Tag: unemployment

The economic cost of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in UK primary care

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome are most often encountered in primary care settings. Given the disabling nature of chronic fatigue it may have a substantial impact on service use and costs as well as on employment. This study estimates this impact.

METHOD: Patients presenting to general practitioners with unexplained chronic fatigue were recruited to the study. Service use over a 3 month period was measured and lost employment recorded. These data were used to estimate economic costs. Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome were compared to patients with only chronic fatigue using a multiple regression model with sample differences controlled.

RESULTS: The mean total cost of services and lost employment across the sample was Pound Sterling1906 for the 3-month period with formal services accounting for 9.3% of this figure. Service use was higher for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared to those with chronic fatigue alone. Total 3-month costs were on average higher for chronic fatigue syndrome (Pound Sterling3515 v. Pound Sterling1176) but when sample differences were taken account of the mean difference was reduced to Pound Sterling1406 (P = 0.086). Over 90% of the cost was accounted for by care provided by friends and family members and by lost employment. Patients with dependants had significantly higher costs than those with none and costs were also significantly higher for greater levels of functional impairment.

CONCLUSION: Chronic fatigue imposes substantial economic costs on society, mainly in the form of informal care and lost employment. Treatments need to be developed which recognize these impacts.

Comment in: Costs, correlates and consequences of fatigue in children and adults. [Psychol Med. 2003]

 

Source: McCrone P, Darbishire L, Ridsdale L, Seed P. The economic cost of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in UK primary care. Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):253-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12622304

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a controversial condition that many occupational physicians find difficult to advise on. In this article we review the nature and definition of CFS, the principal aetiologic hypotheses and the evidence concerning prognosis. We also outline a practical approach to patient assessment, diagnosis and management. The conclusions of this review are then applied to the disability discrimination field. The implications of the new UK occupational health legislation are also examined. Despite continuing controversy about the status, aetiology and optimum management of CFS, we argue that much can be done to improve the outcome for patients with this condition. The most urgent needs are for improved education and rehabilitation, especially in regard to employment. Occupational physicians are well placed to play an important and unique role in meeting these needs.

 

Source: Mounstephen A, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health. Occup Med (Lond). 1997 May;47(4):217-27. http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/4/217.long (Full article)

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: study of the clinical course of 28 cases

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an entity of unknown etiopathogenesis without specific markers. The diagnosis is based on clinical criteria. There are few studies evaluating the natural evolution and prognosis-related factors in CFS.

OBJECTIVES: a) to evaluate the outcome of patients suffering from CFS, and b) to detect predictive factors associated with a better prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical records of all patients diagnosed of CFS between January 1986 and December 1992 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, we included those fulfilling the CDC criteria for CFS, with a follow-up period greater than one year. We evaluated epidemiological, clinical and evolutive data recorded by their usual physicians. Moreover, the patients were interviewed in order to know their own appreciation with respect to their current clinical status, as well as their present working situation.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were included in the present study. Their mean age was 38 +/- 7. Seventy-five percent of them were women. The mean time of clinical follow-up was of 3.2 +/- 1.8 years. According to evaluation, 21% of patients improved or became asymptomatic. A similar percentage (28%) of improvement was obtained from the interview. Forty-eight percent of cases had transitory or definitive laboral incapacity. Regarding to prognostic factors, we could not find any statistical differences among the analyzed variables except for marital status. In this variable, married patients had better outcome than unmarried patients.

CONCLUSION: CFS is an entity with a poor outcome, since it evolves towards to chronicity in an important number of cases. In addition, strong functional disability may be present, leading frequently to laboral incapacity.

Comment in: Chronic fatigue syndrome. To be or not to be? [Med Clin (Barc). 1997]

 

Source: Miró O, Font C, Fernández-Solà J, Casademont J, Pedrol E, Grau JM, Urbano-Márquez A. Chronic fatigue syndrome: study of the clinical course of 28 cases. Med Clin (Barc). 1997 Apr 19;108(15):561-5. [Article in Spanish] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9395421

 

Chronic fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome, and fibromyalgia. Disability and health-care use

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: Disabling chronic fatigue that does not meet criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or fibromyalgia (FM) is a condition thought to be associated with substantial disability and an apparently high use of health-care services. The authors compare patients who have chronic fatigue, CFS, FM, or CFS and FM together (CFS+FM) on employment status, self-reported disability, number of medical care visits, type of services obtained, and other diagnoses received.

METHODS: The authors studied 402 patients from a university-based chronic fatigue clinic. All patients underwent an initial structured diagnostic assessment. One hundred forty-seven patients met case criteria for CFS, 28 for FM, 61 for CFS+FM, and 166 fell in the residual chronic fatigue group. Of these patients, 388 completed a follow-up questionnaire an average of 1.7 years later. Chi-squared tests and analysis of variance were used to compare groups on follow-up measures of health-care use and disability.

RESULTS: Patients with chronic fatigue, CFS, FM, and CFS+FM were similar in terms of disability and health-care use, though those with CFS+FM were significantly more likely to be unemployed and to use more chiropractic and “other” provider services. Rates of unemployment ranged from 26% (chronic fatigue) to 51% (CFS+FM). Overall, patients reported a mean of 21 visits to a wide variety health-care providers during the previous year, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Chronic fatigue, CFS, and FM are associated with considerable personal and occupational disability and low rates of employment. The potentially large economic burden of these disorders underscores the need for accurate estimates of direct and indirect costs, the relative contribution of individual factors to disability, and the need to develop targeted rehabilitation programs.

 

Source: Bombardier CH, Buchwald D. Chronic fatigue, chronic fatigue syndrome, and fibromyalgia. Disability and health-care use. Med Care. 1996 Sep;34(9):924-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8792781

 

Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There are few data on the natural history and prognosis of persons with chronic fatigue (CF) or CF syndrome (CFS). Therefore, we compared functional outcomes in patients with each condition and tested the validity of various prognostic indicators.

METHODS: Four hundred forty-five (89%) of 498 consecutive referral patients were surveyed an average of 1.5 years after an initial evaluation. Data from the initial evaluation were used to predict outcomes.

RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of all patients reported improvement, but only 2% reported complete resolution of symptoms. Patients initially diagnosed as having CFS reported greater symptom severity and lower level of functioning at follow-up than did patients with CF. Major depression predicted unemployment in the CF group. Older age, longer duration of illness, and a lifetime history of dysthymia predicted less improvement in the CF group. Current dysthymia predicted less improvement for the CFS group.

CONCLUSIONS: The case definition of CFS according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identifies chronically fatigued patients with poorer prognosis. In a tertiary care setting, recovery from CF or CFS is rare, but improvement is common. Prognostic indicators vary for the two groups, but the coexistence of dysthymia suggests poorer outcomes generally.

 

Source: Bombardier CH, Buchwald D. Outcome and prognosis of patients with chronic fatigue vs chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Oct 23;155(19):2105-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7575071