Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment in: Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Soc Med. 1992]

Comment on: Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. [J R Soc Med. 1992]

 

I find it surprising that Wood et al. (April 992 JRSM, p 195) no longer appear to consider,that the presence of a precipitating infection should be necessary for the selection of patients involved in the study of chronic fatigue syndromes. The reference they quote, which refers to guidelines laid down at Oxford in 1990, states very clearly that post-infectious patients with chronic fatigue do indeed form a distinct subgroup, and that to fulfil research criteria there, must be,’definite evidence of infection at onset or presentation’.

Having failed to make such a distinction it is not, altogether surprising that they go on to conclude that the higher levels of depression found in their study …. serve to reinforce the now widely–current, notion that such patients may be suffering from a depressive illness, of which physical fatigue is a somatic manifestation’.

You may read the rest of this comment as well as the author’s response here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293670/pdf/jrsocmed00107-0092b.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. Fluctuations in perceived energy and mood among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J R Soc Med. 1992 Sep;85(9):588. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1293670/

 

Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Follow up of patients presenting with fatigue to an infectious diseases clinic. [BMJ. 1992]

 

EDITOR,-Michael Sharpe and colleagues’ follow up study of 177 patients with chronic fatigue of uncertain origin raises several important unanswered questions, which require further investigation. Factors such as a belief that their illness followed an infection, intolerance to alcohol, and membership of a support group for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis were all associated with an adverse prognosis. Could it be that the authors had identified patients belonging to a distinct postinfectious subgroup as many doctors maintain they do? Clearly, if this is the case future studies of this nature will have to include more objective analysis of persisting viral infection (for example, analysis of muscle biopsy specimens with the polymerase chain reaction rather than tests for VP1 antigen); immune function (for example, function of natural killer cells rather than white cell counts); and hypothalamic-pituitary-axis activity (for example, up regulation of serotonin- I receptors and basal cortisol concentrations) to see if there are characteristic abnormalities that distinguish the postinfectious subgroup.

The high incidence of intolerance to alcohol is noted as intriguing, but from personal experience, as well as from seeing many patients with a classic postinfectious fatigue syndrome, I regard this observation as an important diagnostic feature. In these patients even small amounts of alcohol cause a further deterioration in cognitive function, and I suggest that a physiological explanation may lie in the fact that alcohol increases the concentration of the neurotransmitter y-aminobutyric acid, which in turn reduces the availability of calcium ions and hence depresses brain function still further.

You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1883001/pdf/bmj00086-0047c.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. Outcome in the chronic fatigue syndrome. BMJ. 1992 Aug 8;305(6849):365. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1883001/

 

ME: is it a genuine disease?

Abstract:

Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is a postviral syndrome whose dominant clinical features are exercise-induced muscle fatigue, disturbances in cognitive functioning and symptoms of overactivity of the autonomic nervous system. The syndrome tends to affect previously fit young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 but no age group is excluded. One recent epidemiological survey suggested a prevalence rate of 1.3 per 1000 adults, with females outnumbering males by 1.8:1. ME is currently the subject of intense medical (and media) debate, especially over its pathophysiology and management. It has also become known as the postviral/chronic fatigue syndrome (PVFS/CFS).

Comment in: It could be ME. [Health Visit. 1992]

 

Source: Shepherd C, Lees H. ME: is it a genuine disease? Health Visit. 1992 May;65(5):165-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1624312

 

Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome

Comment on: Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome. [Postgrad Med J. 1991]

 

Sir, The paper by Milton and colleagues (1) challenges the hypothesis that patients with postviral fatigue syndrome (myalgic encephalomyelitis) have a persisting viral infection along with consequent immune dysregulation. The protocol employed in the study suggests that their conclusions may not be valid.

Firstly, the 31 patients were selected from a group attending a ‘muscle clinic’ who complained of ‘unexplained chronic fatigue’. Of these only 15 had a clear history of a precipitating viral illness – a key diagnostic feature of postviral fatigue syndrome. Secondly, although other research groups have also demonstrated that raised levels of Coxsackie B virus IgG and IgM antibodies are not diagnostic of the syndrome, (2) these findings cannot be used to exclude the possibility of persisting viral infection within either muscle or the central nervous system.

As far as muscle is concerned, Gow and colleagues( 3) have recently detected enteroviral RNA sequences in muscle biopsies of 53% of patients with a well-defined postviral fatigue syndrome compared to 15% in a control group, and Archard et al. (4) have shown that this persisting enterovirus is poorly replicating.

Demonstrating the presence of persisting virus within the central nervous system is obviously far more difficult without autopsy material. However, Daugherty et al. (5) in America have published the results of MRI scans and cognitive function tests on 20 patients (with age and sex matched healthy controls) showing abnormalities consistent with an organic brain syndrome similar to that seen in patients who are positive for human immunodeficiency virus.

You can read the rest of this letter here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399327/pdf/postmedj00061-0069a.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. Immune responsiveness in chronic fatigue syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 1992 Jan;68(795):66-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2399327/

 

Intravenous immunoglobulin and myalgic encephalomyelitis

Comment on: Intravenous immunoglobulins. [BMJ. 1991]

 

SIR, In his editorial on intravenous immunoglobulin Dr A D B Webster calls for multicentre trials to assess the possible efficacy of this product in various conditions including mvalgic encephalomyelitis. Two such placebo controlled trials have been completed. Unfortunately, the results are conflicting. American investigators treated their patients with 1 g/kg every month for six months. There were no obvious benefits when the treated patients were compared with controls given placebo. An Australian trial used an even higher dose of 2 g/kg over three months. Here there were significant benefits in both physical and psychological wellbeing in the treatment group.

You can read the rest of this comment here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1670935/pdf/bmj00145-0062d.pdf

 

Source: Shepherd C. Intravenous immunoglobulin and myalgic encephalomyelitis. BMJ. 1991 Sep 21;303(6804):716. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1670935/