Tag: primary care

Chronic fatigue complaints in primary care: incidence and diagnostic patterns

Abstract:

The complaint of chronic fatigue is ubiquitous in the primary care setting. Because of the nonspecific nature of chronic fatigue, practitioners do not focus on this complaint. Furthermore, most physicians use a problem-based approach. Such a prematurely narrowed focus could overlook the chronic fatigue complaint. Omissions in the data collection process would prove this oversight.

Therefore, we postulated that a retrospective review of evaluations for chronic fatigue would demonstrate significant categorical deficiencies. These deficiencies would indicate a problem focus different than the chronic fatigue complaint itself.

The authors reviewed the current literature to establish historical, physical, and laboratory findings pertinent to the evaluation of chronic fatigue. Six major categories and the associated data elements were identified for use in analyzing patient records. The patient records from the preceding 6 months were reviewed to find those containing a complaint of chronic fatigue. These records were analyzed to determine if a complete data set had been sought and if an associated diagnosis was made.

A total of 425 consecutive charts from an academic family practice clinic were retrospectively reviewed; 9.9% (42) mentioned chronic fatigue. Physicians were lax in performing the mental status and physical examinations; taking the patient’s psychiatric and sleep history, as well as the history of chief complaint; and ordering laboratory evaluations. The physician diagnoses included: depression (40.4%), nonspecific fatigue (35.7%), general medical disorders (16.6%), chronic fatigue syndrome (2.4%), fibromyalgia (2.4%), and sleep apnea (2.4%).

From these data, the investigators conclude that the workup for chronic fatigue is often incomplete or lacks documentation. This oversight is likely due to a problem focus not directed at the chronic fatigue complaints. Also complicating the evaluation process are the multiple associated disorders, the prevalence of the complaint, and cost/benefit issues facing the primary care physician.

 

Source: Ward MH, DeLisle H, Shores JH, Slocum PC, Foresman BH. Chronic fatigue complaints in primary care: incidence and diagnostic patterns. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1996 Jan;96(1):34-46, 41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8626230

 

Postinfectious fatigue: prospective cohort study in primary care

Abstract:

The idea that chronic fatigue has an infectious origin has become popular, but the main evidence for such an association has come from retrospective case-control studies, which are subject to ascertainment bias. We report a prospective study of the outcome of clinically diagnosed infections in patients presenting to UK general practitioners.

Questionnaires assessing fatigue and psychiatric morbidity were sent to all patients aged 18-45 years in the study practices. The prevalence of chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome was then ascertained among 1199 people aged 18-45 who presented to the general practitioners with symptomatic infections and in 1167 people who attended the surgeries for other reasons. 84% were followed up at 6 months. 9.9% of cases and 11.7% of controls reported chronic fatigue (odds ratio 1.0 [95% CI 0.6-1.1]). There were no differences in the proportions who met various criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. No effect of infection was noted when we excluded subjects who reported fatigue or psychological morbidity at the baseline screening.

The strongest independent predictors of postinfectious fatigue were fatigue assessed before presentation with clinical infection (3.0 [1.9-4.7]) and psychological distress before presentation (1.8 [1.2-2.9]) and at presentation with the acute infection (1.8 [1.1-2.8]). There was no effect of sex or social class. Our study shows no evidence that common infective episodes in primary care are related to the onset of chronic fatigue or chronic fatigue syndrome.

Comment in:

Viral illness and chronic fatigue (syndrome). [Lancet. 1995]

Viral illness and chronic fatigue (syndrome) [Lancet. 1995]

Viral illness and chronic fatigue (syndrome). [Lancet. 1995]

Viral illness and chronic fatigue (syndrome) [Lancet. 1995]

Viral illness and chronic fatigue (syndrome). [Lancet. 1995]

 

Source: Wessely S, Chalder T, Hirsch S, Pawlikowska T, Wallace P, Wright DJ. Postinfectious fatigue: prospective cohort study in primary care. Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1333-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7752755

 

Correlates of somatic causal attributions in primary care patients with fatigue

Abstract:

Researchers in the field of chronic fatigue in tertiary care found that patients’ somatic (e.g. viral) explanations for their condition may lead to chronicity of symptoms. We studied the influence of a somatic attributional bias on outcome and reported symptoms in primary care patients with fatigue.

We compared fatigue scores on a specific scale, and number of presented symptoms, in two groups of primary care patients with ‘functional’ fatigue: 75 with a high score on the somatic subscale of the Fatigue Attribution Scale (S-FAS), and 95 with a low score on the S-FAS. At the index visit, patients with low and high scores on the S-FAS were not different for age, sex, fatigue scores, and levels of depressive symptoms.

Patients with high scores on the S-FAS presented significantly more somatic and psychological symptoms-a total of 36 symptoms for 24 patients (25.3%) in the low-score group, and a total of 52 symptoms for 31 patients (41.3%) in the high-score group.

Forty-two days later, at the follow-up visit, the fatigue scores were similar in both groups. In primary care patients with fatigue not due to somatic illness or major depression, the tendency to attribute fatigue to somatic causes is not associated with a worse outcome, but with a higher number of reported symptoms.

 

Source: Cathébras P, Jacquin L, le Gal M, Fayol C, Bouchou K, Rousset H. Correlates of somatic causal attributions in primary care patients with fatigue. Psychother Psychosom. 1995;63(3-4):174-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7624463

 

Epidemiologic study of chronic fatigue in primary care (general practice)

Abstract:

The results of a cross sectional study of fatigue in two large samples of patients attending primary care physicians are reported. The level of complaint of fatigue was higher in the prospective sample, which consisted of patients who had been diagnosed as suffering from a viral infection six months earlier. Duration and frequency of experience of fatigue correlated with severity in both samples. Severity, duration and frequency were continuously distributed in these populations.

Attribution of fatigue in these two samples was mixed: social stresses, current physical illness and psychological problems all being offered as explanations. 11% of the cross sectional sample and 17% of the prospective sample met study operational criteria for a possible chronic fatigue state. These patients were assessed in greater detail. The majority had a diagnosable psychiatric disorder, predominantly depression. Physical illnesses were not adequate to explain these fatigue states.

These studies in primary care do not support a clinical entity of a “chronic fatigue syndrome”. Some patients in primary care settings have complaints of fatigue that are both disabling and long lasting, but they do not form a distinct group although the majority are likely however to be suffering from a concurrent psychiatric disorder. In contrast to similar patients with chronic fatigue syndromes attending hospital clinics, primary care patients with complaints of fatigue are much more varied in their ideas of causation with considerable less evidence of disease conviction.

 

Source: Mann AH, Mc Donald E, Cope H, Pelosi A, David A. Epidemiologic study of chronic fatigue in primary care (general practice). Encephale. 1994 Nov;20 Spec No 3:575-9. [Article in French] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7843054

 

Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Our goals were to determine the prevalence of unusual, debilitating fatigue and the frequency with which it was associated with the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or other physical or psychological illness in an outpatient clinic population.

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a cohort of 1000 consecutive patients in a primary care clinic in an urban, hospital-based general medicine practice. The study protocol included a detailed history, physical examination, and laboratory and psychiatric testing.

RESULTS: Five patients who came because of CFS studies were excluded. Of the remaining 995, 323 reported fatigue, and 271 (27%) complained of at least 6 months of unusual fatigue that interfered with their daily lives. Of the 271, self-report or record review revealed a medical or psychiatric condition that could have explained the fatigue in 186 (69%). Thus, 85 (8.5%) of 995 patients had a debilitating fatigue of at least 6 months’ duration, without apparent cause. Of these patients, 48 refused further evaluation, and 11 were unavailable for follow-up; 26 completed the protocol. Three of the 26 were hypothyroid, and one had a major psychiatric disorder. Of the remaining 22 patients, three met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for CFS, four met British criteria, and 10 met the Australian case definition. The point prevalences of CFS were thus 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 0.6%), 0.4% (95% CI, 0% to 0.8%), and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.4% to 1.6%) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, British, and Australian case definitions, respectively. These estimates were conservative, because they assumed that none of the patients who refused evaluation or were unavailable for follow-up would meet criteria for CFS.

CONCLUSIONS: While chronic, debilitating fatigue is common in medical outpatients, CFS is relatively uncommon. Prevalence depends substantially on the case definition used.

 

Source: Bates DW, Schmitt W, Buchwald D, Ware NC, Lee J, Thoyer E, Kornish RJ, Komaroff AL. Prevalence of fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome in a primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Dec 27;153(24):2759-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8257251

 

Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders

Abstract:

From 686 patients attending primary care physicians, 77 were identified by a screening procedure as having chronic fatigue. Of these, 65 were given a comprehensive psychological, social and physical evaluation.

Seventeen cases (26%) met criteria for the chronic fatigue syndrome. Forty-seven (72%) received an ICD-9 diagnosis of whom 23 had neurotic depression, with a further 5 meeting criteria for neurasthenia.

Forty-nine were ‘cases’ as defined by the revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R), and 42 if the fatigue item was excluded. Psychiatric morbidity was more related to levels of social stresses than was severity of fatigue.

The main difference between these subjects and those examined in hospital settings is that the former are less liable to attribute their symptoms to wholly physical causes, including viruses, as opposed to social or psychological factors. Identification and management of persistent fatigue in primary care may prevent the secondary disabilities seen in patients with chronic fatigue syndromes.

 

Source: McDonald E, David AS, Pelosi AJ, Mann AH. Chronic fatigue in primary care attenders. Psychol Med. 1993 Nov;23(4):987-98. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8134522