Post-exertional malaise in daily life and experimental exercise models in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract:

Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is commonly recognized as a hallmark of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and is often used as one of several criteria for diagnosing ME/CFS.

In this perspective paper we want to reflect on how PEM is understood, assessed, and evaluated in scientific literature, and to identify topics to be addressed in future research.

Studies show that patients use a wide variety of words and concepts to label their experience of PEM in everyday life, and they report physical or mental exertions as triggers of PEM. They also report that PEM may have an immediate or delayed onset and may last from a few days to several months.

When standardized exercise tests are used to trigger PEM experimentally, the exacerbation of symptoms has a more immediate onset but still shows a wide variability in duration.

There are indications of altered muscular metabolism and autonomic nervous responses if exercise is repeated on successive days in patients with ME/CFS. The decreased muscular capacity appears to be maintained over several days following such controlled exercise bouts. These responses may correspond to patients’ experiences of increased exertion.

Based on this background we argue that there is a need to look more closely into the processes occurring in the restitution period following exercise, as PEM reaches the peak in this phase.

Source: Nina K. Vøllestad, Anne Marit Mengshoel. Post-exertional malaise in daily life and experimental exercise models in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Frontiers in Physiology, Volume 14- 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1257557/abstract

Focus on Post-Exertional Malaise when approaching ME/CFS in specialist healthcare improves satisfaction and reduces deteriorations

Abstract:

Background: Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) is considered a hallmark characteristic of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). This may also apply to subgroups of patients with long COVID induced ME/CFS. However, it is uncertain to what extent PEM is acknowledged in routine specialist healthcare for ME/CFS patients, and how this affects patient outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate to what extent ME/CFS patients experienced focus on PEM in specialist healthcare practice and its significance for outcome and care quality.

Methods: Data from two online cross-sectional surveys covering specialist healthcare services for ME/CFS patients at rehabilitation institutes in Norway and at two regional hospitals respectively, were analyzed. Evaluations of 788 rehabilitation stays, 86 hospital consultations and 89 hospital interventions were included.

Logistic regression models and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to quantify the impact of addressing PEM on health and functioning, care satisfaction or benefit. Spearman’s rank correlation and Cronbach’s alpha of focus on PEM with the respondents’ perception of healthcare providers’ knowledge, symptom acknowledgement and suitability of intervention were assessed as measures for care quality and their internal consistency, respectively.

Results: PEM was addressed in 48% of the rehabilitation stays, 43% of the consultations and 65% of the hospital interventions. Failure to address PEM roughly doubled the risk of health deterioration following rehabilitation (OR=0.39, 95%CI 0.29-0.52; 40.1% vs 63.2% P= <.001) and hospital intervention (OR=0.34, 95%CI 0.13-0.89; 22.4% vs. 45.2%, P=.026).

PEM-focus during the clinical contact was associated with significantly higher scores on patients’ rated care satisfaction and benefit of both consultation and intervention. Furthermore, addressing PEM was (inter)related to positive views about healthcare providers’ level of knowledge of ME/CFS, their acknowledgment of symptoms, obtained knowledge, and the perceived suitability of intervention (Cronbach’s alpha ≥ 0.80).

Conclusion: PEM is still frequently not acknowledged in specialist healthcare practice for ME/CFS patients in Norway. Not addressing PEM substantially increased the probability of a decline in health and functioning following intervention and was strongly associated with reduced perceived care quality, satisfaction and benefit. These findings may be related to the applied explanatory models for ME/CFS and are most likely of relevance to long COVID.

Source: Marjon E. Wormgoor, Sanne C. Rodenburg. Focus on Post-Exertional Malaise when approaching ME/CFS in specialist healthcare improves satisfaction and reduces deteriorations. Frontiers in Neurology 14- 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1247698/abstract

Physical exertion worsens symptoms in patients with post-COVID condition : Post-exertional malaise in patients with post-COVID condition

Abstract:

Patients with post-COVID condition suffer from fatigue, limited exercise capacity, and post-exertional malaise. Post-exertional malaise is the worsening of symptoms after physical or mental exertion, which reduces the efficacy of most forms of rehabilitation. This article presents the current understanding in the pathophysiology of post-COVID condition, particularly the underlying causes of post-exertional malaise.

Source: Ellen Breedveld, Braeden Charlton and Brent Appelman et al. Physical exertion worsens symptoms in patients with post-COVID condition. ScienceOpen Preprints. 2023. DOI: 10.14293/PR2199.000467.v1 https://www.scienceopen.com/document/read?vid=6ebbad1a-4c23-4323-b20c-e57a346ce9f9 (Full text)

Fatigue in post COVID-19 patients: the P4O2 COVID-19 study

Abstract:

Background: Some patients do not fully recover after COVID-19 and have symptoms occurring 3 months after acute illness, lasting for >2 months, defined as post COVID-19. Fatigue seems most present in post COVID-19 and part of the patients might develop symptoms similar to chronic fatigue syndrome.

Aim: To determine the occurrence of fatigue and other symptoms in post COVID-19 patients.

Methods: In the prospective P4O2 COVID-19 cohort, post COVID-19 patients aged 40-65 years were recruited from outpatient post-COVID clinics in 5 Dutch hospitals between May 2021-September 2022. At 3-6 months post-COVID, patients completed the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). If the FSS score was ≥4 (the cut-off for severe fatigue), patients also completed the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire version 2 (DSQ-2). The FSS ranges from 1-7 and a higher score means more fatigued. The DSQ-2 rates frequency and severity of 79 symptoms on a 5-point Likert scale. Binary thresholds (if scored ≥2 on both severity and frequency, the threshold is met and the symptom is present) were calculated.

Results: The mean age of the 78 included patients was 53.9±6.2 and 51.7% were male. Median (IQR) FSS score was 5.6 (4.2-6.3) and 66 patients (84.6%) had a score ≥4. According to the DSQ-2 (n=61), patients reported a median (IQR) of 16 (8-23) symptoms. The majority of the patients experienced fatigue (85%). Furthermore, post-exertional malaise (PEM) (40%), sleep-related problems (37%), pain (21%) and neurocognitive problems (23%) were frequently reported.

Conclusion: The occurrence of severe fatigue 3-6 months after COVID-19 was 84.6% in our cohort. Patients with severe fatigue also frequently reported PEM, sleep related problems, pain and neurocognitive problems.

Source: Merel E.B. Cornelissen, Lizan D. Bloemsma, Nadia Baalbaki, Somayeh Bazdar, Jelle M. Blankestijn, Inés Beekers, Rosanne J.H.C.G. Beijers, Joop P. Van Den Bergh, Debbie Gach, J.J. Miranda Geelhoed, Sebastiaan Holverda, Laura Houweling, John J. Jacobs, Renée Jonker, Ivo Van Der Lee, Paulien M.A. Linders, Lieke C.E. Noij, Esther J. Nossent, Marianne A. Van De Pol, Daphne W. Schaminee, Annemie M.W.J. Schols, Lisanne T. Schuurman, Brigitte Sondermeijer, Anouk W. Vaes, Els J.M. Weersink, Yolanda De Wit-Van Wijck, Martijn A. Spruit, Anke H. Maitland-Van Der Zee. Fatigue in post COVID-19 patients: the P4O2 COVID-19 study.

Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes and ME/CFS : Features, pitfalls and model concept

Abstract:

Background: Multimodal pain therapy usually take place in the context of group therapy lasting several weeks and is based on a generally activating approach. Due to the specificity of stress intolerance with postexertional malaise (PEM) in patients with postviral syndromes, physical as well as psychological overload must be urgently avoided in these cases; however, these aspects can only be insufficiently considered in current medical pain therapy concepts.

Methods: Summary of the current literature and presentation of clinical characteristics as well as presentation of a model project for a multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes with PEM.

Model concept: The presented model project describes a day clinic treatment setting for interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy adapted to the individual resilience with minimization of the risk of strain-induced deterioration of the condition.

Source: Luchting B, Behrends U, Eigner B, Stojanov S, Warlitz C, Haegele M, Neuwirth E, Mihatsch L, Richter HP. Interdisziplinäre multimodale Schmerztherapie bei postviralen Syndromen und ME/CFS : Besonderheiten, Fallstricke und Modellkonzept [Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy in postviral syndromes and ME/CFS : Features, pitfalls and model concept]. Schmerz. 2023 Oct 20. German. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00761-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37864020/864020.

Predicting Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from Early Symptoms of COVID-19 Infection

Abstract:

It is still unclear why certain individuals after viral infections continue to have severe symptoms. We investigated if predicting myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) development after contracting COVID-19 is possible by analyzing symptoms from the first two weeks of COVID-19 infection.
Using participant responses to the 54-item DePaul Symptom Questionnaire, we built predictive models based on a random forest algorithm using the participants’ symptoms from the initial weeks of COVID-19 infection to predict if the participants would go on to meet the criteria for ME/CFS approximately 6 months later.
Early symptoms, particularly those assessing post-exertional malaise, did predict the development of ME/CFS, reaching an accuracy of 94.6%. We then investigated a minimal set of eight symptom features that could accurately predict ME/CFS. The feature reduced models reached an accuracy of 93.5%. Our findings indicated that several IOM diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS occurring during the initial weeks after COVID-19 infection predicted Long COVID and the diagnosis of ME/CFS after 6 months.
Source: Hua C, Schwabe J, Jason LA, Furst J, Raicu D. Predicting Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from Early Symptoms of COVID-19 Infection. Psych. 2023; 5(4):1101-1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5040073 https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/5/4/73

A Scoping Review of ‘Pacing’ for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic

Abstract:

Background Controversy over treatment for people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a barrier to appropriate treatment. Energy management or pacing is a prominent coping strategy for people with ME/CFS that involves regulating activity to avoid post exertional malaise (PEM), the worsening of symptoms after an activity. Until now, characteristics of pacing, and the effects on patients’ symptoms had not been systematically reviewed. This is problematic as the most common approach to pacing, pacing prescription, and the pooled efficacy of pacing was unknown. Collating evidence may help advise those suffering with similar symptoms, including long COVID, as practitioners would be better informed on methodological approaches to adopt, pacing implementation, and expected outcomes.

Objectives In this scoping review of the literature, we aggregated type of, and outcomes of, pacing in people with ME/CFS.

Eligibility criteria Original investigations concerning pacing were considered in participants with ME/CFS.

Sources of evidence Six electronic databases (PubMed, Scholar, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) were searched; and websites MEPedia, Action for ME, and ME Action were also searched for grey literature.

Methods A scoping review was conducted. Review selection and characterisation was performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms.

Results Authors reviewed 177 titles and abstracts, resulting in included 17 studies: three randomised control trials (RCTs); one uncontrolled trial; one interventional case series; one retrospective observational study; two prospective observational studies; four cross-sectional observational studies; and five cross-sectional analytical studies. Studies included variable designs, durations, and outcome measures. In terms of pacing administration, studies used educational sessions and diaries for activity monitoring. Eleven studies reported benefits of pacing, four studies reported no effect, and two studies reported a detrimental effect in comparison to the control group.

Conclusions Highly variable study designs and outcome measures, allied to poor to fair methodological quality resulted in heterogenous findings and highlights the requirement for more research examining pacing. Looking to the long COVID pandemic, future studies should be RCTs utilising objectively quantified digitised pacing, over a longer duration of examination, using the core outcome set for patient reported outcome measures.

Source: Nilihan E.M. Sanal-Hayes, Marie Mclaughlin, Lawrence D. Hayes, Jacqueline L. Mair, Jane Ormerod, David Carless, Natalie Hilliard, Rachel Meach, Joanne Ingram, Nicholas F. Sculthorpe. A Scoping Review of ‘Pacing’ for Management of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): Lessons Learned for the Long COVID Pandemic. medRxiv 2023.08.10.23293935; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.10.23293935v1.full-text (Full text)

The importance of estimating prevalence of ME/CFS in future epidemiological studies of long COVID

Abstract:

The resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic is giving rise to another public health challenge due to the explosion of long COVID (LC) cases. In many cases, LC results in persistent fatigue, post-exertional malaise (PEM), and other debilitating symptoms that resemble the clinical manifestation of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS). The similarity of these two diseases suggests that future epidemiological studies of LC could take the opportunity to also estimate the prevalence of ME/CFS at a minimal cost.

With this opportunity in mind, we revisited the most consensual case definitions of ME/CFS for research purposes. We then compared the symptoms assessed at the participants’ enrollment in the UK ME/CFS Biobank with those documented in three systematic reviews encompassing hundreds of LC epidemiological studies. We found that published epidemiological studies of LC did not consistently assess or report the prevalence of PEM, which is a compulsory symptom for ME/CFS diagnosis. However, these studies assessed many neuro-cognitive, immunologic, and autonomic symptoms.

In this scenario, we recommend that the estimation of ME/CFS prevalence in the context of LC epidemiology is easily achievable by deploying tested and validated diagnosis tools used in ME/CFS. The knowledge of ME/CFS prevalence within the LC population is of cardinal importance to optimal allocation of resources and better design of healthcare interventions to manage and treat patients with this devastating disease.

Source: Anna D. Grabowska, Francisco Westermeier, Luís Nacul, Eliana Lacerda, Nuno Sepúlveda. The importance of estimating prevalence of ME/CFS in future epidemiological studies of long COVID. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.20997.52967 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373043778_The_importance_of_estimating_prevalence_of_MECFS_in_future_epidemiological_studies_of_long_COVID (Full text)

Consequences of sarcolemma fatigue on maximal muscle strength production in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Highlights:

  • Does force failure result from sarcolemma fatigue in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis patients?
  • Two groups of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis patients with or not M wave alterations were compared.
  • Maximal handgrip strength and M wave in forearm muscle were simultaneously measured.
  • Post-exercise changes in Maximal handgrip strength and M wave were positively correlated.
  • The post exercise sarcolemma fatigue measured could be the cause of muscle failure in these patients.

Background: Myalgic encephalomyelitis is an invalidating chronic disease often associated with exercise-induced alterations of muscle membrane excitability (M wave). No simultaneous measurements of maximal isometric force production and sarcolemma fatigue in the same muscle group have been previously reported. We hypothesized that M wave alterations could be partly responsible for the reduced muscle force present in this invalidating disease.

Methods: This retrospective study compared two groups of patients who presented (n = 30) or not (n = 28) alterations of M waves evoked by direct muscle stimulation during and after a cycling exercise bout. The maximal handgrip strength was measured before and after exercise, concomitantly with electromyogram recordings from flexor digitorum longus muscle. The patients also answered a questionnaire to identify eventual exacerbation of their clinical symptoms following the exercise test.

Findings: The M wave amplitude significantly decreased in muscles and the M wave duration significantly increased in the group of patients with M wave alterations after exercise. Resting values of handgrip were significantly lower in patients with exercise-induced M-wave alterations than in patients without M-wave abnormalities. In patients with exercise-induced M-wave alterations, handgrip significantly decreased after exercise and the changes in handgrip and M wave were positively correlated. The frequency of post-exertion malaise, increased fatigue, myalgia, headache and cognitive dysfunction was significantly higher in patients with M-wave alterations and variations in handgrip after exercise.

Interpretation: These data suggest that post-exercise sarcolemma fatigue often measured in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis could be the cause of muscle failure.

Source: Frédérique Retornaz, Chloé Stavris, Yves Jammes. Consequences of sarcolemma fatigue on maximal muscle strength production in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Clinical Biomechanics, Volume 108, August 2023, 106055. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003323001869 (Full text)

Long-term symptom severity and clinical biomarkers in post-COVID-19/chronic fatigue syndrome: results from a prospective observational cohort

Summary:

Background: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is characterised by a wide range of symptoms, primarily fatigue and exertion intolerance. While disease courses in the early months post-infection have been well-described, the long-term health consequences for patients with PCS with disabling fatigue remain unclear.

Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we evaluated symptom severity and various biomarkers, including hand grip strength (HGS), cardiovascular function, and laboratory parameters, in 106 patients with PCS with moderate to severe fatigue and exertion intolerance at three time points after infection (3–8, 9–16, and 17–20 months). The study was conducted at the Charité’s Fatigue Centre and the Charité’s outpatient clinic for neuroimmunology at Berlin, Germany from July 16, 2020, to February 18, 2022. A subset of patients (PCS-ME/CFS) met the diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome according to the Canadian Consensus Criteria (CCC). The aim was to determine differences in the disease course between the two patient groups (i.e., PCS vs PCS-ME/CFS) and identify correlating biomarkers.

Findings: Patients with PCS-ME/CFS reported persistently high severity of most symptoms up to 20 months after infection, while patients with PCS showed overall health improvement. Although fatigue and post-exertional malaise (PEM), hallmarks of post-infectious fatigue syndromes, were still evident in both groups, they remained more pronounced in PCS-ME/CFS. Inflammatory biomarkers decreased in both groups, but not antinuclear antibodies. Lower HGS at onset correlated with symptom persistence, particularly in patients with PCS-ME/CFS.

Interpretation: Our findings suggest that PCS can persist beyond 20 months post-infection and encompass the full scope of post-infectious ME/CFS as defined by the CCC. Sub-classifying patients with PCS based on the CCC can assist in the management and monitoring of patients with PCS-ME/CFS due to their persistently higher symptom severity.

Source: Franziska Legler, Lil Meyer-Arndt, Lukas Mödl, Claudia Kedor, Helma Freitag, Elisa Stein, Uta Hoppmann, Rebekka Rust, Kirsten Wittke, Nadja Siebert, Janina Behrens, Andreas Thiel, Frank Konietschke, Friedemann Paul, Carmen Scheibenbogen, Judith Bellmann-Strobl,
Long-term symptom severity and clinical biomarkers in post-COVID-19/chronic fatigue syndrome: results from a prospective observational cohort, eClinicalMedicine, Volume 63, 2023, 102146, ISSN 2589-5370, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102146. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537023003231 (Full text)