Tag: questionnaire

Psychometric properties of the PROMIS® Fatigue Short Form 7a among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® Fatigue Short Form 7a (PROMIS F-SF) among people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).

METHODS: Analyses were conducted using data from the Multi-Site Clinical Assessment of ME/CFS study, which recruited participants from seven ME/CFS specialty clinics across the US. Baseline and follow-up data from ME/CFS participants and healthy controls were used. Ceiling/Floor effects, internal consistency reliability, differential item functioning (DIF), known-groups validity, and responsiveness were examined.

RESULTS: The final sample comprised 549 ME/CFS participants at baseline, 386 of whom also had follow-up. At baseline, the sample mean of PROMIS F-SF T-score was 68.6 (US general population mean T-score of 50 and standard deviation of 10). The PROMIS F-SF demonstrated good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84) and minimal floor/ceiling effects. No DIF was detected by age or sex for any item. This instrument also showed good known-groups validity with medium-to-large effect sizes (η2 = 0.08-0.69), with a monotonic increase of the fatigue T-score across ME/CFS participant groups with low, medium, and high functional impairment as measured by three different variables (p < 0.01), and with significantly higher fatigue T-scores among ME/CFS participants than healthy controls (p < 0.0001). Acceptable responsiveness was found with small-to-medium effect sizes (Guyatt’s Responsiveness Statistic = 0.28-0.54).

CONCLUSIONS: Study findings support the reliability and validity of PROMIS F-SF as a measure of fatigue for ME/CFS and lend support to the drug development tool submission for qualifying this measure to evaluate therapeutic effect in ME/CFS clinical trials.

Source: Yang M, Keller S, Lin JS. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS® Fatigue Short Form 7a among adults with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02289-4. [Epub ahead of print] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31506915

Symptom frequency and development of a generic functional disorder symptom scale suitable for use in studies of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia syndrome or chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: To describe the extent to which irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) exhibit symptom overlap, and to validate a patient-derived, generic symptom questionnaire.

METHODS: A patient-derived 61-item symptom-frequency questionnaire was completed by participants recruited through IBS, FMS and CFS self-help websites. Principal axis factor analysis with oblimin rotation was performed separately for those reporting an IBS, FMS or CFS diagnosis.

RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed by 1751 participants of whom 851 reported more than one of the three diagnoses. Stomach pain on at least a weekly basis was reported by 79% of IBS, 52% of FMS, and 43% of CFS single diagnosis participants. Pain increasing the day after activity was reported by 32% of IBS, 94% of FMS, and 85% of CFS single diagnosis participants. Waking still tired at least once weekly was reported by 75% of IBS, 97% of FMS, and 95% of CFS single diagnosis participants. Exploratory factor analysis produced consistent results across all three diagnostic groups, the 61 items loading on 12 correlated factors with a single higher order factor on which all items loaded. Frequency analysis led to the rejection of one item (cold sores on or near lips), and freeform reporting by participants of additional symptoms identified an additional five, namely, restless legs, hair loss/brittle hair/thinning, dizziness/balance problems, blurred vision and urination problems.

CONCLUSIONS: IBS, FMS and CFS are polysymptomatic spectrum disorders with a wide range of overlapping symptoms, many of which are unrelated to diagnostic criteria. Frequency analysis and factor analysis confirm the validity of using the same questionnaire across different diagnostic categories. The 65-item general symptom questionnaire (GSQ-65) is a valid generic symptom scale suitable for assessing the many different symptoms of people with IBS, FMS and CFS.

Source: Hyland ME, Bacon AM, Lanario JW, Davies AF. Symptom frequency and development of a generic functional disorder symptom scale suitable for use in studies of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia syndrome or chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2019 Jun 24;5(2):129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2019.05.003. eCollection 2019 Jun. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095882X18300987?via%3Dihub (Full article)

The Development of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire: Original, Expanded, Brief, and Pediatric Versions

Abstract:

One of the key requirements of a reliable case definition is the use of standardized procedures for assessing symptoms. This article chronicles the development of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) to assess symptoms of the major chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) case definitions.

The original questionnaire has been modified and expanded over time to more fully capture symptoms from various adult case definitions, and a brief as well as pediatric version have also been developed. The DSQ has demonstrated very good psychometric properties in terms of test-retest reliability and sensitivity/specificity, as well as construct, predictive, and discriminant validity. The DSQ allows for a clear characterization of a patient’s illness and allows scientists and clinicians to improve diagnostic reliability and validity when employing case definitions of ME and CFS.

Source: Jason LA, Sunnquist M. The Development of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire: Original, Expanded, Brief, and Pediatric Versions. Front Pediatr. 2018 Nov 6;6:330. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00330. eCollection 2018.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460215

Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: The DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) was developed to provide a structured approach for collecting standardized symptomatology and health history information to allow researchers and clinicians to determine whether a patient meets the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), and/or chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the test-retest reliability of the DSQ.

METHODS: Test-retest reliability of the measure was examined with a sample of 26 adults self-identifying as having either ME/CFS, ME and/or CFS and 25 adults who did not self-identify as having these illnesses and were otherwise healthy controls.

RESULTS: Overall, the majority of items on the DSQ exhibited good to excellent test-retest reliability, with Pearson’s or kappa correlation coefficients that were 0.70 or higher.

CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the present study suggests that the DSQ is a reliable diagnostic measure that can provide a standardized way of examining illness constructs and symptomatology among patients who identify as having ME/CFS, ME and/or CFS.

 

Source: Jason LA, So S, Brown AA, Sunnquist M, Evans M. Test-Retest Reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire. Fatigue. 2015 Jan 1;3(1):16-32. Epub 2015 Jan 8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4788471/ (Full article)

 

Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review

Abstract:

PURPOSE: To summarize measurement instruments used to evaluate activity limitations and participation restrictions in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and review the psychometric properties of these instruments.

METHOD: General information of all included measurement instruments was extracted. The methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Results of the measurement properties were rated based on the quality criteria of Terwee et al. Finally, overall quality was defined per psychometric property and measurement instrument by use of the quality criteria by Schellingerhout et al.

RESULTS: A total of 68 articles were identified of which eight evaluated the psychometric properties of a measurement instrument assessing activity limitations and participation restrictions. One disease-specific and 37 generic measurement instruments were found. Limited evidence was found for the psychometric properties and clinical usability of these instruments. However, the CFS-activities and participation questionnaire (APQ) is a disease-specific instrument with moderate content and construct validity.

CONCLUSION: The psychometric properties of the reviewed measurement instruments to evaluate activity limitations and participation restrictions are not sufficiently evaluated. Future research is needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the measurement instruments, including the other properties of the CFS-APQ. If it is necessary to use a measurement instrument, the CFS-APQ is recommended.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Chronic fatigue syndrome causes activity limitations and participation restrictions in one or more areas of life. Standardized, reliable and valid measurement instruments are necessary to identify these limitations and restrictions. Currently, no measurement instrument is sufficiently evaluated with persons with CFS. If a measurement instrument is needed to identify activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with CFS, it is recommended to use the CFS-APQ in clinical practice and scientific research.

 

Source: Vergauwen K, Huijnen IP, Kos D, Van de Velde D, van Eupen I, Meeus M. Assessment of activity limitations and participation restrictions with persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(19):1706-16. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.978507. Epub 2014 Nov 3.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365699

 

Examining case definition criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Considerable controversy has transpired regarding the core features of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Current case definitions differ in the number and types of symptoms required. This ambiguity impedes the search for biological markers and effective treatments.

PURPOSE: This study sought to empirically operationalize symptom criteria and identify which symptoms best characterize the illness.

METHODS: Patients (n=236) and controls (n=86) completed the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, rating the frequency and severity of 54 symptoms. Responses were compared to determine the threshold of frequency/severity ratings that best distinguished patients from controls. A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) algorithm was used to identify the combination of symptoms that most accurately classified patients and controls.

RESULTS: A third of controls met the symptom criteria of a common CFS case definition when just symptom presence was required; however, when frequency/severity requirements were raised, only 5% met criteria. Employing these higher frequency/severity requirements, the CART algorithm identified three symptoms that accurately classified 95.4% of participants as patient or control: fatigue/extreme tiredness, inability to focus on multiple things simultaneously, and experiencing a dead/heavy feeling after starting to exercise.

CONCLUSIONS: Minimum frequency/severity thresholds should be specified in symptom criteria to reduce the likelihood of misclassification. Future research should continue to seek empirical support of the core symptoms of ME and CFS to further progress the search for biological markers and treatments.

 

Source: Jason LA, Sunnquist M, Brown A, Evans M, Vernon SD, Furst J, Simonis V. Examining case definition criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis. Fatigue. 2014 Jan 1;2(1):40-56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3912876/ (Full article)

 

Validating a measure of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome symptomatology

Abstract:

OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to validate a comprehensive self-report measure of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) symptomatology to aid in clinical and research assessment.

METHOD: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to establish the underlying factor structure of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) (Jason, Evans, et al., 2010) using a well-characterized sample of individuals (92.6% met the Fukuda et al. criteria (1994) and/or the Clinical Canadian Criteria (Carruthers et al., 2003)), and this structure was then tested on a less stringently recruited sample of individuals utilizing a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent and discriminant validity of the DSQ were also examined utilizing alternative measures of symptomatology and functioning.

RESULTS: A 3-factor solution was found using EFA (Neuroendocrine, Autonomic & Immune Dysfunction; Neurological/Cognitive Dysfunction; Post-Exertional Malaise) and the fit of this factor structure was adequate for the second sample.

DISCUSSION: The DSQ is a valid measure of ME/CFS symptomatology. The emergent factors were consistent with previous literature on symptom clusters, and convergent and discriminant validity were established.

 

Source: Brown AA, Jason LA. Validating a measure of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome symptomatology. Fatigue. 2014;2(3):132-152. Epub 2014 Jul 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871625/ (Full article)

 

Effects of Time Frame on the Recall Reliability of CFS Symptoms

Abstract:

This study serves as an investigation of the reliability of symptom data as reported by individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), across three recall time frames (the past week, the past month, and the past 6 months), and at two assessment points (with 1 week in between each assessment). Multilevel model analyses were used to determine the optimal recall time frame, in terms of test -retest reliability, for each of the Fukuda et al. (1994) case defining symptoms.

Results suggested that the optimal time frame for reliably reporting CFS symptoms was six months for sore throat, lymph node pain, muscle pain, post-exertional malaise, headaches, memory/concentration difficulties, and unrefreshing sleep. For joint pain, the optimal time frame was one month. Researchers who are interested in the assessment of CFS symptoms need to take recall time frame into account, especially when the intended goal is to standardize and improve the methods used to reliably and accurately diagnose this complex illness.

© The Author(s) 2013

 

Source: Evans M, Jason LA. Effects of Time Frame on the Recall Reliability of CFS Symptoms. Eval Health Prof. 2015 Sep;38(3):367-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713497014. Epub 2013 Sep 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874064/ (Full article)

 

The role of coping in the relationship between depression and illness severity in chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

The self-regulatory model (SRM) proposes that both cognitive and emotional illness representations influence the coping processes adopted in response to an illness.

AIM: This study used the SRM to explore the role of coping in the relationship between depression and self-appraisals of illness severity in a population of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

METHODS: The sample comprised 156 participants, 34 men and 121 women, aged between 18 and 78 yrs, who had been medically diagnosed with CFS. Participants were asked to complete three questionnaires: the Cardiac Depression Scale, Ways of Coping Questionnaire, and Severity Subscale of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised.

RESULTS: Analyses revealed that almost 70% of the participants were moderately or severely depressed. Additionally, two particular subscales, social support seeking and positive reappraisals, emerged as positively contributing to self-appraisals of illness severity (beta = 0.20 [p < 0.05] and beta = 0.21 [p < 0.05], respectively), thereby supporting the SRM. Furthermore, results indicated that a combination of depression and coping was a better predictor of illness severity than depression alone, accounting for 22% of the variance compared with 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that focusing on depression, and particularly coping styles, during treatment interventions could have important implications for therapeutic interventions. This could lead to better treatment strategies for health professionals who work with patients with CFS.

 

Source: Walker K, Lindner H, Noonan M. The role of coping in the relationship between depression and illness severity in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):91-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19623790

 

Diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of a protocol and computerised questionnaires

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: In the context of outpatient care and within the framework of scientific research, guidelines and measuring instruments have been developed to help improve CFS diagnostics. The purpose of this study was to measure the agreement between the evaluations of chronically fatigued patients by physicians using a CFS protocol and by researchers using computerised questionnaires.

METHODS: The sample consisted of 516 patients referred to an internal medicine outpatient clinic with complaints of chronic fatigue. Retrospectively the medical records and the computerised questionnaires were checked separately and compared to see whether the criteria for diagnosis of CFS had been met. In addition, the reasons for not diagnosing CFS were evaluated.

RESULTS: Agreement between the physicians’ and the researchers’ evaluations was 84%. Disagreement mostly concerned severity of fatigue and functional impairment, or premorbid exclusion criteria. A physical cause for the chronic fatigue was only found in 3% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS: For physicians, questionnaire assessment may be complementary to the CFS protocol in optimising the process of diagnosing CFS.

 

Source: Prins JB, Elving LD, Koning H, Bleijenberg G, van der Meer JW. Diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of a protocol and computerised questionnaires. Neth J Med. 2003 Apr;61(4):120-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12852720