Tag: questionnaire

Effects of Time Frame on the Recall Reliability of CFS Symptoms

Abstract:

This study serves as an investigation of the reliability of symptom data as reported by individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), across three recall time frames (the past week, the past month, and the past 6 months), and at two assessment points (with 1 week in between each assessment). Multilevel model analyses were used to determine the optimal recall time frame, in terms of test -retest reliability, for each of the Fukuda et al. (1994) case defining symptoms.

Results suggested that the optimal time frame for reliably reporting CFS symptoms was six months for sore throat, lymph node pain, muscle pain, post-exertional malaise, headaches, memory/concentration difficulties, and unrefreshing sleep. For joint pain, the optimal time frame was one month. Researchers who are interested in the assessment of CFS symptoms need to take recall time frame into account, especially when the intended goal is to standardize and improve the methods used to reliably and accurately diagnose this complex illness.

© The Author(s) 2013

 

Source: Evans M, Jason LA. Effects of Time Frame on the Recall Reliability of CFS Symptoms. Eval Health Prof. 2015 Sep;38(3):367-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713497014. Epub 2013 Sep 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874064/ (Full article)

 

The role of coping in the relationship between depression and illness severity in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The self-regulatory model (SRM) proposes that both cognitive and emotional illness representations influence the coping processes adopted in response to an illness.

AIM: This study used the SRM to explore the role of coping in the relationship between depression and self-appraisals of illness severity in a population of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHODS: The sample comprised 156 participants, 34 men and 121 women, aged between 18 and 78 yrs, who had been medically diagnosed with CFS. Participants were asked to complete three questionnaires: the Cardiac Depression Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, and Severity Subscale of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised.

RESULTS: Analyses revealed that almost 70% of the participants were moderately or severely depressed. Additionally, two particular subscales, social support seeking and positive reappraisals, emerged as positively contributing to self-appraisals of illness severity (beta = 0.20 [p < 0.05] and beta = 0.21 [p < 0.05], respectively), thereby supporting the SRM. Furthermore, results indicated that a combination of depression and coping was a better predictor of illness severity than depression alone, accounting for 22% of the variance compared with 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that focusing on depression, and particularly coping styles, during treatment interventions could have important implications for therapeutic interventions. This could lead to better treatment strategies for health professionals who work with patients with CFS.

 

Source: Walker K, Lindner H, Noonan M. The role of coping in the relationship between depression and illness severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):91-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19623790

 

Diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of a protocol and computerised questionnaires

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In the context of outpatient care and within the framework of scientific research, guidelines and measuring instruments have been developed to help improve CFS diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to measure the agreement between the evaluations of chronically fatigued patients by physicians using a CFS protocol and by researchers using computerised questionnaires.

METHODS: The sample consisted of 516 patients referred to an internal medicine outpatient clinic with complaints of chronic fatigue. Retrospectively the medical records and the computerised questionnaires were checked separately and compared to see whether the criteria for diagnosis of CFS had been met. In addition, the reasons for not diagnosing CFS were evaluated.

RESULTS: Agreement between the physicians’ and the researchers’ evaluations was 84%. Disagreement mostly concerned severity of fatigue and functional impairment, or premorbid exclusion criteria. A physical cause for the chronic fatigue was only found in 3% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS: For physicians, questionnaire assessment may be complementary to the CFS protocol in optimising the process of diagnosing CFS.

 

Source: Prins JB, Elving LD, Koning H, Bleijenberg G, van der Meer JW. Diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of a protocol and computerised questionnaires. Neth J Med. 2003 Apr;61(4):120-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12852720

 

Interpretation of symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an illness characterised by fatigue and other symptoms. Both psychological and biological aetiological factors have been proposed, but the disorder is of uncertain origin. The aetiology of the symptoms is therefore ambiguous. It has been suggested (a) that patients with CFS tend to interpret their symptoms as indicating physical illness and (b) they tend not to interpret these symptoms in terms of negative emotion.

In order to test these hypotheses we developed a self-report questionnaire to assess the interpretation of symptoms in patients with CFS. It was administered to patients with CFS, patients with depression, patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and normal controls. Preliminary results suggest that the measure has acceptable psychometric properties.

Patients with CFS were more likely than either depressed patients or normal controls to interpret symptoms (characteristic of CFS) in terms of physical illness, but did not differ in this from the MS patients. When compared with all three other groups (including the MS patients), the patients with CFS were least likely to interpret symptoms in terms of negative emotional states. The theoretical and clinical implications of the findings are discussed.

 

Source: Dendy C, Cooper M, Sharpe M. Interpretation of symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome. Behav Res Ther. 2001 Nov;39(11):1369-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686271

 

Screening for prolonged fatigue syndromes: validation of the SOFA scale

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The identification of syndromes characterised by persistent and disabling mental and/or physical fatigue is of renewed interest in psychiatric epidemiology. This report details the development of two specific instruments: the SOFA/CFS for identification of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in specialist clinics and the SOFA/GP for identification of prolonged fatigue syndromes (PFS) in community and primary care settings.

METHODS: Patients with clinical diagnoses of CFS (n = 770) and consecutive attenders at primary care (n = 1593) completed various self-report questionnaires to assess severity of current fatigue-related symptoms and other common somatic and psychological symptoms. Quality receiver operating characteristic curves were used to derive appropriate cut-off scores for each of the instruments. Comparisons with other self-report measures of anxiety, depression and somatic distress are noted. Various multivariate statistical modelling techniques [latent class analysis (LCA), longitudinal LCA] were utilised to define the key features of PFS and describe its longitudinal characteristics.

RESULTS: The SOFA/CFS instrument performs well in specialist samples likely to contain a high proportion of patients with CFS disorders. Cut-off scores of either 1/2 or 2/3 can be used, depending on whether the investigators wish to preferentially emphasise false-negatives or false-positives. Patients from these settings can be thought of as consisting not only of those with a large number of unexplained medical symptoms, but also those with rather specific musculoskeletal and pain syndromes. The SOFA/GP instrument has potential cut-off scores of 1/2 or 2/3, with the latter preferred as it actively excludes all non-PFS cases (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 100%). Patients with these syndromes in the community represent broader sets of underlying classes, with the emergence of not only musculoskeletal and multisymptomatic disorders, but also persons characterised by significant cognitive subjective impairment. Twelve-month longitudinal analyses of the primary care sample indicated that the underlying class structure was preserved over time. Comparisons with other measures of psychopathology indicated the relative independence of these constructs from conventional notions of anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA/GP instrument (which is considerably modified from the SOFA/CFS in terms of anchor points for severity and chronicity) is preferred for screening in primary care and community settings. Patients with PFS and CFS present a range of psychopathology that differs in its underlying structure, cross-sectionally and longitudinally, from coventional notions of anxiety and depression.

 

Source: Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Hickie IB, Wilson AJ, Davenport TA, Lloyd AR, Wakefield D. Screening for prolonged fatigue syndromes: validation of the SOFA scale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;35(10):471-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11127722

 

Cognitive distortions of somatic experiences: revision and validation of a measure

Abstract:

The article reports on the revision of the Cognitive Errors Questionnaire (CEQ). The CEQ which was originally developed to measure cognitive distortions specific to chronic pain, has been significantly shortened and made applicable to a wider range of somatic problems.

The Cognitive Errors Questionnaire-Revised (CEQ-R) contains two subscales: Somatic–distortions specific to somatic experiences; and General–distortions to everyday life events. Validation of the scale with CFS, depressed, and chronic pain groups and healthy controls confirms the CEQ-R loads onto general and somatic factors. Both subscales have high internal consistency and good test-retest reliability.

The pattern of subjects’ responses to the CEQ-R scores showed that the depressed group scored significantly higher on the General CEQ-R scale than the other groups, whereas the CFS andchronic pain groups scored higher than healthy controls on the Somatic CEQ-R. Somatic CEQ-R scores showed a significant decrease over the course of a pain management program, with a concomitant decrease in disability and depression scores. Further analyses showed the Somatic CEQ-R to be significantly related to self and symptom focusing, whereas the General CEQ-R was found to be significantly correlated with higher depression, lower self-esteem, and self focusing.

The CEQ-R may be a useful instrument to examine the relationship between cognitive distortions and disability in a variety of illnesses, and to differentiate primary depression from overlapping somatic disorders.

 

Source: Moss-Morris R, Petrie KJ. Cognitive distortions of somatic experiences: revision and validation of a measure. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Sep;43(3):293-306. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9304555

 

Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands

Erratum in: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997 Sep 13;141(37):2686.

 

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and of primary fibromyalgia syndrome (PFS) in the Netherlands.

DESIGN: Questionnaire.

SETTING: Department of Medical Psychology, University Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to all the 6657 general practitioners in the Netherlands in order to inform them of the existence of CFS and to ask them if they had any CFS or PFS patients in their practices.

RESULTS: Sixty percent (n = 4027) of the general practitioners returned the questionnaire. Of all the general practitioners, 27% said they had no CFS patients, 23% said they had 1 CFS patient, while 21% had 2 CFS patients, and 29% said they had 3 or more CFS patients in their practice. Concerning PFS the results were 17% (no PFS patients), 18%, 18% and 47%, respectively. With a mean practice of 2486 patients per general practice, the estimated prevalence of CFS was 112 per 100,000 and that of PFS 157 per 100,000 persons. Of the CFS patients 81% were women and 55% were 25-44 years old; for PFS these figures were 87% and 48% respectively.

CONCLUSION: Extrapolation of the study results indicates that there are at least 17,000 CFS patients and 24,000 PFS patients in the Netherlands. The found prevalence is probably an under-estimation.

 

Source: Bazelmans E, Vercoulen JH, Galama JM, van Weel C, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome and primary fibromyalgia syndrome in The Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Aug 2;141(31):1520-3. [Article in Dutch] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9543739

 

The quality of life of persons with chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

This descriptive study used a between-methods triangulation design to analyze the multiple dimensions of quality of life in persons with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). This method, which refers to the combination of both quantitative and qualitative methods in the same study, allowed the authors to obtain more comprehensive and robust data than could be obtained by either method alone.

A convenience sample of 110 persons with CFS completed the quality of life index and CFS questionnaire, and a subset of 22 persons were interviewed regarding their lived experience with CFS.

Overall scores on the quality of life index were significantly lower in CFS than for other chronic illness groups. Subjects reported the lowest quality of life scores in health and functioning domain. In depth interviews provided a more complete understanding of the quality of life in CFS and further explained the low ratings that were found on the quality of life index. The findings suggest that quality of life is particularly and uniquely disrupted in CFS.

 

Source: Anderson JS, Ferrans CE. The quality of life of persons with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1997 Jun;185(6):359-67. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9205421

 

A population-based incidence study of chronic fatigue

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Most research on syndromes of chronic fatigue has been conducted in clinical settings and is therefore subject to selection biases. We report a population-based incidence study of chronic fatigue (CF) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHODS: Questionnaires assessing fatigue and emotional morbidity were sent to 695 adult men and women who had replied to a postal questionnaire survey 1 year earlier. Possible CFS cases, subjects with probable psychiatric disorder and normal controls were interviewed.

RESULTS: Baseline fatigue score, the level of emotional morbidity and a physical attribution for fatigue were risk factors for developing CF. However, after adjusting for confounding, premorbid fatigue score was the only significant predictor. A minority of CF subjects, all female, had consulted their general practitioner; higher levels of both fatigue and emotional morbidity were associated with consultation. Possible CFS cases reported similar rates of current and past psychiatric disorder to psychiatric controls, but after controlling for fatigue or a diagnosis of neurasthenia the current rates were more similar to those of normal controls. Two new cases of CFS were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS: Both fatigue and emotional morbidity are integral components of chronic fatigue syndromes. The demographic and psychiatric associations of CFS in clinical studies are at least partly determined by selection biases. Given that triggering and perpetuating factors may differ in CFS, studies that examine the similarities and differences between chronic fatigue syndromes and psychiatric disorder should consider both the stage of the illness and the research setting.

 

Source: Lawrie SM, Manders DN, Geddes JR, Pelosi AJ. A population-based incidence study of chronic fatigue. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):343-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9089827

 

Screening for psychiatric disorders in chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Psychiatric disorders are common in chronic fatigue (CF) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). To determine the usefulness of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), a self-report measure of psychological distress, in identifying those with psychiatric illnesses, a structured psychiatric interview and the GHQ were administered to 120 CF and 161 CFS patients seen in a referral clinic.

Overall, 87 (35%) patients had a current and 210 (82%) a lifetime psychiatric disorder. Compared to patients without psychiatric disorders, GHQ scores above the threshold (> or = 12) were more frequent among patients with current (p < 0.001) and lifetime (p < 0.05) diagnoses; scores among patients with CF and CFS were similar.

Longer illness duration, greater fatigue severity, and current psychiatric disorders were significant predictors of the GHQ score. In CF and CFS, the best sensitivity (0.69-0.76) and specificity (0.51-0.62) were achieved for current psychiatric diagnoses using a threshold score of > or = 12. Thus, patients scoring < 12 on the GHQ are significantly less likely to have a psychiatric disorder.

 

Source: Buchwald D, Pearlman T, Kith P, Katon W, Schmaling K. Screening for psychiatric disorders in chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jan;42(1):87-94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9055216