Comment on: Chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence and outcome. [BMJ. 1994]
Editor,-It is sad that, in an issue in which Tony Delamothe considers biased reporting of the chronic fatigue syndrome, S M Lawrie and A J Pelosi’s editorial on the subject should be so one sided. The editorial’s title mentions the prevalence of the chronic fatigue syndrome, but the editorial fails to mention the most complete British study. In this study all general practices in two health boards were circulated with a questionnaire. There was a 91% response rate, with most respondents (71%) accepting the existence of the chronic fatigue syndrome when a strict definition was used. The doctors reported a prevalence among their patients of 1-3/1000 patients (range 0-3-2/1000 for the 10 areas surveyed). The higher prevalences were found in more populated areas.
You can read the rest of this comment here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540208/pdf/bmj00440-0055a.pdf
Source: Ho-Yen DO, Shanks M. Chronic fatigue syndrome. Prevalence study overlooked. BMJ. 1994 May 14;308(6939):1299. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540208/