Diseases of consciousness?

Despite the seemingly rock-solid achievements of some individual sciences, science as a whole is affected by storms that may reshape it within a generation. Books such as Devlin’s Goodbye Descartes a title that no reputable scientist would have thought sensible until recently are now almost commonplace. They all declare that we are reaching, or have reached, a stage at which the scientific consensus worked out in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries by Descartes himself, Bacon, Galileo and Newton has taken us nearly as far as we can go unless it is radically revised. The physicists probably started the whole trouble with their discovery that matter, space and time are not at all as the ‘century of genius’ (i.e. the 17th century), building on classical Greek foundations, had taken them to be. Medicine, in so far as it is an applied science, is unlikely to escape these storms; and one direction in which disturbances may be brewing lies in the newly fashionable area of consciousness studies. Apart from a brief flowering at the end of the 19th century, this field had lain almost entirely fallow until about twenty years ago.

You can read the rest of this article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1296387/pdf/jrsocmed00038-0046.pdf

Comment in: Diseases of consciousness. [J R Soc Med. 1997]

 

Source: Nunn CM. Diseases of consciousness? J R Soc Med. 1997 Jul;90(7):400-1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1296387/

 

Cognitive behavior therapy for functional somatic complaints. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Somatic complaints such as pain and fatigue that are unexplained by conventional disease are common in medical practice and are referred to as functional, somatoform, or somatization symptoms. Despite frequent chronicity, disability, and high associated medical costs, patients with these complaints are rarely offered either constructive explanations or effective treatment. In this perspective, a cognitive-behavioral approach to the problem is described, using chronic fatigue syndrome as an example. It is concluded that the utility of the cognitive-behavioral theory and the proven effectiveness cognitive behavior therapy provide the basis for a new evidence-based approach to psychosomatics.

 

Source: Sharpe M. Cognitive behavior therapy for functional somatic complaints. The example of chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatics. 1997 Jul-Aug;38(4):356-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9217406

 

Fatigue in the chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive phenomenon?

Abstract:

What is the source of the perception of excessive fatigue in the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)? Studies of physiological response to aerobic activity, of muscle pathology and muscle function in CFS, are reviewed, and suggest that the subjective report of fatigue is not due to any peripheral impairment. In addition, current technological methods such as electroencephalography have failed to uncover the nature of any abnormality in the central motor unit. A physiological model which proposes that patients with CFS possess a reduced threshold for sensory fatigue signals is rejected, because it fails to account for recent findings. Instead, it is suggested that the perception of fatigue in CFS is enhanced by idiosyncrasies in cognitive processing. The implications of this view to our understanding of the perpetuation of CFS as a whole are explored.

 

Source: Fry AM, Martin M. Fatigue in the chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive phenomenon? J Psychosom Res. 1996 Nov;41(5):415-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9032706

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach

Abstract:

Observations concerning the characteristics of patients who presented to a medical clinic with a principal complaint of chronic medically unexplained fatigue (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or CFS) are described, including the cognitions (thoughts and assumptions) elicited from a sample of these patients who were treated using cognitive behavioural therapy. On the basis of these observations a cognitive theory of the aetiology of CFS is proposed. These observations have implications for the treatment of patients with CFS.

 

Source: Surawy C, Hackmann A, Hawton K, Sharpe M. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a cognitive approach. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jun;33(5):535-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7598674

 

Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical epidemiology and aetiological classification

Abstract:

To determine the medical and psychiatric diagnoses that have an aetiological role in chronic fatigue we conducted a prospective study of 405 (65% women) patients who presented for evaluation with this chief complaint to an academic medical centre.

The average age was 38.1 years and the average duration of fatigue at entry in the study was 6.9 years. All patients were given comprehensive physical and laboratory evaluations and were administered a highly structured psychiatric interview. Psychiatric diagnoses explaining the chronic fatigue were identified in 74% of patients and physical disorders were diagnosed in 7% of patients.

The most common psychiatric conditions in this series were major depression, diagnosed in 58% of patients, panic disorder, diagnosed in 14% of patients, and somatization disorder, diagnosed in 10% of patients. Primary sleep disorders, diagnosed in 2% patients, and chronic infections, confirmed in 1.6% patients, explained the majority of cases whose chronic fatigue was attributed to a physical disorder.

Thirty per cent of patients met the criteria used to define the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Compared with age- and gender-matched control subjects with chronic fatigue, CFS patients had a similarly high prevalence of current psychiatric disorders (78% versus 82%), but were significantly more likely to have somatization disorder (28% versus 5%) and to attribute their illness to a viral infection (70% versus 33%).

We conclude that most patients with a chief complaint of chronic fatigue, including those exhibiting the features of CFS, suffer from standard mood, anxiety and/or somatoform disorders. Careful research is still needed to determine whether CFS is a distinct entity or a variant of these psychiatric illness.

 

Source: Manu P, Lane TJ, Matthews DA. Chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical epidemiology and aetiological classification. Ciba Found Symp. 1993;173:23-31; discussion 31-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8491100

 

Culture and somatic experience: the social course of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

An anthropological view of culture and somatic experience is presented through elaboration of the notion that illness has a social course. Contemporary anthropology locates culture in local worlds of interpersonal experience. The flow of events and processes in these local worlds influences the waxing and waning of symptoms in a dialectic involving body and society over time.

Conversely, symptoms serve as a medium for the negotiation of interpersonal experience, forming a series of illness-related changes in sufferers’ local worlds. Thus, somatic experience is both created by and creates culture throughout the social course of illness. Findings from empirical research on neurasthenia in China, and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in the United States, corroborate this formulation. Attributions of illness onset to social sources, the symbolic linking of symptoms to life context, and the alleviation of distress with improvement in circumstances point to the sociosomatic mediation of sickness.

Transformations occasioned by illness in the lives of neurasthenic and CFS patients confirm the significance of bodily distress as a vehicle for the negotiation of change in interpersonal worlds. An indication of some of the challenges anthropological thinking poses for psychosomatic medicine concludes the discussion.

 

Source: Ware NC, Kleinman A. Culture and somatic experience: the social course of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom Med. 1992 Sep-Oct;54(5):546-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1438658

 

Postviral fatigue syndrome and psychiatry

Abstract:

The postviral fatigue syndrome overlaps with psychiatry at a number of points. First, there is the influence that some psychological states have on physiological processes, such as immunity. Second, psychological symptoms, particularly depression but also anxiety, are a major feature of the syndrome. Third, difficulties in the doctor-patient relationship are common.

Each of these three areas are discussed in detail. Special attention is given to the possible mechanisms underlying the occurrence of psychological symptoms, which are sufficient to make a psychiatric diagnosis in at least two thirds of cases.

It is concluded that the bulk of the scientific evidence points to psychiatric disturbances being primary but that this does not account for the syndrome in its entirety and other mechanisms probably operate as well. Much of the conflict between doctor and patient arises from misconceptions about the nature and cause of psychological disturbances.

 

Source: David AS. Postviral fatigue syndrome and psychiatry. Br Med Bull. 1991 Oct;47(4):966-88. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1794094

 

Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed

Comment on: Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed. [CMAJ. 1990]

 

As a physician with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) since the early days of the Lake Tahoe, Calif., outbreak, in 1984, I read Olga Lechky’s report (Can MedAssoc J 1990; 143: 413- 415) with particular interest. It was refreshing to hear Dr. Richard Proschek, assistant medical director of Mutual Life of Canada, admit that the industry’s attitude to CFS is one of hostility. Unfortunately for the thousands of severely debilitated patients with the condition this scepticism and hostility are not restricted to that industry, which in many instances has behaved with compassion and responsibility toward its clients. The hostile viewpoint is also widely prevalent in the medical profession and is often freely communicated to patients.

To hold that CFS is not a real disease it is necessary to imagine that in 1984 people of all ages began to manufacture a condition with clearly defined symptoms that begins as a flu-like illness, persists and evolves. How many diseases fit this description? When, before 1984, did depression present so? Can it be true that thousands of our brightest citizens, including children, Olympic aspirants, several members of some families, alarming numbers of teachers, 50% of a symphony orchestra and 10% of the population of Incline Village, Nev., abruptly and concurrently elected to drop out of life, then continued to complain in the face of widespread scepticism, hostility, marital breakdown and, frequently, isolation? What, other than an infectious agent, could cause this?

Proschek’s bias arises from his position. Physicians in practice, however, see many CFS patients who have no insurance or are quite wealthy. The degree to which imagination must extend to accommodate a diagnosis of secondary gain in these people is beyond belief. Many physicians lament the lack of a blood test for CFS. What, pray, is the test for malingering, a diagnosis we seem to have no difficulty making?

You can read the rest of this letter here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1452931/pdf/cmaj00229-0013.pdf

 

Source: Sean J. O’Sullivan, MD. Life insurance MDs sceptical when chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed. CMAJ. 1990 Dec 15;143(12):1283-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1452931/

 

Myalgic encephalomyelitis: an alternative theory

Note: in this editorial published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine ,Volume 83, August 1990, Dr. Wilson discusses the role allergy plays in the development of post-viral fatigue syndromes.

 

In his discussion paper on myalgic encephalomyelitis (April 1989 JRSM, p 215), Wessley drew attention to the destruction of body and mind, and subsequent suicidal despair, and torment, of patients suffering from myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) or the postviral fatigue syndrome (PVFS). He referred to the reported relationship between identification of the VPI antigen and the presence of disease symptoms. He stated that more attention requires to be paid to methodological detail which he defined as population sample definition, and adoption of operational criteria. He suggested that a new term should be used to describe the observed symptoms: chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and enquired what constitutes the syndrome? Unfortunately he did not refer to the necessity for taking a complete clinical and family history in all patients. In his definition of CFS, he did not refer to any of the somatic symptoms which are always present. Yet, he stated that cases of this disease can only be selected by the (presumably holistic) clinical history. It appears that a new kind of approach based on absence of prejudice, more exhaustive and thorough clinical history taking, a wider approach to clinical examination of the patients, and a critical assessment of the origin of this psychosomatic disease would be of value in our investigations.

You can read the rest of the article here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292769/pdf/jrsocmed00133-0005b.pdf

 

Source: Wilson CW. Myalgic encephalomyelitis: an alternative theory. J R Soc Med. 1990 Aug;83(8):481-483. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1292769/

 

Chronic fatigue syndrome–a new disease picture?

Abstract:

The chronic fatigue syndrome has recently been more frequently diagnosed. Yet it is unknown if this syndrome represents a disease entity of its own or merely a diagnostic label for a miscellaneous group of disorders. Further investigations are needed to find out if the syndrome has an organic or psychosomatic aetiology, or a mixture of both. In the meantime it is the responsibility of the clinician to make this decision in each individual case.

 

Source:  Nix WA. Chronic fatigue syndrome–a new disease picture? Nervenarzt. 1990 Jul;61(7):390-6. [Article in German] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2202912