Review part 2: Human herpesvirus-6 in central nervous system diseases

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating chronic illness [Fukuda et al., 1994] that often begins suddenly with a “flu-like” illness. Patients with CFS have great functional impairment [Komaroff et al., 1996]. The cost to the U.S. economy from lost productivity alone (not including medical care costs) is $9 billion annually [Reynolds et al., 2004].

While the pathogenesis of CFS is unknown, there is abundant evidence of an underlying biological process. In comparison to various health and disease control groups, patients with CFS have abnormal findings in the CNS and autonomic nervous system, evidence of chronic activation of various parts of the immune system, and disordered energy metabolism.

CNS abnormalities have been found using MRI [Buchwald et al., 1992; Schwartz et al., 1994a; Lange et al., 2001; de Lange et al., 2005], functional MRI [Tanaka et al., 2006], SPECT [Schwartz et al., 1994b; Schmaling et al., 2003], and positron-emission tomography (PET) [Yamamoto et al., 2004]. Neuroendocrine studies reveal hypofunction of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) neurons in the hypothalamus [Demitrack et al., 1991], disruption of both serotonergic and noradrenergic hypothalamic pathways [Demitrack et al., 1992; Cleare et al., 1995], and of growth hormone secretion [Moorkens et al., 2000]. Typically, these abnormalities are in patterns opposite to those seen in major depression. Cognitive testing has revealed abnormalities [Tiersky et al., 1997; Daly et al., 2001; Deluca et al., 2004] that are not explained by concomitant mood disorders [Marcel et al., 1996]. Autonomic nervous system testing has found abnormalities—particularly postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, neurally mediated hypotension, and heart rate variability during head-up tilt testing [Bou-Holaigah et al., 1995; Freeman and Komaroff, 1997; Stewart, 2000; Naschitz et al., 2002].

The immunological findings described most commonly in CFS are impaired function of natural killer cells, increased numbers of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells that bear antigenic markers of activation on their cell surface, and increased production of various pro-inflammatory and TH2 cytokines [Komaroff, 2006]. Many of these cytokines can produce symptoms characteristic of CFS: fatigue, fevers, adenopathy, myalgias, arthralgias, sleep disorders, cognitive impairment, and mood disorders.

Many recent studies of patients with CFS have identified disorders of energy metabolism [Myhill et al., 2009], increased allostatic load [Maloney et al., 2009], and increased oxidative and nitrosative stress [Maes and Leunis, 2008].

Cases of CFS can follow in the wake of well-documented infection with several infectious agents, and may be more likely when the symptoms of acute infection were most severe [Hickie et al., 2006]. The first large study on the possible role of HHV-6 in CFS included 259 patients with a “CFS-like” illness (the case definition had not yet been developed) and age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects. Primary culture of lymphocytes showed active replication of HHV-6 in 70% of the patients versus 20% of the control subjects (P < 10 −8) [Buchwald et al., 1992].

Some subsequent studies have employed only serological techniques that do not distinguish active from latent infection. The results have been mixed: a slight preponderance has showed an association between CFS and HHV-6 infection [Ablashi et al., 2000; Reeves et al., 2000; Hickie et al., 2006].

In contrast, other studies have employed assays that can detect active infection: PCR of serum or plasma, IgM early antigen antibodies, and primary cell culture. Most of these studies have shown an association between CFS and active HHV-6 infection [Patnaik et al., 1995; Secchiero et al., 1995; Wagner et al., 1996; Zorzenon et al., 1996; Ablashi et al., 2000; Nicolson et al., 2003], whereas a few have not [Koelle et al., 2002; Reeves et al., 2000]. The number of patients in the studies that have found an association between CFS and active HHV-6 infection (N = 717) is much larger than the number in studies that have failed to find an association (N = 48).

Several observations, summarized above, together suggest that active infection with HHV-6 may cause some cases of CFS. First, active infection with HHV-6 is present in a substantial fraction of patients with CFS. Second, HHV-6 is tropic for the nervous system and immune system cells, and CFS is characterized by neurological and immunological abnormalities. Clinical studies with antiviral drugs that have in vitro activity against HHV-6 could provide strong evidence in favor of, or against, the hypothesis that HHV-6 may trigger and perpetuate some cases of CFS.

You can read the full article here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758195/

 

Source: Yao K, Crawford JR, Komaroff AL, Ablashi DV, Jacobson S. Review part 2: Human herpesvirus-6 in central nervous system diseases.J Med Virol. 2010 Oct;82(10):1669-78. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21861. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4758195/ (Full article)

 

The genetics and epigenetics of fatigue

Abstract:

Fatigue is a common symptom and includes both physical and mental components. It can be associated with a variety of different syndromes and diseases, but in many cases is not associated with other comorbid conditions. Most humans have experienced acute fatigue in relation to different stressors. Acute fatigue typically decreases as the effect of the triggering factor is reduced and a normal homeostatic balance is restored. Fatigue that persists for 6 months or more is termed chronic fatigue. Chronic fatigue (CF) in combination with a minimum of 4 of 8 symptoms and the absence of diseases that could explain these symptoms, constitute the case definition for chronic fatigue syndrome. In spite of its prevalence, the biology of fatigue is relatively poorly understood and biological markers have not yet been identified.

This literature search was performed in PubMed to identify research on the genetics and epigenetics of fatigue. Publications were included if fatigue was a major topic and the topic was combined with genetic and/or epigenetic measurements in adult humans. A total of 40 publications were identified.

Although altered functioning in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the serotonergic system, and associations with infectious agents have been identified, the search for genetic or epigenetic markers of fatigue, either in the context of CF or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) has been relatively unproductive or, in the case of epigenetics, nonexistent. Although several studies, both hypothesis-testing and hypothesis-generating, have been performed to search for biomarkers, they have mostly been underpowered, restricted by the heterogeneity of the phenotype, or limited by an unsystematic study design.

To be able to confirm the hypothesis that risk for, or levels of, fatigue are influenced by the genetic or epigenetic background of an individual, studies need to be based on larger sample sizes with a more clearly defined phenotype. Studies need to focus not only on the influence of a single aspect such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or differential gene expression on disease risk or state, but also on the systems biology behind the disease in combination with information on environmental influences and validation of findings in functional studies.

Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Landmark-Høyvik H, Reinertsen KV, Loge JH, Kristensen VN, Dumeaux V, Fosså SD, Børresen-Dale AL, Edvardsen H. The genetics and epigenetics of fatigue. PM R. 2010 May;2(5):456-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20656628

 

Perspectives on fatigue from the study of chronic fatigue syndrome and related conditions

Abstract:

Fatigue is a symptom whose causes are protean and whose phenotype includes physical, mood, and behavioral components. Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness that has strong biological underpinnings and no definite etiology. Diagnostic criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have helped classify CFS as an overlap of mood, behavioral, and biological components. These include the presence of fatigue for more than 6 months associated with a diminution of functional activity and somatic symptoms, and pain not attributable to a specific diagnosis or disease. Four of the following criteria need to be present: sore throat, impaired memory or cognition, unrefreshing sleep, postexertional fatigue, tender glands, aching stiff muscles, joint pain, and headaches.

Many researchers have observed that CFS shares features in common with other somatic syndromes, including irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Correlations between inflammation and infection, augmented sensory processing, abnormalities of neurotransmitters, nerve growth factors, low levels of serotonin and norepinephrine, abnormalities of homeostasis of the stress system, and autonomic dysfunction may be hallmarks of CFS. The relative contributions of each of these abnormalities to the profound fatigue associated with CFS need to be explored further to better evaluate and treat the syndrome.

Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Clauw DJ. Perspectives on fatigue from the study of chronic fatigue syndrome and related conditions. PM R. 2010 May;2(5):414-30. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.010. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20656623

 

Neuroendocrine and immune contributors to fatigue

Abstract:

Central fatigue, a persistent and subjective sense of tiredness, generally correlates poorly with traditional markers of disease. It is frequently associated with psychosocial factors, such as depression, sleep disorder, anxiety, and coping style, which suggest that dysregulation of the body’s stress systems may serve as an underlying mechanism in the maintenance of chronic fatigue (CF).

This article addresses the endocrine, neural, and immune factors that contribute to fatigue and describes research regarding the role of these factors in chronic fatigue syndrome as a model for addressing the biology of CF. In general, hypoactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, autonomic nervous system alterations characterized by sympathetic overactivity and low vagal tone, as well as immune abnormalities, may contribute to the expression of CF. Noninvasive methods for evaluating endocrine, neural, and immune function are also discussed.

Simultaneous evaluation of neuroendocrine and immune systems with noninvasive techniques will help elucidate the underlying interactions of these systems, their role in disease susceptibility, and progression of stress-related disorders.

Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Silverman MN, Heim CM, Nater UM, Marques AH, Sternberg EM. Neuroendocrine and immune contributors to fatigue. PM R. 2010 May;2(5):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.04.008. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933136/ (Full article)

 

What is fatigue? Pathological and nonpathological fatigue

Abstract:

Aid in understanding issues surrounding the construct validity of fatigue including the distinction between pathological versus nonpathological fatigue. Fatigue is a universal symptom reported by individuals in the general population as well as by those suffering from different medical and psychological illnesses, including cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, depression, and anxiety. Chronic fatigue is a significant problem in many primary care settings, and the debilitating and prolonged nature of fatigue can pose significant economic consequences for society. Researchers have struggled to better assess and understand the etiology and classification of fatigue within different illness groups.

Copyright (c) 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Jason LA, Evans M, Brown M, Porter N. What is fatigue? Pathological and nonpathological fatigue. PM R. 2010 May;2(5):327-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.028. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20656613

 

The central role of cognitive processes in the perpetuation of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is considered to be one of the functional somatic syndromes (FSS). Cognitions and behavior are thought to perpetuate the symptoms of CFS. Behavioral interventions based on the existing models of perpetuating factors are quite successful in reducing fatigue and disabilities. The evidence is reviewed that cognitive processes, particularly those that determine the perception of fatigue and its effect on behavior, play a central role in the maintenance of symptoms.

METHOD: Narrative review.

RESULTS: Findings from treatment studies suggest that cognitive factors mediate the positive effect of behavioral interventions on fatigue. Increased fitness or increased physical activity does not seem to mediate the treatment response. Additional evidence for the role of cognitive processes is found in studies comparing the subjective beliefs patients have of their functioning with their actual performance and in neurobiological research.

CONCLUSION: Three different cognitive processes may play a role in the perpetuation of CFS symptoms. The first is a general cognitive representation in which fatigue is perceived as something negative and aversive and CFS is seen as an illness that is difficult to influence. The second process involved is the focusing on fatigue. The third element is formed by specific dysfunctional beliefs about activity and fatigue.

Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: Knoop H, Prins JB, Moss-Morris R, Bleijenberg G. The central role of cognitive processes in the perpetuation of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2010 May;68(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.022. Epub 2010 Mar 16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403509

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: Is it one discrete syndrome or many? Implications for the “one vs. many” functional somatic syndromes debate

Abstract:

There is a current debate as to whether “functional somatic syndromes” (FSSs) are more similar to or different from each other. While at the same time, there is evidence of heterogeneity within single syndromes. So, it could be that these syndromes are all part of one big process/illness, are discrete in their own right, or that they are heterogeneous collections of different illnesses lumped together by common symptoms but separated by uncommon pathophysiologies. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is instructive. There is evidence to support all three models of understanding. Three recent large studies have suggested that FSSs are both similar and dissimilar at the same time. The solution to the debate is that we need to both “lump” and “split.” We need to study both the similarities between syndromes and their dissimilarities to better understand what we currently call the FSSs.

Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Source: White PD. Chronic fatigue syndrome: Is it one discrete syndrome or many? Implications for the “one vs. many” functional somatic syndromes debate. J Psychosom Res. 2010 May;68(5):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Mar 17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20403504

 

A retrospective review of the sleep characteristics in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia

Abstract:

This study characterizes findings on sleep testing and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) markers in a group of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). One hundred eighteen patients seen in a general neurology practice over 5 years meeting standard clinical criteria for FM or CFS were analyzed retrospectively. Cases of untreated sleep apnea or restless legs syndrome were excluded prior to inclusion in this study.

Ninety-two patients had multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT). Seventy-three (80%) were abnormal by standard criteria. Of 57 females having positive MSLTs, 22 (39%) had one or more periods of sleep onset rapid eye movement (SOREM), and 5 of 16 (31%) males with positive MSLTs had one or more SOREM. Highly fragmented sleep, as previously described in FM, was seen but not analyzed quantitatively. HLA DQB1*0602 was obtained in 74 patients, and positive in 32 (43%), P < 0.0001 compared with published values in 228 populations.

In our patients, who presented with neuromuscular fatigue or generalized pain, we found a sleep disorder characterized by objective hypersomnia. Some patients had characteristics of narcolepsy. Objective assessment by sleep studies can assist the diagnostic process, aid future research, and provide rationale for treatment.

 

Source: Spitzer AR, Broadman M. A retrospective review of the sleep characteristics in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Pain Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;10(4):294-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00352.x. Epub 2010 Mar 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20230458

 

Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: There have been several systematic reviews attempting to evaluate the efficacy of possible treatments for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM). However, information regarding the efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has not been comprehensively or systematically covered in these reviews, despite its frequent use in the patient community.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review and evaluate the current literature related to alternative and complementary treatments for ME/CFS and FM. It should be stressed that the treatments evaluated in this review do not reflect the clinical approach used by most practitioners to treat these illnesses, which include a mix of natural and unconventionally used medications and natural hormones tailored to each individual case. However, nearly all clinical research has focused on the utility of single CAM interventions, and thus is the primary focus of this review.

METHODS: Several databases (e.g., PubMed, MEDLINE,((R)) PsychInfo) were systematically searched for randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of alternative treatments and nonpharmacological supplements. Included studies were checked for references and several experts were contacted for referred articles. Two leading subspecialty journals were also searched by hand. Data were then extracted from included studies and quality assessments were conducted using the Jadad scale.

RESULTS: Upon completion of the literature search and the exclusion of studies not meeting criterion, a total of 70 controlled clinical trials were included in the review. Sixty (60) of the 70 studies found at least one positive effect of the intervention (86%), and 52 studies also found improvement in an illness-specific symptom (74%). The methodological quality of reporting was generally poor.

CONCLUSIONS: Several types of alternative medicine have some potential for future clinical research. However, due to methodological inconsistencies across studies and the small body of evidence, no firm conclusions can be made at this time. Regarding alternative treatments, acupuncture and several types of meditative practice show the most promise for future scientific investigation. Likewise, magnesium, l-carnitine, and S-adenosylmethionine are nonpharmacological supplements with the most potential for further research. Individualized treatment plans that involve several pharmacological agents and natural remedies appear promising as well.

 

Source: Porter NS, Jason LA, Boulton A, Bothne N, Coleman B. Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Mar;16(3):235-49. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0376. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20192908

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy?

Abstract:

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent but poorly understood condition mainly characterized by debilitating, persistent or recurrent fatigue; increased physical and mental fatigability; cognitive impairment and widespread musculoskeletal pain. Despite intensive treatment research, the role of pharmacotherapy in the illness remains uncertain.

: An updated review is given of pharmacotherapy in CFS, with a focus on non-antidepressant, controlled drug trials performed between 1988 and August 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: Antiviral, immunological and antibiotic therapies, although sometimes associated with symptom amelioration, can be more harmful than beneficial in CFS. Stimulants seem to benefit some CFS patients but their long-term effects is uncertain. Although antidepressants are not curative for the illness, they might be useful for some symptomatic aspects and co-morbid anxiety and depression. There is little or no evidence that CFS patients benefit from other pharmacological agents (e.g., steroids) or from dietary supplements and complementary medicine products. Future research into treatment should take specific subgroups into account and should target immunological aspects of the illness as well as the complex relationships between CFS, stress and depression.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Pharmacotherapy can currently not be considered first-line treatment in CFS and should always be used in a context of self-management and rehabilitation.

 

Source: Van Houdenhove B, Pae CU, Luyten P. Chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a role for non-antidepressant pharmacotherapy? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;11(2):215-23. Doi: 10.1517/14656560903487744. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20088743