses after an exercise stressor were common in Long COVID. Exercise testing to determine the presence of PEM may have utility for guiding clinical management of Long COVID.

Source: Stussman B, Camarillo N, McCrossin G, Stockman M, Norato G, Vetter CS, Ferrufino A, Adedamola A, Grayson N, Nath A, Chan L, Walitt B, Chin LMK. Post-exertional malaise in Long COVID: subjective reporting versus objective assessment. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 23;16:1534352. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1534352. PMID: 40337174; PMCID: PMC12055772. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12055772/ (Full text)

NIH study offers new clues into the causes of post-infectious ME/CFS

Press Release:

In a detailed clinical study, researchers at the National Institutes of Health have found differences in the brains and immune systems of people with post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (PI-ME/CFS). They also found distinct differences between men and women with the disease. The findings were published in Nature Communications.

“People with ME/CFS have very real and disabling symptoms, but uncovering their biological basis has been extremely difficult,” said Walter Koroshetz, M.D., director of NIH’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). “This in-depth study of a small group of people found a number of factors that likely contribute to their ME/CFS. Now researchers can test whether these findings apply to a larger patient group and move towards identifying treatments that target core drivers of the disease.”

A team of multidisciplinary researchers discovered how feelings of fatigue are processed in the brains of people with ME/CFS. Results from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) brain scans showed that people with ME/CFS had lower activity in a brain region called the temporal-parietal junction (TPJ), which may cause fatigue by disrupting the way the brain decides how to exert effort.

They also analyzed spinal fluid collected from participants and found abnormally low levels of catecholamines and other molecules that help regulate the nervous system in people with ME/CFS compared to healthy controls. Reduced levels of certain catecholamines were associated with worse motor performance, effort-related behaviors, and cognitive symptoms. These findings, for the first time, suggest a link between specific abnormalities or imbalances in the brain and ME/CFS.

“We think that the immune activation is affecting the brain in various ways, causing biochemical changes and downstream effects like motor, autonomic, and cardiorespiratory dysfunction,” said Avindra Nath, M.D., clinical director at NINDS and senior author of the study.

Immune testing revealed that the ME/CFS group had higher levels of naive B cells and lower levels of switched memory B cells—cells that help the immune system fight off pathogens—in blood compared to healthy controls. Naive B cells are always present in the body and activate when they encounter any given antigen, a foreign substance that triggers the immune system. Memory B cells respond to a specific antigen and help maintain adaptive or acquired immunity. More studies are needed to determine how these immune markers relate to brain dysfunction and fatigue in ME/CFS.

To study fatigue, Dr. Nath and his team asked participants to make risk-based decisions about exerting physical effort. This allowed them to assess the cognitive aspects of fatigue, or how an individual decides how much effort to exert when given a choice. People with ME/CFS had difficulties with the effort choice task and with sustaining effort. The motor cortex, a brain region in charge of telling the body to move, also remained abnormally active during fatiguing tasks. There were no signs of muscle fatigue. This suggests that fatigue in ME/CFS could be caused by a dysfunction of brain regions that drive the motor cortex, such as the TPJ.

“We may have identified a physiological focal point for fatigue in this population,” said Brian Walitt, M.D., M.P.H., associate research physician at NINDS and first author of the study. “Rather than physical exhaustion or a lack of motivation, fatigue may arise from a mismatch between what someone thinks they can achieve and what their bodies perform.”

Deeper analyses revealed differences between men and women in gene expression patterns, immune cell populations, and metabolic markers. Males had altered T cell activation, as well as markers of innate immunity, while females had abnormal B cell and white blood cell growth patterns. Men and women also had distinct markers of inflammation.

“Men and women were quite divergent in their data, and that tells you that ME/CFS is not one-size-fits-all,” said Dr. Nath. “Considering male and female immune differences in ME/CFS, the results may open up new avenues of research that could provide insight into other infection-associated chronic diseases.”

The study, which was conducted at the NIH Clinical Center, took a comprehensive look at ME/CFS that developed after a viral or bacterial infection. The team used state-of-the-art techniques to examine 17 people with PI-ME/CFS who had been sick for less than five years and 21 healthy controls. Participants were screened and medically evaluated for ME/CFS over several days and underwent extensive tests, including clinical exams, fMRI brain imaging, physical and cognitive performance tests, autonomic function tests, skin and muscle biopsies, and advanced analyses of blood and spinal fluid. Participants also spent time in metabolic chambers where, under controlled conditions, their diet, energy consumption, metabolism, sleep patterns, and gut microbiome were evaluated. During a second visit, they completed a cardiopulmonary exercise test to measure the body’s response to exercise.

Many studies have identified immune, microbiome, and other abnormalities in ME/CFS, but the results tend to be inconsistent and exactly how these markers relate to or cause fatigue and other symptoms is unknown. By using a rigorous phenotyping approach to pull out meaningful differences, this study helps validate prior results and may identify new ways to target the brain or immune system therapeutically.

The highly collaborative project involved 75 investigators across 15 institutes and centers in the NIH Intramural Research Program, and at national and international institutions. Dr. Nath and his colleagues plan to publish additional findings from the data that was collected during this study.

The study was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program at the NIH.

Article:

Walitt, B., et al. “Deep phenotyping of Post-infectious Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.” Nature Communications. February 21, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45107-3

NINDS is the nation’s leading funder of research on the brain and nervous system. The mission of NINDS is to seek fundamental knowledge about the brain and nervous system and to use that knowledge to reduce the burden of neurological disease.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation’s medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the NIH website.